garfield1:

The door of rigging were opened already by the judgment of 2015 in rivers and akwa ibom.those errors are clearly not fatal according to the apex court

Agboriotejoye:

garfield1, Blindersoff, Olaolufred
Hope you can hear what happened in Imo during the re-run today where thugs invaded the collation centres and carted results away.
I'm sure those results will resurface soon don't worry.
On behalf of EzeCanada I say: All hail Tanko!!

Blindersoff:


How many times do I have to spell things out to you as if you are a toddler.

INCIDENCE FORMS, INCIDENCE FORMS, INCIDENCE FORMS

Let that sink in

Agboriotejoye:

Incidence form at ward collation centre?

Did INEC not also produce forms as evidence that elections did not hold or were cancelled in 388 polling units?

As far as Tanko is concerned, incidence forms are mere toilet papers.

I already told you the floodgate of rigging has been opened.

Watch as results surface soon.

Olaolufred:


I looked at the time I spent answering you.
And discovered it was a wasted time.

I don't want to fall victim of time wasters this year.

You can continue and win your case by yourself.

I congratulate you for winning this case.

I declared you the ssa to Ihedioha.

I declared you as the wisest Nigerian ever.

I declared you everything your ego desire.

Enjoy your day.

And enjoy your gold medal.

Olaolufred:


I looked at the time I spent answering you.
And discovered it was a wasted time.

I don't want to fall victim of time wasters this year.

You can continue and win your case by yourself.

I congratulate you for winning this case.

I declared you the ssa to Ihedioha.

I declared you as the wisest Nigerian ever.

I declared you everything your ego desire.

Enjoy your day.

And enjoy your gold medal.
Agboriotejoye

CanadaOrBust:


To be clear, I am totally unbiased. I neither know nor like Ihedioha nor am I from anywhere near Imo state.

The thing is, u r not looking at the big picture. U r all about technicalities and pretending not to see what is actually happening. If this were just another case u might have a point. The thing is, a case like this is different - it strikes at the very core of what type of country we may end up becoming. This is not a case u decide on technicalities or pretending not to see what is right in front of you. In Bush vs. Gore, for example, Supreme Court not only thoroughly examined the documents, they ordered a recount of the actual original votes!

NO MATTER WHAT, the SC has a duty to make sure that such a momentous, seismic decision has solid, unassailable documentary basis?! They start doing that by thoroughly examining the documents in front of them! This is also their country and they ought care they are setting a precedent that can gradually make it a one-party state! They are removing a gov and replacing him with a fourth-place finishing appellant based solely on a set of uncollaborated documents supplied solely by the appellant. Regardless of what anyone else fails to submit, they have a DUTY to EXAMINE those documents to make sure they are up to par and that the figures therein make sense vis-a-vis number of registered and accredited voters. That, or they are setting a precedent that will gradually slide the country into a one-party state!

Agboriotejoye:


That's the point. Most of these APC guys are taking Nigeria along a dangerous slope even PDP never did. The sc in 2007 while agreeing that the election that brought Yar'adua in was faulty, declined to cancel it on the grounds that such decisions were weighty and needed serious incontrovertible proof.
The US is putting their president to trial cause of a phone call, but they recognise the high bar required for making such a decision which is why the impeachment is DOA from scratch.

Of course ihedioha's elections was not perfect. But it does not mean you hand over to another questionable winner just cause of that fact. Accepting a blatantly fraudulent result were some polling units had votes exceeding registered voters, and of which INEC rejected the results due to obvious irregularities, based on some technicalities is making a mockery of INEC and by extension the constitution that empowered it to conduct elections.

Just as in Osun state, the SC has refused to judge a case by its merits but simply some legal jargons. What happened to ordering a retrial?

The fact is the sc is behaving like a bully, removing governors and senators at will but, developing cold feet when it comes to the president or any powerful official for that matter. They have no scruples riding roughshod on election cases just cause they can. Same thing they did when OBJ was president!!

At the end of the day, this particular judgment is legalising rigging as long as you can get INEC to not have their own copy which is easy as ABC. God help this country!!

CanadaOrBust:
pquaver, garfield1, Blindersoff, Olaolufred, Agboriotejoye

This judgment is even worse than thought. Guardian obtained a copy of Uzodinma’s appeal. Read it below. This is the SOLE basis for prompt replacement of a sitting governor with a 4th-place finisher. This is the judgment some people are spending sleepless nights defending as great.
YOU PEOPLE SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES!


“The Guardian obtained a certified-true-copy of the record of the appeal filed at the Supreme Court by Uzodinma and APC... which shows that there were mathematical and factual inconsistencies which the apex court ignored.

In the records tendered at the tribunal, Uzodinma, from pages 9 to 27 of his petition, drew a table of votes allocation which he claimed were the figures obtained from the duplicate copies of Forms EC8A handed over to his party agents at the 388 polling units, the results of which were excluded in the overall result of the election.

From the table he compiled from the 388 polling units, there were 252,452 registered voters, out of which 213,695 voted for APC, and 1,903 voted for Ihedioha.

But the table does not indicate either the total number of accredited voters or the number of invalid votes, if any, and the votes allocated to the remaining 68 candidates that contested the election, aside from Uzodinma and Ihedioha.

Also, the duplicate Forms EC8A tendered by the PW54, Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Rabiu Hussein, showed that there were no fewer than six polling units where more votes were recorded above the registered number of voters.

For instance, on figure number 69 which shows votes cast at Eziama/Okpala (Umualum Village Square, Eziama), the total number of registered voters was 492, whereas the table shows that the APC scored 819 votes and PDP scored 7 votes, meaning that 334 more votes than the registered voters were recorded, apart from the votes polled by the other candidates at the election that were not shown on the table.

Similarly, on page 22 of the petition referencing polling unit 282, the number of registered voters was put at 591, whereas the tabulation shows that APC polled 586 votes and PDP nine votes, indicating a total of four votes higher than the registered number of voters. This, again, excluded the votes scored by the other candidates.

On the same page 22 of the record, at the polling unit 285 (Obudi/Aro, Central Assembly Square, Unusable 11) with 449 registered voters, APC was credited with 780 votes and PDP with four votes, leaving a total of 335 votes higher than the actual number of registered voters.

Figures obtained from page 79 of the record of appeal under item 384 show that APC scored 526 votes, while PDP was credited with two votes, and the total votes cast was put at 526, indicating two votes higher than the total number registered voters in the area.”

CanadaOrBust:
pquaver, garfield1, Blindersoff, Olaolufred, Agboriotejoye

This judgment is even worse than thought. Guardian obtained a copy of Uzodinma’s appeal. Read it below. This is the SOLE basis for prompt replacement of a sitting governor with a 4th-place finisher. This is the judgment some people are spending sleepless nights defending as great.
YOU PEOPLE SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES!


“The Guardian obtained a certified-true-copy of the record of the appeal filed at the Supreme Court by Uzodinma and APC... which shows that there were mathematical and factual inconsistencies which the apex court ignored.

In the records tendered at the tribunal, Uzodinma, from pages 9 to 27 of his petition, drew a table of votes allocation which he claimed were the figures obtained from the duplicate copies of Forms EC8A handed over to his party agents at the 388 polling units, the results of which were excluded in the overall result of the election.

From the table he compiled from the 388 polling units, there were 252,452 registered voters, out of which 213,695 voted for APC, and 1,903 voted for Ihedioha.

But the table does not indicate either the total number of accredited voters or the number of invalid votes, if any, and the votes allocated to the remaining 68 candidates that contested the election, aside from Uzodinma and Ihedioha.

Also, the duplicate Forms EC8A tendered by the PW54, Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP), Rabiu Hussein, showed that there were no fewer than six polling units where more votes were recorded above the registered number of voters.

For instance, on figure number 69 which shows votes cast at Eziama/Okpala (Umualum Village Square, Eziama), the total number of registered voters was 492, whereas the table shows that the APC scored 819 votes and PDP scored 7 votes, meaning that 334 more votes than the registered voters were recorded, apart from the votes polled by the other candidates at the election that were not shown on the table.

Similarly, on page 22 of the petition referencing polling unit 282, the number of registered voters was put at 591, whereas the tabulation shows that APC polled 586 votes and PDP nine votes, indicating a total of four votes higher than the registered number of voters. This, again, excluded the votes scored by the other candidates.

On the same page 22 of the record, at the polling unit 285 (Obudi/Aro, Central Assembly Square, Unusable 11) with 449 registered voters, APC was credited with 780 votes and PDP with four votes, leaving a total of 335 votes higher than the actual number of registered voters.

Figures obtained from page 79 of the record of appeal under item 384 show that APC scored 526 votes, while PDP was credited with two votes, and the total votes cast was put at 526, indicating two votes higher than the total number registered voters in the area.”

garfield1:

Are you sure that your okay or your blind? So because you are going to lose your job as one of ihedioha's agent,does it mean the end of the world for you? Are you unemployable? if you minus the 6 polling units with over voting,will it stop hope from winning your green capped master

garfield1:

Are you sure that your okay or your blind? So because you are going to lose your job as one of ihedioha's agent,does it mean the end of the world for you? Are you unemployable? if you minus the 6 polling units with over voting,will it stop hope from winning your green capped master

CanadaOrBust:


We are talking of the trajectory of the country and this one is talking about Ihedioha. Who the hell is Ohedioha?! People are so myopic! Can’t u manage to see beyond just the immediate?!

YOU DON’T MAKE SUCH MOMENTOUS, SEISMIC DECISIONS BASED ON SUCH DOCUMENTS!!

Capisce?

Agboriotejoye:

Don't mind the guy. He thinks everyone is like him. The taste of porridge is so sweet in their mouths they're prepared to forego conscience and common sense for it. Imagine asking the SC to reject some parts of a body of evidence and accept others. Chai!!

CanadaOrBust:


Not only that, turnout rarely exceeds 60%. That all the units recorded close to 100% turnout or more tells us how those numbers were obtained.
garfield1 try to forget this particular case, focus instead on where the country would end up if this were allowed to continue

Agboriotejoye:

Oh so you agree the evidence is defective now? But you expect SC to help them refine their evidence. What happened to your SC cannot do what it's not asked to give?
I guess to you, SC doing that does not make it bias. The fact is that the results are oluwole. They come from the same source and that makes them all defective moreso when the results have registered voters figure but no figure for accredited voters.
Anyway ihedioha has applied for review. I hope the SC will take that opportunity to correct this madness

CanadaOrBust:


We are talking of the trajectory of the country and this one is talking about Ihedioha. Who the hell is Ohedioha?! People are so myopic! Can’t u manage to see beyond just the immediate?!

YOU DON’T MAKE SUCH MOMENTOUS, SEISMIC DECISIONS BASED ON SUCH DOCUMENTS!!

Capisce?

garfield1:

You are new to the electoral system

CanadaOrBust:


Seems like u r the one new to it. Otherwise u wouldn’t have said throw out only the 6 units that have +100%. That is so childish. You should have been able to deduced that all the units have unrealistic turnouts. That ALL the figures are compromised.

garfield1:

You are the one new to it because if you do you will discover that all elections have one error or the other and therefore does it mean that the courts should cancel all the elections? Why didnt pdp raise this issue at the court? Is the any election that is 100% perfect?
The courts work based on facts and evidence not deductions or inference.the evidence which we can see here is that 6 polling units have irregularities and pdp never saw this before.minusing it will change nothing.if you have issues with other units,you simply present documentary or verbal evidences and not hearsays.you are becoming a nuisance herd

Olaolufred:
I never knew these soldiers could run away from their own self -indulging thread this way o.
So they yaf left Ihedioha so fast ni.
Why not come and tell us the illegality of Eddy Obinna representing Ihedioha in IMO house of assembly defection to APC.
We need more from the wise men of nairaland.
Are they tired beating the air?
Or are they in the cold like Ihedioha after the gale of defections?
Sorry, I'm just asking as a novice who knows little compared to the veterans that are canadian or agberos that knows more than oluomo.