frosbel:

You also doubt Boko Haram and the Jos issue, lol.

I rest my case.

I love your sarcasm but can you at least stop pretending that you care when you raise these issues on threads.

hatch#:

I love your sarcasm but can you at least stop pretending that you care when you raise these issues on threads.

hatch please please I beg you, stop jumping into my posts and defacing sensible comments.

Go take a hike if you have a problem.

frosbel:

You also doubt Boko Haram and the Jos issue, lol.  

I rest my case.  

Boka Haram and Jos Mayhem can only be compared with what is happening in war fronts like Iraq, afghanistan, Sudan, Tamil Tigers etc.  but you cannot compare them with logical assertions that lies only on suspicions like WTC bombing, UK train bombing, Mutallab bombing, russia bombing of yesterday etc.

the difference is that, the former are physical while the later are logical.

frosbel:

hatch please please I beg you, stop jumping into my posts and defacing sensible comments.

Go take a hike if you have a problem.

Chickens will always come home to roost !
Or when they say that if you must eat with the devil,make sure that your fork or spoon is long enough. Did you think they were kidding ?
You dare to make remarks about in other threads that i have carefully avoided .

LOL ! Let us call spades spades when we see them and not turn blind eyes on the obvious. The fact remains that your post is ridden with propaganda bullets.

hatch#:

Chickens will always come home to roost !
Or when they say that if you must eat with the devil,make sure that your fork or spoon is long enough. Did you think they were kidding ?
You dare to make remarks about in other threads that i have carefully avoided .

LOL ! Let us call spades spades when we see them and not turn blind eyes on the obvious. The fact remains that your post is ridden with propaganda bullets.

Carefully avoid my threads,

Anyway you win, if that sooths your ego.

bashdecash:

Boka Haram and Jos Mayhem can only be compared with what is happening in war fronts like Iraq, afghanistan, Sudan, Tamil Tigers etc.  but you cannot compare them with logical assertions that lies only on suspicions like WTC bombing, UK train bombing, Mutallab bombing, russia bombing of yesterday etc.

the difference is that, the former are physical while the later are logical.

Bin Laden admitted to the WTC attacks. Video footage of the attackers dictating their wills have been outed. WTF do you mean by 'logical assertions'?

bashdecash:

an inside job just like the Mutallab case which is still not clear.

I stopped taking you seriously after reading this. Were i frosbel, i'd take all your reassurances with a pinch of salt.

texazzpete:

Bin Laden admitted to the WTC attacks. Video footage of the attackers dictating their wills have been outed. WTF do you mean by 'logical assertions'?


I stopped taking you seriously after reading this. Were i frosbel, i'd take all your reassurances with a pinch of salt.

i dont believe Bin Laden admitted to the bombing of WTC, those videos and tapes were produced in the studio of those incredible media houses who seek pleasure in propagating falsehood.

they propagated so many falsehoods like Iraq Nuclear possession as orchestrated by G.W. Bush and co. i dont have time to go into details about the Mutallab boy case, at least the boy said he is not guilty according to what they told us.

here is an attachment on what Bn Laden said in his interview.

texazzpete:

Bin Laden admitted to the WTC attacks. Video footage of the attackers dictating their wills have been outed. WTF do you mean by 'logical assertions'?

I stopped taking you seriously after reading this. Were i frosbel, i'd take all your reassurances with a pinch of salt.

@texazzpete, bashdecash;

bin laden never admitted to the 911 attacks. Go and read the official 911 report. There is the declassified 911 report compiled by the US congress committee on 911, it is now in the form of a book, so u can read it. However, there is a guy nicknamed KSM (Khalid Sheikh Mohammed), who is said to have confessed as the master mind of the 911 attacks. He was suposed to be tried in NY but among other things, recently he has denied any guilt and is claiming he was coerced.

Bin laden is just the number one suspect because he is the alleged leader of AlQaeda. Infact, his statement after the attack is that: we are not afraid of saying we have attcked the enemy. Though we didnt attack the enemy, we are very happy and fully endorse the act. (or sumthing like that)

As far as bin laden; he should 1st be caught and convicted in a court. I think they say that a man remains innocent until otherwise proven guilty.

At this point, just for clarification, I FULLY CONDEMNED THOSE ATTACKS. i'm just reacting to your post that bin laden claimed responsibility

@texazzpete,

and yes, the book says that some of the attackers (i think about 3 of them not sure) left footage of their plan. but no mention of bin laden was made in that footage. if the attacker leaves footage of his intent, how does that translate to bin ladens admission?