eyeview:

While one ordered it to reverse a stand, the other maintained that they are in the right on their stand. You see how both nils off each other.
It will have to take a superior court to change inec stand and with the courts going on a total shut down, I fear the APC may not have time to follow that thru

Thank you. EOD

Never mind the Mod and the character you quoted. Shameless chaps, both

nameo:


Lolz... where do you people come from??

Just see "reasoning"

shut up

The abuja judgement only interpretes the stand of the constitution on matter brought before it.

Zamfara high court gave order to inec to collect the list of apc candidates brought before it.

Zamfara court order came first until the decision has been set aside it is binding on inec.

It unlikely because Apc zamfara has closed their ranks and unite ahead of general election.

hmm I have feeling that APC will run in the election in Rivers state with the buhari puppet at CJN

post=75120032:
They should all get there acts together.

They can never and will never get their and not ‘there’ acts together you pervert!!

For Nigeria �� to progress, we must all apotheosize our centripetal proclivities above our centrifugal excrescences.

ORIENTATION101:
shut up

The abuja judgement only interpretes the stand of the constitution on matter brought before it.

Zamfara high court gave order to inec to collect the list of apc candidates brought before it.

Zamfara court order came first until the decision has been set aside it is binding on inec.

It unlikely because Apc zamfara has closed their ranks and unite ahead of general election.

Here, Clown.

The matter is go8ng to superior courts for their interpretation and judgement. So no need been in a meaningless back and forth with you.

But get this: nobody would take the judgement of a State high court over a Federal high court, until a superior court passes judgement. Meanwhile, the status quo subsists

Just imagine CMD National hospital and CMD UCH from the same specailty making different diagnosis on the same patient after wasted so many resources and time..

nameo:


Here, Clown.

The matter is go8ng to superior courts for their interpretation and judgement. So no need been in a meaningless back and forth with you.

But get this: nobody would take the judgement of a State high court over a Federal high court, until a superior court passes judgement. Meanwhile, the status quo subsists

no status quo here . The judgement is clear. The abuja court did not give order to inec to maintain status quo.

Meanwhile zamfara court ruling which came first gave order to inec to accept apc list..
Without this court ruling being set aside by appeal court the zamfara court order is binding on INEC.
I believe Apc Nwc would have done the needful and inec will comply

post=75120032:
They should all get there acts together.

Ask some Nigerian why they want to vote for buhari, their answer will make you think half our our national budget should be spent on EDUCATION. Illiteracy is prevalent in the country and the country is doomed

ORIENTATION101:
no status quo here . The judgement is clear. The abuja court did not give order to inec to maintain status quo.

Meanwhile zamfara court ruling which came first gave order to inec to accept apc list..
Without this court ruling being set aside by appeal court the zamfara court order is binding on INEC.
I believe Apc Nwc would have done the needful and inec will comply

Ok... Sorry for even coming here. This is party politics. It doesn't interest me. I was just trying to correct you on your false interpretation of conflicting judgements of 2 courts. Moreover, the courts can handle this matter themselves.

What interests me ATM is the brazen assault on the constitution by an increasingly fearful President in illegally removing a sitting CJN.

So on this issue, BYE....

nameo:


Here, Clown.

The matter is go8ng to superior courts for their interpretation and judgement. So no need been in a meaningless back and forth with you.

But get this: nobody would take the judgement of a State high court over a Federal high court, until a superior court passes judgement. Meanwhile, the status quo subsists

INEC already told you it would appeal the judgement, right?

nameo:


Ok... Sorry for even coming here. This is party politics. It doesn't interest me. I was just trying to correct you on your false interpretation of conflicting judgements of 2 courts. Moreover, the courts can handle this matter themselves.

What interests me ATM is the brazen assault on the constitution by an increasingly fearful President in illegally removing a sitting CJN.

So on this issue, BYE....

Mind you,the faction that took the case to abuja is an illegal faction sponsored by marafa.that is one of the reasons inec threw out their application moreover they couldn't give the course reasons to rule in their favor.
The other faction that filed at gusau is the duly recognized faction moreover it gave facts to show primaries where held before the 8th.since both are equal courts,the court that ruled would take precedence plus the zamfara court has more jurisdictional grounds.

pmbisadullard:
Buhari destroys whatever he touches.

Yep!, just like he touched corruption and he is destroying it #GodBlessPMB #NextLevel

handie:
INEC in a quandary. Which of these judgements do they obey? How come there are even two differing judgements on one issue? Did money exchange hands? It'll be in INEC's best interest to approach an higher court for proper interpretation ASAP. Else, we are sure of hearing of court cases on d legality of d elections whether d APC participates or not

Let me shed light on the issue.

Zamfara Case : It was to prove that APC Primary election actually took place in the state.

Court Rule:
Now, the Court has affirmed that there was an election and winners emerged.


Abuja Case : It was instituted by Apc claiming that Inec had no right to reject its list.

Court Rule:
It rule that Inec has the right to reject list of candidates of a party where the primary election was not conducted properly within the time frame given by Once.

So, the cases are not the same. They are 2 cases. Therefore, there's no problem or confusion there.
Inec will have to accept the Zamfara list.

Efficacy30:


Ask some Nigerian why they want to vote for buhari, their answer will make you think half our our national budget should be spent on EDUCATION. Illiteracy is prevalent in the country and the country is doomed

....and you think you're more educated than others just because they disagreed with you?

nameo:


Here, Clown.

The matter is go8ng to superior courts for their interpretation and judgement. So no need been in a meaningless back and forth with you.

But get this: nobody would take the judgement of a State high court over a Federal high court, until a superior court passes judgement. Meanwhile, the status quo subsists

Abuja judgement is on whether INEC has the power to reject list of candidates submitted to it by parties.

It was decided that INEC could reject the list from parties if the primary election was not conducted properly within the time frame given by INEC.

Zamfara judgement was to show proof in the Court that there was indeed a primary election and that winners emerged.

The Lordship ruled that there was an election and winners emerged from the primary election. And that Inec should accept the list.

So the cases are not the same hence the issue of applying to higher court for interpretation or clarifications does not arise.

Tareq1105:


Let me shed light on the issue.

Zamfara Case : It was to prove that APC Primary election actually took place in the state.

Court Rule:
Now, the Court has affirmed that there was an election and winners emerged.


Abuja Case : It was instituted by Apc claiming that Inec had no right to reject its list.

Court Rule:
It rule that Inec has the right to reject list of candidates of a party where the primary election was not conducted properly within the time frame given by Once.

So, the cases are not the same. They are 2 cases. Therefore, there's no problem or confusion there.
Inec will have to accept the Zamfara list.

Thanks for this

Augiiee:

Yep!, just like he touched corruption and he is destroying it #GodBlessPMB #NextLevel

...just the way he destroyed the following corruption cases. Ode. Ewu awusa. Stop reasoning with your anus. Use your brain for once.

HtwoOw:
So , two courts in different jurisdictions translated law / constitution differently and gave different judgements ??



thats how you'll know money influences judgements in courts

.

It's not always about money, the issues brought b4 d judges maybe different and those who argue the cases are also different. Judges gives judgement based on d evidence b4 it and not base on what people think or d judgement of other court of competent jurisdiction