easy

Nice one, i was very sure sm1 else will solve. Guess whats? itsa done. Gud jab

SirMichael1:
Come in here guys. Need your help with this.
carinmom
UltraLeslie1
African101
Otesh22
bennyzer
Funpeter
Jozprecious
larnrry
benson91
darlingnuel

I can solve QT better than this primary sch wahala

How can 3undergraduates find division and multiplication difficult huh How can 3undergraduates find division and multiplication difficult huh

gud4dbest:

---

simple:139*3=417
258*2=516 so no 1 is 113*5=565,d missing no is 6.qns 2 is 996 divided by 3 =332 so d missing no is 3 etc

Is this not too much for a 7/8 year old?

I can't bliv this,av spent over 10mins on this questions. like joke like joke I no gat it,this is serious......


Let me send it to my younger sister on watsapp,I will recheck back in the night,an somehow busy now....

This is 3much mehn!!

owji:


I hope you r really this smart

---

when it comes to mental maths like this, you dont think too far, you just av to reason at their(pry 4pupils) level. Cheers!

dominique:


Is this not too much for a 7/8 year old?

---

actually you may say so.nevertheless, nobody has the beforehand hint to solve a particular Q/A question;you just av to reason it out just as they would also no matter how long it would take to unravel it.

UltraLeslie1:
Did you say Primary 4 pupils ? Damn tough for their age.

Tough for any age. Those kinds of questions were in an asvab test i took more than a decade ago. I just skipped that part of the exam.

answer #1= 6, #2 = 3, #3 = 4, #4 = 6, #5 =2

I observed that most of the home works been given to Primary School children now are indirectly given to their parents to solve as most of them are beyond the cognitive capacity of the children. As parents or others like the OP are the one actually doing it, the children gain nothing from such tasks. Nigeria Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC) should wake up to their responsibilities by assessing these books and determine the age cohorts they are meant for. Developmental milestones should be the guiding principle for the authors and publishers not trying to impress the parents who are mostly illiterates or partially educated.

tohpahz:
Multiply the upper numbers by d center number to get d lower ones.. Easy

hey dear, been a while

The answer to the question is with the teachers...they don't stress themselves in marking them cos the publisher av already given them another book that contain all the answer to d questions...

4+3=7..3×3=9...1×1=1....
but the second example is quite difficult... lemme study it well... yet to know where the 5 is coming from...

Jobabori:
I observed that most of the home works been given to Primary School children now are indirectly given to their parents to solve as most of them are beyond the cognitive capacity of the children. As parents or others like the OP are the one actually doing it, the children gain nothing from such tasks. Nigeria Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC) should wake up to their responsibilities by assessing these books and determine the age cohorts they are meant for. Developmental milestones should be the guiding principle for the authors and publishers not trying to impress the parents who are mostly illiterates or partially educated.

---

GBAM.but the teacher that gave this as an assignment should have solved 1 as an example better still explain the example that comes with it to the pupils.

Very easy, i know the answer

Is not that tough. You only need to reason like pry 4 pupil

Kylekent59:
My advise is that u look at d back of the book,you are going to see the contact of publisher. Call him and I think he can show u d solution.

This really got me laughing my heart out!

SirMichael1:
See What I Saw In A Primary 4 Textbook

Quantitative reasoning for primary school should not be an IQ test question for an undergraduate.

A primary 4 lantern quantitative reasoning question was brought to me and being that I was an undergraduate, I was like... 'Izit noh just a primary 4 work? Bring it jare and lemme dissect it'. Little did I know it was tough! Oboi! Was it tough. Hell yeah! So tough to the extent that myself and two other undergraduates weren't able to solve it.

It shattered my pride (or what was left it) so much so that I had to lie to those who gave me, telling them that I've not looked so much into it. So my nairaland brothers and sisters, nephews and nieces, teachers and students. Should this type of question be given to a primary 4 student? If you can solve it, please do.


Quantitative reasoning for primary school should not be an IQ test question for an undergraduate, don't you think?

Bro, I did this in primary 4. School pass school o

I'm sure I would have found the pattern when I was in primary four...as I'm seeing Laplace transform and Bayesian Inference, I can't be thinking the same way again...








anyway, somebody already solved it...no need to bother again...

Bollinger:


Tough for any age. Those kinds of questions were in an asvab test i took more than a decade ago. I just skipped that part of the exam.

Lolz. And to think kids today are more addicted toTV and mobile games

Whenever my nephews bring their quantitative reasoning for assistance, I look for flimsy excuse to avoid them...


Make them no come fall brother hand.




I beats my imagination how they solve it with ease now...


Those boys are geniuses.

XaintJoel20:
Whenever my nephews bring their quantitative reasoning for assistance, I look for flimsy excuse to avoid them...

Make them no come fall brother hand.

Lol

And it has been solved
139*3=417

417/3=139. For primary 4 dat time I sabi am. Hahahaha

This is the original of the book you bought.. Stop circulating fake information based on fake products... Nigerians

gud4dbest:

---

GBAM.but the teacher that gave this as an assignment should have solved 1 as an example better still explain the example that comes with it to the pupils.

They do most times but they tend to solve the easy ones although not all

AnonyNymous:

I swear! How did your mind even go there?

If you still haven't gotten it, you're to read the top as a whole number (not three separate numbers) and read the bottom as a whole number. The top × the middle number is the bottom

139 × 3 = 417
258 × 2 = 516

Cc nne5

Hiaaaa, how is a pry 4 pupil expected to think that much?

gud4dbest:

---

when it comes to mental maths like this, you dont think too far, you just av to reason at their(pry 4pupils) level. Cheers!

u right

SirMichael1:
See What I Saw In A Primary 4 Textbook

Quantitative reasoning for primary school should not be an IQ test question for an undergraduate.

A primary 4 lantern quantitative reasoning question was brought to me and being that I was an undergraduate, I was like... 'Izit noh just a primary 4 work? Bring it jare and lemme dissect it'. Little did I know it was tough! Oboi! Was it tough. Hell yeah! So tough to the extent that myself and two other undergraduates weren't able to solve it.

It shattered my pride (or what was left it) so much so that I had to lie to those who gave me, telling them that I've not looked so much into it. So my nairaland brothers and sisters, nephews and nieces, teachers and students. Should this type of question be given to a primary 4 student? If you can solve it, please do.


Quantitative reasoning for primary school should not be an IQ test question for an undergraduate, don't you think?

Op unto dis small thing na him you write epistle ? And lalasticlala toke it to FP i thought we trash this quesstion last year or so ?

Anyways Op, like i said then stop treating a simple basic school QR question as Further Maths because it's not Further maths rather it's simple Addition, Multiplication, Subtraction and Division now having said that the answer to your question is: Multiply the top numbers by the middle number and you will arrive the below number, or Divide the below numbers by the middle number and you will have the top number, it's ver very very simple.

Op shame on you and your friend, go to school and read your books, you will not instead you'll be craming and be looking for Roman goddess picture online and be reading meaningless articles, mtcheeew!

Let me give you an example so you will understand.

123
3
369 = 123 * 3 = 369 and 369/3 = 123

Got it ?