@Turiano.i no fit laugh.i was just laughing while reading your post.did you actually go thru your postulation before clicking on the submit button?come to think of it,are you a theatre art student or a Jambito?you just wrote gibberish without statutes,precedent or even a locus classicus to drive home your point.when did i become the plaintiff counsel?Too bad.i don't think i have the time for this clown.

@Iniguy.Being out of the picture as the judge to adjudicate on this case,i will now put it to you that the word "hallucination" as used by you is in the literal term.Am abreast of the fact that there are three canons of construction which are:the literal ,Golden,and mischief rules.pls don't deny that fact.Take Note:you are to appeal before the Judicial Disciplinary Committee on Thursday by 9am unfailingly.

@hons
Pls, who r d ppl dat will constitute d members of d Judicìal Disciplinary Committee

@aiero
Hope U enjoy'd ur journey.
This was meant 2b a soft trial nd ìs still is but U went 2hire a fire-brand lawyer (another Festus Keyamo in the making) as ur legal representation nd nw accusations nd counter-accusations abound.

@dwayne
Whr is ur legal representation or R U representing urself.
However U wish 2proceed, pls advice d court.

@ini. .
It looks like U will nìd representation b4 the Disciplinary Committee as d charges levelled against U fall contrary to Judges' Guidelines for Practice

@all
Whr d hell is hayprof

@honsle u cn yell and laugh for all i care, u can cal al me sort of names,i dnt care.one thing 4 sure is that am ready to knck u and ur client of this case,to see that u bot loose in shame and in dishonour.and i was'nt reffering to u as the plentiff,u knw who?why bn concoct about the whole thing.i tot bn a solicitor of dwayne u should deem it worthy to follow the conformity of this court,or are u confond about the recent development,the new diamension the case has taken.i wud say u should wake up from u conk,and dnt try to b tired of this case for it has only just started.ha ha ha ha ha i just laughed.

***Since I can't modify it, the error in the previous post is regretted***


@dwayne
This was meant 2b a soft trial nd ìs still is but U went 2hire a fire-brand lawyer (another Festus Keyamo in the making) as ur legal representation nd nw accusations nd counter-accusations abound.

@aiero
Hope U enjoyed ur journey.
Whr is ur legal representation or R U representing urself.
However U wish 2proceed, pls advice d court.

@ini. .
It looks like U will nìd representation b4 the Disciplinary Committee as d  charges levelled against U fall contrary to Judges' Guidelines for Practice

@all
Whr d hell is hayprof

D court is now set. I want every soul in d court 2 b present by 2.pm. D case is now me [dwayne] and lawyer [honsule] against airomon and his amateur lawyer turiano. See u then.

@hons
Pls, advice ur client dat he cannot tell d court when nd when not-to hear his case, else he be accused of "contempt of court".

@ puskin i'm representing my client genious today at the court which wil be in session at 12pm.so the question of who is representin who shud be left ut.

:p :p

@all is time 4 the great case,u all shud report at the court rite now,

@ inguy y d postponment,because i ave already made preparations 4 dis case 2dy.@ all, do u agree wit iniguy's postponment decree,if no,he shud reinstate court in session.nd if u all have come to concordat term,then it should postponed.

Lol,
Whr is dat fire-brand lawyer dat is busy bamboozling the lay-men in court with all the legal vocabulary in his arsenal.

Has the case btw dwayne nd airomon dissolved.

Who is dis jew.

and what is going on here?

The plaintiff is temporarily indisposed

@puskin,has the case b ajourned to a later date.

Story story story. Once upon a time in a certain thread, a case was brought foward before a court, preliminary ruling was given, there appeared a certain legal luminary out of the blues to defend a certain client. He found faults with the legal process which was partly right and partly wrong. Based on a certain allegation amounting to slander levelled by a certain citizen against the judge and a certain citizen, the firebrand lawyer casted aspersions on the judge's character demanded for his resignation and subsequent haulage before a judicial disciplinary comittee. While doing this he choosed to overlook the fact that his client was also tainted with the same allegations, thereby comitting a fallacy of hasty generalization. There then appeared a new kid on the block who sided with the judge and exchanged a few harsh words with the legal man.The judge dissolved the court and stepped down. A new trial date was not fixed, the instigator of the case was no where to be found and things remained in a state of flux

This thread will soon be heated by a glass clinking good news, Stay posted!!

@ini,u talk's in riddles.pls make it clear, wud there stil b a case,btw dwayne nd airomon.

Dis one wey case dey hungry U.
Hmmm!!
If U c case, u go RUN.

@puskin is not my fault,jus that is the passion i have for legal matters.

Turiana go to law school now!

I wonder ohhhhh

**in the camp clinic dispensing drugs to patients**

ehen!!!!!!!!
So U can avoid cooking and all the other ex-currilar excercises
*******langhing*********

. . .smiling. . .

Frowning

Frowning

@airomon n puskin,i'm in 100lve studin law,so once i'm dne wit my decree,then proceed to the law school u bot requested of me o.k, smilin,

@airomon n puskin,i'm in 100lve studin law,so once i'm dne wit my decree,then proceed to the law school u bot requested of me o.k, smilin,