To all Athiests and Agnostics in the house, kindly watch this video with Open Mind and state what you think about it. Don't allow your pride and quest for superiority set it, just watch it with open mind.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn8TGtBrGb8

... What the ?

Na Wa o!!!

SirWere:
... What the ?

hopefulLandlord:
Na Wa o!!!

Summary abeg

No mb to waste

SirWere:
... What the ?

Did you watch the video?

hahn:




Summary abeg

No mb to waste

Let me hint you a little.

It has been discovered that the Universe was Finely-Tuned for Life.

These discoveries have many scientists now admitting that the universe and life itself appear to be part of a "grand design".

Well, there are three revolutionary discoveries from the fields of astronomy and molecular biology that stand out:
1)The Universe had a beginning
2)The Universe is just right for life
3)DNA coding reveals intelligence.

Hubble, a powerful telescope reveals there are a billion trillion stars clustered in over 100 billion galaxies.
In fact, our sun is like one grain of sand amidst the world's beaches.
In the early 20th Century, astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered that the Universe is expanding.
Rewinding the process mathematically, he calculated that everything in the universe, including matter, energy, space and even time itself, actually had a beginning.

In 1992, the COBE satellite experiments proved that the universe really did have a one-time beginning in "an incredible flash of light and energy".
Most preferred to call it "The big bang".

So, the conclusion is:
Everything in the Universe came from Nothing.

Cosmologists who specialize in the study of the universe and its origins soon realized that a chance cosmic explosion could never bring about life any more than a nuclear bomb would unless it was precisely engineered to do so. And that meant a designer must have planned it.

Physicists calculated that for life to exist, gravity and the other laws of physics that govern our Universe needed to be intricately tuned just right or our Universe couldn't exist.
For instance, did you know that if the expansion rate of the universe had been slightly weaker, gravity would have pulled all matter back into a "big crunch".

Stephen Hawkins [An agnostic] stated that:
If the rate of expansion one second after the "big bang" had been smaller by even one part in a hundred thousand million million, the universe would have re-collapsed before it ever reached its present size.
On the flip side, if the expansion rate had been a mere fraction greater than it was, all galaxies, stars and planets could never have formed, and we wouldn't be here.
And for Life to exist, the conditions in our Solar system and our own planet also need to be just right.
The size, temperature, relative proximity and chemical makeup of our solar planet, sun and moon also need to be just right.

Scientists who believe in God may have expected such Fine-Tuning, but Atheists and agnostics were unable to explain the remarkable "coincidences".
Theoretical physicist Stephen Hawkins, an agnostic, writes, ""The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life."

These discoveries all brings us to one question.

The Universe: Accident or Miracle?

But couldn't this Fine-Tuning be attributed to chance? After all, odds-makers know that even long shots can eventually win at the racetrack, and against heavy odds, lotteries are eventually won by someone.
So, what are the odds against human life existing by chance from a random explosion in cosmic history?
For human life to be possible from a big bang utterly defies the law of probability.

One astronomer calculates the odds at less than:One chance in a Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion.
In other words, it would be far easier for a blind-folded person in one try to discover one specially marked grain of sand out of all the beaches of the world.

The odd of one random big bang producing life as we know it would be like one person winning over a thousand consecutive mega-million dollar lotteries after purchasing only a single ticket for each.
Really quite impossible, unless it was fixed by someone behind the scenes which is what everyone would think.
And that is what many scientists are concluding. Someone behind the scenes designed and created the universe.

Boland:
Let me hint you a little.

It has been discovered that the Universe was Finely-Tuned for Life.

These discoveries have many scientists now admitting that the universe and life itself appear to be part of a "grand design".

Well, there are three revolutionary discoveries from the fields of astronomy and molecular biology that stand out:
1)The Universe had a beginning
2)The Universe is just right for life
3)DNA coding reveals intelligence.

Hubble, a powerful telescope reveals there are a billion trillion stars clustered in over 100 billion galaxies.
In fact, our sun is like one grain of sand amidst the world's beaches.
In the early 20th Century, astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered that the Universe is expanding.
Rewinding the process mathematically, he calculated that everything in the universe, including matter, energy, space and even time itself, actually had a beginning.

In 1992, the COBE satellite experiments proved that the universe really did have a one-time beginning in "an incredible flash of light and energy".
Most preferred to call it "The big bang".

So, the conclusion is:
Everything in the Universe came from Nothing.

Cosmologists who specialize in the study of the universe and its origins soon realized that a chance cosmic explosion could never bring about life any more than a nuclear bomb would unless it was precisely engineered to do so. And that meant a designer must have planned it.

Physicists calculated that for life to exist, gravity and the other laws of physics that govern our Universe needed to be intricately tuned just right or our Universe couldn't exist.
For instance, did you know that if the expansion rate of the universe had been slightly weaker, gravity would have pulled all matter back into a "big crunch".

Stephen Hawkins [An agnostic] stated that:
If the rate of expansion one second after the "big bang" had been smaller by even one part in a hundred thousand million million, the universe would have re-collapsed before it ever reached its present size.
On the flip side, if the expansion rate had been a mere fraction greater than it was, all galaxies, stars and planets could never have formed, and we wouldn't be here.
And for Life to exist, the conditions in our Solar system and our own planet also need to be just right.
The size, temperature, relative proximity and chemical makeup of our solar planet, sun and moon also need to be just right.

Scientists who believe in God may have expected such Fine-Tuning, but Atheists and agnostics were unable to explain the remarkable "coincidences".
Theoretical physicist Stephen Hawkins, an agnostic, writes, ""The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life."

These discoveries all brings us to one question.

The Universe: Accident or Miracle?

But couldn't this Fine-Tuning be attributed to chance? After all, odds-makers know that even long shots can eventually win at the racetrack, and against heavy odds, lotteries are eventually won by someone.
So, what are the odds against human life existing by chance from a random explosion in cosmic history?
For human life to be possible from a big bang utterly defies the law of probability.

One astronomer calculates the odds at less than:One chance in a Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion Trillion.
In other words, it would be far easier for a blind-folded person in one try to discover one specially marked grain of sand out of all the beaches of the world.

The odd of one random big bang producing life as we know it would be like one person winning over a thousand consecutive mega-million dollar lotteries after purchasing only a single ticket for each.
Really quite impossible, unless it was fixed by someone behind the scenes which is what everyone would think.
And that is what many scientists are concluding. Someone behind the scenes designed and created the universe.

Cool. And this "someone" is?

hahn:


Cool. And this "someone" is?

The Almighty God.

Boland:
The Almighty God.

Which one?

Allah?
Zeus?
Vishnu?
Jehovah?
Yahweh?
Eledumare?

hahn:

Which one?
Allah?
Zeus?
Vishnu?
Jehovah?
Yahweh?
Eledumare?

the God I serve is mightier than any of the gods listed by you

FSM is the God that video is referring to

Pastafarian:



the God I serve is mightier than any of the gods listed by you

FSM is the God that video is referring to

Nope. I am the God that video is referring to

hahn:


Which one?

Allah?
Zeus?
Vishnu?
Jehovah?
Yahweh?
Eledumare?

You and this nonsense bro .

KingEbukasBlog:

Gods in various religions are simply variants of The Supreme Being , each creating different concepts of the Nature of This Being . So its One God , myriads of concepts in different religions.

So which religion or theological/philosophical proposition portrays the true Nature of the Supreme Being - that's an entirely different argument ..

KingEbukasBlog:


You and this nonsense bro .

So, is Ebuka a Christian name?

hahn:


So, is Ebuka a Christian name?

Why you dey ask me

KingEbukasBlog:


Why you dey ask me

KingEbukasBlog:


You have a point , Christians do change their names , the one they once bore as heathens if the name gives glory to a lesser god .

Source: https://www.nairaland.com/3470206/oluwaseun-osewa-plz-read#51110817

Make we hear word joor.
One of the oldest deities yo be worshipped was over 40 000 years old
So all you young earth creationists Yahweh was like 36000 years behind
He was basically creating the universe when the Löwenmensch figurine was worshipped
PS: The earth isn't 6000 years old

hahn:




Source: https://www.nairaland.com/3470206/oluwaseun-osewa-plz-read#51110817

My name glorifies God , Chukwuebuka - God is very big

KingEbukasBlog:


My name glorifies God , Chukwuebuka - God is very big

Lol. Which god?

Were your village people not bearing Chukwuebuka before they were introduced to Christianity?

jonbellion:
Make we hear word joor.
One of the oldest deities yo be worshipped was over 40 000 years old
So all you young earth creationists Yahweh was like 36000 years behind
He was basically creating the universe when the Löwenmensch figurine was worshipped
PS: The earth isn't 6000 years old

I am a progressive creationist , so you are not making any sense .

You always attack young earth creationism because you can easily rebut their arguments . How about debating a progressive creationist , let's see if your arguments'll be sensible .

You atheists always stick to one perspective and think refuting arguments from that perspective would invalidate other perspectives .

Another good example is the "Argument of poor design " . To a panentheist who believes God is neither omniscient nor omnibenevolent , the argument is false because according to the proposition the universe serves as a source of knowledge to God .

To a theistic evolutionist , this argument is also false because he believes that as time goes on the so called design flaws would be corrected since God used natural selection as a mechanism for creation .

And of course to a Christian , God will make everything new - a new universe , a new earth according to Revelation 21:5 . If the world were perfect there won't be any need for re-creation .

KingEbukasBlog:


I am a progressive creationist , so you are not making any sense .

You always attack young earth creationism because you can easily rebut their arguments . How about debating a progressive creationist , let's see if your arguments'll be sensible .

You atheists always stick to one perspective and think refuting arguments from that perspective would invalidate other perspectives .

Another good example is "Argument of poor design " . To a panentheist who believes God is neither omniscient nor omnibenevolent , the argument is false because according to the proposition the universe serves as a source of knowledge to God .

To a theistic evolutionist , this argument is also false because he believes that as time goes on the so called design flaws would corrected since he uses natural selection as mechanism for creation .

And of course to a Christian , God will make everything new - a new universe , a new earth according to Revelation 21:5 . If the world was perfect there won't be any need for re-creation .

lol but progressive creationism is basically intellegent design mixed with scientific fact
The only difference is your denial of the evolutionary process

Boland:
The Almighty God.

Theist will always rush to science when they think it supports their God. But when science speaks of evolution they will stand firmly against it.
Well for your information, physicist have theorized that there could be more than one universe, a multiverse if you may. And ours managed to fit the criteria for life. We are only here to think because we survived.
Even at that it doesn't prove Yahweh is real any more than it proves sango or Zeus or Odin is real.
I won't argue against a deist God but I will stand firmly against any religious God.

Lennycool:


Theist will always rush to science when they think it supports their God. But when science speaks of evolution they will stand firmly against it.

There are theistic evolutionists - theists who believe God guides the evolutionary process . And there are atheists who impugn evolution because of numerous inconsistencies in the theory .

I won't argue against a deist God but I will stand firmly against any religious God.

The difference between the deistic God and theistic God is immanence . So can you produce any cogent rebuttal against the immanence of God?

hahn:


Which one?

Allah?
Zeus?
Vishnu?
Jehovah?
Yahweh?
Eledumare?

There is only one true God.

Man created religion to have connection with God. The different types of God you listed were created through different religion.

If you want to know the one true God and have a connection with him, open your mind and seek him truthfully.
The evidence of Original is the presence of Fake. Many false prophet, false religion and belief only point to the existence of a true God.

If you want the truth, seek the truth, but if your will and desire to serve only yourself and feel superior because religion seems like a "weak concept" to you, you are free to choose your path.

Boland:
There is only one true God.

Man created religion to have connection with God. The different types of God you listed was created through different religion.

If you want to know the one true God and have a connection with him, open your mind and seek him truthfully.
The evidence of Original is the presence of Fake. Many false prophet, false religion and belief only point to the existence of a true God.

If you want the truth, seek the truth, but if your will and desire to serve only yourself and feel superior because religion seems like a "weak concept" to you, you are free to choose your path.

I sought after it but didn't find it

Oh well. It is still imaginary all the same

hahn:


Which one?

Allah?
Zeus?
Vishnu?
Jehovah?
Yahweh?
Eledumare?

Which one do you believe in

Stop all these kid attitudes.

Boland:
There is only one true God.


The evidence of Original is the presence of Fake. Many false prophet, false religion and belief only point to the existence of a true God.

I fully agree with this well thought statement

the evidence of original (FSM) is the presence of fake (Allah, Yahweh, Vishnu, Odin etc)

preach Boland! preach!!

hahn:


I sought after it but didn't find it

Oh well. It is still imaginary all the same

The reason why you couldn't find Him is because you define your own system of knowing Him.

Whereas, the True God has His own system of knowing Him.

Emusan:


The reason why you couldn't find Him is because you define your own system of knowing Him.

Whereas, the True God has His own system of knowing Him.

true that

FSM has his own system

KingEbukasBlog:


There are theistic evolutionists - theists who believe God guides the evolutionary process . And there are atheists who impugn evolution because of numerous inconsistencies in the theory .



The difference between the deistic God and theistic God is immanence . So can you produce any cogent rebuttal against the immanence of God?

Lol there are more difference than that ebuka. And you know it. A deistic God is in no way similar to any religious God.
I was talking about theist on Nairaland

Emusan:


The reason why you couldn't find Him is because you define your own system of knowing Him.

Whereas, the True God has His own system of knowing Him.

Enlighten me on this "true system"

Emusan:


Which one do you believe in

Stop all these kid attitudes.

Answer the damn question or go and read your bible

hahn:


I sought after it but didn't find it

Oh well. It is still imaginary all the same

You sound like you're angry and I understand you bro, I've been there.

Whatever it is, God can solve it.

I know deep down you know that there is a supreme being. Seek him "truthfully" and he shall reveal himself to you.