Daviddson:
You see some people praising Falana now because he has said what pleases them. Were it for the other way around, they'd call him disparaging names. When Sahara Reporters exposes people from the Buhari government, they give a thumb up; when it's Patience, Maduekwe, or a PDP member, they'll say they're being paid by APC to spread "propaganda" and "media trial".

Tinubutoto:


Reasoning with anus and not with the brain, are you finding it difficult to comprehend a simple write up like this one? Buhari and Mahamma are fighting Barrow today, relying on the same ECOWAS Treaty I guess?

comshots:
Translate.

Misterone:
gullible Nigerians being gullible as usual.
have you read the law? no.
does the law affects Adeboye as the spiritual head of RCCG? no.
does the law prevent him from carrying out his godly works as before? no.
does the law stop him from ministering sunday service even in Nigeria? no.
so what is the issue?
the law is a corporate governance law. here is a copy from the act.

9.3. Where the Founder or Leader has occupied all or any of these three governance positions
for more than twenty years, or is aged seventy years or above, the choice in section 9.2.2
above should only relate to the Board of Trustees as in section 9.4(c) below, except the
constitution of the organisation otherwise provides.
In the case of religious or cultural organisations, nothing in this code is intended to change
the spiritual leadership and responsibilities of Founders, General Overseers, Pastors,
Imams and Muslim Clerics, Presidents, Bishops, Apostles, Prophets, etc. which are
distinguishable from purely corporate governance and management responsibilities and
accountabilities of the entities.

Misterone:
i taya o! Buhari don refuse to handover power before?

tolexy007:


see dem

DropShot:
How does one refusing to accept defeat in an election he had earlier conceded defeat equate to not obeying an ECOWAS court whose ruling is largely advisory?

DropShot:
How does one refusing to accept defeat in an election he had earlier conceded defeat equate to not obeying an ECOWAS court whose ruling is largely advisory?

DropShot:
How does one refusing to accept defeat in an election he had earlier conceded defeat equate to not obeying an ECOWAS court whose ruling is largely advisory?

klax:
Buhari does not worth telling jammeh to step down. Fayose was right when he said buhari lack moral right to tell jammeh to step down.

I love the way jammed bluffed him.

VERDA:


Are court rulings in Nigeria that Dasuki be released on bail also advisory??.

Ermacc:
zombie spotted

klax:
Buhari does not worth telling jammeh to step down. Fayose was right when he said buhari lack moral right to tell jammeh to step down.

I love the way jammed bluffed him.

psalmsjob:


Starting your comment with an insult shows how dysfunctional your brain is; and you just made me a partner by this.

Somebody with a functional brain will know I didn't suggest that there was no ECOWAS judgments for both Nigeria and Ghana but the nature of the two cases being fundamentally different from what is happening in the Gambia meant that the issue of moral justification in not admissible.

So read my comments first and react to it and not be reacting to my signature instead. Or do you want me to change it to "I hate cluelessness"?

Enice:
we all remember the case of Ayo Salami vs FG during GEJs regime. He vehemently refused to obey court orders yet some pile holes call him hero today.

psalmsjob:


I disagree with him because:

The cases in Nigeria and Ghana which were referred to are criminal cases whereas that of Gambia is an electoral case or issue.

I can't adequately speak for Ghana but in the case of Nigeria, releasing the criminal Dasuki will jeopardise the case because he could jump bail, interfere with evidence, intimidate witnesses and being a former NSA makes him a security risk as well if released.

Sentiments apart only a clueless man like GEJ will release such a criminal who has more or less admitted guilt.

If Buhari contest elections and lost but refuses to hand over then you can say he lack moral grounds to tell someone else to do so which is not the case here.

TheFreeOne:


That's akin to saying they should remove the specs of dusts in their own eyes before seeking the log of wood in Jammeh eyes.

So Buhari and Akufo-Addo stand disqualified in the eyes of moral justice.

Obdk:


Hear urself. So why did the court grant dasuki bail... U kno more than the court


Smh

kutchs:

There's no fundamental difference between the two as both bother on respect for the Rule of Law. Disrespecting the wishes of Gambians and the rulings properly constituted courts of Nigeria are offenses for which the offenders deserve to be punished. Buhari has shown himself at various times to be anti-democratic and like Falana said has no moral right to advice Jammeh (not saying that Jammeh is right though).
in case you don't know, respect for the Rule of Law is the most important element of democracy and among its application is respect for the wishes of the courts properly constituted.

Leopardd:


E pain am.

Counter the point nwokem and leave unnecessary talk...

Firefire:
Buhary lack moral justification whatsoever...

temitemi1:
Like buhari like jammeh...

proeast:
Buhari is a shameless hypocrite!!! A man that rejected election results were he clearly lost as an opposition leader, is now at the forefront asking Jammeh to concede defeat

DropShot:
How does one refusing to accept defeat in an election he had earlier conceded defeat equate to not obeying an ECOWAS court whose ruling is largely advisory?

DropShot:
How does one refusing to accept defeat in an election he had earlier conceded defeat equate to not obeying an ECOWAS court whose ruling is largely advisory?