Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,150,642 members, 7,809,412 topics. Date: Friday, 26 April 2024 at 09:07 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? (2334 Views)
Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef Calls Black People 'Monkeys' During His Weekly Sermon / Was The First Living Thing That Evolved A Child Or An Adult / If We Resemble Apes, Does That Mean We Evolved From Apes? (2) (3) (4)
If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? by benzics(m): 2:02am On Jan 01, 2017 |
Happy new year guys.. Looking at the title, I don't know if it's just me, but it really sounds absurd and insane.. How do a grown up ask this kind of question? WE EVOLVED FROM NO MONKEYS WE SHARE A SIMILAR ANCESTOR!! As someone would say, ignorance is more expensive than knowledge! You don't know how evolution works and you think you can trash evolution? Please enough of those dumb questions, it's a new year, get some knowledge! 1 Like
|
Re: If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? by ovaRAYted(m): 2:39am On Jan 01, 2017 |
Op Stop monkeying around 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? by felixomor: 3:07am On Jan 01, 2017 |
ovaRAYted: The guy is one hell of a comedian 3 Likes |
Re: If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? by Oche211(m): 7:14am On Jan 01, 2017 |
ovaRAYted:hehehehehehe.....wickedness in this new year? Abeg, it is too early na. 2 Likes |
Re: If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? by coputa(m): 8:00am On Jan 01, 2017 |
For ages, the blacks has been the subject of deceit and lies manufactured by white scientists.but with exposure and education,the blacks are now reasoning with their head.many of the theories propounded by Western scientists. are fairy tales. |
Re: If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? by Splinz(m): 10:14am On Jan 01, 2017 |
felixomor: You don't blame him. He belongs to the 'ape family' anyways. 1 Like |
Re: If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? by Fash20: 11:17am On Jan 01, 2017 |
coputa: That's not reasoning that stupidity as a result of half baked knowledge. |
Re: If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? by hahn(m): 3:41pm On Jan 01, 2017 |
coputa: Just like the theory of Jesus and Jehovah 1 Like |
Re: If We Evolved From Monkeys, Why Are There Still Monkeys? by ScienceWatch: 11:59am On Jan 12, 2017 |
benzics:I wish everyone a Happy New Year ! Agreed, it is a new year so lets start with a big bang ! Lets protect decent people and their chilfren from mad scientists. Philip Bell's review of Richard Dawkins’ latest book, The Magic of Reality (MOR), is quite unlike his previous works, not least because he would like children to read it. But, to borrow the words of nineteenth-century geologist Adam Sedgwick, “From first to last it is a dish of rank materialism cleverly cooked up … . And why is this done? For no other reason, I am sure, except to make us independent of a Creator.” It is logically impossible to find meaning in life within an atheist paradigm—unless, that is, one deceitfully steals notions of human worth and dignity from a worldview in which people are God’s image-bearers. Actually, Hawcock considers that “the text is persuasive whatever one’s age”.3 Unquestionably, unwary readers are very likely to be influenced towards atheism by this book. The book is divided into a dozen deceiptive chapters, the headings of which quickly reveal that this is Dawkins’ attempt at a materialist’s Answers book. For instance: Who was the first person? Why are there so many different kinds of animals? What is the sun? What is a rainbow? When and how did everything begin? Are we alone? Why do bad things happen? What is a miracle? This is boring atheistic-style ‘creation apologetics’. However, Tichard Dawkins latest attempt falls well short. Dawkins gives a sloppery definition of evolution (repeated in so many words a sentence later): “Evolution means a change in a gene pool. Change in a gene pool means that some genes become more numerous, others less” (p. 73). Many biologists would disagree with Dawkins. Dawkins and other evolutionary popularizers are renowned for employing the tactic of equivocation. Once he has warmed up to his favourite theme, and suckered his young (or naïve) readers. |
(1) (Reply)
Romans 7 : The Flesh Test - Paul Ellis / "Benny Hinn Must Clarify Tithing Teachings Or Offer 'Refund' To Those He Misled" / Should Religious Dogma Be Free From Criticism?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 16 |