Maximus69:


Hmmmmmmmmmmm

Let me guess!

It seems the op is the one agitating now, whereas the OP is just the concept itself. Right?

Mr Image, you're now insulting the op, because there is no OP without an op who supposed to be the intelligent mind behind the OP.
So if you're ridiculing the OP, then the op must rise up to defend the OP. I think that is what's happening right now!

As much as i wished you were right for the first time, you are wrong again. Eeyah. He is the OP out of respect, and because he already referred to the opening post as "op". i'm not insulting or ridiculing Frank to be frank.

frank317:


U don't because u are talking off point... How can I love my food... If I don't eat them how will I survive? But the op is about the creator nor the created. Ur questions assume I am the creator. Does the creator eats food to survive?

The "nor" is not clear so as not to misunderstand you for the first time. Do you want to say "nor" or "not"?

Image123:


As much as i wished you were right for the first time, you are wrong again Eeyah. He is the OP out of respect, and because he already referred to the opening post as "op". i'm not insulting or ridiculing Frank to be frank.

Hmmmmmmmmm, that's nice of you Sir

It's obvious you've not studied JWs very closely, we never expect any thumbs-up from churchgoers regarding whatever we do!

Whether OP or op one thing is sure, you really did something funny with his concept Sir!

frank317:
Sincere answers needed.

None since none of them are righteous!