CanadaOrBust:


With due respect sir, you are the one who seems deluded not him/her.

How do u explain that PDP won the rerun recently held in the same Hope’s “stronghold” where he got 99.9% of the votes with 100+% voter turnouts!

Sir, this is not finally about a Ihedioha or PDP. This is about u having a say in who governs u, and about your country becoming a one-party state.

Never in Nigerian judicial history (or any authentic democracy for that matter) has the SC ruled against ALL lower courts AND the election authority itself in order to immediately replace a sitting governor with a 4th-place finisher - all based on clearly questionable, uncollaborated, and unauthenticated documents supplied solely by the 4th-place finisher himself!!

Consider the Uzodinma documents they relied on to replace an 8-month incumbent governor with a FOURTH place finisher: not only were they full of ridiculous numbers, they were also incomplete, smudgy, full of alterations, signed only by APC, and showed results for only APC and PDP out of 70 parties!

Also consider the precedent set here which lawyers will cite ad infinitum:

A person that did not receive even a single vote can easily be declared winner and immediately replace the incumbent. All they’d have to do is present result sheets which the Supreme Court MUST accept no matter how outrageous and defective they may be, as long as no one can produce the originals!
That’s what u r supporting!
franchasng

idealogical:



You have every right to spin the SC judgment and opine your opinion, it's your blessed rights, but you can not spin facts and the sound judicial decision by the SC based on issues brought before the SC to litigate between Ihedioha and Hope.

1. Regardless of any subsequent election in the same localities that was won by the PDP, it doesn't change the fact that the INEC, PDP and Ihedioha couldn't present and refused to present their own or the real results to counter Hope's election documents, this is the reason why they lost, not because of any election that the PDP won after the fact.

2. The case before the SC was about INEC illegally and unconstitutionally discounting Hope's votes, a different case and argument that had nothing to do with what was presented, litigated and decided at the SC so your argument about the lower court means nothing, it's totally irrelevant.

The SC doesn't litigate or accept pre-election issues litigated by the lower courts.

3. Ihedioaha did not score the required 2/3 so his election and 8 months rule was totally illegal, there should have been a runoff, but they colluded with INEC and the tribunal to ignore the constitution and rig the election in favor Ihedioha.

4. The case before the SC was clear cut, one party brought a case about INEC taking away his votes and he presented his own credible proof to litigate his case with, it was the job of INEC, Ihedioha and the PDP to prove otherwise with their own sets of facts and election results, but they did not so why are you lashing out the SE when n fact your grievance should face INEC, the PDP and Ihedioha with your anger and frustration.

You people need to do away with emotions, sentiments and illogical opinions.

Senatorbng:
PDP rig, APC rig, PDP rig pass come win, APC come use court collect am, now PDP dey declare fasting and prayer. Who you dey pray to now, amadioha abi? Clowns

Don't worry about my life, worry about yours.

Was technicality, lies, incompetent or stupidity the reason why INEC, Ihedioha and the PDP couldn't produce evidence to counter Hope's results?

Was technicality the reason why INEC rigged for Ihedioha and put him in office even though he didn't secure the necessary 2/3 votes?

CanadaOrBust:


Once again,sir, this is not finally about PDP or Ihedioha. This is about YOU having a say in who governs you, and about YOUR country becoming a one-party state.

This is not just another case. This is a case that strikes at the very core of what kind of country we’d end up becoming. And this is not just another court. This is the Supreme Court!

Study Bush vs. Gore and you’d see the stark contrast. The US SC could have relied on ridiculous technicalities, but they realized how important the case was. They not only thoroughly examined the documents, they ordered a MANUAL recount of the original votes cast!

Compare to this case: Tanko’s SC refused to examine Hope’s documents or tabulate his numbers, because they knew fully well if they did they’d have no choice but LAUGH HIM OUT OF COURT!

All elections have errors. After all the shenanigans and maneuverings the umpire declared Ihedioha the winner and Hope 4th place. That is the baseline. You don’t lightly change that. That’s why the bar for replacing an incumbent is high.

YOU DON’T REPLACE AN INCUMBENT WITH A 4TH PLACER BY ACCEPTING CLEARLY FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS AND REFUSING TO TABULATE CLEARLY RIDICULOUS NUMBERS!!

The following are from Newspapers not me. Aren’t you ashamed your country has such a SC?!
———————————
Vanguard. Tuesday, January 28, 2020
Imo Guber: How Supreme court erred in computation of results

*Declared more votes than accredited voters
*Failed to interrogate petitioners’ evidence
*Avoided mentioning figures in a written judgment

Facts have emerged that the Supreme Court failed to do a thorough mathematical computation of the results of the election but relied only on the wrong computations submitted by Sen. Hope Uzodinma to declare him the duly-elected governor of Imo State...

Both the EPT and the Appeal Court dismissed the petition for lacking in merit.

By relying on the faulty tabulation made by Sen. Uzodinma, the Supreme Court arrived at a figure of 950,952 total votes cast at the election, which is more than the total votes cast at the election totalling 823,743.

This gave rise to 127,209 excess votes at the election as affirmed by the Supreme Court, which all through avoided mentioning figures regarding the votes cast for the disputants or the total registered voters and valid and invalid votes in the judgment.
——————-

Here are some magic numbers (remember these numbers exclude votes scored by the other 68 Parties!)

“The Guardian obtained a certified-true-copy of the record of the appeal filed at the Supreme Court by Uzodinma and APC...

On figure number 69 which shows votes cast at Eziama/Okpala (Umualum Village Square, Eziama)
total number of registered voters =492, whereas the APC scored 819 votes
and PDP scored 7 votes,
meaning 334 more votes than registered voters!

On page 22 of the record, at the polling unit 285 (Obudi/Aro, Central Assembly Square,
registered voters = 449
APC polled 780 votes
PDP polled four votes, leaving a total of 335 votes higher than the actual number of registered voters.

Also on page 22 of the petition, polling unit 282
number of registered voters = 591,
APC polled 586 votes
PDP nine votes, indicating a total of four votes higher than the registered number of voters.

Figures from page 79 of the record of appeal show:
Registered voters = 526
APC got 526 votes, while PDP was credited with two votes, indicating two votes higher than the total number of registered voters in the area.”

idealogical:



You have every right to spin the SC judgment and opine your opinion, it's your blessed rights, but you can not spin facts and the sound judicial decision by the SC based on issues brought before the SC to litigate between Ihedioha and Hope.

1. Regardless of any subsequent election in the same localities that was won by the PDP, it doesn't change the fact that the INEC, PDP and Ihedioha couldn't present and refused to present their own or the real results to counter Hope's election documents, this is the reason why they lost, not because of any election that the PDP won after the fact.

2. The case before the SC was about INEC illegally and unconstitutionally discounting Hope's votes, a different case and argument that had nothing to do with what was presented, litigated and decided at the SC so your argument about the lower court means nothing, it's totally irrelevant.

The SC doesn't litigate or accept pre-election issues litigated by the lower courts.

3. Ihedioaha did not score the required 2/3 so his election and 8 months rule was totally illegal, there should have been a runoff, but they colluded with INEC and the tribunal to ignore the constitution and rig the election in favor Ihedioha.

4. The case before the SC was clear cut, one party brought a case about INEC taking away his votes and he presented his own credible proof to litigate his case with, it was the job of INEC, Ihedioha and the PDP to prove otherwise with their own sets of facts and election results, but they did not so why are you lashing out the SE when n fact your grievance should face INEC, the PDP and Ihedioha with your anger and frustration.

You people need to do away with emotions, sentiments and illogical opinions.

franchasng:
may life give you the same justice supreme court gave to Emeka Ihedioha, if you believe everything you typed and truly believe supreme court did justice based on law and facts, say AMEN

EmmyDJourno:
PDP is cursed by the gods

The same stupidity that saw them run this country to the ground

Still infests them till this very day....Iranu party

TRUSTEDGUY:
How many fasting and prayers did they conduct in their 16 stupid years of power na now they wan form Christianity.

Boko Haram problem started with the PDP

garfield1:
[s][/s]
Rubbish

idealogical:


Amen.

AMOTEKUN2023:


I can feel your pains....hunger will kill you

CanadaOrBust:


You wish to be sent to hell on a ridiculous technicality??
Be careful what you wish for

idealogical:
[s][/s]


Don't worry about my life, worry about yours.

Was technicality, lies, incompetent or stupidity the reason why INEC, Ihedioha and the PDP couldn't produce evidence to counter Hope's results?

Was technicality the reason why INEC rigged for Ihedioha and put him in office even though he didn't secure the necessary 2/3 votes?

CanadaOrBust:


(So why not be honest and appeal on basis of 2/3 and save us this embarrassment of a judgment??!! Also, don’t be fooled, the ruling party ALWAYS controls INEC!)

I was just trying to clarify to u what u just said “amen” to - to be sent to hell not just on technicality but on RIDICULOUS technicality as in this case.

Like I’ve said, this is not just another case. This is a case that strikes at the very core of what type of country we’d end up becoming. The SC has a duty to make sure that such a momentous, unprecedented decision has solid, unassailable documentary basis?! They start doing that by thoroughly examining the documents in front of them! SC does not exist in a vacuum. This is also their country and they ought care they are setting a precedent that can gradually make the country a one-party state.

But this TANKO SC is obviously compromised.
Here they are, removing a gov and replacing him with a fourth-place finishing appellant based solely on a set of uncollaborated documents supplied solely by the appellant himself. Regardless of what anyone else submits or fails to submit, they have a DUTY to EXAMINE those documents they are basing everything on to make sure they are up to par and that the figures therein make sense vis-a-vis number of registered and accredited voters! That is how it is done! And that is why you’ve never had a judgment like this before!

garfield1:

You just wasted time and energy for nothing

idealogical:
[s][/s]


Pointless and delusional nonsense.

I quoted you and your rubbish against my best judgment.

CanadaOrBust:


Good sir, childishly canceling a post doesn’t erase it, in fact it highlights it and exposes your inability to counter the points raised.

Have u considered what u r up all night defending?
HAVE U NO SHAME, SIR?!

Consider:
The Uzodinma documents they relied on to replace an 8-month incumbent governor with a FOURTH place finisher: not only were they full of ridiculous numbers, they were also incomplete, smudgy, full of alterations, signed only by APC, and showed results for only APC and PDP out of 70 parties!

YOU DON’T USE SUCH DOCUMENTS TO REPLACE AN INCUMBENT GOV NO MATTER HOW HE WAS ELECTED, NO MATTER WHO FAILS TO SUBMIT WHAT, NO MATTER WHO FAILS TO PROVE WHAT!!

Consider:
PDP won the rerun recently held in the same Hope’s “stronghold” where he got 99.9% of the votes with 100+% voter turnouts!

Consider:
Never in Nigerian judicial history (or any authentic democracy for that matter) has the SC ruled against ALL lower courts AND the election authority itself in order to immediately replace a sitting governor with a 4th-place finisher - all based on clearly questionable, uncollaborated, and unauthenticated documents supplied solely by the 4th-place finisher himself!!

Consider:
The precedent set here.

A person that comes 10th can easily be declared winner and immediately replace the incumbent. All they’d have to do is present result sheets which the Supreme Court MUST accept no matter how outrageous and defective they may be, as long as no one can produce the originals!

Consider:
Using that precedent, a ruling party can easily “win” any election, effectively removing any say u may have in choosing who rules you.

That’s what u r up all night supporting!
Once again, HAVE YOU NO SHAME SIR??!!

———————————
Vanguard. Tuesday, January 28, 2020
Imo Guber: How Supreme court erred in computation of results

*Declared more votes than accredited voters
*Failed to interrogate petitioners’ evidence
*Avoided mentioning figures in a written judgment

yanabasee:


The devil (PDP) that I know is better than the angel (APC) that has turned Nigeria into everything negative....

Anigreat:




Inasmuch as i will love Ihedioha to get his mandate back, i will say this 7days prayer is not nescessary, frankly speaking it's not going to work.


Rather they should pray that God should show his wrath to the Pharaoh who is in aso rock, covering the right of his children.

kamez:
who did we offend in imo state?... oh my dear imo state!!!


now that mr iberiberism is gone, i thought liberation has finally come...but alas, political Clowns still full my dear imo state...

fasting ko, hunger strike ni

yarimo:
Instead of PDP to declare 7 days fasting for mismanagement of Nigeria.