Bibors:


Cannot be trusted with Nuclear power by who?
Who has the parameter or yardstick of measuring maturity?
How can you call North Korea a Juvenile? A whole country?
Even if you are referring to her president, is he the youngest of presidents?

If Nigeria develops Nuclear weapons today, will you caller her Juvenile considering the age of our president?

wildkat:



I'm not talking of the age of the president. And I being a whole country has nothing to do with being a nuclear power. Not every nation is mature enough to be a nuclear power, which also has nothing to do with the age of the country. It's just like giving a mad man an AK-47 rifle. I believe u know what the result would be. The same thing as when u give Iran or Iraq nuclear bombs. Imagine the consequence. A nuclear weapon in the hands of a rogue nation is a big risk and North Korea is one

BabaIbo:


You are wrong and the user you quoted is right.
Russia do more advert than US, you can do research on country with highest military fare/game etc.
And again, you know nothing about Korean war, when the war broke out, the population of the two forces (according to documentaries on the war) are as follow, NK force was numbered around 200k + tanks including Soviet union and Chinese full support
while
on the other side, SK had about 98k, no tank, with around 200 to 300 only as support(they were not prepared at first) but that turned around with time, NK already had tanks and other sophisticated weapons while SK don't have it, but that changed when Us entered the fight. You need someone to enlighten you on the heavy bombing that was done on NK after US entered the game.
Stop saying what you don't know about Korean War.

When it comes to technology, aside from USA, there are other countries better in technology than Russia, if you doubt this fact, you can research more on it.
You need someone to enlighten you about the cold war on USSR(that led to the breaking apart of USSR), that alone is enough reason.
I can go on and on to give you enough reasons to show that US is more powerful than Russia

honestivo:

Don't be surprise that was built by a black man ,stop being inferior

honestivo:

Don't be surprise that was built by a black man ,stop being inferior

Proudlyngwa:
waste of money

Welrez:
Well, Russia may be up there, but they are not really as good as the US.

obafemee80:

That's why many people are running into Politics

Idrismusty97:
Nothing special here, Ice is more vulnerable from below. Because you are breaking from the softer tissue up to the harder part which is just a few millimeter of surface linen.

petsam11:


I don't think so bro! The difference between the US and Russia is that Russia is just into unnecessary exhibitions just to prove to the US that they are strong while the US does not need to prove anything... it's like a case of Messi (as US) and Ronaldo (as Russia).
Messi has nothing to prove to the world (because he is a raw talent, excessive training or not)) before u know that he is the world best while Ronaldo has a lot to prove (even by excessive trainings and drills) so that the world "can see him" as the world best which in the depth of his mind, he knows Messi is his Boss.

So America doesn't need to prove nothing to the world because the world knows that they (US) are the Real World Power but Russia has a lot to prove to the world so as to "see her" as the world power...

Krak:


Submarine is never and can never be ordinary. Especially nuclear-powered submarines.

Do you know how much it cost to build and maintain just one?

dangoteinlaw:
u really believe that? Do more research and enlighten urself , Russia is no where close to USA military wise, even with the much Rissia has got their citizens are almost dieing from hunger due to bankruptcy. Only the USA has successfully spent high budgets on military and still afford to feed other nations plus guarantee their citizens A1 standard of living. ..I could go on bro, 4get USA ,no contests, they will remain on top for a long while

Johnboom:
Keep on fooling yourself. Even ordinary Israel shot down Russia aircraft.

Fawklicant:


Never underestimate anybody based on their size or perceived deficiency in capabilities. US was thoroughly embarrassed in Vietnam and Japan and even somalia. Russia was thoroughly frustrated in Afghanistan. Israel was embarrassed by Palestine just a few years ago. Warfare doesn't necessarily mean you go about bombing civilians, there are rules of engagement.
Russia doesn't make noise. They don't feel the need to, but when they make threats, everybody pays attention.
Same with China who is more interested in dominating the world through a more subtle means...economy.

US issues threats Everytime and the problem with that is that at some point, someone is bound to dare you and call your bluff and when there is a semblance of balance of power, standoffs and threats turn to negotiations.

If anything history has taught us that not all wars are won on the strength of a military might. Many are won when there's singleness of purpose and tactical maneuvers.

Akoja360:
while the black man is still believing in hocus pocus bullshhit such as religion ,money ritual and witches the rest of the world is making giant leaps to into the future leaving africa in an acient dust

Fawklicant:


The same noise was made during Vietnam war, same during invasion of somalia. Same mistake Russia made in Afghanistan. With all their tech prowess and maneuvers, what happened?
Naturally, israel and Palestine no be mates, but what happened over a decade ago? We just pray that such a day never surfaces when Russia and US or China etc will have to square it off. It will be mutually assured destruction.
With all the Nukes in stock all around the world, nobody is a write off.

BabaIbo:


You are wrong and the user you quoted is right.
Russia do more advert than US, you can do research on country with highest military fare/game etc.
And again, you know nothing about Korean war, when the war broke out, the population of the two forces (according to documentaries on the war) are as follow, NK force was numbered around 200k + tanks including Soviet union and Chinese full support
while
on the other side, SK had about 98k, no tank, with around 200 to 300 only as support(they were not prepared at first) but that turned around with time, NK already had tanks and other sophisticated weapons while SK don't have it, but that changed when Us entered the fight. You need someone to enlighten you on the heavy bombing that was done on NK after US entered the game.
Stop saying what you don't know about Korean War.

When it comes to technology, aside from USA, there are other countries better in technology than Russia, if you doubt this fact, you can research more on it.
You need someone to enlighten you about the cold war on USSR(that led to the breaking apart of USSR), that alone is enough reason.
I can go on and on to give you enough reasons to show that US is more powerful than Russia

Bibors:


Cannot be trusted with Nuclear power by who?
Who has the parameter or yardstick of measuring maturity?
How can you call North Korea a Juvenile? A whole country?
Even if you are referring to her president, is he the youngest of presidents?

If Nigeria develops Nuclear weapons today, will you caller her Juvenile considering the age of our president?

TFLASHOGEE:
help me ask them o we no get snow to lunch our own and last last if you check the brain behind the invention na still black so what the oyinbo get brain pass all about

Bibors:


While i understood you abinitio, I still beg to differ that such a weapon shouldnt be in the hands of any country, the US inclusive.
When they developed thw atomic bomb, they didnt hesitate to use it and the effects are still there.
They had to ensure that Japan will be deweaponised for fear of a reprisal attack in the future.

Also note that whoever has absolute power determines what is right and wrong, who to live or die etc.

When they accused Sadam of having weapon of mass destruction, Iraq was a relatively peaceful country. They invaded Iraq , didnt find the weapon and that invasion created a turbulent Iraq till date.
They also went ahead to do same in Lybia and the rest is history. From your argument, is the US mature enough to have nuclear weapons/power which enables them being pain to other nations for nothing?

Why havent they ended the war in Syria if they are so matured?

blueAgent:



How is it a waste?
Do you know the thousands of jobs that was created directly and indirectly during the construction of that submarine or the thousands of jobs created for those who work on it daily
plus contractors and vendors.


Blackman and his mediocre thinking

Proudlyngwa:


waste of comment
Slave man mentality.
If half of that money had been put into core aeronautics and ship building, we would have had safer and faster long distance travel, not toys that give you inspiration to go to war

blueAgent:



Did US lose any of this War's you mentioned?

blueAgent:


Your reasoning is beyond logic.
So after building all the trains and roads they should live like they have all friends and no enemies, I guess 9/11 incident built more roads in your logic?

You could have suggested that they disband the entire army at once.

honestivo:

Don't be surprise surprised that was built by a black man ,stop being inferior

Cindy08:
lol that joke is a killer

blueAgent:


True.

Our leaders and fellowers lack the IQ to create wealth.
You can imagine Texas alone has over 24 Oil refineries all owned and started by White entreprenuers some over 100yrs ago

In US an western world people don't need to join politics inorder to be wealth they use their brain.

longjon:


First of all, nowhere in my post did I mention that Russia is more powerful than US or vice versa. I deliberately avoid making such outlandish and bombastic comments because we all know that when shit hits the fan , it’s mutually assured destruction.

Secondly no where did I mention in my post anything about the tank battles that occurred during the Korean War. So I don’t know where you pulled that from. Neither was I talking about the fire bombing of Korean cities that followed. Heck I’m not even talking about the broader Korean War in general . Cos then we’ll get into another debate of whether US actually won that war

I was specifically referring to the air warfare which was a direct test of skill between the two opposing forces as a significant number of the North Korean pilots were actually Russian.
Why are you pulling up troop numbers ? Are we comparing North Korea to US ? If you knew anything about the Korean War, you’d have immediately realized why I mentioned the air battle that has been subjected to much debate by military historians . Also Russia did not openly commit/engage in the war like US did. Their pilots had to wear Korean uniforms to ensure deniability by Kremlin.

Actually you need to enlighten yourself on the number of war-games conducted by US annually. For the simply fact that they have more allies should tell you that they engage in more military exercises . The following countries conducts annual or bi-annual exercises with US either individually, collectively as a bloc or both :

Japan
Australia
New Zealand
South Korea
Taiwan
Israel
NATO (29 countries)
RIMPAC (22 Asian countries)
South American nations

Every military exercise is an opportunity to showcase weapons and superior defense maneouvres. The number of exercises USA engages in annually is more than triple that of Russia and China combined. Please list the number of Russian military exercises here since you’re sure . I need facts not claims .

Btw you made assumptions in your post about me which I’ll simply overlook.

Bibors:


While i understood you abinitio, I still beg to differ that such a weapon shouldnt be in the hands of any country, the US inclusive.
When they developed thw atomic bomb, they didnt hesitate to use it and the effects are still there.
They had to ensure that Japan will be deweaponised for fear of a reprisal attack in the future.

Also note that whoever has absolute power determines what is right and wrong, who to live or die etc.

When they accused Sadam of having weapon of mass destruction, Iraq was a relatively peaceful country. They invaded Iraq , didnt find the weapon and that invasion created a turbulent Iraq till date.
They also went ahead to do same in Lybia and the rest is history. From your argument, is the US mature enough to have nuclear weapons/power which enables them being pain to other nations for nothing?

Why havent they ended the war in Syria if they are so matured?

Proudlyngwa:


Once Again Rubbish post.
911 was the product of a US creation
The US has a very large and unnecessary army.
If they can learn to mind their business, their Enemies will drastically reduce.

Incase you are not aware North Eastern Nigeria is suffering from the after effects of US oversabi in Libya.
Yet they behave as if they don't care, because they have not gotten the right bargaining chip.

They can continue building weapons and leaving in paranoia or they can afford to build peace time objects and enjoy the ripple effects.




Joker.