In case you haven't heard a white nationalist and avid trump supporter went into a mosque and killed half a dozen muslims in Quebec.

Where was the media extensive coverage?

Whats more pressing is no one is calling this man a terrorist and he has escaped terror charges, instead being charged for murder.

Apparently in the world we live only muslims qualify as terrorists,

Only when a muslim commits a crime does it get the vigorous coverage such heinous acts deserve.


http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/30/americas/quebec-mosque-shooting/

I actually read about that online.

hmmm

Lol dear OP
In the land of christian propaganda only Muslims and athiests can be terrorists
A christian terrorist was "never really a christian"
Also a christian gets to criticise and even mock the Gods of other religions like Islam but can cry foul if their religion is being ridiculed as well

why criticise the protege , the muslims are his mentor

Just half a dozen? do the maths and compare that's just like 0.00000000000001% vengeance

kilokeys:
why criticise the protege , the muslims are his mentor

Muslims arent white supremacists. (Like him)


Muslims are donald trump supporters. (Like him)


Muslims arent christians. (Like him)

TemmyWon:
Just half a dozen? do the maths and compare that's just like 0.00000000000001% vengeance

Vengeance yeah?

TemmyWon:
Just half a dozen? do the maths and compare that's just like 0.00000000000001% vengeance

I thought Jesus said turn the other cherk

na una na

Muslim are the bad one, the terrorist, ready made bomb.

No Christian terrorist, Christian are the peace makers like in Iraq. Most Christians are saint per media census.

Per history records, the despise group inherits the land.

i read it about it online and tv.. if the media wanted to cover it up you wouldn't even hear about it at all... so it's not about media hyping one more than the other but rather how often both occurs which then appeals to the laws of probability that one will appear more in the media coverage than the other................

johnydon22:
i read it about it online and tv.. if the media wanted to cover it up you wouldn't even hear about it at all... so it's not about media hyping one more than the other but rather how often both occurs which then appeals to the laws of probability that one will appear more in the media coverage than the other................

Spare me that probability BS! A muslim non fatally stabbed a person in a bus station in london and we couldnt rest, they kept posting the same thing over and over again, im not talking about recurrence here, im talking about how negative stories on muslims gets more airtime and is subject of countless hours of coverage.

Obviously they cant completely cover it up, how could they? the world is too advanced for that, but you can clearly tell that if it were a muslim that did this in a church we wouldnt hear the last of it. Terrorist this, terrorist that, why is no one calling this man a terrorist?

This has nothing to do with probability, you clearly dont understand where i'm coming from!