[url=http://www.vanguardngr.com/2009/12/19/soludo%E2%80%99s-clearance-for-anambra-2010-guber-poll-tears-scourt-apart/] Vanguard Writes
[/url]The ruling handed down, last Thursday, by a five -member panel of the Supreme Court clearing Prof Charles Soludo to run for the Anambra gubernatorial poll slated for February 6, 2010 on the platform of ruling PDP is tearing the apex court apart.

Specifically, Saturday Vanguard authoritatively gathered yesterday that majority of serving justices of the Supreme Court, including the outgoing Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Idris Legbo Kutigi, disagreed with the position of the court on the matter.

According to an impeccable source close to the CJN preferring anonymity, the angry justices of the court believed that the verdict was more political than judicial.

Already, Justice Kutigi had summoned the five justices who sat on the case Thursday to a crucial meeting.
The justices include George Adesola Oguntade, Fedode Tabai, Mohammed Tanko, Olufunmilayo Adekeye and John Fabiyi.

Justice Oguntade delivered the lead ruling in the case

All other justices in the case also delivered their verdicts concurring with Justice Oguntade’s reasoning.

They all honoured the invitation of the CJN with the exception of Justice Oguntade who was said to have flown to Abuja soon after the case Thursday.

Saturday Vanguard visited the Supreme Court yesterday to see the support staff of the apex court discussing the matter in hushed tones.

Some of the apex court staff shared the sentiment of the CJN while others queried his interest in the case.
But a source close to Kutigi said he meant well.

He said he could keep quiet over the issue since he has less than two weeks to retire from the bench.

“Kutigi and other concerned justices were of the view that the bad judgment delivered in Amaechi’s case was enough for the judiciary to contend with. You know the verdict of the Supreme Court in Amaechi’s case impeached certain provision of the 1999 constitution to the effect that you can’t be a state governor without standing election.

“You know Amaechi never stood election and yet he was made a Governor.

“It was a bad judgment and the Supreme Court knows but they are just hiding under the cover of being a final court of the land and explain its position away with another provision of the constitution which forbids independent candidacy.

“You know it was also Justice Oguntade that delivered the lead judgment in the case.
“The fear is that having a multitude of bad judgments is capable of destroying the judiciary,” he added.

What is bad about the judgement ? Is it that the interoctory injuction restraining Soludo from parading himself as a governorship candidate should subsists? Any way,this is a typical romour mongering write-up. It contained no substance. It seems to have been sponsored. It is better to discountenance it in its entirety.

Too late for this.

Vanguard should be ashamed of themselves for allowing such a conjecture to make it to the homepage.

Why did they not tell us what section of the law Kutigi relied upon to say thay the Judgement was not a sound one?

All they claim is that it is like Amaechi's case, it is not. Amaechi was replaced after he has won a primary. But this is not the case with Soludo. Justice Oguntade did not even base his judgement on the validity or otherwise of Soludo's nomination. All he did was to quash the exparte order based on an armateur procedural error by Justice mary odili.

This rulling by the Supreme Court is a very sound one and I will bet my life that vanguard did not hear anything from Kutigi.

Beating a dead dog.

The Supreme Court judgement was superb!It's good to give a level playing ground to all guber aspirants.Justice Mary Odili erred in law by mounting those road blocks on Soludo's way which the Supreme Court eventually removed those impediments.The Supreme Court is doing a good job while the Court of Appeal is not!

Too much soap-opera drama happening in Naija these dayz.