This is a response to FreeHuman. The response was too long so I had to make it into a post of its own.


Hmmm!
"Disbelief is naturally more intelligent than belief especially a belief system without concrete evidence". Funny enough this is coming from someone who believes an explosion from a state of previous Nothingness blew up and formed into this complex fine-turned Universe. Next time, try explaining to your son or daughter that a pencil was made from the explosion that happened at a burnt down China factory and see if that child of yours won't certainly think you are mad.

This is one of those ridiculous argument that Atheists use to perpetuate the silly claims that religious people are less intelligent, less rational and less capable of engaging in intellectual conversations and thinking.

For too long, Atheist Academics have done damage by spreading around this false propaganda especially against believers.
Now, let's look at some of these:

1) Atheist claim 1:

Atheists reject Religious beliefs because they are more rational.

This is a Correlation Causation Fallacy which tries to infer that Atheists reject Religious beliefs
because there is a causal relationship between Atheism and Rationality which has little to no evidence of causality. "Whether a belief is rational or irrational depends on whether the person holding it has sufficient justification for the belief". And doesn't depend on if the person holding it is intelligent or not. Take for instance, John Nash, who came from a Christian background (which supports my theory that Christians and those who left Christianity have a hand in virtually everything modern today). Nash was a highly intelligent Nobel laureate mathematician who suffered from paranoid schizophrenia and as result formed delusional beliefs about the World. A movie, called A beautiful mind was even made about him. Here was an intelligent Atheist who had several delusional beliefs that he had to be treated off&on for mental illness but the funny thing was he still was a Nobel laureate. Imagine for a second, if that was a Theist who suffered from these repeated case of mental illness like John Nash. The Atheist Community would have gone into fit of rage about how all of the intelligence from that Theist was no more valid because the theist exhibited this case of schziophrenism. John Nash was clearly delusional and mentally ill but was still one of the intelligent mind. Being an Atheist or Theist doesn't take out intelligence from minds that are genuises. Infact, Peer review studies inform us that Higher level of Intelligence causes people to develop a form of bias called Bias Blind Spot which leads to formation of beliefs from implicit biases instead of via rational and unbiased enquiry so what this infers is that people of higher intelligence do not really differ from people with lower intelligence in the likelihood of possessing 6 out of 7 of cognitive bias which are:

1) Outcome bias
2) Base-rate Neglect
3) Framing bias
4) Conjunction effect
5) Anchoring bias
6) Myside bias

People of higher cognitive abilities do not at all display lower levels of confirmation bias or other levels cognitive biases. Higher intelligent people are statistically not different from lower intelligent people based on cognitive biases instead what has been discovered is that higher intelligent people are ironically more likely than lower intelligent people to display a bias blind spot and are more likely to be unaware of their own biases when placed in comparison to the general population.

The point is that there are numerous psychological factors that contribute to how beliefs are formed. It is not just based on intelligence as Atheists outrageously claim it to be. I have come come across several Atheists who say that the only reason that they now subscribe to Atheism was because that their parents tried disciplining them and being prideful. They resented anything that has to do with authority of which God also looks like a higher authority figure. Hence, they completely reject any belief in God just so they can live in their little cocoons of they being in "charge of their purposeless lives" and they never answering to any higher power. Hence, the justification to live their lives immorally and otherwise.

Lol! A lot of Nigerian so called Atheists are on this train. They are just rebellious Olodos who think Atheism offers them the license to live as they so please. It is not that they are any intelligent. Many of them are blockheads that I have come across. This conclusively let's us know that there is nothing logically that follows that Atheism has a Correlation to Intelligence. Big lie!!!!!

Now, what I always tell these New baby Atheists is that lower Intelligence can be found amongst fundamentalist Atheists or religious fundamentalist irrespective of belief or disbelief. There are Christians who are just plain fundamentalist without the Holy Spirit and correct knowledge. Then there are those of course we can say with higher Intelligence, Bible Literarism and the Holy Spirit (The fruits)

Atheists love to make ridiculous claims but Christianity upon study has produced far more intelligent people than Atheism. It is a fact and facts don't care about your feelings or emotions like Ben Shapiro would always say.

Where are your data using Wechsler Adult Scale of Intelligence (WAIS) and Stanford Binet Test on how you surveyed Nigeria and came to the fallacious claim that Atheists are more intelligent than Christians or other Religious people. Where are the statistics? Or you are just one of those Beer Parlour Atheists who throw silly assertions in the air. A simple search of 100 most influential Nigerians past or present will simply show you that 98% of them are religious people with just 2% been Atheists. Academic achievement is a part of intelligence and Nigeria for instance even has Pastors who are First class PHD holders in Scientific fields like Mathematics. Many Nigeria Christians or even Muslims when sampled on even out of the country are on average B.Sc or M.Sc holders. Even in the US, UK, etcetera. Nigerians are one of the most highly educated people in places where Atheism is on the rise. Hence, Nigeria's problem is not Christianity which has contributed far more advantages than disadvantages. The problem remains the set of political leaders we have had since 1960.

There are studies that even show in post-Christian countries such as England, Atheists think less analytically than Theists.

"In Cultures where institutional religion is waning and where acceptance of atheism arises from tendencies to confirm, it is possible that cognitive reflection may predict the rejection of atheism, a matter of future investigation."
Gervais, will M, et al.
"Analytic Atheism: A Cross-Culturally weak and Fickle Phenomenon?" 2017, p.272.

What this infers is that people with low analytical Intelligence tend to just conform to Atheism probably due to it's propaganda that states once you are an Atheist. You are then regarded as "smart". This happens in places like the UK where religion is on the decline and Atheism seems the norm. In the US despite the silly propaganda by Atheists. More than 63% are still religious believers and that's because we have many highly intelligent Christian Scientists and Philosophers who present the argument for the rationality of the faith as against the irrationality of Atheism.

In conclusion it is the height of stupidity to suggest that higher levels of analytical thinking leads to Atheism or that belief in the concept of Nothingness and a life of no purpose is more rational than a reasonable, rational, logical and science observed process which is that order can never come from disorder. It is madness to assert otherwise.




2nd Response on Science Vs Christian:

This is the more reason I have always said that every Christian needs to read deeply and be an Apologist. For far too long. We have allowed the Atheists and evolutionists tell several lies and perpetuate different wrong myths. The Atheists for too long have used the Galileo story as their purported "evidence" to show that Science and Christianity is in conflict which is not true.

We have established already that Christianity for instance has produced far more Scientists, Philosophers, etc than Atheism. Infact, Atheism, Islam, etc has to credit Christianity because wherever you find a modern day atheist scientist. You find someone who came from a Judeo-Christian heritage and hence carries on the Judeo-Christian principles and values even if they fail to recognise that.

I am glad you admitted that Galileo Galilei, an Italian astronomer, physicist and engineer was first a Christian so this first of all gives credence to the fact that Science is never in conflict with Christianity. Now, no one disputes the fact that the Catholics did a couple of things that were not really biblical as instituted by Jesus Christ, the very Word of God and that is why the reformation happened (Topic for another day and for in-house religious people).

No disrespect to the Catholics. Personally, I feel there are good people in there who might want to reform the place from within. True Christianity is very easy to follow. You pick up your cross and follow Christ. Whatever Christ doesn't do. You don't do. Christianity is basically modeling after Christ Jesus. For me, the Catholics also played a huge part in pushing back the advancing Islamists who first took the lands of the Christians. A lot of people don't know this about the Crusades War but keep blaming the Catholics as regards the Crusades War but anyone who really has researched into the history of this would not help but give them kudos for raising an army that repelled the advancing Muslim army. If not for the Catholics. Christianity would have long gone extinct in Europe and won't probably be in the US or Nigeria for instance. There would have been no free world today as we have it. The Atheists won't be able to do all of what they do today. The Catholics played a role that Protestants or Evangelicals won't have been able to do as at that time. God is mysterious and HIS ways are higher than ours. If it were the Evangelicals. The War would have been a case of "Slap me and I will turn my other cheek for you to slap me more" which everyone knows is the principle of Jesus Christ and this is something Islam is taking advantage of even in this modern times. The Catholics of those periods did what they had to do to beat back the advancing Muslim army during the Crusades War (Topic for another day).

Back to what I was saying. The Galileo Galilei Science Vs Catholic clash story is actually more complicated than you would know unless you are the type who digs into history the more. Galileo Galilei discovered some pretty controversial things through his telescope. He discovered that Venus goes through Phases kind of like our moon. This discovery of his killed ancient astronomy but it didn't actually prove the Copernican view. There was a third alternative called the Tychonic view (16th Century) which stated that Earth is at rest in the middle of the universe. This was the ancient view and was in sync with the best evidence of that time. No experiment proved that Earth moved in the Tychonic view. The Sun in the Tychonic view goes around the Earth and this was the ancient Scientific view (Don't forget it was the Church that sponsored several of these ancient Scientific research). Now, Tycho Brahe presented his Tychonic view in such a way that it looked new and added that it was not just the Sun that goes round the Earth but that the other planets also go around the Earth including Venus which will produce the different phases that Galileo Galilei discovered via his Telescope but Galileo Galilei strategically sidelined the other scientist view which is the Tychonic view in his book that was under investigation by the inquisition.

The inquisition was right that Galileo Galilei exaggerated his case for his Copernican view by under-emphasizing the Tychonic view which was in sync with the best scientific evidence available as at that time by the 16th century Christian Scientists and the Church.

Another thing most people don't know is that Galileo Galilei wanted to teach his own Church the Truth. Galileo Galilei and his Church agreed and affirmed two things which were:

1) The Bible was without error
2) Science can find truth.

But where the Church and Galileo Galilei disagreed on was how to interpret these two sources of truth:

3) Nature
4) Scripture

Further more, it was not like the Whole Church was against Galileo Galilei like these unlearned Atheists would have you believe. There were Christians scientists and Theologians on Galileo Galilei's side (Pro-Galileo Christian Scientists and Theologians) and those Scientists and Theologians who were against Galileo Galilei obviously on the side of Tycho Brahe and those who queued against him were in the majority so this was clearly a case of two Camps of Christian Scientists fighting to be regarded as the authority on Solar Science and not a case of just the Church (religious fanatics) fighting against Science like these unlearned Atheists would have you believe. Just know that this false rendition of theirs actually goes against factual history as they would want to have you believe that the Galileo story proves that Science is in some sort of Warfare with Christianity. You have to understand that there are nuances to the story that proves otherwise. It was a complicated, messy event that ended up as a source of embarrassment for the Catholic church till date but the playing up of the event by these Atheists making it look like Galileo was martyr for Science is really ridiculous. Atheists in recent times have played up the lie that it represents Science. Any reasonable person knows there are just too many holes in Evolution and Big Bang Theory that these both are "Pseudo-Science Myths" spread around by these New Atheists who have infiltrated our educational institutions everywhere. Galileo had to recant his Copernican view. Also charged with vehement suspicion of heresy and had to live under House arrest at his comfortable rural Estate, Villa II Gioiello, on the hillside outskirts of Florence. Galileo Galilei was not burned. A generation after him. Science improved and it was discovered that his Copernican view was found to be true and Church Theologians on his side of the different Views about the Earth presented in his time also came forward with the clear interpretation that the Bible actually supports the Copernican view of Galileo Galilei as against Scientist Tycho Brahe's view which ancient Science supported and Theologians who were on
Tycho's side clearly misinterpreted the Bible.

Understand that during Galileo Galilei's time. Different Scientific views were brought forward by these Christian Scientists and Galileo Galilei was one of them with his own Copernican view. Anyone who reads several Scientific history regularly will understand that this plays out most times in Science. If I ask anyone here on who invented Early Motion Picture Camera and the first person to shoot a moving picture sequence using a single lens camera and a strip of paper film. Everyone would say it is Thomas Edison and the Lumeire Brothers but do you know some years before them. A French man, Louis le Prince in the late 1800s was the first man to invent and do this. He was coming down to the US to Premier his invention. He was last seen by his family to board the train in September, 1890 but never got out alive till today. Infact, no one can tell what exactly happened to Louis till today. He simply just disappeared from the surface of the Earth. Some few years after. Thomas Edison and the other Lumeire brothers were credited as the inventors but upon the French man's son going to court to bring concrete evidences of which he really did that his father was actually the first to do that before Thomas Edison. The Frenchman's son was also mysteriously killed till today. No one till today knows what to make of these but everyone now knows that the French man was the first with this invention before Thomas Edison and the other brothers. You can even see the first capture by this French man some years before Thomas Edison on the internet.

Thomas Edison has been found to have been really shady destroying the reputation and works of several other inventors in other to own several patents of inventions to himself. He became quite rich from several court cases. We know now that Nikola Tesla died a poor man despite his inventions that Thomas Edison went with the credit. These always plays out with whatever Humans handle whether Religion or Atheism


This is becoming quite lengthy as I need to create a post for this. Lol! For your information like you said based on Reason. A Christian Latina lady by name, Lupe Hernandez invented the Hand Sanitizers in 1966 so lol! We have reason like you said and we also have Faith. There is nothing you clowns- Atheists have. Even your Big Bang Theory was first proposed by a Catholic Jesuit Priest, George Lemaitres. That's how stupid Atheists are. They don't even own the foundation of their "disbelief system".

I don't even want to go into how Atheism has killed more people than Religion. It is a topic for another day.




Much respect to Seun. I don't know Seun's current state but I sense that even he is probably Agnostic now and not really an Atheist. Agnostics are more smarter than the dumb Atheists. At least they understand from Science that there could be a higher power or not. They understand that there is just too much complexity to the universe of ours that one just can't say like the foolish Atheists that there is totally no God. The Agnostics are like in the middle ground but you won't notice this because the Atheists love attaching just about everything and everyone to their miserable selves to give themselves some sort of succour from the hopelessness of their disbelief.

Even Seun knows to pay respect to a Christian Scientist like Charles Baggage who contributed to the set up of Computers. Seun definitely came from a Christian background, right? So you kind of still prove my argument. It is like every Atheist must run and cling to Seun. Lol! Who else aside Seun?!!

Free human, Bluezy13 , Nairalandmonika
Gemineye, Flipmode squad,

Ah! Are you writing a project?

Masterpiece676:
Ah! Are you writing a project?

Lol!

Definitely, a project of exposing the lies of Atheists.

Wait o...

Who is going to read all this thing


Please, read and summarize for me

CoronaVirusPro:
Wait o...

Who is going to read all this thing


Please, read and summarize for me

You can't compress time, every piece of this masterpiece can't be shorten. So take your time to read and come back to complete the reading some other time you are not busy just like me.

Eyin atheist in the garden come forward, Marlian go back... We go call you when we won make noise

CoronaVirusPro:
Wait o...

Who is going to read all this thing


Please, read and summarize for me

Hahaha!
The funny thing is that I didn't even get to touch on virtually everything Free human posted. If I had done that. I guess lol! Nairaland will get filled up.

[s]

CoronaVirusPro:
Wait o...

Who is going to read all this thing


Please, read and summarize for me

[/s]

PervertProphet:
This is a response to FreeHuman. The response was too long so I had to make it into a post of its own.


Hmmm!
"Disbelief is naturally more intelligent than belief especially a belief system without concrete evidence". Funny enough this is coming from someone who believes an explosion from a state of previous Nothingness blew up and formed into this complex fine-turned Universe. Next time, try explaining to your son or daughter that a pencil was made from the explosion that happened at a burnt down China factory and see if that child of yours won't certainly think you are mad.

This is one of those ridiculous argument that Atheists use to perpetuate the silly claims that religious people are less intelligent, less rational and less capable of engaging in intellectual conversations and thinking.

For too long, Atheist Academics have done damage by spreading around this false propaganda especially against believers.
Now, let's look at some of these:

1) Atheist claim 1:

Atheists reject Religious beliefs because they are more rational.

This is a Correlation Causation Fallacy which tries to infer that Atheists reject Religious beliefs
because there is a causal relationship between Atheism and Rationality which has little to no evidence of causality. "Whether a belief is rational or irrational depends on whether the person holding it has sufficient justification for the belief". And doesn't depend on if the person holding it is intelligent or not. Take for instance, John Nash, who came from a Christian background (which supports my theory that Christians and those who left Christianity have a hand in virtually everything modern today). Nash was a highly intelligent Nobel laureate mathematician who suffered from paranoid schizophrenia and as result formed delusional beliefs about the World. A movie, called A beautiful mind was even made about him. Here was an intelligent Atheist who had several delusional beliefs that he had to be treated off&on for mental illness but the funny thing was he still was a Nobel laureate. Imagine for a second, if that was a Theist who suffered from these repeated case of mental illness like John Nash. The Atheist Community would have gone into fit of rage about how all of the intelligence from that Theist was no more valid because the theist exhibited this case of schziophrenism. John Nash was clearly delusional and mentally ill but was still one of the intelligent mind. Being an Atheist or Theist doesn't take out intelligence from minds that are genuises. Infact, Peer review studies inform us that Higher level of Intelligence causes people to develop a form of bias called Bias Blind Spot which leads to formation of beliefs from implicit biases instead of via rational and unbiased enquiry so what this infers is that people of higher intelligence do not really differ from people with lower intelligence in the likelihood of possessing 6 out of 7 of cognitive bias which are:

1) Outcome bias
2) Base-rate Neglect
3) Framing bias
4) Conjunction effect
5) Anchoring bias
6) Myside bias

People of higher cognitive abilities do not at all display lower levels of confirmation bias or other levels cognitive biases. Higher intelligent people are statistically not different from lower intelligent people based on cognitive biases instead what has been discovered is that higher intelligent people are ironically more likely than lower intelligent people to display a bias blind spot and are more likely to be unaware of their own biases when placed in comparison to the general population.

The point is that there are numerous psychological factors that contribute to how beliefs are formed. It is not just based on intelligence as Atheists outrageously claim it to be. I have come come across several Atheists who say that the only reason that they now subscribe to Atheism was because that their parents tried disciplining them and being prideful. They resented anything that has to do with authority of which God also looks like a higher authority figure. Hence, they completely reject any belief in God just so they can live in their little cocoons of they being in "charge of their purposeless lives" and they never answering to any higher power. Hence, the justification to live their lives immorally and otherwise.

Lol! A lot of Nigerian so called Atheists are on this train. They are just rebellious Olodos who think Atheism offers them the license to live as they so please. It is not that they are any intelligent. Many of them are blockheads that I have come across. This conclusively let's us know that there is nothing logically that follows that Atheism has a Correlation to Intelligence. Big lie!!!!!

Now, what I always tell these New baby Atheists is that lower Intelligence can be found amongst fundamentalist Atheists or religious fundamentalist irrespective of belief or disbelief. There are Christians who are just plain fundamentalist without the Holy Spirit and correct knowledge. Then there are those of course we can say with higher Intelligence, Bible Literarism and the Holy Spirit (The fruits)

Atheists love to make ridiculous claims but Christianity upon study has produced far more intelligent people than Atheism. It is a fact and facts don't care about your feelings or emotions like Ben Shapiro would always say.

Where are your data using Wechsler Adult Scale of Intelligence (WAIS) and Stanford Binet Test on how you surveyed Nigeria and came to the fallacious claim that Atheists are more intelligent than Christians or other Religious people. Where are the statistics? Or you are just one of those Beer Parlour Atheists who throw silly assertions in the air. A simple search of 100 most influential Nigerians past or present will simply show you that 98% of them are religious people with just 2% been Atheists. Academic achievement is a part of intelligence and Nigeria for instance even has Pastors who are First class PHD holders in Scientific fields like Mathematics. Many Nigeria Christians or even Muslims when sampled on even out of the country are on average B.Sc or M.Sc holders. Even in the US, UK, etcetera. Nigerians are one of the most highly educated people in places where Atheism is on the rise. Hence, Nigeria's problem is not Christianity which has contributed far more advantages than disadvantages. The problem remains the set of political leaders we have had since 1960.

There are studies that even show in post-Christian countries such as England, Atheists think less analytically than Theists.

"In Cultures where institutional religion is waning and where acceptance of atheism arises from tendencies to confirm, it is possible that cognitive reflection may predict the rejection of atheism, a matter of future investigation."
Gervais, will M, et al.
"Analytic Atheism: A Cross-Culturally weak and Fickle Phenomenon?" 2017, p.272.

What this infers is that people with low analytical Intelligence tend to just conform to Atheism probably due to it's propaganda that states once you are an Atheist. You are then regarded as "smart". This happens in places like the UK where religion is on the decline and Atheism seems the norm. In the US despite the silly propaganda by Atheists. More than 63% are still religious believers and that's because we have many highly intelligent Christian Scientists and Philosophers who present the argument for the rationality of the faith as against the irrationality of Atheism.

In conclusion it is the height of stupidity to suggest that higher levels of analytical thinking leads to Atheism or that belief in the concept of Nothingness and a life of no purpose is more rational than a reasonable, rational, logical and science observed process which is that order can never come from disorder. It is madness to assert otherwise.




2nd Response on Science Vs Christian:

This is the more reason I have always said that every Christian needs to read deeply and be an Apologist. For far too long. We have allowed the Atheists and evolutionists tell several lies and perpetuate different wrong myths. The Atheists for too long have used the Galileo story as their purported "evidence" to show that Science and Christianity is in conflict which is not true.

We have established already that Christianity for instance has produced far more Scientists, Philosophers, etc than Atheism. Infact, Atheism, Islam, etc has to credit Christianity because wherever you find a modern day atheist scientist. You find someone who came from a Judeo-Christian heritage and hence carries on the Judeo-Christian principles and values even if they fail to recognise that.

I am glad you admitted that Galileo Galilei, an Italian astronomer, physicist and engineer was first a Christian so this first of all gives credence to the fact that Science is never in conflict with Christianity. Now, no one disputes the fact that the Catholics did a couple of things that were not really biblical as instituted by Jesus Christ, the very Word of God and that is why the reformation happened (Topic for another day and for in-house religious people).

No disrespect to the Catholics. Personally, I feel there are good people in there who might want to reform the place from within. True Christianity is very easy to follow. You pick up your cross and follow Christ. Whatever Christ doesn't do. You don't do. Christianity is basically modeling after Christ Jesus. For me, the Catholics also played a huge part in pushing back the advancing Islamists who first took the lands of the Christians. A lot of people don't know this about the Crusades War but keep blaming the Catholics as regards the Crusades War but anyone who really has researched into the history of this would not help but give them kudos for raising an army that repelled the advancing Muslim army. If not for the Catholics. Christianity would have long gone extinct in Europe and won't probably be in the US or Nigeria for instance. There would have been no free world today as we have it. The Atheists won't be able to do all of what they do today. The Catholics played a role that Protestants or Evangelicals won't have been able to do as at that time. God is mysterious and HIS ways are higher than ours. If it were the Evangelicals. The War would have been a case of "Slap me and I will turn my other cheek for you to slap me more" which everyone knows is the principle of Jesus Christ and this is something Islam is taking advantage of even in this modern times. The Catholics of those periods did what they had to do to beat back the advancing Muslim army during the Crusades War (Topic for another day).

Back to what I was saying. The Galileo Galilei Science Vs Catholic clash story is actually more complicated than you would know unless you are the type who digs into history the more. Galileo Galilei discovered some pretty controversial things through his telescope. He discovered that Venus goes through Phases kind of like our moon. This discovery of his killed ancient astronomy but it didn't actually prove the Copernican view. There was a third alternative called the Tychonic view (16th Century) which stated that Earth is at rest in the middle of the universe. This was the ancient view and was in sync with the best evidence of that time. No experiment proved that Earth moved in the Tychonic view. The Sun in the Tychonic view goes around the Earth and this was the ancient Scientific view (Don't forget it was the Church that sponsored several of these ancient Scientific research). Now, Tycho Brahe presented his Tychonic view in such a way that it looked new and added that it was not just the Sun that goes round the Earth but that the other planets also go around the Earth including Venus which will produce the different phases that Galileo Galilei discovered via his Telescope but Galileo Galilei strategically sidelined the other scientist view which is the Tychonic view in his book that was under investigation by the inquisition.

The inquisition was right that Galileo Galilei exaggerated his case for his Copernican view by under-emphasizing the Tychonic view which was in sync with the best scientific evidence available as at that time by the 16th century Christian Scientists and the Church.

Another thing most people don't know is that Galileo Galilei wanted to teach his own Church the Truth. Galileo Galilei and his Church agreed and affirmed two things which were:

1) The Bible was without error
2) Science can find truth.

But where the Church and Galileo Galilei disagreed on was how to interpret these two sources of truth:

3) Nature
4) Scripture

Further more, it was not like the Whole Church was against Galileo Galilei like these unlearned Atheists would have you believe. There were Christians scientists and Theologians on Galileo Galilei's side (Pro-Galileo Christian Scientists and Theologians) and those Scientists and Theologians who were against Galileo Galilei obviously on the side of Tycho Brahe and those who queued against him were in the majority so this was clearly a case of two Camps of Christian Scientists fighting to be regarded as the authority on Solar Science and not a case of just the Church (religious fanatics) fighting against Science like these unlearned Atheists would have you believe. Just know that this false rendition of theirs actually goes against factual history as they would want to have you believe that the Galileo story proves that Science is in some sort of Warfare with Christianity. You have to understand that there are nuances to the story that proves otherwise. It was a complicated, messy event that ended up as a source of embarrassment for the Catholic church till date but the playing up of the event by these Atheists making it look like Galileo was martyr for Science is really ridiculous. Atheists in recent times have played up the lie that it represents Science. Any reasonable person knows there are just too many holes in Evolution and Big Bang Theory that these both are "Pseudo-Science Myths" spread around by these New Atheists who have infiltrated our educational institutions everywhere. Galileo had to recant his Copernican view. Also charged with vehement suspicion of heresy and had to live under House arrest at his comfortable rural Estate, Villa II Gioiello, on the hillside outskirts of Florence. Galileo Galilei was not burned. A generation after him. Science improved and it was discovered that his Copernican view was found to be true and Church Theologians on his side of the different Views about the Earth presented in his time also came forward with the clear interpretation that the Bible actually supports the Copernican view of Galileo Galilei as against Scientist Tycho Brahe's view which ancient Science supported and Theologians who were on
Tycho's side clearly misinterpreted the Bible.

Understand that during Galileo Galilei's time. Different Scientific views were brought forward by these Christian Scientists and Galileo Galilei was one of them with his own Copernican view. Anyone who reads several Scientific history regularly will understand that this plays out most times in Science. If I ask anyone here on who invented Early Motion Picture Camera and the first person to shoot a moving picture sequence using a single lens camera and a strip of paper film. Everyone would say it is Thomas Edison and the Lumeire Brothers but do you know some years before them. A French man, Louis le Prince in the late 1800s was the first man to invent and do this. He was coming down to the US to Premier his invention. He was last seen by his family to board the train in September, 1890 but never got out alive till today. Infact, no one can tell what exactly happened to Louis till today. He simply just disappeared from the surface of the Earth. Some few years after. Thomas Edison and the other Lumeire brothers were credited as the inventors but upon the French man's son going to court to bring concrete evidences of which he really did that his father was actually the first to do that before Thomas Edison. The Frenchman's son was also mysteriously killed till today. No one till today knows what to make of these but everyone now knows that the French man was the first with this invention before Thomas Edison and the other brothers. You can even see the first capture by this French man some years before Thomas Edison on the internet.

Thomas Edison has been found to have been really shady destroying the reputation and works of several other inventors in other to own several patents of inventions to himself. He became quite rich from several court cases. We know now that Nikola Tesla died a poor man despite his inventions that Thomas Edison went with the credit. These always plays out with whatever Humans handle whether Religion or Atheism


This is becoming quite lengthy as I need to create a post for this. Lol! For your information like you said based on Reason. A Christian Latina lady by name, Lupe Hernandez invented the Hand Sanitizers in 1966 so lol! We have reason like you said and we also have Faith. There is nothing you clowns- Atheists have. Even your Big Bang Theory was first proposed by a Catholic Jesuit Priest, George Lemaitres. That's how stupid Atheists are. They don't even own the foundation of their "disbelief system".

I don't even want to go into how Atheism has killed more people than Religion. It is a topic for another day.




Much respect to Seun. I don't know Seun's current state but I sense that even he is probably Agnostic now and not really an Atheist. Agnostics are more smarter than the dumb Atheists. At least they understand from Science that there could be a higher power or not. They understand that there is just too much complexity to the universe of ours that one just can't say like the foolish Atheists that there is totally no God. The Agnostics are like in the middle ground but you won't notice this because the Atheists love attaching just about everything and everyone to their miserable selves to give themselves some sort of succour from the hopelessness of their disbelief.

Even Seun knows to pay respect to a Christian Scientist like Charles Baggage who contributed to the set up of Computers. Seun definitely came from a Christian background, right? So you kind of still prove my argument. It is like every Atheist must run and cling to Seun. Lol! Who else aside Seun?!!

Free human, Bluezy13 , Nairalandmonika
Gemineye, Flipmode squad,

Lol. I never said I'm atheist . I'd rather "disbelief" or "disbeliever". I just doubt organized religion.

Everyone comes from a christian background if he is from the Christian part of the country.

I'll read your essay and give you a robust reply. Trust me.

Freehuman:


Lol. I never said I'm atheist . I'd rather "disbelief" or "disbeliever". I just doubt organized religion.

Everyone comes from a christian background if he is from the Christian part of the country.

I'll read your essay and give you a robust reply. Trust me.

I understand your point of Organized Religion has done some harm. Jesus Christ of whom we follow never brought Organized Religion. He brought a one way Relationship path which HE alone is to God but I want you to understand something that most people fail to understand.
There are just so many mysteries that play up on Earth. That religion or Science might never get to answer. Take for instance, the wisdom behind the Catholics raising an Army to push back the advancing Muslims in the Crusades War who had already taking many Christian lands like Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Iraq, Iran, etcetera and and even Jewish land of Jerusalem years before the Palestine claim to the land of Israel and were now pushing heavily into Europe. Spain was already partially down. France about to fall. If that had not happened. You and I would not have had this Western type of conceptual freedom of speech. I won't be a Christian and you won't be a "Disbeliever" or an Atheist (I don't know why you are shying away from that title). This is a war that is re-happening again in the modern times and Atheists/LGBT guys/white supremacists, etcetera being undiscernly blind and disorganized are allowing this happen again. Islam is gradually and steadily pushing into Europe, US with many immigrant family, buying up of many former Christian sites and converting them to mosques while not allowing any Christian build their Worship places in the Middle East like Saudi Arabia, etcetera. These migrant Islamic individuals come into Europe and breed more kids than the Europeans themselves while claiming to be the "fastest growing religion" instead of the proper tag, "fastest breeding religion". They are forcing Islam on the West while never allowing Christianity to spread in the Middle East.

Atheism been so blind don't understand what's going on but when these all come to a climax and Islam comes to dominate the West then free speech and freedom and the basic rights will be taken away. It won't be just the Christians suffering it but also Atheists, LGBT guys, women (all will be forced to put on hijab), etcetera.

This is why there is a silent kind of re-awakening of brilliant theists in the West who somehow intuitively are aware of this and are opposing Atheists who are kind of like paving away for the total blindness of the West and total takeover of the forces of evil against good. The funny thing is a few Atheists who are smart understand this too and are waging a war against the coming doom. Atheists like Abdullah Sameer (An Ex-muslim himself), Apostate Prophet (Ex-muslim too), Abdullah Gondal (Ex-muslim too), etcetera


Brother, even the Muslim contributed to Science. No taking it away from them. I will be dishonest to do that.

If you do a little careful digging. You will still discover a majority of them were not Arabs but Persians or otherwise who assimilated into them.

You do more digging and you find out that there are traces of Jewish ancestry like for instance, Abu al-Tayyib Sanad ibn Ali al-Yahudi (died c. 864 C.E.) was an eighth-century Iraqi Jewish, astronomer, translator, mathematician and engineer.


Today, where are the Jews of Yemeni, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, etcetera?!!!!

All expelled and driven out. How is the Arab world fairing with Science today?!!!

You guessed it correct. Zero glitch!!

Modern Western World civilization that we all follow remains based on Judeo-Christian heritage, principles, values and contributions.