StrikeBack:
Another one from a [b]mentally deranged [/b]human being

StrikeBack:
Another one from a menntally deeeranged human being

Brandstudio01:
It's a Biblical principle. Wives submit to your Husband. Much more of a Law than an advice.

jesusjnr:
Genesis 3:16 (KJV)

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

The curse of sin has been broken by Jesus. So any man who after knowing this, yet tries to subject the woman to the bondage and curse of sin that Jesus already delivered her from would reap what he sows.

God bless.

alBHAGDADI:

When speaking of feminism, I'm talking about the one in the confines of marriage, not the one which claims to be about equality in education and occupation.

Now, according to the title of this article, what is the curse from God which feminists exhibit? You see, when Eve got decieved by the serpent and Adam joined in, it led to the fall of mankind. This made God place a curse on the parties involved - Eve, Adam and the serpent.

What was the curse on Adam? He was to sweat before he eats bread and will always come across difficulties and obstacles to whatever he wants to do. This is a universal thing for all males. We always sweat before we eat i.e we engage in hardwork to provide our daily bread which is the way out as required by God. The males who don't follow God's way in the face of the curse are those who don't do hardwork. They are the Yahoo boys, fraudsters, robbers etc all of which are easy route, which is why they are the ones in jail.

Now, what was the curse on the woman? Read the Bible verse below.

Genesis 3:16 (KJV)
Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

As seen above, God placed two curses on the woman for sinning. Both curses are universal. The first is that the woman will always experience pain during child birth, which is universal because all women face this.

The second curse is that their desire shall be to their husband and he shall rule over them. Looking at this curse, one would think it is talking about sexual desire. No, it isn't because that desire had been there before they sinned. That is the essence of why God said they should be fruitful and multiply. Desire comes before becoming fruitful.

So, what is the desire that made God say their husband will have to rule over them? Definitely, sexual desire doesn't make a man rule over his wife. No, it makes them engage in something consentual.

Now, the desire God spoke of involves a woman wanting to take over her husband's rightful position of authority. This is why the husband will have no choice but to be forced to rule over his wife.

"and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee".

That desire is what feminists exhibit in their marriage which leads to chaos. They want equal right in decision making in the family. When Adam agreed to Eve's decision of eating the forbidden fruit instead of standing against it because it is wrong, he fell into sin.

Feminists also want to make their own decisions without their husband's consent. That was what Eve did when she didn't seek Adam's consent before eating the fruit. Guess the dilemma her action left Adam in? He was left with kicking her out for sinning or joining in the sin. Adam chose to sin as well. Did you see how a woman's independent decision led to her fall and that of her husband? She desired to do things on her own and also act as the decision maker in the family. That's desiring the husband's place. This is why husband's are firm in ensuring their authority is not undermined.

God that has placed such a curse on woman as a result of her sin, also provided a way to manage it. And the way to manage it is by being submissive to their husband.

Ephesians 5:22
Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

If you submit to your husband, you will realize that the desire for his position will reduce. And this will certainly bring a wife peace because it will make her husband love her more. No one loves a troublesome wife who questions one's authority. The above verse even says wives should submit unto their husbands as unto the Lord.

Any woman who doesn't obey this commandment of God in respect to submission will exhibit the curse God placed on the Woman as the consequence of her sin. That curse is to desire to usurp her husband. That is what Feminists are exhibiting today in their fight for equal rights in marriage when God placed the husband as the head of the family.

Ephesians 5:23
For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church:

As seen above, a church which doesn't obey the words of Jesus Christ which is its head, such church will start fighting against Christ with false doctrines and practices.

A wife who doesn't respect her husband's authority as head will look for a way to cut off that head.

So clearly, God gave Eve a command which she disobeyed and did what she desired. This led to curses on her. Here, God has commanded wives to submit to their husband as head. Feminists disobey that command, which is why they are fighting for equal rights in marriage. This is chaos, because there has to be a head in every affair in life e.g at work, in a country, community, family etc.

Ladies, what this sermon basically teaches is that if you fail to submit to your husband, it means you desire to be authoritative like him in the family. This means your husband will be forced to rule over you which you might not like. If you go ahead to undermine that rule, then comes lack of interest in you from your husband and many more before divorce.

So, make sure you obey your husband...


1 Peter 3:6
Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.

jesusjnr:
Genesis 3:16 (KJV)

16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

The curse of sin has been broken by Jesus. So any man who after knowing this, yet tries to subject the woman to the bondage and curse of sin that Jesus already delivered her from would reap what he sows.

God bless.

LilMissFavvy:
This is a great input. Submission is good, but when this people keep sounding like a woman should be turned into a slave without a say, it sounds awful, the description is pure slavery.

solite3:

False prophet!

You cant even quote the scripture accurately and the worse is that you quote out of context; which is typical of satan's way of decieving the foolish


Galatians 3:10-14 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.
And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.
Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:
That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.


Paul was talking about justification by faith alone which you Jesujnr reject but, quick to scope out and twisted a part so as to further your satanic failed intention.

2 Corinthians 11:13-15 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.
And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.
Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.

Brandstudio01:
It's a Biblical principle. Wives submit to your Husband. Much more of a Law than an advice.

CAPSLOCKED:


THE LAW USED TO BE THAT NON-VIRGIN WOMEN ARE TO BE STONED TO DEATH ON THEIR WEDDING NIGHT.

NOW SHOULD WE BASE OUR LIVES ON SOME LAWS FROM A RETĄRDED STONE-AGE BOOK?

IS THE OWNERSHIP AND MALTREATMENT OF SLAVES, AND THE MURDER OF YOUNG WOMEN GOOD FOR THE WORLD?

Brandstudio01:
It's a Biblical principle. Wives submit to your Husband. Much more of a Law than an advice.

nlPoster:


Why these extreme examples?

nlPoster:


Why these extreme examples?

GoodBadandUgly:


You haven't read your bible and it's very clear.

it also says :
We should throw babies at rocks for the blessing of God.
We shouldn't wear two fabrics.
Stone girls if you find out they're not virgins.
Not to eat pork or shellfish.
If someone rapes your daughter, they should pay you some money to marry her.
cutting the hair on the side of your head.
Manufacturing anointing oil.
Working on the sabbath.
Being in a town that believes in another God.
Your parents can kill you if your disobedient.

ARE YOU ALSO WILLING TO ACCEPT THESE AS ADVICE? OR ARE YOU READY TO BE A HYPOCRITE BY PICKING AND CHOOSING?

CAPSLOCKED:


I LIKE THIS PART.

GoodBadandUgly:


Wonderful, it's right there in the book...

The book explicitly gives you Christians permission to kill ANYONE (EVEN FAMILY) if they tell you to come to try a new religion.

SO HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE YOU ALL KILLED? I WANT TO KNOW.

I GUESS IF YOU WANT A SUBMISSIVE WIFE, IN ACCORDANCE TO THE LAWS OF GOD , YOU SHOULD TAKE UP ARMS AND KILL YOUR NON-VIRGIN RELATIVES, KILL YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS AND FRIENDS THAT DO NOT BELONG TO YOUR DENOMINATION.

THIS IS STUPID.

CAPSLOCKED:


I GUESS IF YOU WANT A SUBMISSIVE WIFE, IN ACCORDANCE TO THE LAWS OF GOD , YOU SHOULD TAKE UP ARMS AND KILL YOUR NON-VIRGIN RELATIVES, KILL YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS AND FRIENDS THAT DO NOT BELONG TO YOUR DENOMINATION.

THIS IS STUPID.

jesusjnr:
I don't worship Paul as you do, so don't expect me to be under obligation to his teachings as you are.

I worship Jesus and He is King!

solite3:
who talked about worshiping paul You cannot worship someone you dont know, stop deceiving yourself You dont know Jesus.

jesusjnr:
Are you now denying your Master, Lord, and Savior, Paul?

You can continue in your iniquity because of Paul whose teachings you place above that of my own Master Jesus, so that when you die, Paul who you think died for your sins and gave you eternal life, would allow you inside heaven with all your work of iniquity when you appear before him on judgment day.

So continue decieving yourself.

Eviana:
Hmmmm...kinda interesting topic.
Not sure I agree with the title.
Looks like you did a "play-on-words" sort of thing here.
This caught my eye because I actually had made reference (on another thread) to a few women in the Bible calling their husbands "lord".
I think I need to clarify that a little better.

However, let me address the word "feminisim" in a Godly marriage.
I'm not sure that the term fits or is being used properly.
I know Nigerians are obsessed with the use of the word and use it so frequently and broadly to label any woman--regardless of religion or not--and who (has a personality/voice) of her own-- as one.
That is quite unfortunate.
The secular use of the word feminism should not be used in a non-secular situation. Op you are directly doing that, although you say you are not.
I can also understand women wanting to be treated fairly...(although that is a topic for another time and section).
The scripture the OP was referring to was the following:

1 Peter 3:6 (KJV)
6 Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.

The OP, I believe, was saying that Christian women in marriages should be obeying their husbands.
He went a step further and said that by NOT calling their husbands "lord" , they are basically placing a curse on themselves.
I disagree.
I think that we, sometimes, take scripture out of context to justify certain behaviors, rather than praying for true understanding and wisdom.
We should look at the use of the term, "lord" in the broader scope.
I initially thought that women were calling their husbands "lord" regularly. (Ex. "Lord Abraham" or "Lord David" etc.,)
I do not, now, believe that is what was meant by what Sarah did. I don't think she did that.
I think she was honoring her husband's head-ship over the household. Respecting and honoring him as the spiritual leader over their family...of course as he was led by the Creator...Christ.

Ephesians 5:22-25 (KJV)

22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.

24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

25 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it

As the scriptures state, their is a mutual "submission" /respect to each other. Both genders need to do something in order to make for a peaceful, Godly family. A whole lot of love, respect, humility, forgiveness and self-control, need to take place.
However, no spouse should oppress the other by not allowing him/her the dignity to have a "voice".

Christianity is not an oppressive religion.

I know some couples who actually use the terms, "beloved", "bride", "groom", "husband", "wife" to refer to their spouse. I love that too.
I do not think that Christ would have a spouse referring to another as "lord". That could cause a very "sticky" situation.
That title (in my humble opinion) belongs to Jesus and God.