It sure felt good when Earth was flat, Earth was the center of the universe, Earth was only about 6,000 years old, life on Earth originated as the handiwork of a supernatural creator(that is probable but likely a diestic entity), and when species were fixed and didn't evolve. And it felt really good when humans were "special", created separately from other life on Earth, not descended from a common ancestor.
Charles Darwin brought the human race to reality and because of this he is hated by the creationist crew
Unfortunately for us they still want to keep us in the stone age
Why do they like the stone age
The theory of evolution explains how life diversified on earth. They're may be a few holes but the puzzle is pretty much complete
Creationists don't like Charles Darwin and reality
They have made fruitless efforts on the last two centuries to disprove this groundbreaking theory
So far it hasn't really been holding up
Things you have to ignore to not ackwledege evolution

-stratigrahpy
-fossilised footprints
-fossils
-fossils of extinct species
-plate tectonics and continental drift
-same fossils on the edge of continents
-carbon dating(it's accurate)
-dendrochronology
-peer reviewed papers
-scientists that do actual peer reviews
-genetics
-Heredity
-universal genetic material
-Stanley miller
-speciation
-the codon table
-mutations
-molecular clock mutations
-mithochloridial DNA
-mithochloridial eve
-Y-chromosomal Adam (not biblical)
-Neanderthal DNA in humans
-homology
-embryos
-neoteny
-vaccines
-marsupials
-transitional fossils (yes they exist)
-adaptations
-sickle cell disease
-flightless birds
- artificial selection ( creationists use this for the bizzare science of Noahs ark like the rise of such a wide variety of species in just 6000 years ) .............
-the peppered moth
-fruit flies
The Galapagos islands
-taxonomy
-E Coil experiment( this has been attempted to be disproved by butthurt creationists. So far similar to their attempts to disprove the theory it isn't working out so well)
-ring species
Please creationists
Charles Darwin meant no harm
He really didn't

RoyalBlak007:

Good one.
O.P.

lol
Don't mind creationists

but but but "Man came from monkeys"

hopefulLandlord:
but but but "Man came from monkeys"

then why are there still monkeys

.

Isn't this a waste of effort? You're trying to logically engage people who the most part didn't come by their belief in God rationally.

People are indoctrinated into religion during their formative years rather than argued into it. It's all emotion - fear, love etc. There is an emotional aspect where by people see even questioning their beliefs as a betrayal - of 'God', Jesus, their family, their culture and so on.

I think that's what keeps people in that religious orbit. Otherwise any reasonably educated or intelliget person should be able to see that at the very least, most of religion is implausible.

Nice one

jonbellion:
It sure felt good when Earth was flat, Earth was the center of the universe, Earth was only about 6,000 years old, life on Earth originated as the handiwork of a supernatural creator(that is probable but likely a diestic entity), and when species were fixed and didn't evolve. And it felt really good when humans were "special", created separately from other life on Earth, not descended from a common ancestor.
Charles Darwin brought the human race to reality and because of this he is hated by the creationist crew
Unfortunately for us they still want to keep us in the stone age
Why do they like the stone age
The theory of evolution explains how life diversified on earth. They're may be a few holes but the puzzle is pretty much complete
Creationists don't like Charles Darwin and reality
They have made fruitless efforts on the last two centuries to disprove this groundbreaking theory
So far it hasn't really been holding up
Things you have to ignore to not ackwledege evolution

-stratigrahpy
-fossilised footprints
-fossils
-fossils of extinct species
-plate tectonics and continental drift
-same fossils on the edge of continents
-carbon dating(it's accurate)
-dendrochronology
-peer reviewed papers
-scientists that do actual peer reviews
-genetics
-Heredity
-universal genetic material
-Stanley miller
-speciation
-the codon table
-mutations
-molecular clock mutations
-mithochloridial DNA
-mithochloridial eve
-Y-chromosomal Adam (not biblical)
-Neanderthal DNA in humans
-homology
-embryos
-neoteny
-vaccines
-marsupials
-transitional fossils (yes they exist)
-adaptations
-sickle cell disease
-flightless birds
- artificial selection ( creationists use this for the bizzare science of Noahs ark like the rise of such a wide variety of species in just 6000 years ) .............
-the peppered moth
-fruit flies
The Galapagos islands
-taxonomy
-E Coil experiment( this has been attempted to be disproved by butthurt creationists. So far similar to their attempts to disprove the theory it isn't working out so well)
-ring species
Please creationists
Charles Darwin meant no harm
He really didn't

you forgot atavism and somme others

Charles Darwin – The master of faking evolution theories for personal status. He lived the greatest portion of his life in deep mental depression and insanity, there is a history of mental illness in his family. He believed his dad had the power of prediction; He had an endless catalogue of psychosomatic illnesses and lived as a semi invalid barely past thirty.

Now we have to deal with another mentally disturbed scientist called RICHARD DAWKINS. He is the God-Father of modern Atheism.
Dawkins proudly encourage his gullible followers to look into a mirror and see that they and their families were once fish.

Dawkins takes pains to inform his reader that his venom is mostly reserved for one particular religion:
‘Unless otherwise stated, I shall have Christianity mostly in mind.

However, it is not for nothing that Richard Dawkins has been described as ‘Darwin’s Rottweiler’ The professor is on record as saying something very different the previous year:
‘I believe, but I cannot prove, that all life, all intelligence, all creativity and all “design” anywhere in the universe is the direct or indirect product of Darwinian natural selection.’

It seems that Dawkins dont know that Charles Darwin defrauded his own evolution theories.

Edenoscar:


then why are there still monkeys

Then monkeys evolved to Atheists.

ScienceWatch:
Charles Darwin – The master of faking evolution theories for personal status. He lived the greatest portion of his life in deep mental depression and insanity, there is a history of mental illness in his family. He believed his dad had the power of prediction; He had an endless catalogue of psychosomatic illnesses and lived as a semi invalid barely past thirty.

Now we have to deal with another mentally disturbed scientist called RICHARD DAWKINS. He is the God-Father of modern Atheism.
Dawkins proudly encourage his gullible followers to look into a mirror and see that they and their families were once fish.

Dawkins takes pains to inform his reader that his venom is mostly reserved for one particular religion:
‘Unless otherwise stated, I shall have Christianity mostly in mind.

However, it is not for nothing that Richard Dawkins has been described as ‘Darwin’s Rottweiler’ The professor is on record as saying something very different the previous year:
‘I believe, but I cannot prove, that all life, all intelligence, all creativity and all “design” anywhere in the universe is the direct or indirect product of Darwinian natural selection.’

It seems that Dawkins dont know that Charles Darwin defrauded his own evolution theories.

True True.