mofeoluwadassah:
if there will be no sex.....then i can put it into consideration

Essentials1:
thats only what a prostitute would say, because without the money there is no reason why she will be sleeping with men.
.
But I knew you were joking so i will laugh it off.

mofeoluwadassah:
so he will just be banging me with nothing to offer shey...i hear you

marisdgreat:

baddest guy

PrimadonnaO:
There is something inherently wrong with this question, and as far as I am concerned, it stems from human selfishness. Can anyone live without money? It is a necessity that has no substitute. So, how then does a guy expect to not meet certain financial needs of a woman he claims to love? She needs money to exist and more than that, to enjoy a few luxuries now and again.
A girl is justified in having those expectations when entering into a relationship. Any man who denies and cuts short those expectations is merely self -centeted and it has got nothing to do with being "wise" as a lot of guys tend to explain it.

What I do not support, however, is when a girl goes into a relationship with the primary intent of being a financial beneficiary. That's wrong. I also do not support a girl being primarily dependent on a guy to fix all of her financial issues at all times. Very importantly, too. A relationship should be hinged on give and take, but without keeping scores.

Next2Bezee:


If a girl in a relationship feels she deserves luxury, she is at liberty to go get them herself. She is in a relationship with her bf and not her father. Any girl who enters into a relationship with the intention of being pampered financially is already a liability that will be discarded as soon as she no longer serves any purpose.

A woman should have pride. There is nothing wrong in asking your partner for money if you need financial support. What is wrong is when she looks down on him & abuses him when he can't provide. These kind of women should have respect for themselves.

No one is at liberty to pamper you and take care of your needs for life, you're not a queen. Even your parents will want you to be independent at a certain age.

The real OGs are those ladies out there hustling and reigning it in financially despite the challenges, those are the women that are respected...not the small oloshos that expect to be pampered by their bfs because they have a ponyor.

PrimadonnaO:
There is something inherently wrong with this question, and as far as I am concerned, it stems from human selfishness. Can anyone live without money? It is a necessity that has no substitute. So, how then does a guy expect to not meet certain financial needs of a woman he claims to love? She needs money to exist and more than that, to enjoy a few luxuries now and again.
A girl is justified in having those expectations when entering into a relationship. Any man who denies and cuts short those expectations is merely self -centeted and it has got nothing to do with being "wise" as a lot of guys tend to explain it.

What I do not support, however, is when a girl goes into a relationship with the primary intent of being a financial beneficiary. That's wrong. I also do not support a girl being primarily dependent on a guy to fix all of her financial issues at all times. Very importantly, too. A relationship should be hinged on give and take, but without keeping scores.

PrimadonnaO:


All you've done is highlighted sections and extremely analysed it. I'm afraid we aren't on the same page, Sir.
I have no respect for liabilities either. But a woman needs pampering, no matter how independent she is. Perhaps I wasn't emphatic enough when I said I don't support those who come into relationships with the intent of heaping their financial needs on a man.
Let's take Beyoncé for instance. She can do more than look after herself and pay her bills, but Jay-Z's still got to step in, whether or not she asks for it, whether or not she needs it...and spoil her, too.

Next2Bezee:


Who told you Beyonce doesn't pay her own bills or pamper herself? Was she with Jay-z from birth?? Only lazy women believe they are entitled to pampering. A man can choose to shower his wife or gf with gifts, same way a girl can choose to shower her husband or bf with gifts. Its a choice not a birth right or an entitlement.

You can't claim not to be in support of women who enter relationships to be financial liabilities but then still claim that women are entitled to pampering. It's like trying to look left and right at the same time.

PrimadonnaO:


I'm done with you...

mofeoluwadassah:
if there will be no sex.....then i can put it into consideration

dukeprince50:
what do you mean by no sex? I'll give you money but I'll touch u first, even ATM cannot dispense cash without bin touched.

Stellie:
babe ,. U serious??