felixomor:

Shut up that dirty mouth.
And where is the blood there?
Shebi u said osteocytes receive nutrients from blood which contains heme?
So the heme is now "gap junction"?

You just demonstrated ignorance on osteocytes and it's going to stay with you for long.

Ediort.

You're looking for blood, abi?
Well, here it is. Osteocytes receive nutrition from canaliculi and harvesian canals
https://www.britannica.com/science/osteon

CatfishBilly:

You're looking for blood, abi?
Well, here it is. Osteocytes receive nutrition from canaliculi and harvesian canals
https://www.britannica.com/science/osteon

And those canals are heme and blood ba?

Herbalist!

felixomor:


Your refusal to read keeps highlighting ignorance in your talk.
At first, you showed ignorance about what armitage discovered and claimed it was not written.
I had to bring it out to douse your lack of readership

All of a sudden you have become the expert on what Armitage discovered and trying to approximate it to "osteocyte like cells"

Please allow shame to catch you.
Once again, read the news in whole.
Stop chasing rabbits.

I asked you where Armitage analysed the bone he found to show there was no heme, not if he published due to your statement here, I didn't claim he did not publish.

felixomor:


Unfortunately there is no heme in what we discovered here.
You have now moved to using assumption on heme as full blown evidence.

Besides that experiment you earlier quoted was found to be conducted at room temperature.

We need not say more

Armitage himself referred to them as osteocyte like cells. It's literally in the article he wrote himself.

You have no meaningful rebuttal and you know it.

CatfishBilly:

You're looking for blood, abi?
Well, here it is. Osteocytes receive nutrition from canaliculi and harvesian canals
https://www.britannica.com/science/osteon

You are debating with someone who would rather be deliberately ignorant rather then concede he was Ill informed.

LightandDarkness:


I asked you where Armitage analysed the bone he found to show there was no heme, not if he published due to your statement here, I didn't claim he did not publish.

You are still exposing yourself that you diddnt bother to read before copy pasting.
If you had read and found out, you would have know that using heme to explain was dumb.

LightandDarkness:

Armitage himself referred to them as osteocyte like cells. It's literally in the article he wrote himself.

You have no meaningful rebuttal and you know it.

Keep quiet please

He referred to them as osteocyte like cells because they had just been discovered then.
Until confirmation, thats how observations are reported
And the cells possessed all features of osteocytes.
Also because they are equivalent of osteocytes in humans and other animals.

Meanwhile, to further expose you
And since you are now expert on Armitage work,
Did you see any heme in his work discovery?

In summary Your explanation with heme was useless.
Humble yourself and accept that
because you failed to read Armitage work before copying and pasting

Or you want to still clutch straws?

LightandDarkness:


You are debating with someone who would rather be deliberately ignorant rather then concede he was Ill informed.

Says the person who just ignorantly told us osteocytes receive blood and heme.

The joke is on you guys.

felixomor:


And those canals are heme and blood ba?

Herbalist!

The canals supply blood which contains heme to the osteocytes, olodo rabata.

felixomor:


Says the person who just ignorantly told us osteocytes receive blood and heme.

The joke is on you guys.

So osteocytes have no blood supply whatsoever. You must have gotten your medical degree at oluwole university.

CatfishBilly:

The canals supply blood which contains heme to the osteocytes, olodo rabata.

As in, just the level of stupidity is shocking, and he wants to tell me he's a doctor. Bleep.

LightandDarkness:


As in, just the level of stupidity is shocking, and he wants to tell me he's a doctor. Bleep.

It's a Christianity thing. They are just dumb fellows.

LightandDarkness:


So osteocytes have no blood supply whatsoever. You must have gotten your medical degree at oluwole university.

Olodo!
Even with google in your hands.
The funniest thing is that you are even trying to accuse the person lecturing you of being fake.

You are shamelessly shameless

CatfishBilly:

The canals supply blood which contains heme to the osteocytes, olodo rabata.

Keep quiet, Foolish quack

"Osteocyte. ... When osteoblasts become trapped in the matrix that they secrete, they become osteocytes. Osteocytes are networked to each other via long cytoplasmic extensions that occupy tiny canals called canaliculi, which are used for exchange of nutrients and waste through gap junctions.'

Its the Canals that carry blood.
Nutrients reach the osteocytes through gap junctions

You are foolishly trying to swap "canals" for "osteocytes"

Ignorant LightandDarkness read above and educate yourself


Olodo!

felixomor:


Olodo!
Even with google in your hands.
The funniest thing is that you are even trying to accuse the person lecturing you of being fake.

You are shamelessly shameless

I made my points. I referenced published papers.

I challenge you to make yours using published papers too. Not cheap creationist websites, actual papers with methodologies we can all see..

I know you won't because you are nothing but an internet scientist, you can't stand up in a room full of people who know what they are talking about because most of the time you post here you don't know what you're talking about.

If your points were valid and right, you would have given me a rebuttal using articles published in reputable journals as is the standard in the scientific community. Dumbass, the only place where you are a scientist is on nairaland, one of these days you have to post your degree.

CatfishBilly:

So institute of creation research work with the scientific method and publish in peer reviewed science journals? Desperate creationists passing of pseudoscience as actual science. There are a thousand and one reputable scientific journals and not one mentioned the pseudoscientific crap you posted up there.

I remember when you were busy making noise about multi verses and all that and claiming it was actually science when it was full throttle hard core pseudoscience and sci-fi bull crap and you never saw your stupidity even when kingebukasblog slammed you about it but here you are trying to shoot down the same pseudoscience you presented as scientific evidence of an eternal universe.

Oh I guess you did not see felixomors sarcasm.

Felixomor let me have my lunch. Science haf suffered under these retards.

I dey come.

butterflylion:
Felixomor let me have my lunch. Science haf suffered under these retards.

I dey come.

So you can post your ICR articles

LightandDarkness:


[s]I made my points. I referenced published papers.

I challenge you to make yours using published papers too. Not cheap creationist websites, actual papers with methodologies we can all see..

I know you won't because you are nothing but an internet scientist, you can't stand up in a room full of people who know what they are talking about because most of the time you post here you don't know what you're talking about.

If your points were valid and right, you would have given me a rebuttal using articles published in reputable journals as is the standard in the scientific community. Dumbass, the only place where you are a scientist is on nairaland, one of these days you have to post your degree[/s].

Sorry the point you made (with heme) was dumb
because you didnt read Armitage work before pasting it.

And even till now you are still ignorant of the fact that osteocytes dont contact heme.
They exchange nutrition via gap junctions.

And in case you dont know, armitage work is published.

LightandDarkness:


So you can post your ICR articles

Lets even assume you are correct
This does not win arguments

Its called Argumentum ad hominem.
Learn to adress issues directly

butterflylion:
Felixomor let me have my lunch. Science haf suffered under these retards.

I dey come.

Honestly it has suffered

felixomor:


Sorry the point you made (with heme) was dumb
because you didnt read Armitage work before pasting it.

And even till now you are still ignorant of the fact that osteocytes dont contact heme.
They exchange nutrition via gap junctions.

And in case you dont know, armitage work is published.

I didn't read it and yet I referenced it?. My greatest regret with this argument is that we can only have this on nairalamd where it's only a few people who can actually see through the nonsense you post.

Again, next time you want to counter my points, use refernces from published papers or you have no rebuttal fake scientist.

butterflylion:


I remember when you were busy making noise about multi verses and all that and claiming it was actually science when it was full throttle hard core pseudoscience and sci-fi bull crap and you never saw your stupidity even when kingebukasblog slammed you about it but here you are trying to shoot down the same pseudoscience you presented as scientific evidence of an eternal universe.

Oh I guess you did not see felixomors sarcasm.

Sleek!

LightandDarkness:


[s]I didn't read it and yet I referenced it?. My greatest regret with this argument is that we can only have this on nairalamd where it's only a few people who can actually see through the nonsense you post.

Again, next time you want to counter my points, use refernces from published papers or you have no rebuttal fake scientist.[/s]

Lobbish!

I even forgot one question you copped out from

"Why the university lost?"

In short, rest

Evolution does not depend on chance. It occurs via NATURAL SELECTION.

butterflylion:


I remember when you were busy making noise about multi verses and all that and claiming it was actually science when it was full throttle hard core pseudoscience and sci-fi bull crap and you never saw your stupidity even when kingebukasblog slammed you about it but here you are trying to shoot down the same pseudoscience you presented as scientific evidence of an eternal universe.

Oh I guess you did not see felixomors sarcasm.

Pseudoscience bullshitt that gets published in science journals?
This is what a scientific journal looks like, that's Aguirre's model. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301042
You don't even know what pseudoscience is. No wonder you're pushing ICR

CatfishBilly:

Pseudoscience bullshitt that gets published in science journals?
This is what a scientific journal looks like, that's Aguirre's model. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301042
You don't even know what pseudoscience is. No wonder you're pushing ICR

If they call u journal and wikipedia doctor now, you will start ranting.

CatfishBilly:

Pseudoscience bullshitt that gets published in science journals?
This is what a scientific journal looks like, that's Aguirre's model. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301042
You don't even know what pseudoscience is. No wonder you're pushing ICR

If they call u journal and wikipedia doctor now, you will start ranting.

And if you think that mentioning ICR upandan will win an argument for you, it shows you dont know the fallacy called ad hominem.

People at ICR are college professors and doctors in different schools who know their onions.
If you cant adress their points, then keep quiet

felixomor:


If they call u journal and wikipedia doctor now, you will start ranting.

Sure, since in your community, it's forbidden for a doctor to regularly update his knowledge. No wonder you're still stuck in the past.

CatfishBilly:

Sure, since in your community, it's forbidden for a doctor to regularly update his knowledge. No wonder you're still stuck in the past.

Real doctors dont copy and paste blindly.
And lest i forget they don't misdiagnose

CatfishBilly:

Pseudoscience bullshitt that gets published in science journals?
This is what a scientific journal looks like, that's Aguirre's model. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301042
You don't even know what pseudoscience is. No wonder you're pushing ICR

Herbalist one question and one question only and if you can answer it truthfully then your own stupidity would be slapping you in the face and anally assaulting you.

IS THE MULTIVERSE HYPOTHESIS A SCIENTIFIC THEORY?

go ahead and answer.

Catfishbilly I am waiting for my answer. I do not need many words to always shoot you down. My case and your own is like Papa and pikin own with you being the pikin.

So IS THE MULTIVERSE HYPOTHESIS A SCIENTIFIC THEORY?

Oponu! You think I did not deliberately include hypothesis in what I typed? Unlike you I am analytical and shoot straight.

Okay let's go there.

Thanks for explaining how models work so tell me if your models have been scientifically tested and proven. Can the multiverse model be scientifically proven?

I await your answer.