AuroraB:
If you were wise, ask yourself what Busola stands to gain in defaming this man! Now she's married.

AuroraB:
If you were wise, ask yourself what Busola stands to gain in defaming this man! Now she's married.

martineverest:
u are a bigger idiat

kenex4ever:
which evidence do you want? Do dey give receipt after rape Mr Thomas? If they rape your daughter and ask her to produce evidence will you like it?


ESE Walter alone is enough for every Dumbo like you to believe but you won't.

lilbest4:
please fucck off my dear

prinsam30:




may God help u retract ur path, I don't have time to argue with nonexisting being

Born2Breed:
.

jazzy16:


Which evidence you want for rape case. Abi you want see the full rape video. Use your brain

israelmao:
Why it seems almost everybody is taking side in a case where incriminating evidence is yet to be presented?It is foolishness to take side in a matter which is yet to be backed up with concrete fact(s).

kenex4ever:
which evidence do you want? Do dey give receipt after rape Mr Thomas? If they rape your daughter and ask her to produce evidence will you like it?


ESE Walter alone is enough for every Dumbo like you to believe but you won't.

YorubaWarrior:
But wait... why does this foolish Davido dude just open his mouth to talk for talking sake? His grammatical expressions are always wrong and trying to talk like dem Akata folks. Go ahead and curse him with the correct grammatical expression at least.

Dude is just too full of himself for real! Bastar.d!

Foodforthought:

When next you hear that Africans are dumb, believe it. It's fact, not racist.

Foodforthought:

When next you hear that Africans are dumb, believe it. It's fact, not racist.

israelmao:
Why it seems almost everybody is taking side in a case where incriminating evidence is yet to be presented?It is foolishness to take side in a matter which is yet to be backed up with concrete fact(s).

israelmao:
Why it seems almost everybody is taking side in a case where incriminating evidence is yet to be presented?It is foolishness to take side in a matter which is yet to be backed up with concrete fact(s).

OduntanGabriel:
High time we understand a man of God is not God

obie3rixe:
I dont know why, but you sound like a rapist.

lilbest4:
I knew Davido was an idiot
So nobody can have a different opinion from the bandwagon?
This man hasn't been proven guilty and you don't know if he is guilty or not yet you want everyone to crucify him. Fools parading themselves as celebrities and trying to appear politically correct. it's pure stupidity to already hang a suspect based on accusations. The accuser must prove her case before you take sides and crucify the accused.
Wtf is wrong with the whole world so because it's man vs woman the man is automatically guilty?
there are too many foolish people in the world right now so Davido, as a man does not know that this can happen to him, any girl can come out tomorrow and say Davido raped me and everyone will crucify him without trying to know if she is lying or not

dancewith:


There has been several cases of historic crimes, especially historic rapes successfully prosecuted

The weight of evidence in proving this is a bit different from the norm. The standard is circumstantial.

Let me quote this: If it walks like a duck, quakes like a duck, jumps like a duck, then it must he a duck

Another: if the witch cries at night and in the morning the child dies, both must he related

Now study the two quotes above. For historic crimes, this is enough to convict you.
Thanks for the analysis but for I remain neutral.
The prosecutor only needs to line up 3 or more women pointing and recounting similar experiences with this pastor to get a conviction. Do not bet against more than three women coming forward against this man

YorubaWarrior:
But wait... why does this foolish Davido dude just open his mouth to talk for talking sake? His grammatical expressions are always wrong and trying to talk like dem Akata folks. Go ahead and curse him with the correct grammatical expression at least.

Dude is just too full of himself for real! Bastar.d!

dancewith:


There has been several cases of historic crimes, especially historic rapes successfully prosecuted

The weight of evidence in proving this is a bit different from the norm. The standard is circumstantial.

Let me quote this: If it walks like a duck, quakes like a duck, jumps like a duck, then it must he a duck

Another: if the witch cries at night and in the morning the child dies, both must he related

Now study the two quotes above. For historic crimes, this is enough to convict you.
Thanks for the analysis but for now I remain neutral.
The prosecutor only needs to line up 3 or more women pointing and recounting similar experiences with this pastor to get a conviction. Do not bet against more than three women coming forward against this man