Promomarlie:


There's nothing respectable about you because you can carry any STI and dump it in your matrimonial bed.. 14 years??!! and you carry Ashawo at the sliest of chance you have. Brother I fó for you oh!

Promomarlie:


There's nothing respectable about you because you can carry any STI and dump it in your matrimonial bed.. 14 years??!! and you carry Ashawo at the sliest of chance you have. Brother I fó for you oh!

SUPERPACK:
5 minutes pleasure = 6 months of sleepless nights. Is it worth the stress?

akpoguma1989:
If you read very well, I used protection throughout

Cakephp:

As much as you are educated but some of your assertions are false.
[b]no study have ever been conducted on the use of P[/b]EP . The available data is merely from observations . No comprehensive data is available. In fact, it is physically impossible to conduct a study on PEP.
On the other hand, comprehensive studies have been conducted on PreP and it has been proven to be 100% effective.

Also, PEP has failed to prevent HIV in some cases but researchers did not conclude that PEP actually failed, those failures could not be attributed to PEP. It could be due to exposures during or after PEP is initiated or due to transmitted drug resistance.
This simply means the strain of HIV the individual contracted is resistant to available drugs.

But please sir I want to ask, concerning PEP I am only familier with Lamivudine / Zidovudine combination as prescribed by my doctor. Is this combination effective?

YoungBlackRico:
It's your house na, not an hotel. FYI, they do have contacts of all these escorts and runs girls.

manontree:


This is so false. Several studies have been conducted on macaques proving the efficacy of PEP and effectively confirming the overall success rate at 87% and how the increase in the volume of inoculation and passage of time decreases this efficacy percentage

I agree that on humans most of the studies done have been observational mostly because of the ethics involving a cohort study where you would divide people into two groups of one cohort receiving PEP and the other group not receiving PEP

The problem with this is that you now have to have people who actually need PEP but you choose to deny them this medication to know if they would catch HIV while you give the other group PEP to check the impact. This is the only way to actually do this study in a lay man's language. This would be unethical

As regards PEP failures which you claimed were not linked to the medication failure, you are wrong. I would post two links now that shows two cases of PEP failure where there were no subsequent exposures and the medications used were not resistant to the HIV variants mutation. The medication failed to work pure and simple

Lamivudine / Zidovudine is NOT a first line best defense. Most PEP failures we have so far experienced have come from the use of these combo. If you check my post above you would see the best first line defense. No failure has been so far observed from this new combo

https://www.jwatch.org/na32520/2013/10/23/novel-explanation-pep-failure

https://blog.askdrtan.com/a-case-of-pep-failure/#.Xj6XdzPTXqs

akpoguma1989:
I travelled to imo state where I stayed at any hotel, I asked the receptionist to get a girl for me to spend the night, during the night we engaged in sex and used condom throughout after sex I discovered that I had a small boil that has burst on my abdomen.

My issue is that vagina fluid came in contact with my boil that has burst on my abdomen, is there any risk of having hiv, I am presently taking truvada but the side effects are much, note that the condom did not burst, am I at risk or just unnecessary worried

akpoguma1989:

It is not a sore, it is a boil with pus

Cakephp:

You are wrong once again.
Lamivudine / Zidovudine is the only drug that has been proven to reduce the risk of contracting HIV after exposure.
first line treatment on the other hand refers to drugs with fewer side effects. Most people stop using PEP due to the side effects that's why health care organizations recommended drug with fewer side effects as first line treatment.

Also, the two links you've shared have further confirmed there was no evidence that PEP actually failed. I wonder if you actually read the article.

https://blog.askdrtan.com/a-case-of-pep-failure/#.Xj6XdzPTXqs
According to the above article PEP was started 34hours after exposure. If you noticed I clearly recommend 24hrs latest, anything short of that is game of chance.

tolakush92:



This is a serious question
I know you must be a doctor
Pls how can I detoxify my system of weed
I'm actually going for an interview sometime next month and I'll be doing a drug test and I don't want to to be positive... I have stopped since last month ...

manontree:


I do not know why someone would be looking for argument. You simply should argue on something you are an expert on and not what you think you have read up. Your first argument about Lamivudine /Zidovudine and what a first line defense is instantly shows what your level of knowledge is. You also stated your doctor prescribed this for you. Taken all together it is obvious you are not a doctor nor even a HIV specialist so why are you making this argument?

I do not have to prove anything to you nor even educate you. It's up to you to believe whatever you want as regards your uninformed opinion. The things I have wrote are critical information people pay good money to learn but I know you have learnt a great deal from them but choose to make arguments on things you have filial knowledge of

proclinician:


If you have one month inbetween you will pass the test. You can try few things like drinking a lot of water and engaging in aerobic exercises to sweat. You can take lipton every now and then. They may test ur blood or urine for traces of the THC-COOH that's the hydrocarbon component of the cannabis or ttetrahydrocannabnol. Whichever, with a lot of water, like carry water in can everytime drink like ur life depends on it and from time to time get your body to sweat profusely. The lipton yellow label tea will introduce antioxidants into ur body

Cakephp:

Lol people pay money for information that is widely available and people are even begged to learn.
You do not have any valid argument. Reason why nobody should accept your view.

For the benefit of doubt, I will post a link to CDC website so you can learn about first line treatment used for PEP.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00052801.htm

Cakephp:

You are wrong once again.
Lamivudine / Zidovudine is the only drug that has been proven to reduce the risk of contracting HIV after exposure.
first line treatment on the other hand refers to [b]drugs with fewer side effects[/b]. Most people stop using PEP due to the side effects that's why health care organizations recommended drug with fewer side effects as first line treatment.

Also, the two links you've shared have further confirmed there was no evidence that PEP actually failed. I wonder if you actually read the article.

https://blog.askdrtan.com/a-case-of-pep-failure/#.Xj6XdzPTXqs
According to the above article PEP was started 34hours after exposure. If you noticed I clearly recommend 24hrs latest, anything short of that is game of chance.

manontree:


I think you are a stubborn person. You are here referring me to a 1998 article by CDC!!! Something is very wrong with you

I say this because some people may actually read this and believe in what you say. Social media is internet based and people read all manners of things and some may actually believe you

If your doctor is prescribing this in 2020 you should get a new doctor. I have always said it over and over that if an exposure is serious enough to warrant PEP, the person must be followed by a WHO designated HIV specialist not just any GP. It is precisely for doctors doing this that this rule is in place

I was shocked that LUTH still gives Tenofovir disoproxil, emtricitabine and efavirenz as their standard PEP protocol. This is a long discontinued protocol with debilitating side effects and efavirenz particularly being resistant to most HIV mutations in Africa

So if LUTH does this who is your doctor to know any better and dish out nonsense to you and you rely on that to come here and argue with me

I feel bad that you may have learnt something from me today. Your type shouldn't have such information without paying big time for it

SUPERPACK:
I mean you should ZIP UP, That pleasure you seek in sex will burn out in an hour highest and you are left with nothing. Should you feel you can't do without it, go and marry so you can stick to one partner.

akpoguma1989:
I travelled to imo state where I stayed at any hotel, I asked the receptionist to get a girl for me to spend the night, during the night we engaged in sex and used condom throughout after sex I discovered that I had a small boil that has burst on my abdomen.

My issue is that vagina fluid came in contact with my boil that has burst on my abdomen, is there any risk of having hiv, I am presently taking truvada but the side effects are much, note that the condom did not burst, am I at risk or just unnecessary worried

akpoguma1989:

I used my hand that I used to remove the condom to clean the boil

manontree:


Indeed it is. Infact using a 4th generation tests, I have never seen a negative result at 30 days change. At 90 days the result is 99.99% conclusive

manontree:


This is serious misinformation. A big problem that some people may actually read you and believe this and start acting on its premise

This is false. While PEP has shown to dramatically reduce the risk of HIV transmission by stopping the progression of the virons from the dendritic cells to the lymph nodes where the infection would become permanent, there has been several cases of PEP failures even when the medication was properly taken and no further exposure made

Infact the success of PEP has been estimated at just 87% while some studies even estimated less

For the OP I am surprised someone actually prescribed PEP for this exposure which is not PEP INDICATED. There is virtually no risk for this exposure and as such PEP is certainly NOT warranted. The only positive for you here is that the Travuda would serve as PreP for you

Even if PEP is warranted, Travuda alone is NOT the best medication to be used. For the seriousness of this topic I would break protocol and state the best line of defense used as PEP. I know some would still not go to a professional when they have an exposure but patronize pharmacists who continue to dish out travuda, ensure that when you do visit the pharmacist, demand for these meds combo. Its the best combination therapy and failure is rare

Tenofovir disoproxil, 300 mg/emtricitabine, 200 mg (Truvada) once daily (This comes as a single tablet)

plus

Raltegravir (Isentress), 400 mg twice daily or dolutegravir (Tivicay), 50 mg once daily. Dolutegravir is new and highly effective but relatively scarce. In its absence go for Isentress

These must be taken for 28days

You must follow these guidelines before demanding for PEP

(1) The risk must be significant enough to be PEP indicated or warranted

(2) You must see a health care professional and not self medicate

(3) If PEP is warranted, you must do a HIV baseline test to confirm you are HIV negative at the time of embarking on PEP

(4) The exposure must have occured less than 72hrs ago

If PEP is warranted and you do start it, adherence is key to ensuring its success. Do not skip any dosage. Studies have shown that the new combo as stated above are highly effective for almost all significant risks. Travuda alone cannot stop virons progressions and has been shown to at best preserve your immune systems when you do seroconvert but won't stop the seroconvertion itself

Thank you for reading

dober:
HIV can be transmitted via contact with open wounds. If she has high HIV load and the fluid touches any open wound in your body (even boil), then there's a possibility of transmission. Same with having an injury in ur fingers and fingering an HIV infection pussy.
LOL.
Ain't trying to scare you though.
But the way you are curious, seems u already know her HIV status. If maybe u know, when then where u careless?