ogawisdom:


Dnt u have sense at all. D case against this lecturer is sexual harassment n d content of audio evidence against this man is grossly insufficient to prove d case get dt into ur thick head. By d way did u listen to d tape. It merely depicts a lecturer asking for sex n d std saying no n d lecturer walks away so were is d harassment. Their conversation could even happen bw husband n wife self. D girl kept saying her breast is paining her as her reason for turning d lecturer down n even promised to give in next time. Set up rubbish

And this guys handle has wisdom in it.
It depicts a lecturer asking a student for sex and the student says no and the lecturer walks away. In a work place. A lecturer to a student. And in your own world that's no biggie. Like how old are you seriously? Wondering how someone like you would manage your home if you could reason so low...and I'm sure you probably have 15 million things against the girl.
You're not the sharpest tool in the box really. You seem to be more active in car talk and politics.....would advice you just limit your comments to those threads and not engage in any intellectual conversation here.

More students should learn from this. It is wrong for any Lecturer for any reason to demand for sex, money, whatever form of gratification from Student. Expose any Lecturer that is into this. Do not let fear stop you from taking action.

I know a guy back in school then, he bought a Walkman when his HOD began to ask for gratification, every time the HOD sees him, he says lots of incriminating things. He didn't have to use the recordings though because he just didn't bulge.

It also turned out that the HOD was at loggerheads with some other students about the same time. In addition to these, he included the names of some part-time students that should not go for the NYSC programme in the departmental list.

To cut long story short, the HOD had to resign.

ogawisdom:


Go n sit down olodo, when u get sense u can then mention me

Offer a superior argument and he goes "olodo" I'm many things but olodo ain't one of them.

Borrowing from one of Kongi's epic quotes " A tiger does not proclaim its tigritude, he pounces"..Your moniker literally translates to master of wisdom in Yoruba, if you are really wise you would pick a more self-effacing moniker. That my friend is all the attention you will get from me.

Out.

Firstly, l do not condone exploitation of students or junior staff by superiors or lecturers.

However specifically in this case, which was presented as sexual harassment & rape....l strongly beg to differ based on the evidence (the audio tape) presented so far.

This at best can be proved as professional misconduct/ethical misconduct which is not a criminal offense but a disciplinary matter by the Faculty board and or University Senate at most.

In the audio evidence firstly, there was no indication that it was actually a student as throughout the 8minutes plus of it, there was no mention of their professional connection but only the location "an office" was explicitly mentioned. ....this a BIG positive for the accused.

Secondly, there was no threat of repercussions on the part of the accused which will help a case against SOME aspects of abuse of power

3rdly, the charge of rape is grossly over-reaching as the girl willingly visited, the accused always stopped any implied action once told and on at least 3 occasions actually told the girl to leave his office (with no threat attached).

From the audio exchange, it could actually be termed consensual negotiation of sexual relations between two consenting adults ....this could be gleaned from what the girl said on different occasions in the audio: "l will like to, but just that my breasts are painful and l am on my period" and also "I can next time" . All these were going on with the girl not held against her will as well as with the door open, been asked to leave on 3 occasions, her personally going to lock the door as well as having the keys to the door.

A counter charge of manipulation and false misrepresentation can be brought against the girl to support the accused's assertion that this was a setup(which becomes a criminal act). It could be argued from the audio evidence that it was the girl initiating & pushing as it was mentioned on 3 occasions by the accused for her to "stop calling his phone and always coming to his office". This is a very strong portion of the audio to assist the accused in proving it could have been a setup.

All in all, based on this evidence (audio), it will be highly insufficient to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of the charges brought against him (sexual harassment & rape) though it will be sufficient for him to be disciplined for professional misconduct/ethical misconduct.

The above is just a logical view of this issue but my sentimental opinion will be to crucify (though not feasible l think) the lecturer because during my university days, there were a few of them exploiting the female students and l won't want my daughter to go through that too.

EreluY:



[size=18pt]Go and bury your head in the sand. How much did you pay (or how many prostitutes did you hire) to get your contemptible degree certificate that's not worth the paper it's written on to the likes of the infamous Dr. Mohamed Sani Idiagbon at UNILORIN. The glorified secondary school called UNILORIN didn't even make the top universities in Africa.[/size]



https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/best-universities-in-africa-2016

Well, you have demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that you are nothing but a "teenage adult". Developing your brain and Figuring out your identity now should be your utmost concern. Until then I won't take your comments serious.