Welcome, Guest: Join Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 2,712,543 members, 6,407,795 topics. Date: Tuesday, 27 July 2021 at 05:13 PM

Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine - Politics (3) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine (26360 Views)

Nigerian Army Reacts To Foiled Attack On Imo Police Area Command / Nnamdi Kanu On Imo Prison Break: "No Nigerian Deserves To Be In Prison" / Hope Uzodinma Deals With Rochas Okorocha On Imo APC Campaign Poster (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Dadaboy: 10:07am On Jan 24, 2020
alizma:

Oga go and read the complete judgement on the case. The supreme court has dine what any reasonable court would have done. If you don't have it, ask people who have it before then, be mindful of what you say so that you don't look stupid later. Hope provided evidence of record of the votes that were excluded, police provide delicate copy that was kept with them as demand by law yet Ihedioha and Inec said they were fake, OK provide the original one, ihedioha and inec couldn't provide something to price that what hope provide was fake. While hope produce 54 witnesses to back his claim, ihedioha only produce 4 while inec produce one yet they stupidly expect hope to produce agent from each of the polling units. is that one normal talk?

You are a fool and an uncomprehending bastard
You can clearly see the number of total voters surpassing the accredited voters but you choose to show your zombism and foolishness online

3 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by tomdon(m): 10:09am On Jan 24, 2020
alizma:

Oga go and read the complete judgement on the case. The supreme court has dine what any reasonable court would have done. If you don't have it, ask people who have it before then, be mindful of what you say so that you don't look stupid later. Hope provided evidence of record of the votes that were excluded, police provide delicate copy that was kept with them as demand by law yet Ihedioha and Inec said they were fake, OK provide the original one, ihedioha and inec couldn't provide something to price that what hope provide was fake. While hope produce 54 witnesses to back his claim, ihedioha only produce 4 while inec produce one yet they stupidly expect hope to produce agent from each of the polling units. is that one normal talk?


Those votes were cancelled.
Supreme Court now run election while the budget goes to inec
A re run is the sensible thing any judge or panel should've recommended. They are compromised and the ruling will be upturned inshallah

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by kynbasil01: 10:13am On Jan 24, 2020
alizma:

Oga go and read the complete judgement on the case. The supreme court has dine what any reasonable court would have done. If you don't have it, ask people who have it before then, be mindful of what you say so that you don't look stupid later. Hope provided evidence of record of the votes that were excluded, police provide delicate copy that was kept with them as demand by law yet Ihedioha and Inec said they were fake, OK provide the original one, ihedioha and inec couldn't provide something to price that what hope provide was fake. While hope produce 54 witnesses to back his claim, ihedioha only produce 4 while inec produce one yet they stupidly expect hope to produce agent from each of the polling units. is that one normal talk?
this is Nigeria bro, the judgment was pre-planned and that's why inec failed to bring the original and even if inec does not bring it's original copy.. it doesn't give the herder cjn and co the right to use police copy which is not empowered by the constitution. . In the midst of confusion they could have ordered for election re-run...

1 Like 2 Shares

Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by ignis: 10:14am On Jan 24, 2020
The mathematricks that happened in the last Imo state gubernatorial election remains a mystery.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by tiwiex(m): 10:14am On Jan 24, 2020
alizma:

Oga go and read the complete judgement on the case. The supreme court has dine what any reasonable court would have done. If you don't have it, ask people who have it before then, be mindful of what you say so that you don't look stupid later. Hope provided evidence of record of the votes that were excluded, police provide delicate copy that was kept with them as demand by law yet Ihedioha and Inec said they were fake, OK provide the original one, ihedioha and inec couldn't provide something to price that what hope provide was fake. While hope produce 54 witnesses to back his claim, ihedioha only produce 4 while inec produce one yet they stupidly expect hope to produce agent from each of the polling units. is that one normal talk?

Is judgment now based on number of witnesses?

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by ensamy(m): 10:15am On Jan 24, 2020
If so, then how was INEC able to tender evidence that Buhari won the 2019 Presidential election. grin angry shocked shocked shocked
Yes, how did INEC proof it.

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Ejames234: 10:15am On Jan 24, 2020
When you say something is incorrect, it is expected that you show that which is correct.
In a case where you allege that something is incorrect or fake and fail to provide the correct or original, it might be assumed that you're not sure of what you've alleged.

The Supreme Court has given her verdict.
If anyone deserves blame, it is Ihedioha's legal team.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by danie09(m): 10:19am On Jan 24, 2020
You just nailed it
Ejames234:
When you say something is incorrect, it is expected that you show that which is correct.
In a case where you allege that something is incorrect or fake and fail to provide the correct or original, it might be assumed that you're not sure of what you've alleged.

The Supreme Court has given her verdict.
If anyone deserves blame, it is Ihedioha's legal team.

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by hush15: 10:19am On Jan 24, 2020
yns4real:


https://www.thecable.ng/scourt-on-imo-inec-failed-to-tender-results-it-claimed-were-genuine/amp?__twitter_impression=true

So, if INEC can't present original results of IMO elections, how are we sure they have results for any elections....
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Trimque2k1: 10:22am On Jan 24, 2020
Doubleoh7:

You don't sound like you read the judgement either except you did indeed read it but the APC partisanship virus will not let you sound objective. In that same judgement, you will see that Hope claimed he has records of 388 units that were excluded, police submitted their own copies for 368 units while during cross examination of witness, the DCP who tendered the documents mentioned 358 units hence the reason the lower courts thrashed this witness as being unreliable. It was the same double speaking unreliable witness that sharia Tanko's panel saw nothing wrong in the multiple speakings and conveniently choose to accept Hope's version of 388 units. Like the guy u mentioned rightly said, in the face of glaring irregularities and unreliable witnesses, the best a learned judge out to give justice would have done is to order a rerun and not prove to the whole world that indeed you had F9 in English and Maths in your O'level exam results for which you gained admission into the university to study law.

Let's see this judgement this way, INEC and PDP said the results which APC claimed are fake I mean the 388 polling units but they couldn't provide original of that same 388 polling units to counter the claims of APC.And the Supreme judge made a remark which changed my mind over everything that, inec didn't contest that election didn't hold in those places not even pdp so why was these 388 polling units result excluded from whole results. That I say was the main argument. But I still want Buhari out of power sha

1 Like

Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by wasuka14(m): 10:40am On Jan 24, 2020
Still ignorantly relied on inec document that have been clearly seen as false and inconsistent to based your judgement on supreme Court or it's officers. Have u patiently go through document for Hope to know which is valid and which is not??

This is a public place stop embarrassing yourself simply because u hate d personality of person at helm of supreme Court.

Do u think d Almighty Supreme court will be stupid to to give judgment with lapses.?

Why do u think all d SAN defending ihedioa keep mute and silent after d judgment.? Are u more educated than them.?

No matter how far lies flies the thruth will silent it one day.
clarocuzioo:


Your problem is.comprehension. If you have read my submission, you would have seen were I made mention about inconsist ncies from all the parties involved.
How do you possibly explain total number of votes cast being more than accredited voters. What a terrible precedence to set by the supreme Court.

You don't even understand the disaster Tanko has created in the judiciary. Tomorrow any judge will award votes to anyone he likes citing this disaster as a precedence.

The best thing to have done would have been to order for a rerun so that he won't possibly be on any side of the mess created by INEC, IHEDIOHA AND HOPE UZODINMA.

Stop thinking like Tanko,and look at the bigger picture.

You are the one obviously sounding foolish.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by clench3(m): 10:41am On Jan 24, 2020
Doubleoh7:

You don't sound like you read the judgement either except you did indeed read it but the APC partisanship virus will not let you sound objective. In that same judgement, you will see that Hope claimed he has records of 388 units that were excluded, police submitted their own copies for 368 units while during cross examination of witness, the DCP who tendered the documents mentioned 358 units hence the reason the lower courts thrashed this witness as being unreliable. It was the same double speaking unreliable witness that sharia Tanko's panel saw nothing wrong in the multiple speakings and conveniently choose to accept Hope's version of 388 units. Like the guy u mentioned rightly said, in the face of glaring irregularities and unreliable witnesses, the best a learned judge out to give justice would have done is to order a rerun and not prove to the whole world that indeed you had F9 in English and Maths in your O'level exam results for which you gained admission into the university to study law.
Uncle, do you have an idea of what it means to run and election in Nigeria,( death pool, snatching of ballot boxes, etc,) am sure it won't be easy for you as a cjn to order a rerun
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by IpobAntidote: 10:43am On Jan 24, 2020
[quote author=clarocuzioo post=86054408]Rubbish, Tanko the Sharia judge has proven that the only reason he was made the CJN was to enthrone chaos.

There where a lot of inconsistences discrepancies on the side of INEC, HOPE UZODINMA, EMEKA IHEDIOHA ETC, what any sensible panel would have done is to order a re run, so that there will be a result consistent with the lay down rules and guidelines, but the incompetent Sharia judge manufactured figures and awarded to Hope UZODINMA, having more figures than the accredited voters, who the hell does that.
This is the reason why they removed Onnoghen b cause no sound Justice that knows his onus will be involved in this mess and ridicle of the bench.[/quote]


Rubbish. The man was enthroned to mess Apc up in Rivers and zamfara abi? Was it not the same man who gave ridiculous sanctions that allowed pdp to run opposed in 2 states? Fools in the pdp were happy with what a sane person will consider as the worst form of judgment in a democratic dispensation. He was good then, but now he's a Sharia judge.
Pls buy some common sense plus brain or STFU.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Doubleoh7: 10:45am On Jan 24, 2020
Trimque2k1:


Let's see this judgement this way, INEC and PDP said the results which APC claimed are fake I mean the 388 polling units but they couldn't provide original of that same 388 polling units to counter the claims of APC.And the Supreme judge made a remark which changed my mind over everything that, inec didn't contest that election didn't hold in those places not even pdp so why was these 388 polling units result excluded from whole results. That I say was the main argument. But I still want Buhari out of power sha
Thanks for your opinion, but lets look at this from this angle. INEC organised elections and because of the way things happened on some 388 units, they say no we can't uphold this results hence we cancel them. Then someone who participated in the same elections but who the results of the cancelled 388 favored approaches the courts and the courts expects inec to tender results for a 388 INEC has earlier said they cancelled because of glaring irregularities. So what exactly are they supposed to tender? Maybe their error was not arguing the admissibility of those results with the supreme court but asking why they didn't tender the correct results means you expect something else
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Doubleoh7: 10:50am On Jan 24, 2020
clench3:

Uncle, do you have an idea of what it means to run and election in Nigeria,( death pool, snatching of ballot boxes, etc,) am sure it won't be easy for you as a cjn to order a rerun
But in places or past ones that reruns were ordered, no one thought about this? You see most of us don't understand why people are raising voices against this judgement, its because its the supreme court for goodness sake! Whatever they say is okay today becomes a precedence and tomorrow someone will make another crazy ruling citing this as precedence. Speak up today not because it affects you but because its the right thing to do!

2 Likes

Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Femeto: 10:55am On Jan 24, 2020
Naija na Zoo this is terrible.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Qadaffi2idiamin: 10:58am On Jan 24, 2020
just like buhari... Tanko Mohammed Is a terrorist.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Jubilee1982: 11:15am On Jan 24, 2020
His Excellency, Chief Dr. Hope Uzodimma, Onwa 1 of Omuma, please carry go. Your victory is Victory for democracy. Who doesn't like you or your government should go and hug transformer. Instead of Emeka Ihedioha to concentrate and consolidate on the achievement of his Excellency,Chief Rochas Okorocha,the Owelle 1 Of Orlu, he was busy setting up committee and destroying statues. Carry on my Amiable governor. Haters of Most Rev. Fr Ejike Mbaka, an anointed servant of the Most High God waited to crucify him had it been the prophecy did not come to past.Now that it came to pass Instead of them to use this period to give their lives to God, they are saying he is APC prophet. What about if his prophecy didn't come to past?
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Awoo88: 11:18am On Jan 24, 2020
danie09:
ihedioha should hold his lawyers for deliberate sabotage ,his legal team and inec's legal teams are the biggest criminals in this case.

Cos they were forking complicit.
They all knew where this case was heading from the tribunal.

Hope Uzodinna was smart

Ihedioha's and inec's legal teams are either dumb or corrupt but my instincts said the later is the right option here.

All uzodinma needed do to win was to buy off ihedioha's lawyers and the INEC legal team.

Theres no point blaming the supreme court.
The court and the judges did nothing but their job.
The supreme court was factual they played by the book
Local k well. The supreme court judges messed big time. INEC has the power to council an election if they deem it fit that the process was compromised. The elections in this area were council for a reason. And the reason in the over 100k vote above accredited voters. What thus judgement means is anybody can go get result from anywhere and supreme court will award the person with victory. INEC can not tender results for place it did not declare result for.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by awa(m): 11:23am On Jan 24, 2020
So who provided the genuine one used to declare Hope Governor? cheesy
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Monday60655(m): 11:25am On Jan 24, 2020
All well meaning Nigerians have lost hope in compromised and cabals controlled supreme court right from Osun State verdict.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Trimque2k1: 11:46am On Jan 24, 2020
Doubleoh7:

Thanks for your opinion, but lets look at this from this angle. INEC organised elections and because of the way things happened on some 388 units, they say no we can't uphold this results hence we cancel them. Then someone who participated in the same elections but who the results of the cancelled 388 favored approaches the courts and the courts expects inec to tender results for a 388 INEC has earlier said they cancelled because of glaring irregularities. So what exactly are they supposed to tender? Maybe their error was not arguing the admissibility of those results with the supreme court but asking why they didn't tender the correct results means you expect something else
Well said. but the 388 units we talking about is different from the other units election was cancelled o
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by paddypat: 11:46am On Jan 24, 2020
The court issue is not all about moral but prove. who knows what transpired between Hope and INEC.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by clarocuzioo(m): 11:59am On Jan 24, 2020
wasuka14:
Still ignorantly relied on inec document that have been clearly seen as false and inconsistent to based your judgement on supreme Court or it's officers. Have u patiently go through document for Hope to know which is valid and which is not??

This is a public place stop embarrassing yourself simply because u hate d personality of person at helm of supreme Court.

Do u think d Almighty Supreme court will be stupid to to give judgment with lapses.?

Why do u think all d SAN defending ihedioa keep mute and silent after d judgment.? Are u more educated than them.?

No matter how far lies flies the thruth will silent it one day.

And you have not "educatedly" proven to me the mathmagic behind actual voters being more than accredited voters, Mr. Sabi, where has it ever happened.

Go and read up how many justices that refused to get involved in this show of shame when the Sharia court cheif judge was shopping for Judges.

The best thing to be done is order for a rerun.

Please stop thinking like the Sharia judge, ohh, I forgot, you all are product of quota system.

And by the way, who told you Ihedioha's SANS kept quiet? Stop spreading propaganda you don't know.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Doubleoh7: 12:00pm On Jan 24, 2020
Trimque2k1:

Well said. but the 388 units we talking about is different from the other units election was cancelled o
No bro, its part of cancelled votes which was why supreme court now added the figures to the man's votes. And true to the issues raised by INEC, the total number of votes now exceeds total number of accredited voters. That is the abracadabra people are angry with
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by ud4u: 12:03pm On Jan 24, 2020
alizma:

Don't mind inec, I think those that were sent to owerri connived with ihedioha to exclude the result where hope had larger share of votes. Neither ihedioha nor inec could present original result to counter what hope produce and the couldn't prove that there was no election in those area but they kept saying what hope present is not correct, OK let see the correct one, no way

Larger vote abi all vote cast and above
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by kutashi: 12:10pm On Jan 24, 2020
[quote author=Racoon post=86054102][/quote]
You and your channels crew are mumu of life! Didn't all of you know that the new vote added will automatically increased the number of accredited voters by same amount immediately those vote are accepted! I wished I can call in when I saw the nomsense on Channels TV that day and they will be claiming they have staticitian! The arguement should have been shifted to total number of people on the registered instead! I swear you and PDP goons, e wail ku ni!
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by demitola(m): 12:16pm On Jan 24, 2020
Doubleoh7:

While i do not hold brief for either of them, INEC the umpire claimed the elections in those areas were marred with irregularities hence they cancelled them. How then will u expect them to tender results from places they claimed elections did not hold up to acceptable standards?
So if you wanna believe that elections were cancelled, then how did Uzodinma's result copies and that of the Police carry the signature of the Opposition Party agents and they couldn't deny in court?
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by SoNature(m): 12:19pm On Jan 24, 2020
danie09:
ihedioha should hold his lawyers for deliberate sabotage ,his legal team and inec's legal teams are the biggest criminals in this case.

Cos they were forking complicit.
They all knew where this case was heading from the tribunal.

Hope Uzodinna was smart

Ihedioha's and inec's legal teams are either dumb or corrupt but my instincts said the later is the right option here.

All uzodinma needed do to win was to buy off ihedioha's lawyers and the INEC legal team.

Theres no point blaming the supreme court.
The court and the judges did nothing but their job.



The supreme court was factual they played by the book

You were making sense you got to that point.

Supreme Court messed up big time.

INEC said there were irregularities in the polling centers Hope used to win.

What the court would have done was to call for a rerun because the number of votes coming from there was huge.

The Supreme Court was clearly biased
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Doubleoh7: 12:26pm On Jan 24, 2020
demitola:

So if you wanna believe that elections were cancelled, then how did Uzodinma's result copies and that of the Police carry the signature of the Opposition Party agents and they couldn't deny in court?
How does signature of party agents make the process credible? In this country where party agents and adhoc staff are ferried from polling unit to a politician's house, paid and made to sign off on electoral materials after they have written the results that suits them? Not saying that is what played out here, but for inec to cancel the results and refuse to admit them as theirs means that they couldn't even believe their own lies. What this is taking us back to is the era where materials are hijacked from polling units, results are written in the convenience of their enclaves and somehow the sheets will resurface at the collating center and if INEC says no we cnt afford to accept and collate these results you head to the supreme courts that have set this precedence and they will help you add the figures.
Re: Supreme Court On Imo: INEC Failed To Tender Results It Claimed Were Genuine by Bolognese: 12:26pm On Jan 24, 2020
According to you the elections in the 388 units were marred by irregularities and INEC cancelled them. IF INEC CANCELLED THESE UNITS, THE RESULTS FROM THESE UNITS SHOULD HAVE BEEN CAPTURED UNDER CANCELLED VOTES!!!. This is different from what INEC is saying, INEC claims elections didn’t hold in the 388 Units, so there are No results from those Units!

If you’ve been involved in elections you should know there’s something called an incidence form. If elections were disrupted in these units, there would have been an incidence form to prove this.

Based on the norm, the next day, INEC would have conducted fresh elections in these units like it was done in Osun and Rivers States, but No, INEC in its wisdom went ahead to collate and announce a winner without results from 388 Units, which is about 12% of the entire state, and without any justification? INEC should be held responsible for everything wrong in IMO!

Most of you commenting here have no first hand knowledge of elections in Nigeria, all I see is ignorance displayed in full confidence.


Doubleoh7:

While i do not hold brief for either of them, INEC the umpire claimed the elections in those areas were marred with irregularities hence they cancelled them. How then will u expect them to tender results from places they claimed elections did not hold up to acceptable standards?

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply)

One Year After, Nigeria’s Border Remains Closed / Valedictory Session Of The 7th Senate (pictures) / Floods Wash Snakes Into Plateau Community.

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2021 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 221
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.