MJKJ:
Relax. As long as your score is above the draw score, you would get your ITA.

Congratulations are in order.

slydog:
I've been dulling. Let me go and pay for my wife eca to boost up to 475, even though it will take a while, but 470's is the new 460

Liispa:


Yes

NanaF:


Please was this in the era of booking online that this happened? Trying to see what the odds are of this working for me.

NanaF:
Finally received my GCMS. Officer said I did not provide proof of funds so ‘review required’ for eligibility. Also commented that I provided $0 out of the required proof of funds.

Used my stanbic mutual funds letter/statement and pension letter/statement, included explanation on POF in LOE, even included a table breaking everything down alongside the exchange rate.

This thing is very unpredictable because you don’t know the officer that will be in charge of your file.

CanadianBae:
I'm relaxing. Can you please tell the bar man to pass me a glass of red wine

bekayy:
Mehn im sorry. I thought you had gotten it a long time ago o. These scores are scary. I hope you find another way.b Amen.

Silversurfer1:

I believe I've read about people whom WES assessed LLB and Law school certificate as two or more certificates

Silversurfer1:


We are in the same boat oh. I read on Canadavisa about Lawyers who used WES and still got PPR. They just explained with LOE about the disparity and what IRCC says about Law degrees. Some people here said it won't work because its misrepresentation but how can it be misrepresentation when their government states otherwise? Glad to see proof of this from a Nigerian here. Granted this didn't work for everyone but I did this too and I'm praying for a positive outcome. God dey

NanaF:
Finally received my GCMS. Officer said I did not provide proof of funds so ‘review required’ for eligibility. Also commented that I provided $0 out of the required proof of funds.

Used my stanbic mutual funds letter/statement and pension letter/statement, included explanation on POF in LOE, even included a table breaking everything down alongside the exchange rate.

This thing is very unpredictable because you don’t know the officer that will be in charge of your file.

adanac13:
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGGGGG POST ALERT!!!! GRAB YOUR POP CORN AND SODA

NanaF:
Finally received my GCMS. Officer said I did not provide proof of funds so ‘review required’ for eligibility. Also commented that I provided $0 out of the required proof of funds.

Used my stanbic mutual funds letter/statement and pension letter/statement, included explanation on POF in LOE, even included a table breaking everything down alongside the exchange rate.

This thing is very unpredictable because you don’t know the officer that will be in charge of your file.

NanaF:
Finally received my GCMS. Officer said I did not provide proof of funds so ‘review required’ for eligibility. Also commented that I provided $0 out of the required proof of funds.

Used my stanbic mutual funds letter/statement and pension letter/statement, included explanation on POF in LOE, even included a table breaking everything down alongside the exchange rate.

This thing is very unpredictable because you don’t know the officer that will be in charge of your file.

CanadianBae:
Tie breaking rule affected me My score is 478 but I submitted on the 9th of Dec

Dare002:

Liquidate your POF immediately, print your bank statement, and send CSE. Otherwise, it’s straight rejection.

Dare002:

Liquidate your POF immediately, print your bank statement, and send CSE. Otherwise, it’s straight rejection.

Somaris:
PNP draws come almost every week. And they are mostly routed via EE. That's why the scores are high. Alberta and Manitoba drew this week. And others, the weeks before too. So, the only way this is coming down is, if provinces reduce the time space for draws because it's as if they have no time limit, just wake up and draw every day.
I said this before and someone disagreed without more but here we are.

"unregulated" (for want of a better word) PNP draws + normally qualified people with 470s up = high draw score. By January, lots of people will be in the pool, qualified and the first draw for the year won't even inspire anyone.

I just hope there is hope somewhere cos more people are coming in. More qualified people at that. Improve your scores and most of you are losing points due to aging.

I'm on 447 awaiting sibling point to hit 462 by January( if AVO will do the honours), if not, i wait till 2021 for 3 Years experience (487). Till then, off to research another country or something. Can't have things like this pause one's life.

Last active post till then. The mental exhaustion is crazy. Good luck to everyone in this pursuit, see you in Canada or NOT.

ans123:
Hi NanaF

Sorry to hear this but did the letters state that the funds are accessible at any time and free of any liens, debts, encumbrances ?

CanadianBae:
Tie breaking rule affected me My score is 478 but I submitted on the 9th of Dec

jjohndoe83:

Let me understand you sir. Does the VO mean none of the components of your POF came from you, like you got 100% gift of POF?

ednut1:
how is it pnp

NanaF:


No, it literally said I didn’t provide proof of funds.

adanac13:
lol Thank you I did that in my previous post before my epistle in total it was 5mths. Oya give me my .5

WeAreDLucky1s:


IELTS ME+MADAM = CRS@475

Presently: Gently waiting for Wednesday, so I can shout IT'S ITA, BABY!!!

Waiting for the golden ITA, come next draw.

Somaris:


I reckon you were the one that disagreed lol. Maybe if you had been following before this year, you'd have known.

The first time PNPs hit 711, a subsequent draw was done a week later in 2018 which marked the end. It was also the lowest.

These days the PNPs hits 700s weekly or IN between before the next draw. With no back to back draws.
Reduce that 715 back to the previous 200-300s( which were more) and you'd have a normal draw touching 440s even without back to backs And more people in your "normal zone" would have gotten ITA. The increase in PNP numbers has a rolling effect on those behind.

Now compare and contrast, research and be informed. It's not the just "715" you saw for this week. A pattern has been altered.

Agree or disagree, I'm Done with it.

Somaris:


I reckon you were the one that disagreed lol. Maybe if you had been following before this year, you'd have known.

The first time PNPs hit 711, a subsequent draw was done a week later in 2018 which marked the end. It was also the lowest.

These days the PNPs hits 700s weekly or IN between before the next draw. With no back to back draws.
Reduce that 715 back to the previous 200-300s( which were more) and you'd have a normal draw touching 440s even without back to backs And more people in your "normal zone" would have gotten ITA. The increase in PNP numbers has a rolling effect on those behind.

Now compare and contrast, research and be informed. It's not the just "715" you saw for this week. A pattern has been altered.

Agree or disagree, I'm Done with it.

NanaF:


No, it literally said I didn’t provide proof of funds.

Tina26:
lol, will be back to drop full gist.