Imagine husband and wife are both working and being paid very well at work. Should the man still be the only one to cater for all the responsibilities and bills (like rent, children school fees, feeding, clothing, light bill, upkeep allowance etc) at home? Then if the husband is taking care of all the bills (as the head of the family), then what role will his 'working class' wife be playing? What will she be doing with her salary/income? You know most naija women don't like 'touching' their money for general use at home. To such women, no matter how much they have, the man should always be the bread provider!

its most time painful

That's to tell you never to marry brainless women. Most of them are wired to be parasites, or the dead sea.

Guys guys, if you are making enough money, this should be the least of your worries.
Men want submissive wives, yet they complain about footing the bills.
It's either one or the other, take care of us and we'll respect you, had over some financial responsibility to us and expect the respect and submissiveness to now be reciprocal.

Simple.
It's just like cooking, it's the ladies primary responsibility to cook, but when the man starts cooking regularly for the family, then she no longer "owns" the home and shouldn't complain when the role is shared with another woman.

Bottom line is everyone should strive to play their roles, men hustle to make money to take care of ALL your family needs, women take care of the home.

rose54321:
Guys guys, if you are making enough money, this should be the least of your worries.
Men want submissive wives, yet they complain about footing the bills.
It's either one or the other, take care of us and we'll respect you, had over some financial responsibility to us and expect the respect and submissiveness to now be reciprocal.

Simple.
It's just like cooking, it's the ladies primary responsibility to cook, but when the man starts cooking regularly for the family, then she no longer "owns" the home and shouldn't be complain when the role is shared with another woman.

Yeah,I quite agree that, when the man has enough,it should be the least of his worries.But most working class wives don't need to be told to support their hubby's financially.They are the neck supporting the head(hubby).Some working class women takes it upon themselves to take care of the feeding and clothing aspect,while the hubby takes care of utility bills and all that.
.
.
.
If a woman loves and respects her hubby,whether she is a career or home keeper shouldn't determine whether she should submit to the hubby.

I think that you should stick to telling your individual experience with your wife, and maybe conduct a poll for other couples. Because it is clear that you do not know a lot regarding this issue. At the risk of making assumptions just like you did, I'm going to say: most women who do not contribute financially to the upkeep of their homes have the luxury of having well-off husbands who do not want them to contribute. Think back to your days growing up (if at all those days are in your past), was there ever a need that you father couldn't provide that your mother wouldn't break her head over? Women in average homes do share the burden with their husbands, whether they are working class women or petty business owners.