This dude you are been dishonest. And its getting childish. You posted a problem and Akin claimed there was an easier way to solve IT (meaning that particular problem) without taking squares. He challenged you to come up with an easier method but you didn't. Then he posted his method which (compared to the taking of squares is far easier and does not require writing anything down). He even asked you to figure out the simple criteria for discarding non-solution pairs in the counting - and you could not figure it out. Now, it appears you are trying to say he claimed something he never did. Akin never said his method will yield non-integer solutions. He made it clear that IF an integer solution exists his method can find it faster than taking squares. Have you forgotten that, those of us on this thread a math lovers and we are following the thread very closely? Learn when/how to move on. It will serve you well in life. You lost this bout, just live to fight another day. Bro.

FisifunKododada:


lol how much is this one going for? You people u na no dey tire? Even the Akin that is the seminal subject of discourse has moved on. But come to think of it Cacawa - didn't Akin say (several times) that his quick/fast method will yield an integer solution IF one exists? So, why are you making it sound like he said his method was some 'almighty' formula? I think you are been dishonest here and its very obvious. Many of us are paying close attention to this thread because its fascinating - so trying to fool people with this passive aggressive lies won't work.

Who says this one will not yield an integer answer??

Ahhhhhhhh!!!!

So you want to use my method to find the answer and see if it actually an integer, before knowing whether your "counting" method will work??


And you call that an intelligent less than. One minute solution?

I thought you were gonna just count from 1 to 56, then when you notice that integers won't work, you then use my method.... I thought that was a very "creative" solution.

Lol.

I know you guys agree with me ... I'm just catching my fun replying you guys

to me akin is no more than a joke....let him go and. solve the unified field problem..

CACAWA:

Lol you really believe he solved that in less than a minute?

Yes - cos I tried it and I figure it out in about one and a half minute.

CACAWA:

Okay here you go, solve this in less than one hour, using same method.
√(x) + √(x+17) = 56

You still don't get it. Akin's method is the easiest/fastest to find an INTEGER solution IF one exists. Knowing that an INTEGER solution DNE is itself knowledge I did not have before counting. Then you can now use squaring both sides to solve for the solution (s) that exist. That is the genius we are talking about here not mindlessly punching numbers in calculators/taking squares etc. without thinking.

FisifunKododada:


Isaac Newton said worst things and nobody doubts his genius. You think very intelligent people are always nice people?

guy don't let the thunder of science strike you there...I have read many biographies of Sir Isaac Newton....and many other great scientists, he is one of the most humble and holy scientist who ever lived....He has never belittled anyone in open....not even Robert Hook (who was his constant opposition)

GodIsBiafran:

Yes - cos I tried it and I figure it out in about one and a half minute.


You still don't get it. Akin's method is the easiest/fastest to find an INTEGER solution IF one exists. Knowing that an INTEGER solution DNE is itself knowledge I did not have before counting. Then you can now use squaring both sides to solve for the solution (s) that exist. That is the genius we are talking about here not mindlessly punching numbers in calculators/taking squares etc. without thinking.

solve this question and stop making noise jorr... Talkative lol

inschool:

guy don't let the thunder of science strike you there...I have read many biographies of Sir Isaac Newton....and many other great scientists, he is one of the most humble and holy scientist who ever lived....He has never belittled anyone in open....not even Robert Hook (who was his constant opposition)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rosspomeroy/2013/11/04/why-was-isaac-newton-such-a-jerk/#270e9f7d6e20

Enjoy

CACAWA:
solve this question and stop making noise jorr... Talkative lol

x = 775.523 Happy now?

inschool:

lol see what the so called Nairaland Mathematical genius is saying...

Lol...That pride won't let him agree that his "trial and error" method will take him absolutely no-where in life.

Okay let's even address the chicken and rabbit question...

Replace the word chicken with "a 4.5kg box" and the word rabbit with "a 2.4kg box"

Now let them use that method of carrying legs up and down again.

GodIsBiafran:


x = 775.523 Happy now?

swear that you Didn't use my method.

Swear that you used his "fastest intelligent creative" method.

CACAWA:
swear that you Didn't use my method.

Swear that you used his "fastest intelligent creative" method.

Bia when did taking squares of both sides become your method? Your are deluded.

GodisBiafra and Cacawa: PLEASE behave yourselves. No need for the insulting back and forth. Have your exchange without the very obvious condescension.

CACAWA:


Who says this one will not yield an integer answer??

Ahhhhhhhh!!!!

So you want to use my method to find the answer and see if it actually an integer, before knowing whether your "counting" method will work??


And you call that an intelligent less than. One minute solution?

I thought you were gonna just count from 1 to 56, then when you notice that integers won't work, you then use my method.... I thought that was a very "creative" solution.

Lol.

I know you guys agree with me ... I'm just catching my fun replying you guys

exactly.... any reasonable mathematician would agree that counting method used by akin is just mere play.....should I say just to show another method...cos in the end one would still use the conventional method before using the so called "counting method"

GodIsBiafran:


Bia when did taking squares of both sides become your method? Your are deluded.

hahahha everyone knows what I meant by "my method"

So again my dear, why DOESNT YOU USING akinpsychiatrist method

When are we gonna discuss some fun math ideas. This preoccupation with Akin is not adding any cells to our brains. Someone needs to come into this thread and liven it up intellectually. Akin where art thou? CC: Akinphysicist

FisifunKododada:
When are we gonna discuss some fun math ideas. This preoccupation with Akin is not adding any cells to our brains. Someone needs to come into this thread and liven it up intellectually. Akin where art thou? CC: Akinphysicist

you mean akinpsychiatrist

FisifunKododada:
When are we gonna discuss some fun math ideas. This preoccupation with Akin is not adding any cells to our brains. Someone needs to come into this thread and liven it up intellectually. Akin where art thou? CC: Akinphysicist

My thoughts exactly. Too many children on this thread this morning. I just PMed Akin. My guess is he is on his way to work. I am leaving soon myself but FK try and liven things up.

YungMillionaire:


My thoughts exactly. Too many children on this thread this morning. I just PMed Akin. My guess is he is on his way to work. I am leaving soon myself but FK try and liven things up.

dude you are Akin yourself. Stop trying to be clever by half.
I know everyone on NL so watch who you lie to

CACAWA:
you mean akinpsychiatrist

Cacawa you really don't like Akin. Did he take something that belongs to you?

FisifunKododada:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rosspomeroy/2013/11/04/why-was-isaac-newton-such-a-jerk/#270e9f7d6e20

Enjoy

The ancestors of science will not forgive u on this...so you deliberately went on Google and searched for "Newton is controversial" or what ever word u used knowing too well that a blogger must have written something close and Google would not hesitate to pour them out for you...let me tell you that no one owns the internet....I can as well write gibberish and post online for any one to believe at his/her peril....
I invoke the holy sprit of science to give you strength to start reading published books in the name of our God of science .....Ameen...I rest my case

CACAWA:
dude you are Akin yourself.

okay sir is dat all?

CACAWA:

Stop trying to be clever by half.

No sir! You ALONE are the clever one here

CACAWA:

I know everyone on NL so watch who you lie to

Yes sir! You know EVERYONE in the UNIVERSE

FisifunKododada:

Cacawa you really don't like Akin. Did he take something that belongs to you?

Oh lawd!!!!!!!!Cacawa has lost his mind. Akin has done a number of his psyche

YungMillionaire:
GodisBiafra and Cacawa: PLEASE behave yourselves. No need for the insulting back and forth. Have your exchange without the very obvious condescension.

The problematic one here is Cacawa. He keeps repeating himself and going around in circles. I actually like his passion for math but he is just too childish for my liking

YungMillionaire:

okay sir is dat all?


No sir! You ALONE are the clever one here



Yes sir! You know EVERYONE in the UNIVERSE

Oh Lawd - please STOP. I am gonna hurt myself from sheer laughter

Thank God Seun created Nairaland otherwise all these mentally unstable people will have nowhere to vent

YungMillionaire:
Thank God Seun created Nairaland otherwise all these mentally unstable people will have nowhere to vent

You don't wanna mention names but you and I know you are talking about the one and only COWCOW

GodIsBiafran:

You don't wanna mention names but you and I know you are talking about the one and only COWCOW

Guys easy on Cacawa. I think he just woke up on the wrong side of the bed. We are having fun here...no yawaz

inschool:

The ancestors of science will not forgive u on this...so you deliberately went on Google and searched for "Newton is controversial" or what ever word u used knowing too well that a blogger must have written something close and Google would not hesitate to pour them out for you...let me tell you that no one owns the internet....I can as well write gibberish and post online for any one to believe at his/her peril....
I invoke the holy sprit of science to give you strength to start reading published books in the name of our God of science .....Ameen...I rest my case

My guy this issue has been studied extensively. Go and do the research

FisifunKododada:


My guy this issue has been studied extensively. Go and do the research

guy chill....am aware of the controversy b/w Newton and some of his contemporaries....but that is far from the way akin responds to critiques here or the way he take others here....

YungMillionaire:
okay sir is dat all?

No sir! You ALONE are the clever one here


Yes sir! You know EVERYONE in the UNIVERSE

Oga Khalid calm down

AkinPhysicist:


Solution
Using simple logic: Imagine the animals all raise one leg. When this is done, there will be a total of 80 – 28 = 52 legs visible. Then imagine each of the animals raising a second leg, then there will be 52 – 28 = 24 legs left. Since the chickens have only two legs, all the 24 legs must belong to the rabbits. Now since the rabbits have already raised two legs, then each of the rabbits must be contributing 2 legs to the 24. Therefore there are 24 divided 2 = 12 rabbits. Therefore, since there are 28 animals in total, then there are 28 – 12 = 16 chickens.

Format mathematics method:
Let X be the number of Chickens and Y be the number of Rabbits. Here is the formal mathematical approach.
X + Y = 28 (1)
2X + 4Y = 80 (2)

Multiply eq.1 by 4:
4X + 4Y = 112 (3)
Subtract eq.2 from eq. 3:
2X = 112 – 80 => 2X = 32 => X = 16 therefore Y = 28 – 16 = 12.

Baba nla, mo tii ri ise yen......I really appreciate it. E ba mi dupe lowo Yungmillionaire

YungMillionaire:


Yes. I assume the name starting with C is your first name and your last name starts with O. Also mail me your phone number.

Yungmilli baba, thanks for the dough.....u will not sell Boeing private jet to buy Raleigh bicycle. I really appreciate