NwaAmaikpe:



Innoson should ignore all of them.
Where were they when he was struggling from the scratch? Now they want to take credit on being a part of the IVM history.
We are not complaining over the original logo, they should take their creativity to Proforce or Sinotruk.

I truly hope he doesn't fall prey to these schemers because tomorrow they'd claim his company as their patent and ask for huge settlements.

He should invite all of them for a meeting and ask them to tell their father to start building cars so they can design a logo for him.

okeyumez:
I prefer the second design. It shows IVM in a symbolic way
The first design is good but it looks like a secret cult logo

dominique:
The second logo is better, the first one looks like an evil mask. I wonder how Innoson intend to implement such logo on their vehicles

vibbb:
Ok, I like the first logo.
That lion's eye look.

DadaStephen1:
It won't fly
It's a copied job.

deepwater:



Life itself is not FAIR

Finallydead:
Some people just act like kids that don't know what life's about. Innoson doesn't owe the first guy anything but the promised meeting with the GM and maybe a tip to encourage him. This is business, whatever is better for your brand is what you do. So if someone gives an idea to boost your business sales and someone else inspired by that gives u a better idea, u should ignore the second to play fair. Obviously, most people prefer the second, and that's exactly why in soon should choose it over the first. I personally think the second looks more standard for a brand, the first looks like some occultist stuff. Let all those in favour of the second help to bring it to innosons notice, maybe through their social media pages, so they can make an informed choice.

Finallydead:
Some people just act like kids that don't know what life's about. Innoson doesn't owe the first guy anything but the promised meeting with the GM and maybe a tip to encourage him. This is business, whatever is better for your brand is what you do. So if someone gives an idea to boost your business sales and someone else inspired by that gives u a better idea, u should ignore the second to play fair. Obviously, most people prefer the second, and that's exactly why in soon should choose it over the first. I personally think the second looks more standard for a brand, the first looks like some occultist stuff. Let all those in favour of the second help to bring it to innosons notice, maybe through their social media pages, so they can make an informed choice.

Abortedfetus:
clown. Say something.
I command u.

kingjoe:
really !! and you said you're a graphic designer.I laugh in Swahili. look very well in the second LOGO. the three letters. are creatively represented. Nigerians are creative to be honest

MNDY:


And they will not agree that they copied it from you o, very annoying.

I experience dat thing during my uni days wella.

NwaAmaikpe:



Innoson should ignore all of them.
Where were they when he was struggling from the scratch? Now they want to take credit on being a part of the IVM history.
We are not complaining over the original logo, they should take their creativity to Proforce or Sinotruk.

I truly hope he doesn't fall prey to these schemers because tomorrow they'd claim his company as their patent and ask for huge settlements.

He should invite all of them for a meeting and ask them to tell their father to start building cars so they can design a logo for him.

deepwater:


Life itself is not FAIR

dominique:
The second logo is better, the first one looks like an evil mask. I wonder how Innoson intend to implement such logo on their vehicles

yers6:
i though the first one was good, mehn this one is far better

olaboy33:


A vehicle's logo doesn't need conceptualisation and innovation, that's for the vehicle features.

A vehicle's logo simply needs something that is classic and catchy to the eyes.

To me, the first one looks like an evil mask while the second looks classic.

One man's food is another's poison though..