Men are superior to women and therefore have more responsibilities than women. Women are superior to children, and therefore have more responsibilities than children. Superiority means "leadership over" due to increased maturity and reason, it does not come with a connotation of hate.

Women do not hate children because they're superior to them in the same way that men do not hate women because they're superior to them. Although plenty of men have their hang-ups with women (just as the reverse is true.) Men are more mature than women, who are more mature than children. This is about a hierarchy of maturity, of which men are at the top. The less mature you are, the less reasonable you are. You wouldn't want an immature person in charge of you, and assuming you found someone competent, you wouldn't say you were equal to the person in charge of you.

The problem with people today is women have been told it's bad to let a man be in charge of them, and men have been told to treat women as equal partners rather than subordinate dependants they care for.

You are superior, and you have to be in order to be eligible. That's reality. For the sake of ego preservation on her part, she will want to think of herself as your "first mate" or "partner", but you're not the captain, you're the ship. Without you there is nothing, no base nor foundation. She relies on you VASTLY more than you rely on her, and any functional relationship between a man and a woman is always based on this model.

It doesn't mean she's not important, it means you're depended upon more than you depend on her. It means the distribution of burden is disproportionate in order to reflect your difference in maturity, your burden is greater because her need is greater, her need is greater because she is more immature, and by extension of being less mature, less competent.

In fact, it's dangerous for you to depend on her emotionally, but the reverse is perfectly acceptable and fine. This is the burden that comes with being at the top of the maturity hierarchy. Emotional loneliness. Accepting you cannot confide all your deepest secrets and fears, not unless you're a schmuck who wants to see your relationship fall to shit. Women are so upset they're not really equals that they're completely ignorant to the fact that not being the final person everybody depends on is a privileged position. That when push comes to shove, women want someone to lean on and someone to blame, that true equality to men is something they could never handle. Like a child who wants to stay up late and eat unlimited amounts of candy, they only see the privileges of being a man, not the burdens.

Notice how women always go on about maturity in a way men don't seem to give a Bleep about? They're like the damn maturity police. This reminds me of little kids who insist they're grown-ups out of insecurity. "Women are equal to men!" touted by women is the same infantile narcissism as a child claiming "I'm not a little kid anymore!". It stems from the desire to be taken seriously by people you're less mature and capable than. This is all ego, remember you will find the truth in action rather than words, for in words they claim equality to man, but in action they demand superiority from him.

In relation to the statement "women are children", this is hyperbole, what /u/redpillschool concretely means is "women are childlike" - if they weren't, you wouldn't want them. Feminine charm comes from a certain present-orientation, feminine beauty comes from a lack of ageing.

Women play up innocence and play down their cunning because this is what makes them attractive to men. Innocence is an inherently childlike quality. Men don't try to seem innocent because it's not masculine, things that are childlike are inherently unmasculine, but they aren't unfeminine. Why? Because women are closer to children than men. Stop thinking this is some way of talking women down or some sad attempt at dehumanisation. It isn't. It's a truism regardless of whether it suits your sensibilities.

Shrewd women constantly leverage the appearance of innocence to get people to help them. Women pout, men don't. Women have strops, men don't. Women cry more than men. Women are less rational than men. In summary: women are more mature than children, but less mature than men.

You can teach a woman to behave well, but she is still a woman and so requires discipline in the same way a child does. She craves it. She will not "be good" because "she's a good woman" she will only "be good" because you convey authority, and in order to convey authority, you must be superior, superior meaning more mature and more competent. This is the natural order of things. Egalitarianism is an indoctrinated ideal, it is normal to you because you grew up brainwashed by feminist garbage, but it is not normal in nature, and it is not indicative of reality.

Women's childlike qualities are not just physical (smaller, less hair etc), but their neonatality is likewise echoed mentally. The hottest women have greater neonatal traits than uglier ones. She's not your psychological equal. You can love her, care for her, even depend on her for small things, but she's not your equal and never will be.

As Schopenhauer said, she is somewhere between a child and an adult, an adolescent perhaps. If you can't accept that, if you need to believe in the feminine ego porn that she's your equal in every which way, fine. But that doesn't mean TRP is wrong, it means you're unable to accept an aspect of reality that discomforts you.

I came across this long essay on Reddit.

Where are the feminists of Nairaland, no shots fired my way? In addition to the above , they (feminist bandwagon) lack mental grit to read an averagely long essay or the intalectual ability to process

Drama-free pussy is what we're all after, my friends.

family section now boring, if na before fight for don bust for this thread

Splendid.

To paraphrase Frank Underwood; "they want to be equal when it suits them and they want a man to take charge when it suits them". Really says a lot about the mental state of women. Woe unto that man that actually believes his wife wants him to debase himself to being her equal.

@OP

Rank vs quality. The importance of euphemism on matters like this shouldn't be underestimated. Men have no superiority - aren't higher in quality - over women, but they sure have natural right to claim superior - higher in rank - over women. The earlier you understand that, there's a thin but big difference, between the words "superior (higher in rank)" and "superiority (higher in quality)" in this context the better for you. Leader should be used (in words and action) in stead of superior/superiority - this is my main point.

To this end, tell me that men are higher in rank than women thus the reason why they naturally assume first between equals role when in a relationship (marriage/dating) - and wishes to maintain status quo - and that women (adults) are higher in rank than children (adolescents) I will agree with you. Anything on the contrary is balderdash. At best men have physical strength advantage over women, just as women have physical strength advantage over adolescents.

The only attribute that naturally determines a sane human being's quality is conscientiousness, therefore, the most conscientious between two people - irrelevant of gender and age - automatically has higher quality (lays claim of superiority) and makes better leader. Old age doesn't automatically confer wisdom.

Hey Women! This doesn't mean say una go de let us down, because to be first between equals no easy.

LordKO:
@OP

The importance of euphemism on matters like this shouldn't be underestimated. Men have no superiority (aren't higher in quality) over women, but they sure have natural right to claim superior (higher in rank) over women. The earlier you understand that there's a tiny but big difference between the words "superior (higher in rank)" and "superiority (higher in quality)" the better for you.. . . As nouns the difference between superiority and superior is that superiority is the state of being superior while superior is a person of higher rank or quality.

Hey, your first paragraph makes no sense.

If you feel the woman in your life is more matured than you are, and as result take your position in a relationship then my friend, you are doomed.

Beware of Male Feminists !!!

ositadima1:


Hey, your first paragraph makes no sense.

If you feel the woman in your life is more matured than you are, and as result she should take your position in a relationship then my friend, you are doomed.

I don't join issue with unwise people, so kindly vamoose and look for your small-minded ilk elsewhere.

Lies, husband are superior to there wives by being yhe head of the family not men or women. Their are female bosses who are head of an org .

.

LordKO:
@OP

Rank vs quality. The importance of euphemism on matters like this shouldn't be underestimated. Men have no superiority (aren't higher in quality) over women, but they sure have natural right to claim superior (higher in rank) over women. The earlier you understand that there's a tiny but big difference between the words "superior (higher in rank)" and "superiority (higher in quality)" in this context the better for you. Leader should be used (in words and action) in stead of superior/superiority - this is my main point.

To this end, tell me that men are higher in rank than women thus the reason why they naturally assumes first between equals role when in a relationship (marriage/dating) - and wishes to maintain status quo - and that women (adults) are higher in rank than children (adolescents) I will agree with you. Anything on the contrary is balderdash. At best men have physical strength advantage over women, just as women have physical strength advantage over adolescents.

The only attribute that naturally determines a sane human being's quality is conscientiousness. Therefore, the most conscientious between two people - irrelevant of gender and age - automatically has higher quality (lays claim of superiority) and makes better leader. Old age doesn't confer wisdom automatically.

Hey Women! This doesn't mean say una go de let us down, because to be first between equals no easy.

Wisdom will not kill you