Qadaffi2idiamin:
Now that confirms my diagnosis. You are suffering from phenocolosis lumpumba. A very rare condition. Maybe your dog would understand better.

Sirjamo:
The miserable Poverty Development Party now thrives on baseless and Useless allegations! No wonder Mr Timi Frank with his twisted mouth had the gut to accuse Osinbajo of stealing 90 billion. The woeful loss of elections back to back has made the thieves in that useless PDP to become ordinary beer parlour gossipers!!!!

Cityguy:

Oga go siddon. This is not about elections. That line is stale. Don't attempt to distract, face the issues raised. Not everyone falls for that gimmick anymore.

Commentor:


I insist if he was using a fake passport, he would be detained.

Since there's no evidence of this it means it is a non-story.

He is close to the presidency but they couldn't get him a diplomatic passport?

Abeg make una dey think am.

lexy2014:

Was Nasiru Danu arrested at Heathrow Airport?

Does being "close to the presidency" automatically entitle a person to diplomatic passport?

Commentor:


Does it also mean his 'crime' should be associated with the presidency?

Commentor:


Does it also mean his 'crime' should be associated with the presidency?

lexy2014:


U haven't answered d question. D same deflective tactics clearly shows that u are trying to defend d indefensible.

Was Nasiru Danu arrested at Heathrow Airport?

Does being "close to the presidency" automatically entitle a person to diplomatic passport?

A simple yes or no will suffice

Commentor:


I would not answer yes or no when the single premise upon which this silly cass is predicated is that Nasiru, who holds no public office, was apprehended in UK but somehow, it should be the responsibility or lack thereof of the presidency.

If you don't see the flaw in your question, then it simply means you have a jaundiced view.

Sirjamo:
The only issue here is the one you are seeing in your dreams, every other thing is just hearsays and innuendos!!!!

Commentor:


I would not answer yes or no when the single premise upon which this silly cass is predicated is that Nasiru, who holds no public office, was apprehended in UK but somehow, it should be the responsibility or lack thereof of the presidency.

If you don't see the flaw in your question, then it simply means you have a jaundiced view.

lexy2014:


U can't yes or no because u are saying things that u can't defend.

At first u said this:

"I insist if he was using a fake passport, he would be detained.

Since there's no evidence of this it means it is a non-story."

In this comment, u are saying d story about Nasiru's arrest is fake.

But in ur comment above u said:

"that Nasiru, who holds no public office, was apprehended in UK".

Although u contradicted urself, in a way, u ended up answering my first question: "Was Nasiru Danu arrested at Heathrow Airport?"

So we can agree that Nasiru was arrested in d UK. D question now is, y was he arrested?

Second, in trying to exonerate d presidency, u said:
"this silly cass is predicated is that Nasiru, who holds no public office, was apprehended in UK but somehow, it should be the responsibility or lack thereof of the presidency."

But earlier, in an attempt to rubbish d story, u asked:

"He is close to the presidency but they couldn't get him a diplomatic passport?"

So u expected someone who holds no public office to b in possession of a diplomatic passport because he is "close to the presidency" but u don't think its right 4d presidency to be held responsible for what d guy does with d diplomatic passport.

Hence my last question:

"Does being "close to the presidency" automatically entitle a person to diplomatic passport?"

Commentor:


That question would still be answered with the question does being 'close' ( to the presidency, the closeness of which we cannot determine) make the presidency responsible for your personal action?

Being close to the presidency is the whole basis for the entire 'scandal' according to PDP.

The simple question is why such an individual, so close to the presidency, such that he ferries money on their behalf, as suggested by some on this thread (you've not bothered to refute their belief), isn't close enough to be given a diplomatic passport?

Note:

The presidency can easily assign him a post through which a diplomatic passport can he issued.

Commentor:


That question would still be answered with the question does being 'close' ( to the presidency, the closeness of which we cannot determine) make the presidency responsible for your personal action?

Being close to the presidency is the whole basis for the entire 'scandal' according to PDP.

The simple question is why such an individual, so close to the presidency, such that he ferries money on their behalf, as suggested by some on this thread (you've not bothered to refute their belief), isn't close enough to be given a diplomatic passport?

Note:

The presidency can easily assign him a post through which a diplomatic passport can he issued.

lexy2014:


Earlier, in trying to defend ur position, u asked "He is close to the presidency but they couldn't get him a diplomatic passport?" Now u are saying "the closeness of which we cannot determine". this is obviously double speak and speaking from both sides of your mouth, characteristic of all your comments. if u knew his closeness to the presidency qualified him to get a diplomatic passport, how do u now say "the closeness of which we cannot determine"?

meanwhile, u have systematically avoided answering this: "Does being "close to the presidency" automatically entitle a person to diplomatic passport?"

once again, with ur comments as a "commentor", u have only succeeded in entangling urself with humongous contradictions. according to you: "The presidency can easily assign him a post through which a diplomatic passport can be issued."

D story is talking about d past and u talking in future tense. how can what d presidency hasnt done change or alter what happened in London? If d presidency uses its prerogative and appoints Nasiru to qualify as d holder of a diplomatic passport as u suggest, how does that change d event that took place at Heathrow airport?

Ur statement about appointment clearly shows how u keep digging deeper and messing up your position. based on this "The presidency can easily assign him a post through which a diplomatic passport can he issued", then what type of passport was he holding in London since u had alluded to the fact that d story of d arrest is false? Was he arrested at Heathrow and what was his offence?

Lastly, i dont need to "refute their belief" neither do i need to refute yours. with your comments, u have only succeeded in shooting yourself in the foot several times and giving credence to the beliefs u are asking me to refute

Commentor:
[/s]

Rubbish.

Next!

Commentor:
[s][/s]

Rubbish.

Next!