HIGHESTPOPORI:
You expected kompany to have supported Liverpool? Does it make sense?

TheGoodJoe:


You are just evading the truth. The above article clearly highlights the corrupt decision and lies made by the EPL officials.

The VAR officials knew it was a penalty and clearly denied City it. This is why I like VAR, now we know the agenda is clear.

Shezkid:
A reminder that this was called a PK...VAR is SHIT

izzou:


That's the mistake Oliver made, to me

He should have blown a foul against City, instead of a play-on: like an advantage for Liverpool

That can never be a penalty, even in Nigerian league sef

Shezkid:


No..it was a clear PK, Now Tell me why this one below wasn't a PK?

JayPeeOham:


I don't know why nobody is talking about this part

TheGoodJoe:


You are just evading the truth. The above article clearly highlights the corrupt decision and lies made by the EPL officials.

The VAR officials knew it was a penalty and clearly denied City it. This is why I like VAR, now we know the agenda is clear.

rowland545:
Liverpool won clean and clear the ball touched the two players hands...but the second one might b a penalty so....let's give them the goal
3:2....Liverpool still won...end of thread

Mod pls close this thread....we are done

aadoiza:

What corruption are you talking about? How come all of you are seeing faults where there is non. Abi you wan tell me you no see the ball came straight from silva's arm to hit Arnold's.
English media and there sensationalism, I hail.

shurlar50:

VAR also overruled Bobby's goal because his armpit hair was 1CBM offside, it is only when it is in favor of Liverpool that you remember

complexBoss12:
why is everyone ignoring the fact that the ball came off Silva's arm

Shezkid:
The funny thing about this incident is before the end of this season, same thing will happen to Liverpool and their fans perspective will change...till it happens to your club you'll know that second handball was a clear PK....VAR is USELESS

TheGoodJoe:


‘One way or another, the action should have been stopped there and then,’ Kompany told Sky Sports. ‘You can argue about Bernardo’s handball, I don’t think he knows about it, but that [Alexander-Arnold’s] is a handball, that’s not a natural position.

‘Bernardo’s is in a natural position, Alexander-Arnold’s isn’t.’... Vincent Kompany.

Michael Oliver said Trent Arnold Alexander did not move his hand - He did

Michael Oliver said his hand was in a natural position - It was not.

Michael Oliver said there was not enough time for Arnold to get his hand away - There was because Arnold even moved his hand to the ball.

The VAR watched the replay and said Michael Oliver was right when the picture clearly shows he was not.

Do you get it now?

shurlar50:

VAR also overruled Bobby's goal because his armpit hair was 1CBM offside, it is only when it is in favor of Liverpool that you remember

Seventy7kings:
the ball actually touched a city player hand before touching a red player's hand. I don't understand why some people just wanted liverpool to lose that match. May be those people are gamblers who staked on city

TheGoodJoe:


You are just evading the truth. The above article clearly highlights the corrupt decision and lies made by the EPL officials.

The VAR officials knew it was a penalty and clearly denied City it. This is why I like VAR, now we know the agenda is clear.

TheGoodJoe:


It was a penalty because Arnold Alexander had time to remove his hand and made his himself bigger with his arm. Finally moved his arm to the ball. Blatant penalty.

Finito.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTreCQCmBx0

HIGHESTPOPORI:
You are not making sense

TheGoodJoe:


That was why the penalty was not given. If you read the article, the officials did not talk of the ball hitting Bernardo Silva's arm. The ball ricocheted to Silva's arm and was not a deliberate act.

Replay shows clearly that Trent Arnold Alexander on the other hand saw the ball and chose to use his hand to stop it. Which is clearly a deliberate act for a penalty.

The officials chose to deny it which shows a clear case of their corruption.

niaralandtopuser:
that is a clear penalty. 1. The hand is not in a natural position( veltman hand ball against Chelsea. 2.the hand made Arnold body bigger

niaralandtopuser:
that is a clear penalty. 1. The hand is not in a natural position( veltman hand ball against Chelsea. 2.the hand made Arnold body bigger

izzou:


Firminho's goal against Villa was cancelled. Did you see it?

Why didn't you create a thread to cry for Liverpool too?

Juliuss01:


Did Man City scores and the goal was cancelled?, Or you mean Man city can no longer win in Anfiled without penalties or red card ?.

Wait even Pep Guardiola was scared of Anfiled , playing mind game with Sadio Mane over diving, his words ahead of the match made him suspicious.

It will be unfair to Liverpool if the Bernardo silver's hand ball should should overlooked and then punished Trent for his own.

I have said it ahead of this season that Man city will suffer in the hand of VAR because of the pattern of their game. They escaped many error last season where the ref favour them.

From off side goals to red cards and penalties. Hence they wouldn't have won the league last Season.

They would have won Tottenham Hotspur in champion's league last season when they were running up and down and scored off side goals , it was VAR that recalled and cancelled, otherwise there pattern would have overshadowed the ref.

Then again we could say why the so much noise on the Liverpool Man City match .... It happens to everyone, it was Liverpool last previous week and it was Man City last week.


Liverpool had an hand ball with Aston Villa not taken and a goal ridiculously disallowed nobody made noise.

Manchester United fouled Origi and the ref did not respond to it, hence Manchester United scored , does anyone sees that ?.

Meanwhile, Bernardo silver's goal should have been cancelled too, because there was a foul before the ball was passed to him, but the ref chosed to neglect it so what's the sympathy for Man City all about or just bad belle for Liverpool.

TheGoodJoe:


At least read the bolded of the article and look at the pictures to understand the point.

TheGoodJoe:


Look at the point he made. Do not attack character. His point was clear.