Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,153,371 members, 7,819,331 topics. Date: Monday, 06 May 2024 at 02:32 PM

Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. - Politics (2) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. (5200 Views)

Army Raids Plateau Fulani Settlers, Burns 100 Homes After 2 Soldiers Were Killed / Nigerian Army Opens Up On Why Soldiers Were Sent To COZA Headquarters / Only Igbo Soldiers Were Sent To Fight Boko Haram. (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Ngokafor(f): 5:31pm On Mar 20, 2018
Throwback:


I have no sympathy for you.

It is not my fault that you found yourselves at the obnoxious end of the shortsighted politics of your own leaders.

You are right and I am wrong, yet I am not the one lamenting about the past.


Who needs your sympathy??...dude to hell with you and whatever you represent...mscheww!

6 Likes

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 5:48pm On Mar 20, 2018
Ngokafor:



Who needs your sympathy??...dude to hell with you and whatever you represent...mscheww!

That Ojukwu did not give you food during the war, doesn't mean you cannot digest the below information.



OPEN LETTER OF RESIGNATION TO ODUMEGWU OJUKWU

FROM Robert S. Goldstein

Public Relations Representative of Biafra in the United States
(Published in the Morning Post, Lagos, August 17, 1968)
.

As your Public Relation’s Representative in the United States, it is my distasteful duty to tender my resignation based on the following points:

POINT 1 – In November of 1967 when we met in Umuahia, you and your Cabinet were very impressive. You told me of the woes of your little Republic, that thousands of people had died, were dying and more were prepared to die for freedom’s sake.

You and your Cabinet told me you believed world opinion would help your cause if you could get your story across.
You expressed the opinion that very few if any people in the United States knew of the plight of the Biafrans.

You asked me to tell the world that Britain had teamed up with Russia in a conspiracy with the Federal Government of Nigeria to murder every Ibo in Biafra. You suggested I use my talents to induce the Press to write about the Biafran side of the war, as at that time all news came out of Lagos.

You will recall I did not take the asssignment that day but stayed on several days before deciding to take that job.

To help win the peace

At that time I stated to you and your cabinet that I was taking the assignment making it crystal clear I would try my best to help win the peace not the war.

POINT TWO – I immediately arranged the first world Press conference in Biafra inviting the US Press as well as journalists and television people from England, France, Switzerland, Africa and other parts of the Globe. This was the first news break through. I arranged regular trips into Biafra for the world Press, helped set up stringers, etc., so that your statements and the statements of your Cabinet would be heard.
At that time, I was absolutely positive you were right and your cause was a just one in the best interests of the free world and your countrymen.

POINT THREE – Finally the Republic of Biafra was recognized first by Tanzania, then quickly followed by Gabon, the Ivory Coast and
Zambia. Our public relations work was paying off, world opinion was starting to side with us.

Peace talks were arranged at Kampala. I thought that if anyone walked away from the table it would be the Federal Government. But to my dismay it was Biafra that left the Conference. After all the fighting and killing, I knew that peace would not come easy but I could not understand leaving the Peace Conference until the last point was negotiated and the avenue explored.

POINT FOUR – Then urgent telex messages were received from
‘Biafra’ telling of tens of thousands of people starving in the refugee camps, the villages, the bush country – stating if something weren’t done in the next few months over a million women, children and aged would be starved to death. I immediately contacted the Press, urgently petitioned the State Department for action on their part.

Food, medicine and milk were sent to the only available ports open for immediate shipment to ‘Biafra’ via land routes through Federal and Biafra territory, under the auspices of world organizations such as the International Red Cross among others.

Then came the incredible answer from ‘Biafra’ that land corridors could not be acceptable until there was a complete ceasefire, and that an airlift was the only solution to feed the starving.

You then appeared before the various Heads of State and
representatives of the OAU at Niamey in Niger. I fully expected you to at least accept the world help that was offered your starving
throngs. However, you delayed, hoping to use these unfortunates with world sympathy on their side as a tool to further your ambition to achieve war concessions at the upcoming peace talks in Addis Ababa. Thus innocent victims continue to perish needlessly of starvation, the most agonising death that can befall any living
creature.

POINT FIVE – This was incredible to me. I am now convinced that I have been used by you and your cabinet to help in military
adventures of your origin….using your starving hordes as hostages to negotiate a victory.
If at some later date, following the issuance of this letter, you do concede to allow a mercy land corridor…would you expect me to agree to espouse before the world Press the incredible delay of your decision. What explanation could I honestly give for the needless prolongation of this horror.

Inconceivable acts

I pray this communication may in some small way influence you to move affirmatively, allowing the mercy land corridor to be born.

It is inconceivable to me that you would stop the feeding of
thousands of your countrymen (under auspicies of world
organizations such as the International Red Cross, World Council of Churches and many more) via a land corridor which is the only
practical way to bring in food to help at this time. It is inconcievable to me that men of good faith would try to twist world opinion in such a manner as to deceive people into believing that the
starvation and hunger that is consuming ‘Biafra’ is a plot of Britian, Nigeria and others to commit genocide.

POINT SIX – I cannot in all conscience serve you any longer. Nor can I be a party to suppressing the fact that your starving thousands have the food, medicine and milk available to them…..it can and is ready to be delivered through international organizations to you. Only your constant refusal has stopped its delivery.

I am this date, tendering my resignation and am returning to Mr. Collins Obih of the African Continental Bank all the fees you have given me (Letter of Credit No. 354 $400,000 US.)

I have sent your representative in New York a Bond in the amount of 800.000 pounds that I was holding in your behalf. I have also this date, sent the Bond of 200,000 pounds issues by the Central Bank of Nigeria back to them for disposal.

POINT SEVEN – I am now convinced that one Nigeria is the only solution to peace. I also call upon you Mr. Ojukwu to allow your starving people to be fed. Their well-being is of deep concern to me as well as other right thinking people of the world. Your acting in the utmost haste in this matter is in my opinion the first step toward any lasting peace in your country.


https://www.google.com.gh/amp/s/drbiggie./2013/11/19/open-letter-to-odumegwu-ojukwu-by-robert-s-goldstein-during-the-civil-war/amp/


http://www.citypeopleonline.com/history-101-americas-secret-files-ojukwu/

3 Likes

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by LZAA: 5:49pm On Mar 20, 2018
imhotep:
Lzaa this is a new one oh grin

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 5:53pm On Mar 20, 2018
POINT SIX – I cannot in all conscience serve you any longer. Nor can I be a party to suppressing the fact that your starving thousands have the food, medicine and milk available to them…..it can and is ready to be delivered through international organizations to you. Only your constant refusal has stopped its delivery.

1 Like

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 5:54pm On Mar 20, 2018
POINT FIVE – This was incredible to me. I am now convinced that I have been used by you and your cabinet to help in military
adventures of your origin….using your starving hordes as hostages to negotiate a victory.
If at some later date, following the issuance of this letter, you do concede to allow a mercy land corridor…would you expect me to agree to espouse before the world Press the incredible delay of your decision. What explanation could I honestly give for the needless prolongation of this horror.

1 Like

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 5:55pm On Mar 20, 2018
POINT SEVEN – I am now convinced that one Nigeria is the only solution to peace. I also call upon you Mr. Ojukwu to allow your starving people to be fed. Their well-being is of deep concern to me as well as other right thinking people of the world. Your acting in the utmost haste in this matter is in my opinion the first step toward any lasting peace in your country.

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:25pm On Mar 20, 2018
.
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DerideGull(m): 10:13pm On Mar 20, 2018
GoroTango:
Oga the civil war was not about igbos standing up to the north. The events that led to it are well chronicled so don't try to distort history

There was no distortion to the discourse. How many coups were branded ethnic coup thereafter?
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DerideGull(m): 10:14pm On Mar 20, 2018
imhotep:

It was about crude oil grin

You could not be more correct.

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DerideGull(m): 10:17pm On Mar 20, 2018
Throwback:


Your greed led you to a position where you had to fight.

Yorubas are not backbones to serve the purpose of the Igbos or come to their rescue after fomenting trouble.

Azikiwe was in control of his full senses when he ensured that Nigeria will not have a secession clause, and that such a move would only be settled by war. If only he knew he was sealing the fate of his own people.

You never remembered your Yoruba partners in NCNC when it came to sharing the juicy spoils from your partnership with the North. Yet with greed you wanted more and thought best to eliminate political and military leaders from other regions except yours.

Rather than be grateful that the Yorubas were civilized enough not to have their own pogrom against you in their region, your delusional entitlement makes you expectant that the Yorubas will lay down their life to protect you in the crisis you caused.

You have never been useful to us, we do not owe you any delusional loyalty after an alliance gone wrong with your Northern partners.

What idiotic greed if I may ask? Was there anything Eastern Region of Nigeria tried to deny all other regions in the shithole called Nigeria? The statement about "Yoruba partners in NCNC and sharing the juicy spoils from your partnership with the North" showed that you are very ill-educated about the facts.

3 Likes

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Igboid: 11:46pm On Mar 20, 2018
RE: NigerianID | Re:Robert S. Goldstein (Biafra Public Relations Rep in the USA) - Letter of Resignation to Odumegwu Ojukwu (1968) Dr. Aluko: It is obfuscation at its most blatant to read Goldstein letter outside of the rationale for action taken by Ojukwu and the Biafran leadership. I'll attempt to answer your earlier questions posed to me alonsgide this, because they are related. - The first question was why Ojukwu did not, given that Biafra had shrunk dramatically, not surrender to save starving Biafrans.

- The second is, to link it to the substance of Goldstein's letter, why Ojukwu insisted on ceasefire and the airlift of relief to Biafrans as the only grounds or conditions for accepting relief. First, Ojukwu knew that an internationally observed ceasefire was the only guarantee for the security and safety of the Biafran. Second, the atrocities recorded wherever the federal forces liberated lent credence to that demand. In fact, it made it imperative, particularly because the Lagos regime was not prepared to negotiate in true faith for the amicable end of the conflict.

The war strategy of the Gowon administration was hell-bent on Biafra's complete surrender without guarantees. No political and military leader will agree to that kind of suicide. I'll return to this point. But let me quote from Susan Cronje's quite illuminating book, The World and Nigeria: The Diplomatic History of the Biafran war 1967-1970 ( I'd also recommend that you read the other, Biafra: Britain's Shame). Cronje writes this about the meeting in Niamey referenced by Goldstein: "The Nigerian delegation was led by Chief Awolowo, but General Gowon arrived in Niamey on 16 July and addressed the meeting as an 'observer.'

The main theme of his speech was a warning that if the 'rebels persist in their contemptuous attitude to the conference table the federal government will have no choice but to take over the remaining rebel-held areas...In military terms the rebellion is virtually suppressed already.' But the atmosphere had suibtly changed. hamani diori had altrady suggested that the committee's consultative role should be changed to a mediatory one, and after Gowon's address the committee went into closed session. Eventually it was announced that that Ojukwu had been asked to attend, and Gowon who had already returned to Lagos flew back to Niamey the following day, cancelling all engagements. His presence in Niamey was required not for a meeting with Ojukwu but to reply to a truce proposal put forward among others by General Ankrah. This called for a ten-mile wide demilitarized zone patrolled by neutral troops to allow relief supplies to pass to Biafran refugees. According to one account of the debate, Gowon is said to have turned to General Ankrah, saying, 'You are a military man: you know what it is with commanders.'

The suggestion that he might be unable to restrain his army was reinforced when he warned the committee that if it did not see things his way they would have to have 'a Nigeria without me.' According to a Niamey radio report the following day, General Gowon rejected the resolution put to him by the O.A.U. committee; the main points of this resolution were the establishment of a demilitarized zone and 'an international force which would include neutral observers acceptable to both sides.' Ghana and Cameroun, the broadcast said, had offered shipping facilities for moving relief supplies. Ojukwu arrived in Niamey on 19 July in President Houphet-Boigny's private jet.

The Biafran delegation, when it was fully assembled, included Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, the former Nigerian president, Dr. Okpara, former Eastern Nigerian premier, Sir Louis Mbanefo, Dr. Eni Njoku and several other notables; Lagos was not far off in suggesting that the 'entire rebel leadership' had assembled in Niger. At the end of the meeting between Ojukwu and the consltative committee - Gowon had returned to Lagos two days previously - a communique was issued. Two versions appear to be in existence; the one broadcast by Niamey radio read:

(1) the Nigerian Federal Military Government and Colonel Ojukwu have agreed to meet immediately in Niamey under the chairmanship of President Diori Hamani in order to begin preliminary talks on a speedy resumption of Nigerian peace negotiations;

(2) the Nigerian Federal Military Government and Colonel Ojukwu have agreed to resume as soon as possible peace negotiations in Addis Ababa under the auspices of the O.A.U Consultative Committee on Nigeria.' The version as broadcast by Lagos - and which does not pretend to be a verbatim report - said that the committee had called on both parties to resume peace talks as soon as possible, '... with the objecvtive of preserving Nigeria's territiorial integrity and guaranteeing the security of all its inhabitants.' The committee said, according to this broadcast, that 'it will be in contact with the federal military government, and Ojukwu or his representativs may at any time contact any member government of the committee.' The Lagos version went on to cite two further point of which ther was no mention in the Niamey version, both dealing with relief, and appealing to the two sides to undertake various mesures to alleviate the suffering among war victims.

In view of the strong criticism that has been levelled at the Biafran leadership for its intrasigence, and the high praise heaped o General Gowon and his Government for humanitarian concern and magnanimity, it should be stressed that in Niamey Gowon rejected the O.A.U proposals for a partial truce and international policing of relief routes, while Ojukwu was prepared to accept both these proposals. When Ojukwu returned to Biafra, he gave a press conference at which he was asked whether his invitation to the OAU had meant any form of recognition of him. For once Ojukwu was cautious in his reply: 'Let's put it this way. My presence in Niamey for once represents the O.A.U's acceptance that there are two sides to a conflict.' He would not reveal any further details about the forthcoming Addis Ababa peace talk, but said, 'I find myself in a rather simillar situation as after Aburi.' He did not want to say anything in case Lagos started 'interpreting it, and go back to square one..." (302-303)

The foregoing provides the clear context of the situation, that it was not Ojukwu, but Gowon who rejected the proposals by which Ojukwu and the Biafran leadership was prepared to abide.The context is clearly established and makes nonsense of Golsdstein's ground for resignation.

While the Biafran government was prepared to act without precondition, the Nigerian authorities persistenly insisted on Biafran surrender. It was a deliberate and determined argument made to make certain that the only solution was by a military solution because Lagos knew that the basic grounds on which it made its offer of relief was conditional and unconscionable.

It was to disavow the very basic reason why Biafra defended itself in the first place: its sovereignty as a means to the safety, security and dignity of its population. Now, were the Gowon administration acting in good faith, that would be a differet matter. What guaratees could Biafrans have, had Ojukwu surrendered as a condition for food? None. Here is the evidence narrated by John Stremlau in his The International Politics of the Nigerian Civil War how Gowon's cable upturned the agreements reached in May 1968 in kampala between Eni Njoku and Enahoro in which Eni Njoku had in fact "conceded the evntuality of one-Nigeria."

As Stremalau notes, "Whereas Enahoro had left acceptance of the twelve-state structure implicit in his propsals, Gowon insisted that before any agreement was reached the rebels must explictly embrace the twelve states. In addition, Gowon stipulated that there would be no question of an interim commission for the rebel-held areas, there would be no recruitment and formation of Ibo units into the federal armed forces, and no elements of the rebel troops or police would be allowed to retain their arms. Gowon's instruction, which did not reach Kampala until shortly after Enahoro had made his presentation, clearly reflected the views of the more hawkish elements in the federal government" (172-173).

To put these in summary: (a) Ojukwu did not reject relief, he wanted the security and guarantee of safety for Biafrans. He was in fact willing to accept the O.A.U's proposals

(b) Gowon and the Lagos administration manipulated international propaganda, as testified in the versions of the broadcasts of the Niamey agreement to further its own goals of the liquidation of Biafra

(c) The federal government was not, in spite of all the efforts made by the Biafrans willing to negotiate peace, they were hell-bent on "surrender" as the only condition for the survival of the Biafran population.

If anybody must bear responsbility, it must be those who kept using the talks to elongate the suffering of the civilian population, and clearly this are the 'hawks" who placed the only condition for peace on Biafra's surrender and liquidation. And there, you have it.
Obi Nwakanma

4 Likes 1 Share

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Igboid: 11:47pm On Mar 20, 2018
“Its (mass starvation) is a legitimate aspect of war (Anthony Enahoro, Nigerian Commissioner for Information at a press conference in New York, July 1968)

“Starvation is a weapon of war, and we have every intention of using it against the rebels” (Mr Alison Ayida, Head of Nigerian delegation, Niamey Peace talks, July 1968.)

“The Igbos must be considerably reduced in number”, Lagos Policeman quoted in New York Review 21 December, 1967)


“Until now efforts to relieve the Biafran people have been thwarted by the desire of the central government to pursue total and unconditional victory and by the fear of the Ibo people that surrender means wholsesale atrocities and genocide. But genocide is what is taking place right now- and starvation is the grim reaper. This is not the time to stand on ceremony, or go through channels or to observe diplomatic niceties. The destruction of an entire people is immoral objective, even in the most moral of wars. It can never be condoned”, (Richard Nixon, during the presidential campaign, September 9, 1968)

“All is fair in war, and starvation is one of the weapons of war. I don’t see why we should feed our enemies fat in order for them to fight harder”, (Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Nigerian Minister of Finance, July 28, 1969)

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by horsepower101: 11:54pm On Mar 20, 2018
New York Times: They Fled Boko Haram, Only to Be Raped by Nigeria’s Security Forces

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/08/world/africa/boko-haram-nigeria-security-forces-rape.html


This is what nigerian military is good at. They also did it to liberian and sierra leonean women.

So many reports of rape during their missions in those countries.

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Nobody: 12:50am On Mar 21, 2018
Throwback:


Go and laugh over the graves in Biafra.

Those that laughed and gloated like you after the Jan 1966 coup, never had the opportunity to ever laugh and gloat heartily in the rest of their lifetime.

Over the graves in Biafra, like for real?
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by SakuraSimiola: 1:26pm On Mar 21, 2018
This is why people hate us.

This is why Nigeria does not work.

The blockade was civilian genocide. It had nothing to do with the military.

These were children who had nothing to do with the politics of grown men.

Starving children is WRONG

It's wrong in Igbo culture.

It's wrong in Hausa culture.

It's wrong in Yoruba culture.

In 2018 we cannot justify our forefathers starving millions of children and call ourselves civilised.

And we wonder why these people hate us.




Throwback:








Biafra was unable to provide food security for its citizens. It was not Nigeria's obligation to provide or allow food to a separatist state that had already been successfully blockaded.

It claimed to have the greatest army known to black Africa, yet that great army could not secure food for its citizens.

The mere situation that they were dependent on Nigeria's mercy to allow food pass through Nigeria into Biafra, already suggest that they were already defeated and were expected to surrender, which is the ultimate plan of the economic blockade as detailed by Azikiwe when he outlined what would be done to the North if they attempt to secede illegally, Azikiwe having ensured that there was no allowance for secession in our constitution.

Sanctions, embargoes, blockades are not imposed for fun. They are imposed to hurt and force a retraction of policy or position. If you chose to suffer and persist, please don't look for pity now. If you choose to persist only to capitulate eventually, then it is only evident that living in denial can never become reality.

Ojukwu starved millions of children who needed a leader that wasn't mad. A beggar who felt he could dictate terms to the Nigerian government over the use of its own airspace, and ultimately employing famine and genocide as an international media propaganda that eventually sickened the very international media consultant whom Ojuku hired. Such that they turned round to beg Ojukwu to let his people have food.

However, the mad man knew how to preserve himself and his family, and ensured they never suffered until an eventual escape to avoid the death he willfully imposed on others.

There is no admission to make to a people who say others are cowards and they are not. Even the current democratic debates and discussions on how to restructure the country is considered as begging by the same people who insist that is weakness and cowardice.

Peace is the price for cowardice, while misery is the result of blind arrogance and delusional self evaluation.

I have no admission to make to such who chose their own path while I chose mine.

4 Likes

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 1:43pm On Mar 21, 2018
SakuraSimiola:
This is why people hate us.

This is why Nigeria does not work.

The blockade was civilian genocide. It had nothing to do with the military.

These were children who had nothing to do with the politics of grown men.

Starving children is WRONG

It's wrong in Igbo culture.

It's wrong in Hausa culture.

It's wrong in Yoruba culture.

In 2018 we cannot justify our forefathers starving millions of children and call ourselves civilised.

And we wonder why these people hate us.





They hate Yorubas for many reasons.

Firstly you dare to become premier in your own tribal region when an Igboman migrant was also aspiring to the post.

You dared to win a war where they wanted to ilegally secede and attempted to invade the SouthWest in a bid to keep the war tied down in Yorubaland, while the aggressors would be enjoying peace in their own region.

They love to gloat to other tribes but have realised gloating to the Yorubas is a case of a child boasting to his teacher.

If Ojukwu refused to surrender after being defeated with a successful economic blockade, the result is what they suffered, only to later surrender after Ojukwu ran away to preserve his own and his family's cherished life.

If Ojukwu refused to accept the land corridor always offered by the Nigerian side as the route to allow food get to Biafra, then the blood of the dead is on the head of Ojukwu. Little wonder he died as an invalid while his contemporaries like Gowon and Obasanjo look fit as ever.

If Biafra failed to secure food for its people being already landlocked inside Nigeria as the federal forces had already secured the coastal territories, then that failed republic was only hoping to win the war by mercy and media propaganda, which it did do and failed.

Mercy only has its place in war after a surrender, not before. Also a beggar can never dictate terms by which it will receive humanitarian supplies, such that it insisted on the air route so as to stealthily import weapons to ensure the war continued.

Of good note is that all that was done as police action to get the illegal Biafra to retrace its step, were the very actions that Azikiwe outlined as punitive measures that will be taken by Nigeria against the North if that region tried to illegally secede from Nigeria, as he had already ensured that secession was not allowed in the constitution.

And we wonder why these people reject the very practices, policies, rules, laws and decree they foisted on Nigeria.


In 2018 we cannot justify the stupidity of continuing in a war when you are already at the mercy of your enemy, only to surrender eventually.

3 Likes

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 2:01pm On Mar 21, 2018
Igboid:
“Its (mass starvation) is a legitimate aspect of war (Anthony Enahoro, Nigerian Commissioner for Information at a press conference in New York, July 1968)

“Starvation is a weapon of war, and we have every intention of using it against the rebels” (Mr Alison Ayida, Head of Nigerian delegation, Niamey Peace talks, July 1968.)

“The Igbos must be considerably reduced in number”, Lagos Policeman quoted in New York Review 21 December, 1967)


“Until now efforts to relieve the Biafran people have been thwarted by the desire of the central government to pursue total and unconditional victory and by the fear of the Ibo people that surrender means wholsesale atrocities and genocide. But genocide is what is taking place right now- and starvation is the grim reaper. This is not the time to stand on ceremony, or go through channels or to observe diplomatic niceties. The destruction of an entire people is immoral objective, even in the most moral of wars. It can never be condoned”, (Richard Nixon, during the presidential campaign, September 9, 1968)

“All is fair in war, and starvation is one of the weapons of war. I don’t see why we should feed our enemies fat in order for them to fight harder”, (Chief Obafemi Awolowo, Nigerian Minister of Finance, July 28, 1969)



Why were you still fighting a war when you were already at the mercy of your enemy?

The moment you were encircled by your opponent, common logic should have told you it was time to negotiate a surrender then, rather than capitulate to an unconditional surrender later.

Besides I remember it was also Biafran boast then that they would rather have weapons than to have food? Why didn't they chew on the weapons when hunger finally descended?

You were ready for war only to cry later that you were not shown mercy.

Even the Igbos who were still being accommodated in Lagos, upon hearing that Biafran forces were at MidWest region and approaching the West, were noted to have been rejoicing and boasting to their Yoruba accommodators that Ojukwu will soon bomb Lagos.

That is how vile and suicidally senseless a creature you are.

3 Likes

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by uba1991: 2:22pm On Mar 21, 2018
gidgiddy:


The same Yorubas who are today begging the North for control of their own land via restructuring. At least Igbos rose and fought, what did Yorubad do except embrace slavery to the North?

I would rather fight and lose than become a willing slave without a fight
The funny thing u are writing dis trash from Yoruba land. go back to poto poto land so dat we ll knw u ar not a slave

1 Like

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DeeMain(m): 2:27pm On Mar 21, 2018
Repeated
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DeeMain(m): 2:47pm On Mar 21, 2018
Throwback:


Fight and lose, it is your headache. Stop wailing like babies in the aftermath that you were killed and impoverished. You should be proud of the fight you invited.

When you were forming alliance and enjoying the spoils, you did not know you were embracing slavery.

When Azikiwe was insisting that Nigeria must not have a secession clause you did not know you were embracing slavery.

When Azikiwe was detailing how the North will be economically blockaded if it attempts to secede, you did not know you were detailing your own sorrow.

When you were establishing a unitary government, you did not know you will become perpetual losers under such arrangement.

Igboman, stop courting my sympathy. When you were dictating the type of Nigeria you now reject, having found yourselves as followers rather than leaders, all was well with that Nigeria.

I have no sympathy to give you. Continue fighting with those you aligned with.

When there was a need to fight for Democracy and the rights of the Yorubas, we fought and won. The current democracy allows for debate to chart a new direction for the country, but such constitutionally recognised debates are considered begging by a tribe that would rather self destruct like a blind fool, only to ask others why they did not come to its aid.

Continue fighting your own fight to undo the errors of your elders who lacked foresight.

Beautiful nonsense. All warped logic and zero heart.

You sir is the definition of a seared callous mind.

For your information Nnamdi Azikiwe, Ironsi or even the coup plotters' sins do not represent the Igbo nation's sins just like Jonathan's sins did not represent that of the entire Ijaw nation.

These people were humans that made mistakes, erred and had weaknesses just like Obafemi Awolowo and the rest of us. Stop equating the wisdom or lack of it and the mistakes of one man or a group of men to that of their whole tribe.

It's this sort of tribal stereotype and propaganda that led to the pogrom and the subsequent civil war which we are still on the aftermath till this day.

Do well to find your lost humanity young man. Feel. Empathize. Swap places. Use your brain to make the world a better place.

3 Likes

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by DejiSantos: 5:29pm On Mar 21, 2018
It's sad that you have many of our compatriots.

Trying to rationalise the starvation of our children.

It's disgusting.

Trying to blame it Ojukwu. Kmt.
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by InfiniteLoopx: 5:30pm On Mar 21, 2018
Throwback is a devil incarnate. May the experiecne of innocent fallen Biafran children be the portion of his future generation. angry angry
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by SakuraSimiola: 9:33pm On Mar 21, 2018
Someone is telling you starving children is wrong.

And your response is

Mercy only has its place in war after a surrender, not before.


You see the psychopaths our nation produces?

This is the legacy of hatred. Where we hate each other so much we justify the unjustifiable.


Throwback:


They hate Yorubas for many reasons.

Firstly you dare to become premier in your own tribal region when an Igboman migrant was also aspiring to the post.

You dared to win a war where they wanted to ilegally secede and attempted to invade the SouthWest in a bid to keep the war tied down in Yorubaland, while the aggressors would be enjoying peace in their own region.

They love to gloat to other tribes but have realised gloating to the Yorubas is a case of a child boasting to his teacher.

If Ojukwu refused to surrender after being defeated with a successful economic blockade, the result is what they suffered, only to later surrender after Ojukwu ran away to preserve his own and his family's cherished life.

If Ojukwu refused to accept the land corridor always offered by the Nigerian side as the route to allow food get to Biafra, then the blood of the dead is on the head of Ojukwu. Little wonder he died as an invalid while his contemporaries like Gowon and Obasanjo look fit as ever.

If Biafra failed to secure food for its people being already landlocked inside Nigeria as the federal forces had already secured the coastal territories, then that failed republic was only hoping to win the war by mercy and media propaganda, which it did do and failed.

Mercy only has its place in war after a surrender, not before. Also a beggar can never dictate terms by which it will receive humanitarian supplies, such that it insisted on the air route so as to stealthily import weapons to ensure the war continued.

Of good note is that all that was done as police action to get the illegal Biafra to retrace its step, were the very actions that Azikiwe outlined as punitive measures that will be taken by Nigeria against the North if that region tried to illegally secede from Nigeria, as he had already ensured that secession was not allowed in the constitution.

And we wonder why these people reject the very practices, policies, rules, laws and decree they foisted on Nigeria.


In 2018 we cannot justify the stupidity of continuing in a war when you are already at the mercy of your enemy, only to surrender eventually.

1 Like

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:39pm On Mar 21, 2018
SakuraSimiola:
Someone is telling you starving children is wrong.

And your response is

Mercy only has its place in war after a surrender, not before.


You see the psychopaths our nation produces?

This is the legacy of hatred. Where we hate each other so much we justify the unjustifiable.




If only Ojukwu cared about his people like you care. Maybe he would have allowed them to have food rather than use them as tools of media propaganda.

I repeat, mercy is only expected after a surrender and not before.

Anyone who chose to fight a war already expects death as a possible outcome.

1 Like

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:41pm On Mar 21, 2018
DeeMain:


Beautiful nonsense. All warped logic and zero heart.

You sir is the definition of a seared callous mind.

For your information Nnamdi Azikiwe, Ironsi or even the coup plotters' sins do not represent the Igbo nation's sins just like Jonathan's sins did not represent that of the entire Ijaw nation.

These people were humans that made mistakes, erred and had weaknesses just like Obafemi Awolowo and the rest of us. Stop equating the wisdom or lack of it and the mistakes of one man or a group of men to that of their whole tribe.

It's this sort of tribal stereotype and propaganda that led to the pogrom and the subsequent civil war which we are still on the aftermath till this day.

Do well to find your lost humanity young man. Feel. Empathize. Swap places. Use your brain to make the world a better place.


I cannot feel for a man who hates me and who is gloating. There are no tender feelings in such interactions.

2 Likes

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:46pm On Mar 21, 2018
InfiniteLoopx:
Throwback is a devil incarnate. May the experiecne of innocent fallen Biafran children be the portion of his future generation. angry angry

Are you one of those who gleefully and willfully chose to fight a war and promised destruction, only to lament after an unconditional surrender that they were not shown mercy during the war?

What stopped the rebels from negotiating a surrender when they were already blockaded but still posed a threat that could be employed to negotiate a compromise?

Why wait till hunger set in, and deliberately cultivated to win a media propaganda that failed?

Why wait until all was lost before capitulating to an unconditional surrender?

1 Like

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Guestlander: 9:50pm On Mar 21, 2018
Throwback:


Your greed led you to a position where you had to fight.

Yorubas are not backbones to serve the purpose of the Igbos or come to their rescue after fomenting trouble.

Azikiwe was in control of his full senses when he ensured that Nigeria will not have a secession clause, and that such a move would only be settled by war. If only he knew he was sealing the fate of his own people.

You never remembered your Yoruba partners in NCNC when it came to sharing the juicy spoils from your partnership with the North. Yet with greed you wanted more and thought best to eliminate political and military leaders from other regions except yours.

Rather than be grateful that the Yorubas were civilized enough not to have their own pogrom against you in their region, your delusional entitlement makes you expectant that the Yorubas will lay down their life to protect you in the crisis you caused.

You have never been useful to us, we do not owe you any delusional loyalty after an alliance gone wrong with your Northern partners.

You capture so much with little words. I doff my hat to you sir. This is the straight up truth about the ibos in Nigeria.

1 Like

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:53pm On Mar 21, 2018
DejiSantos:
It's sad that you have many of our compatriots.

Trying to rationalise the starvation of our children.

It's disgusting.

Trying to blame it Ojukwu. Kmt.


Who should it be blamed on?

Were the children starving as Nigerians or was Biafra even attacked after it declared itself a sovereign state?

Who dared to venture into the others' territory?

Was Ojukwu not the ruler of Biafra who should have the welfare of his followers at heart the moment he realised that Biafra had been strategically and technically defeated since 1968 and not the Jan 1970 that they surrendered without Ojukwu?

Yes I blame it on Ojukwu and rather than even surrender, he ran away like a heartless coward to avoid the death he committed others to, both military and civilian.

The coward ran away with his well fed and healthy family and also did not forget his favourite car.

1 Like

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by Throwback: 9:56pm On Mar 21, 2018
Guestlander:


You capture so much with little words. I doff my hat to you sir. This is the straight up truth about the ibos in Nigeria.

They are looking for empathy.

They want me to have empathy for a tribe that gloats after it has inflicted death and agony on others.

I have learnt to be as vile as my enemy.

3 Likes

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by OnyeOGA(m): 10:23pm On Mar 21, 2018
imhotep:

It was about crude oil grin
Chukwu kpo gi oku.
Why you no call me
grin
Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by CrtlAltDel: 11:01pm On Mar 21, 2018
Throwback:


Fight and lose, it is your headache. Stop wailing like babies in the aftermath that you were killed and impoverished. You should be proud of the fight you invited.

When you were forming alliance and enjoying the spoils, you did not know you were embracing slavery.

When Azikiwe was insisting that Nigeria must not have a secession clause you did not know you were embracing slavery.

When Azikiwe was detailing how the North will be economically blockaded if it attempts to secede, you did not know you were detailing your own sorrow.

When you were establishing a unitary government, you did not know you will become perpetual losers under such arrangement.

Igboman, stop courting my sympathy. When you were dictating the type of Nigeria you now reject, having found yourselves as followers rather than leaders, all was well with that Nigeria.

I have no sympathy to give you. Continue fighting with those you aligned with.

When there was a need to fight for Democracy and the rights of the Yorubas, we fought and won. The current democracy allows for debate to chart a new direction for the country, but such constitutionally recognised debates are considered begging by a tribe that would rather self destruct like a blind fool, only to ask others why they did not come to its aid.

Continue fighting your own fight to undo the errors of your elders who lacked foresight.
Gbam… igbos are the architect of thier present predicament but as usual, they rewrite history and blame yorubas just like they will blame yorubas in future when they want to discuss coward Kanu. grin grin

4 Likes 1 Share

Re: Surviving Biafra : The Soldiers Were Taking Girls, Like Boko Haram. by sharpsecret: 11:57pm On Mar 21, 2018
if ur father hav a problem wit a rich man and ur father tried to avoid his troubles and ran wit you and other members of ur family to the next village and the rich man kip comin to fyt ur family to the extent of blockin every means of ur survival..and then ur siblings start dieing cos of hunger.who wud u blame,ur father or the rich man?

2 Likes

(1) (2) (3) (Reply)

Most Encouraging Statements Made By Our Leaders / ACN Alleges Threat To Aregbesola’s Life By PDP / Real Reasons Southwest Govs Gathered In Ibadan

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 140
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.