olumide4christ:


Please sirs and mas, back to the purpose of this thread, my question above is yet to be answered...

both vehicles are solid

civic is a compact sedan
Accord is a midsize sedan

The 2013 Accord is a mean looking car that says honda still got what it takes to be a people mover with its redesign and additional standard features. available in 3.5L V6 and 2.4L I4 with robust space and legroom

The civic is a good car and only beats the accord in fuel economy.

with all said and done picking your choice is a breeze if you do city driving with a small and young family for school and outing pickup and drop, civic it is
If you are a big shot with older children and don't mind been in owners corner once in a while Accord it is

Can someone help with an Acura TL 10/11 vs a Venza of same year comparison?

-Reliability And Durability
-The more powerful engine
-Transmission issues if any
-Average cost of basic maintenance repairs and OEM
- Not an everyday car (Sundays and official/business meetings) but will embark on a Lagos <-> Cross River trip at least four times a year
-What will be your personal choice and why?

Thanks

I'd also like your opinions on the Ford Fusion 2007 vs Toyota Camry 2007.
Please focus your inputs towards their 4 cylinder engines (2.3/2.4l).
-As a daily driver and frequent interstate travels.
-Cost of parts as well as maintenance.
-Comfort and Luxury they both can afford to offer.
-Suspensions, tyre wear and Electricals.
-And also reliability and performance of their transmission systems.

Thanks in advance...

nurey:


both vehicles are solid

civic is a compact sedan
Accord is a midsize sedan

The 2013 Accord is a mean looking car that says honda still got what it takes to be a people mover with its redesign and additional standard features. available in 3.5L V6 and 2.4L I4 with robust space and legroom

The civic is a good car and only beats the accord in fuel economy.

with all said and done picking your choice is a breeze if you do city driving with a small and young family for school and outing pickup and drop, civic it is
If you are a big shot with older children and don't mind been in owners corner once in a while Accord it is

Thanks so much Mr. @nurey for your explicit comments...now I know better. God bless you!

Aquariann:
Can someone help with an Acura TL 10/11 vs a Venza of same year comparison?

-Reliability And Durability
-The more powerful engine
-Transmission issues if any
-Average cost of basic maintenance repairs and OEM
- Not an everyday car (Sundays and official/business meetings) but will embark on a Lagos <-> Cross River trip at least four times a year
-What will be your personal choice and why?

Thanks

Acura 3.5L V6 280hp
Acura 3.7L SHAWD 305hp
0-60 in 5.5secs
11.6L/100km city driving

Venza 2.7L I4 182hp
Venza 3.5L V6 2xxhp
0-60 in 7.2secs
10.0L/100km

the Acura is more luxurious

both vehicles are reliable but the venza has an edge

the 4cylinder venza is the most fuel efficient of the lot but the Acura is fastest as it's a sedan with better balance and better curb weight than the venza

for your travelling the Acura would be safer less common and not a robbers magnet compared to the venza. though the venza ground clearance would be useful on our potopoto highway.

verdict if you intend to hurl goods and family on a travelling expedition stopping along the way to take a nap, buy more stuffs for travelling the venza 4cylinder would do it with its leg room, cargo space and build stance you can carry more things around, it's V6 for addition safe speeding and acceleration.

The Acura TL is not bad either, has premium entertainment for passengers, comfortable sitting and ample space. The 3.5 and 3.7L engines would always make sure you get power on demand and not the last to arrive at your destination.

nurey:


Acura 3.5L V6 280hp
Acura 3.7L SHAWD 305hp
0-60 in 5.5secs
11.6L/100km city driving

Venza 2.7L I4 182hp
Venza 3.5L V6 2xxhp
0-60 in 7.2secs
10.0L/100km

the Acura is more luxurious

both vehicles are reliable but the venza has an edge

the 4cylinder venza is the most fuel efficient of the lot but the Acura is fastest as it's a sedan with better balance and better curb weight than the venza

for your travelling the Acura would be safer less common and not a robbers magnet compared to the venza. though the venza ground clearance would be useful on our potopoto highway.

verdict if you intend to hurl goods and family on a travelling expedition stopping along the way to take a nap, buy more stuffs for travelling the venza 4cylinder would do it with its leg room, cargo space and build stance you can carry more things around, it's V6 for addition safe speeding and acceleration.

The Acura TL is not bad either, has premium entertainment for passengers, comfortable sitting and ample space. The 3.5 and 3.7L engines would always make sure you get power on demand and not the last to arrive at your destination.

Thanks Nurey..

We really like the build and design of both cars and if money weren't an issue, we'll get both. Perhaps someday.

@Robber magnet for the Venza. That has always been an issue. Not just robbers, but the police too especially outside Lagos and heading Eastward.

The TL isn't all that common so we felt maybe there was some kinda reliability issue or something about it.

Pls which should I go for as a first time car user...Honda baby boy or Honda addidas.thanks

Aquariann:


Thanks Nurey..

We really like the build and design of both cars and if money weren't an issue, we'll get both. Perhaps someday.

@Robber magnet for the Venza. That has always been an issue. Not just robbers, but the police too especially outside Lagos and heading Eastward.

The TL isn't all that common so we felt maybe there was some kinda reliability issue or something about it.

Its majorly price also luxurious japanese vehicles arent common same for infiniti (nissan) and some lexus variant (IS, GS, HR etc)

Durchmann:
I'd also like your opinions on the Ford Fusion 2007 vs Toyota Camry 2007.
Please focus your inputs towards their 4 cylinder engines (2.3/2.4l).
-As a daily driver and frequent interstate travels.

The camry wont be bad for this, the duratec engine in the ford too isnt bad, but camry parts are bound than the ford, for a 11 years old car, expect parts to fail or not work as expected so frequent change. you will be safe in the camry in an unexpected turn of event than the ford.

Durchmann:
I'd also like your opinions on the Ford Fusion 2007 vs Toyota Camry 2007.
Pl-As a daily driver and frequent interstate travels.
-Cost of pease focus your inputs towards their 4 cylinder engines (2.3/2.4l).
-Cost of parts as well as maintenance.

i would pick the ford here, their parts are extremely durable and it shares parts with some other vehicles also parts bought would be original whether tokunbo or new. The camry on the other hand has expensive parts and knockoffs are bound in the open market.

Durchmann:
I'd also like your opinions on the Ford Fusion 2007 vs Toyota Camry 2007.
Please focus your inputs towards their 4 cylinder engines (2.3/2.4l).
arts as well as maintenance.
-Comfort and Luxury they both can afford to offer.

Both vehicles to me are both bland but the camry has an edge in safety and technology, ford ABS and stability control is optional. The XLE camry trumps the SEL ford

Durchmann:
I'd also like your opinions on the Ford Fusion 2007 vs Toyota Camry 2007.
Please focus your inputs towards their 4 cylinder engines (2.3/2.4l).
-Suspensions, tyre wear and Electricals.

Toyota suspension are poo, tyre wear minimal, electricals minimal both vehicles are basic

Durchmann:
I'd also like your opinions on the Ford Fusion 2007 vs Toyota Camry 2007.
Please focus your inputs towards their 4 cylinder engines (2.3/2.4l).
-And also reliability and performance of their transmission systems.

Camry wins here, also has more hp, better mpg, high reliability but the 2007 camry was plagued with transmission issues and sensitive transmission so be careful and wary

For me, i would pick the camry to play safe and the ford just to try something new for a change

Aaaaarghmed:
Pls which should I go for as a first time car user...Honda baby boy or Honda addidas.thanks

Honda baby boy is more common while the addidas is the european variant of same year though the baby boy is a tad bigger. i have never seen the adidas experience the K-leg issue though.

i think you will be safe with any of the 2, just pick one your heart cherish most

nurey:


Its majorly price also luxurious japanese vehicles arent common same for infiniti (nissan) and some lexus variant (IS, GS, HR etc)

Alright then. Thank you

nurey:

The camry wont be bad for this, the duratec engine in the ford too isnt bad, but camry parts are bound than the ford, for a 11 years old car, expect parts to fail or not work as expected so frequent change. you will be safe in the camry in an unexpected turn of event than the ford.



i would pick the ford here, their parts are extremely durable and it shares parts with some other vehicles also parts bought would be original whether tokunbo or new. The camry on the other hand has expensive parts and knockoffs are bound in the open market.



Both vehicles to me are both bland but the camry has an edge in safety and technology, ford ABS and stability control is optional. The XLE camry trumps the SEL ford



Toyota suspension are poo, tyre wear minimal, electricals minimal both vehicles are basic



Camry wins here, also has more hp, better mpg, high reliability but the 2007 camry was plagued with transmission issues and sensitive transmission so be careful and wary

For me, i would pick the camry to play safe and the ford just to try something new for a change

Nice analysis.
Going by this, I think I can do with the Fusion.

Thank you for your unbiased analysis.

Nurey is the man of the year.

HeavenlyBang:
Nurey is the man of the year.

do u know how long I have been begging him to open this thread?

at least someone who wants to know about a civic or corolla can just come here and view easily

obekediamondfuto:


do u know how long I have been begging him to open this thread?

at least someone who wants to know about a civic or corolla can just come here and view easily

He's doing a really good job, yeah!

HeavenlyBang:

He's doing a really good job, yeah!

he is very very good.... asif that's his main job.....
knowing cars..... his summary is world class as well....

pls i need u 2 compare 07 accord nd 09 rav4, which 1 is beta in performance, fuel economy nd a bit light on maintenance cost, i luv both of dem jst confused on which 2 go 4, both are so cute.

Tnks

nurey:


Honda baby boy is more common while the addidas is the european variant of same year though the baby boy is a tad bigger. i have never seen the adidas experience the K-leg issue though.

i think you will be safe with any of the 2, just pick one your heart cherish most

princevih:
pls i need u 2 compare 07 accord nd 09 rav4, which 1 is beta in performance, fuel economy nd a bit light on maintenance cost, i luv both of dem jst confused on which 2 go 4, both are so cute.

if I had to answer this, I would be biased considering I have a first hand 6years plus experience with the Honda Accord 2006 DC and though I have been driven in a 4cylinder 2009 rav4 and I love the offroad movement.

Both vehicles are top class and respected in their respective category.

in performance both are OK for their basic design use, you can't compare a sedan to CUV in performance, the sedan would always achieve more due to design but the rav4 ground clearance and cute shape makes it ideal for rough terrain and it's V6 packs a punch to envy.

fuel economy the accord wins in both 4cylinder and V6 also wins in the 2door coupe category

maintenance cost is subjective as both don't have known factory issues but a warning toyota suspension aren't as strong as their engine. Even the rav 4 I was driven in had suspension issues after change due to knock off parts of toyota available in the market. The accord on the other hand has been going strong on stock suspension.

verdict I will pick the accord if my family is not greater than 4, the extra sitting space can be used for school bags no need of opening boot. the 4cylinder gives around 10L/100km in city driving not a robbers magnet but mindful of front suspension breakdown (K-leg)

The rav4 would be my choice whether the 4cylinder 11L/100km city isn't too bad, ground clearance when the tough gets going, good interior space and access to the boot on the go, good for taking snacks from back packs and children playing hide and seek when bored Also seats 5 comfortably and the 3rd row version is a plus for additional seating

thank u so much general nurey, am still single bt planning 2 gt married soon so d accord will b my best bet, cus d fuel economy wil help save sm more cash 4 oda expenses. Thanks

Make una help me with this one abeg:
BMW X6 2010
Acura ZDX 2010

I don watch YouTube videos and online reviews tire. I need comparison fom a Nigerian user's perspective

FrancisAdl:
Make una help me with this one abeg:
BMW X6 2010
Acura ZDX 2010

I don watch YouTube videos and online reviews tire. I need comparison fom a Nigerian user's perspective

Both vehicles re actually good for someone who can't make up his mind whether he needs an SUV or a sedan, apart from outward look both vehicles differ from each other and offerings from their respective maker.

both vehicles have good ground clearance but not your average offroad vehicle even with AWD present, don't go rock climbing and hillbilling around

performance the BMW has it as it's the ultimate driving machine, has more torque and the V8 will outrun the ZDX in any competition configuration.

luxury and comfort is top notch in both but the Acura tech package offers more, if you don't want to live in the car or run a 5 star hotel in there, any will do remember more tech more headache in fixing when parts fail

As for reliabilty the ZDX trumps

the BMW is a 4seater with good cargo space, the ZDX is a 5 seater (Yimu) rear seating isn't comfortable for adults, cargo space and roof too close so a few load blocks the rear view don't let me get started with the canoe shape of the roof in all for interior seating and style the X6 is preferred.

MPG those cars are worth millions, a poor mans dream and a rich man's reality the ZDX wins but who pays millions for a car and focuses on MPG.

In all both vehicles are OK the BMW for class, swags and that intimidating road feel

The ZDX for rear master piece on wheels, top notch reliabilty and stare of respect from other road users

The ZDX, in particular, will absolutely not tolerate any maintenance compromises. Some pretty sophisticated electronics in that car.

Good day op. Nice thread you have here, i have really learnt a lot going through. I am considering getting my first car however i am a fan of suv and after my own investigation, i 3 suv's have made it to the last draw Honda Crv, Honda Pilot and Nissan Xtera (all 2004 model). I hoping your in-depth insight on cars can help me make a decision out of this three. I want to know which is best in terms of fuel economy, reliability and low maintenance cost.

oladee13:
Good day op. Nice thread you have here, i have really learnt a lot going through. I am considering getting my first car however i am a fan of suv and after my own investigation, i 3 suv's have made it to the last draw Honda Crv, Honda Pilot and Nissan Xtera (all 2004 model). I hoping your in-depth insight on cars can help me make a decision out of this three. I want to know which is best in terms of fuel economy, reliability and low maintenance cost.

pilot and xterra are SUV while the CRV is a CUV.

all vehicles are reliable, the CRV wins in fuel economy and low cost of maintenance as it shares engine and parts with a few offerings from Honda and acura.

I would pick the CRV for its practicality and mpg rating also drives like a car with good ground clearance.

the pilot comes in next with its 3.5L V6 for power and 3rd row seat foe additional seating room.

next is the xterra the best among the contenders in off road capability. has a 4 cylinder, V6 and V6turbo. reliable too but only wins in the off road capability.

the winner here is the CRV with its practicality combined with good fuel economy it would get the job done

nurey:


pilot and xterra are SUV while the CRV is a CUV.

all vehicles are reliable, the CRV wins in fuel economy and low cost of maintenance as it shares engine and parts with a few offerings from Honda and acura.

I would pick the CRV for its practicality and mpg rating also drives like a car with good ground clearance.

the pilot comes in next with its 3.5L V6 for power and 3rd row seat foe additional seating room.

next is the xterra the best among the contenders in off road capability. has a 4 cylinder, V6 and V6turbo. reliable too but only wins in the off road capability.

the winner here is the CRV with its practicality combined with good fuel economy it would get the job done

Bros this table you're shaking has diportivo on it o..

Pls gurus between Toyota Venza 2010 vs Lexus ES 350 which one is better, durablity, security features and well loaded with infortainment system

godwinkessi:
Pls gurus between Toyota Venza 2010 vs Lexus ES 350 which one is better, durablity, security features and well loaded with infortainment system

better no winner they are both cars of same year

durability Venza less tech in the finish and engine is less complicated

security features Lexus has good security features even in Base also the Venza is a magnet for the men of the under world.

loaded Lexus ES 350 is loaded to the tooth

nurey:


better no winner they are both cars of same year

durability Venza less tech in the finish and engine is less complicated

security features Lexus has good security features even in Base also the Venza is a magnet for the men of the under world.

loaded Lexus ES 350 is loaded to the tooth

Pls how do I recognize the premium version of the Lexus ES 350 apart from the glass roof feature? Are u saying the base model ha e parking sensors and the adaptive cruise control? And pls someone told me that Mark Levinson premium Sound is the real way to recognize a limited edition of Lexus ES 350! Pls I also will like to know if normal Lexus audio system comes with a woofer or is it just the Mark Levinson Sound that comes with that feature just like in Toyota where only the trims that are fitted with JBL Audio that comes with that feature

godwinkessi:


Pls how do I recognize the premium version of the Lexus ES 350 apart from the glass roof feature? Are u saying the base model ha e parking sensors and the adaptive cruise control? And pls someone told me that Mark Levinson premium Sound is the real way to recognize a limited edition of Lexus ES 350! Pls I also will like to know if normal Lexus audio system comes with a woofer or is it just the Mark Levinson Sound that comes with that feature just like in Toyota where only the trims that are fitted with JBL Audio that comes with that feature

BASE

The ES 350 interior featured walnut wood accents, leather seats, dual zone climate control with air filter, an MP3 player auxiliary input, power tilt and telescoping steering wheel, and eight standard airbags. A keyless entry and ignition system, Lexus
SmartAccess , which does not require the electronic remote to be taken out of the driver's pocket, was standard.

PREMIUM

Available new features included a 300-watt, 14-speaker Mark Levinson premium audio system, power seat cushion extender, radar-based
adaptive cruise control , rain-sensing windshield wipers, power rear sunshade, DVD navigation system, and Lexus Park Assist, a sonar-based warning system with backup camera .

ULTRA LUXURY

For the first time, the ES offered an "Ultra Luxury Package," which featured many of the aforementioned options along with a three-panel panoramic glass
moonroof

ultra luxury is different from premium just by having the panoramic view.

at least with all these you can identify a Base from premium.

the base too have woofers they just have a 6CD changer and less speakers.

The 2010 was redesigned though I did advice you go for one with factory fitted Nav system and rear camera them seem to be standard for identifying the top of the range loaded ES also has wood trim in steering

nurey:


BASE

The ES 350 interior featured walnut wood accents, leather seats, dual zone climate control with air filter, an MP3 player auxiliary input, power tilt and telescoping steering wheel, and eight standard airbags. A keyless entry and ignition system, Lexus
SmartAccess , which does not require the electronic remote to be taken out of the driver's pocket, was standard.

PREMIUM

Available new features included a 300-watt, 14-speaker Mark Levinson premium audio system, power seat cushion extender, radar-based
adaptive cruise control , rain-sensing windshield wipers, power rear sunshade, DVD navigation system, and Lexus Park Assist, a sonar-based warning system with backup camera .

ULTRA LUXURY

For the first time, the ES offered an "Ultra Luxury Package," which featured many of the aforementioned options along with a three-panel panoramic glass
moonroof

ultra luxury is different from premium just by having the panoramic view.

at least with all these you can identify a Base from premium.

the base too have woofers they just have a 6CD changer and less speakers.

The 2010 was redesigned though I did advice you go for one with factory fitted Nav system and rear camera them seem to be standard for identifying the top of the range loaded ES also has wood trim in steering

So you're saying that any Es 350 2007 that comes with navigation is fitted with woofers and can offer premium sounds

godwinkessi:


So you're saying that any Es 350 2007 that comes with navigation is fitted with woofers and can offer premium sounds

yes the Nav and JBL are a combo installation with 14-speaker at least counting speakers too can help you identify your target