correctBlogger:
Apple always stealing from other people, since 1998...Who do you think is behind the recent Samsung Galaxy Note 9 fire incident... Apple of cause.. because they know that for as long the Note 9 is there with features that are more better than what their new glorified and overhyped iPhone Xs has, they are not going to sell even one single unit... Bleep Apple. Bleep iPhones.

correctBlogger:
Apple always stealing from other people, since 1998...Who do you think is behind the recent Samsung Galaxy Note 9 fire incident... Apple of cause.. because they know that for as long the Note 9 is there with features that are more better than what their new glorified and overhyped iPhone Xs has, they are not going to sell even one single unit... Bleep Apple. Bleep iPhones.

MrWondah:
Apple self, I don't think I like that fruit.
On a more serious note, I have come to realize that most of the companies that made it to the top areost times dishonest.

RealTrump:


It's still theft. Did they seek Qualcomm's permission before SHARING their research? This is not like Qualcomm published a research paper n Apple shared it, this is a patent shared or perhaps sold to a direct competitor. And I intentionally used the word SOLD cos Apple couldn't have handed out data to them out of mere good will.

Apple has now made their own chips based off on stolen Qualcomm data. Do you have any idea of research money n man hours that goes into those chips only to have some companies steal for a competitor or even produce their own? How would u feel as a Qualcomm researcher if u worked so had to make the fastest chip in the world only for some riffraffs to steal n start producing their own? And what u might not kNow is that some Qualcomm scientifist might have quit the company cos they can't protect the research they sweat on.

SarcasticGenius:
As soon as Apple announced that it's next generation of Iphones will not run on Qualcomm's semi conductors, I knew something like this would happen.
And Apple is actually right. Qualcomm is abusing its dominant position in the market by pricing other chip makers out of business and forcing handset manufacturers to only buy from them.

midastouch:
Your sensational topic is misleading.

Apple cannot be accused of stealing what was readily shared with them by Qualcomm.

The law suit is on the premise that Apple shared Qualcomm's intellectual property with Intel, NOT that they stole.

Please conduct more research before you rush in looking for likes and clicks.

MrWondah:
Apple self, I don't think I like that fruit.
On a more serious note, I have come to realize that most of the companies that made it to the top areost times dishonest.

SarcasticGenius:
As soon as Apple announced that it's next generation of Iphones will not run on Qualcomm's semi conductors, I knew something like this would happen.
And Apple is actually right. Qualcomm is abusing its dominant position in the market by pricing other chip makers out of business and forcing handset manufacturers to only buy from them.

Flattino:

Another mad man don lose

Omololu001:
what a foolish defence by apple,is apple not abusing is position by selling phone as high as $1500, well I'm sure they will lose this case and will have to pay billions of dollars as compensation to Qualcomm

ivolt:

Mr. Chief Justice, Apple can sell its phone as high as $100000 provided there are buyers. That is the beauty of
America's capitalism and one of its greatest strength.
Since you can get a phone of about $20, there is no need to fret about Apple.

RealTrump:


It's still theft. Did they seek Qualcomm's permission before SHARING their research? This is not like Qualcomm published a research paper n Apple shared it, this is a patent shared or perhaps sold to a direct competitor. And I intentionally used the word SOLD cos Apple couldn't have handed out data to them out of mere good will.

Apple has now made their own chips based off on stolen Qualcomm data. Do you have any idea of research money n man hours that goes into those chips only to have some companies steal for a competitor or even produce their own? How would u feel as a Qualcomm researcher if u worked so had to make the fastest chip in the world only for some riffraffs to steal n start producing their own? And what u might not kNow is that some Qualcomm scientifist might have quit the company cos they can't protect the research they sweat on.

IbrahimDamola:


Just as in law, there is no morality in business especially where competition is stiff. Ask any businessman. You have to play pranks sometimes to get to the top.

MrWondah:


Like what I did above? There where three people without meaningful comments, had to remove theirs to make mine number 1

Xisnin:


How did Qualcomm come about its chip technology?
Conjured it from thin air?

Every technology out there is as a derivative plus enhancement of a previous "stolen" tech.
Qualcomm will never have shared data that will allow other companies to duplicate its core technology.
It is just angry that it can no longer dictate to Apple.

henryobinna:
Seems you don't understand the topic or you don't know what pricing others out of business means, if Qualcomm was pricing others out of business I don't think Apple would complain, but the reverse is the case. Pricing others out of business means your stuffs are extremely cheap that competitors can't compete considering cost of production, but Apple is actually complaining that Qualcomm prices their chips too high; very expensive. Apple wants everything cheap while selling their pieces of crap at exorbitant prices.

By the way, Qualcomm is not pricing others out of business rather they're outperforming hence sending others out of business by their performance not price.

SarcasticGenius:


Next time think twice before sharing your lack of intellect with us, my dear houseboy. Just earlier this year, Qualcomm was hit with a 1.2 Billion dollar fine for pricing its rivals out of business. Understand that the internet has other uses apart. from xvideo and online betting

henryobinna:


What the actual fu...ck are you stupiiidly saying?


Are you even okay? did you read the article? My response to your dumb post was with respect to the original post on this thread. Still you have comprehension issues coupled with other issues which I would have dealt with here if I was your personal shrink.

Shift boy!

SarcasticGenius:


Nay my friend, YOU have comprehension issues. My initial response to the original post was that Qualcomm was rigging the market by unfair price tactics. You chose to respond to my post like the dimwit you are: with an ignorant quote. My follow up reply was simply meant to put you in your place at the bottom of the food chain where you belong. Consider yourself schooled and next time stay the f-ck away from anyone mentally superior to you (which means 99% of everyone else)

Thurgger:
apple can never win this case. I'm a tech analyst and I know what am saying. without Qualcomm no phone will ever be able to browse the internet, they own the technology and everyone knows that. apple just want to maximise their profit.