saintokwuluora:

The grounds for Supreme court disqualification of Uche Nwosu was not that he bought nomination forms from two parties but because he was already validly nominated by APC before he went to AA and also got nominated thereby making him double candidate. Obaseki was not allowed to participate in the primary election of APC talkless of being nominated by the party before leaving for PDP.

Jesusloveyou:
and participate in the nomination process of screening and he was disqualified,
and he is not supposed to jump ship.

if you fail in your class, can you go to the next class to participate in the same exam?

Jesusloveyou:
s／c further explain that participating in nomination process alone has already amount to illegality

SmartProf:
See mumu talk o...how is Obaseki competing under 2 parties when he was screened out from participating in the APC primary contest? This man's analysis is so daft and grossly deficient that you will prefer listening to a cock crow, than listen to his opinion on issues. His statement has ended up announcing him as one who meets the case definition for psychiatric evaluation

vicdom:

Post your own SC judgement here let me see whether it's different from the two links fergie001 earlier posted. Just throwaway emotions and be objective for once. I know that you are a staunch APC apologist, I have known you since 2016 when you maligned and lampooned POI because he was PDP candidate, but now you are singing his praises and on the other hand, making calumnious remarks against Obaseki whom you earlier extolled and eulogized then in 2016 because he was the APC candidate. Please try and be objective this time devoid of emotions.

Blainz:



You right
But in giving the judgement, the Supreme further explained that it is was even wrong to have participated or bought nomination forms of two parties.

Jesusloveyou:
but he purchased two party nomination form according to supreme court.

Jesusloveyou:
but you can read? you saw where it stated that from nomination process at the point of purchasing two or more party nomination form.

or can't you read were supreme court further explain, so that people like you can understand what it means by nomination process.

Vatsyayana:

It is more like if you fail Post UTME in unilag can you still write Post UTME for another uni and still get admission? The answer is Yes - as far as you're still within time.
The Supreme Court is not daft!

Jesusloveyou:
you should know that supreme court usually give elaborate review or explanations after judgement.
supreme court further explain how they arrived at the judgement.

read this report again and again and see how supreme court arrived at the explanation,
it was not in the judgement, because that is not the prayer of the plaintiff.

if truly supreme court said uche nwosu won the primary of APC, so why did they declared him the governor like in the case of ameachi and omeha..

the simple the APC will do now , is to add the prayer for obaseki to be disqualified bese on this nomination process. and court will easily grant the prayer, because the supreme court has already giveb a lead judgement about the case.

engineerboat:


That was erhahor opinion not part of the judgement

Jesusloveyou:
in the write up, erahon simply quoted supreme court judgement and how the supreme court further explain.
the further explanation is not among the prayer of the plaintiff.

ask lawyer, when judges further explain in details after delivering judgement.

remember how another day is set for details explanation after delivering judgement.

maybe this last Friday June 26 was for the detail explanation.

consult Nigeria law week.
that is where lawyer's usually got the reasons behind judges decision.

SmartchildTutor:
All your arguments are valid.
It remains to be seen whether the spirit of the law will actually override the letters of the law when there's no underlying misdoing to contravene the law.
I'm sure most of your e-lawyers didn't see where the Supreme Court mentioned the spirit of the law.

engineerboat:


That was erhahor opinion not part of the judgement

SmartchildTutor:
All your arguments are valid.
It remains to be seen whether the spirit of the law will actually override the letters of the law when there's no underlying misdoing to contravene the law.
I'm sure most of your e-lawyers didn't see where the Supreme Court mentioned the spirit of the law.

Jesusloveyou:
you're right, this is my point.
the spirit of the law, not what you saw in the letter.
the reason behind the decision make by judges.

SmartchildTutor:
All your arguments are valid.
It remains to be seen whether the spirit of the law will actually override the letters of the law when there's no underlying misdoing to contravene the law.
I'm sure most of your e-lawyers didn't see where the Supreme Court mentioned the spirit of the law.

Ayed44:
Link, please!

Please kindly post the supreme court judgement here.

Thank you.

Jesusloveyou:
in the write up, erahon simply quoted supreme court judgement and how the supreme court further explain.
the further explanation is not among the prayer of the plaintiff.

ask lawyer, when judges further explain in details after delivering judgement.

remember how another day is set for details explanation after delivering judgement.

maybe this last Friday June 26 was for the detail explanation.

consult Nigeria law week.
that is where lawyer's usually got the reasons behind judges decision.

Ayed44:
Link, please!

Please kindly post the supreme court judgement here.

Thank you.

Sunnyja:
You can see the mentality of those ruling the country, trying to twist facts in an yet to be conducted election. From certificate forgery to competing under two parties. Goosh.

SmartchildTutor:
All your arguments are valid.
It remains to be seen whether the spirit of the law will actually override the letters of the law when there's no underlying misdoing to contravene the law.
I'm sure most of your e-lawyers didn't see where the Supreme Court mentioned the spirit of the law.

Sunnyja:
You can see the mentality of those ruling the country, trying to twist facts in an yet to be conducted election. From certificate forgery to competing under two parties. Goosh.

engineerboat:


Meaning you've passed Utme exam.

But did obaseki writes APC UTME EXAM

Jesusloveyou:
he wanted to write APC exam but was qualified.

participating in that process of written apc exam before disqualification has already make obaseki a partaker of apc exam.
in a straightforward words- obaseki failed APC exam, so he can't partake in the same exam in PDP.

7lives:


You better go and read about a certain Uche Nwosu and the supreme Court judgement.
Don't say you are not aware, it's about to go down to the last wire, PDP may not even have a candidate for Edo governoship election.