dalaman:


Progressive creationist? Very soon you'll be a dimensional creationist from there you'll advance and become a portal creationist.

star trek creationism

KingEbukasBlog:


I get what you mean bro but this didn't address the question .

I mean looking at the timeline of human evolution , we did gain emotions - anger , love , hatred , joy etc . So the question is : Did we lose some emotions , or are we expected to lose emotions as time goes on . The same way some features like tails , large forehead , large teeth were lost . Or are they important evolutionary needs for our survival . You dig ?

I get you, I think. You are asking if we can evolve out of feeling emotions.

The honest answer is 'I don't know'. Your original question was whether evolution Theories could explain why we have certain emotions. I hope I answered that to your satisfaction.
What will subsequently happen down the line is as much a mystery to me as it probably is to you.

KingEbukasBlog:

shut up

abeg abeg
carry your star trek creationism and go!

See who's talking. Where did homosexualism come from if not religion. Priests raping their younger monks. Core Muslims from Saudi Arabia and Co because of their strict laws raping small children.

Athiesm doesn't support bullshit. Your religion did. Athiesm is logical, religion is illogical.

Ok Christian. What about the two sisters that gave their fathers wine to drink in d bible then had sex with him?? Did they die?? We're they struck down?? Lots daughters.

I don't support incest but incest has been recorded in the bible on several occasions.

Anas09:
Where is hopefullandlord? This man here said, animals are homosextuals and incestuous, and since they evolved from them, they should freely sleep with their mothers, Fathers, and siblings.

Just imagine Hopefullandlord with his Atheistic wife and kids. He puts it into his daughters, his sons pits it into his wife. his daughters freely roll with their younger sisters and turn around and roll with their brothers too.

His sons roll with their brothers and turns around and roll with their sisters.

Relations come for visits, the rolling continues. When he feels like it, he rolls with his Dog. (I remember Hopefullandlord saying there's nothing wrong in people rolling with their animals), Yes, he rolls with his dogs and every other family memeber can do it with the Cats too.

And when they are feeling Gay, they all put a porn Video and start the rolling in his sitting room. Rolling around.

This is the Atheistic Utopian society that these Athiests are envisaging.

Satanism, Satanism, Satanism, Satanism.

It's a good thing churches are accepting homosexuals. So much for religion. And there's no God after death when he isn't part of the living. Open your eyes. Why should the afterlife be any different?

LambanoPeace:



Hahahahahahahahhahahahahaha


Are you kidding me? Well, let them answer if homosexuality is OK and why inbreeding isn't.

What exactly are morals?? The one you learnt while growing, the one that sits right with you or the one you're conditioned to live with??

availableisme:


First of all, we need to agree on something regarding atheism. Atheism is not by definition a disbelief in God or gods. That is the foundation of atheism and not a final position as there are atheists who disbelieve in God or gods but believe in spirits and reincarnation and...everything that God or gods are which is spirit.

Atheism is a foundation which other things are built on. If the foundation is that they lack belief in God or gods then what is permissible to be built on such a foundation which would still hold to their core belief yet make them comfortable which is why there are different kinds and classes of atheists in the world even here on nairaland.

If an atheist says homosexuality or incest is alright as long as both are adults and its based on mutual agreement then this is like a direct affront to the position of God whom they disbelieve. If they do not believe in God then they also by extension want to assert this by also seeing nothing wrong with those things God abhors otherwise that would mean they are okay with Gods idea of morality.

However if you say that in some nations homosexuality is permitted or even bestiality or perhaps incest as the focus is simply for you to do what makes you happy but does that make it right?

Anas09 painted a very vivid picture in her comment and a mind with a conscience and morals would either be repulsed at the thought of it or seriously think about it.

Not everyone is aware of the problems inbreeding may cause and in fact it does not always cause problems as both parties can have perfectly healthy genes but does that make it right is the question? Is there nothing inherently wrong with it? can you tell me?

Eve was made from Adam and he had sex with with her. In the beginning of the world. Was eve from Jupiter or unrelated to Adam. She was his flesh, bone and blood according to the bible. Isn't that the beginning of incest??

shadeyinka:


You truely sound like Squealer of Animal Farm!
So, agentofallah has become your Napoleon? SMH!

Atheists who have live in the shadows of popular votes with no mind of their own. The major question still is "If we are all atheists in the world, then there shall be nothing wrong with incestuously living: would this promote civilization?"

Really and what has religion given the world?? Aparthied, war, unrest. You need to go on the internet and see when christians shed blood in the name of God. They killed heretics and many others. The present world is the result of religions where out of every 100 persons only 3 are rich. So much for moral teachings and selflessness.

shadeyinka:


Atheists to me are just Rebranded Hypies of the 70. This time around, the rebellion isntbagainst the society but against God Himself.

Full atheism will leadbtoba society that will self destruct

Bitchvibe:
Ok Christian. What about the two sisters that gave their fathers wine to drink in d bible then had sex with him?? Did they die?? We're they struck down?? Lots daughters.

I don't support incest but incest has been recorded in the bible on several occasions.

And what did God say about those two sisters, sir? Did God commend them for their act of bravery?

The Bible recorded that God declared the Children they had by their Father Bastards. This is actually the first time that word was mentioned in the Bible and what the words means.
God Commanded that no Israelite shd ever marry from those Nations. Moab and Ammon.

And, God said none of them should ever come into his presence becos they were perpertually unclean.

We saw what happened to an Isrealite, Elimelech, who defied that imstruction and not only went into Moab to.live, but married two Moabitess girls for his sons.

He died, the sons died without leaving any Seed behind.

Ruth got.herself freed from that Curse by her actions.

And Ruth said, Entreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God:

Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried: the LORD do so to me, and more also, if ought but death part thee and me.
Ruth:1: 16-17

Take note of "And thy God My God".



Yes, they died. Dead of the spirit is not the dead of the flesh.

If you don't support incest, what are you doing bringing this up?

KingEbukasBlog:


Hahaha ... Atheists criticize Christians by claiming that we don't know how Christianity came about but most of them like you don't know how atheism developed from 5 BCE in different areas of the world . Someone needs to do some studying

If atheism started in 5BCE then it's still older than Christianity.

Religious or unreligious, everybody dies. Just because you read something in a book doesn't substantiate any claim to being dead in the spirit lol... can you prove anyone has died of the spirit??

I'm sure you read the part where moses was born of incest, have you also addressed that??

Anas09:

And what did God say about those two sisters, sir? Did God commend them for their act of bravery?

The Bible recorded that God declared the Children they had by their Father Bastards. This is actually the first time that word was mentioned in the Bible and what the words means.
God Commanded that no Israelite shd ever marry from those Nations. Moab and Ammon.

And, God said none of them should ever come into his presence becos they were perpertually unclean.

We saw what happened to an Isrealite, Elimelech, who defied that imstruction and not only went into Moab to.live, but married two Moabitess girls for his sons.

He died, the sons died without leaving any Seed behind.

Ruth got.herself freed from that Curse by her actions.

And Ruth said, Entreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God:

Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried: the LORD do so to me, and more also, if ought but death part thee and me.
Ruth:1: 16-17

Take note of "And thy God My God".



Yes, they died. Dead of the spirit is not the dead of the flesh.

If you don't support incest, what are you doing bringing this up?

Bitchvibe:
Religious or unreligious, everybody dies. Just because you read something in a book doesn't substantiate any claim to being dead in the spirit lol... can you prove anyone has died of the spirit??

I'm sure you read the part where moses was born of incest, have you also addressed that??

You are too young in your mind. I can't do this.

Ok spiritually old woman

Anas09:

You are too young in your mind. I can't do this.

Bitchvibe:
Ok spiritually old woman

Yes my son, how are you doing this night? I hope say you chop? No.sleep hungry you hia?

Anas09:

God Commanded that no Israelite shd ever marry from those Nations. Moab and Ammon.

And, God said none of them should ever come into his presence becos they were perpertually unclean.

Abeg, where did the ancestress of the precious King David come from? Nor be Moab?

shadeyinka:


Atheists to me are just Rebranded Hypies of the 70. This time around, the rebellion isntbagainst the society but against God Himself.

Full atheism will leadbtoba society that will self destruct

I haven't heard from you since i suggested a debate topic to you.

Well, you may also consider this one, in case you didn't find the other topic acceptable.

Topic: Shadeyinka Vs Akintom: A Society Without God!

*The society in its nativity is passive to God idea

*The awe of the beauty and diversity of the society, ascribed to the causality of god idea is a pessimistic position, in the art of curiosity.

*optimistic, initiative and critical approach to curiosity, is the only relevant factor in the adjustment to the dynamism of the society.

I assert that the society has thrived without the "untraceable interventionist god". And it will thrive better, if god idea is annihilated.

Waiting.......

Hehehehe...

MrMontella:
star trek creationism

KingEbukasBlog:


I think you should read about progressive creationism first

Do you mind opening a thread on 'progressive creationism'?

RevAIO:


Abeg, where did the ancestress of the precious King David come from? Nor be Moab?

Are you sure you read what i posted? Go back and read, this time slowly.

Anas09:

Are you sure you read what i posted? Go back and read, this time slowly.

Okay, I've read it all now. All you've done there is totally contradict yourself.

Are Moabites 'pertually unclean' or can their 'uncleanness' be revoked.

Maybe it is not you, maybe it is the bible itself that is just demonstrating another example from it's morass of contradictions.

But let us not just blame the bible because in this case you are clearly adding your own jara to the bible.

I do not recall anywhere where Ruth freed herself from a curse despite her devotion to Boaz and his God.

RevAIO:


Okay, I've read it all now. All you've done there is totally contradict yourself.

Are Moabites 'pertually unclean' or can their 'uncleanness' be revoked.

Maybe it is not you, maybe it is the bible itself that is just demonstrating another example from it's morass of contradictions.

But let us not just blame the bible because in this case you are clearly adding your own jara to the bible.

I do not recall anywhere where Ruth freed herself from a curse despite her devotion to Boaz and his God.

Really? I contradicted myself?

You still didn't read the passages i quoted, or maybe you have comprehension issurs.

She freed herself from the ways of Moab and it's gods and clung to the God of Naomi the Israelitess woman.

Anyways. I don't think i want to go into this. Believe what you want.

Anas09:

Really? I contradicted myself?

You still didn't read the passages i quoted, or maybe you have comprehension issurs.

She freed herself from the ways of Moab and it's gods and clung to the God of Naomi the Israelitess woman.

Anyways. I don't think i want to go into this. Believe what you want.

You don't have to go into it but if you do then I'll have to insist that saying Moab was under a 'perpetual uncleanness' is contradicted when you say that Ruth chose to follow the God of Boaz and so the uncleanness was lifted.

You are trying to force Ruth out of the curse of Moab by inventing doctrines. There is nowhere where it states that the curse was lifted off Ruth because she chose to follow Boaz' God.