Ishilove:

You mean starres?

Playthepianos:
If you think clearly, you will know that he used the action of the phone metamorphically.

Playthepianos:
Lol. You have only succeeded in contradicting yourself with this junk.

budaatum:

Yes, I am saying "contradictions are good", but because they are problematic.

If the book had no contradictions, people who read it would not have to think but just obey what is written in it, but the contradictions make that impossible since one would have to resolve the "do" with its opposite "don't". That resolution is what makes the book valuable as far as I'm concerned because it makes many zombies think.

budaatum:

I think op got his starring from Stare, staring, stared. I just want a phone that does what his does.

Ishilove:

Heh. I was being sarcastic.

budaatum:

Lol. I'm beginning to think I might be blind to sarcasm.

Ishilove:

Indeed. It flies over your head like fighter jets.

budaatum:

You need to start being honest, you liar! By your own admission your phone did not "did nothing", since with your own hands you typed "It was just starring" at you. Not only that, but it even seems to have said "fool! Is my existence and ability alone not a proof that my maker exists?" So your phone did two things, it starred at you and it spoke to you, and I have the feeling that if your phone considered it not a waste of time, it would have pointed you to its "made in" wherever it was made label, so you could reason for yourself that it was made by people there.

Do know that I trust your phone more than most humans though, since anyone who does not say they were made by their mummy and daddy is either lying or think they dropped down from God's factory somewhere or are too young to know how humans are made.

Do let me know if your phone meets my criteria please. I'd love one that stares and talks like your's does and wouldn't mind upping my budget to get one.

BackllGodNaija:
What an irony! The best way to tell me I was lying (which in itself was a lie) was to lie lol! It's obvious you're just seeking something else to clutching at as your pals here since all your straws have hence been destroyed. The same label ya'll don't consider good enough to prove that man's maker exist, is that which you said my phone would have used to prove to me it's maker exists? It seems you are too blind to realize from the Op that I'm not that foolish...I don't need my phone to point any label but just using my phone to prove how foolish that logic of atheists is.

How if you still able to comprehend the concept, you may yet refer to @playthepiano's comments. Thanks.

budaatum:
Do know that I trust your phone more than most humans though, since anyone who does not say they were made by their mummy and daddy is either lying or think they dropped down from God's factory somewhere or are too young to know how humans are made.

budaatum:

I'm beginning to like and trust your phone even more. Could I buy it please?

The irony is actually you and playthepiano's miscomprehension, or is it just an inability to read? Because, only fools don't know who made them.

BackllGodNaija:
Yeah, more like only fools would ask a proof for a proof...

By the way, my phone don't like fools, so look for one that does to like or buy.

budaatum:

Well, I'm not exactly the one looking for who made me am I. Ma would look at me funny if I did. And I do agree your phone don't like fools or it would have done more than stare at you when you asked it who made it.

Yeah, considering that I was only acting as the fools who do so, you just might have a point.

budaatum:

Well, I'm not exactly the one looking for who made me am I. Ma would look at me funny if I did. And I do agree your phone don't like fools or it would have done more than stare at you when you asked it who made it.

BackllGodNaija:
Yeah, considering that I was only acting as the fools who do so, you just might have a point.

budaatum:

I'd say stop acting and ask fools to work harder instead, but why should you do what I say?

BackllGodNaija:
I'd say it's better to act as fools than to actually be one. Perhaps that's the best way to make fools know how foolish it is to be one. So why not advise yourself instead?

budaatum:

BackllGodNaija:
only fools would ask a proof for a proof...

Dtruthspeaker:

Foolish Stupid People.

Let me go and ask my Prado if it knows who is Creator is, may be it would answer me.

I"LL be back!

budaatum:

Now we know who this Foolish Stupid People is we must understand.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/10799612_notable00631_jpeg09f84e6d8ba9b391d46ef6abbf20665c

BackllGodNaija:

I just thought I should apply the reasoning of those who ask people who believe in God for a proof His existence to my phone, since they consider a phone to be a proof of its maker's existence.

So I asked my phone which has the ability to do many things, even speak and answer questions, "prove to me your maker exists".

But Lo and behold, it did nothing! It was just starring at me as if to say, "fool! Is my existence and ability alone not a proof that my maker exists?"

But going by the thought process of those who ask someone for a proof of his maker's existence, since the phone couldn't 'prove it', that should mean its maker doesn't exist right?

Of course I wasn't that foolish to think such a thing but just trying to apply the foolish reasoning of those who would deem it wise to ask a living proof of his maker's existence for a proof of his maker's existence to a phone which they consider to be a proof of its own maker's existence to illustrate how foolish it was to do so.

So despite that it couldn't prove its maker's existence to me, I didn't take it in any way to mean that its maker doesn't exist, because its existence and ability alone was already a proof of its maker's existence, so I didn't need another one. Praise the Lord.

God bless Nigeria.

delkuf:
No man have shown you this, but the Father in heaven

BackllGodNaija:

I just thought I should apply the reasoning of those who ask people who believe in God for a proof His existence to my phone, since they consider a phone to be a proof of its maker's existence.

So I asked my phone which has the ability to do many things, even speak and answer questions, "prove to me your maker exists".

But Lo and behold, it did nothing! It was just starring at me as if to say, "fool! Is my existence and ability alone not a proof that my maker exists?"

But going by the thought process of those who ask someone for a proof of his maker's existence, since the phone couldn't 'prove it', that should mean its maker doesn't exist right?

Of course I wasn't that foolish to think such a thing but just trying to apply the foolish reasoning of those who would deem it wise to ask a living proof of his maker's existence for a proof of his maker's existence to a phone which they consider to be a proof of its own maker's existence to illustrate how foolish it was to do so.

So despite that it couldn't prove its maker's existence to me, I didn't take it in any way to mean that its maker doesn't exist, because its existence and ability alone was already a proof of its maker's existence, so I didn't need another one. Praise the Lord.

God bless Nigeria.

BackllGodNaija:

I just thought I should apply the reasoning of those who ask people who believe in God for a proof His existence to my phone, since they consider a phone to be a proof of its maker's existence.

So I asked my phone which has the ability to do many things, even speak and answer questions, "prove to me your maker exists".

But Lo and behold, it did nothing! It was just starring at me as if to say, "fool! Is my existence and ability alone not a proof that my maker exists?"

But going by the thought process of those who ask someone for a proof of his maker's existence, since the phone couldn't 'prove it', that should mean its maker doesn't exist right?

Of course I wasn't that foolish to think such a thing but just trying to apply the foolish reasoning of those who would deem it wise to ask a living proof of his maker's existence for a proof of his maker's existence to a phone which they consider to be a proof of its own maker's existence to illustrate how foolish it was to do so.

So despite that it couldn't prove its maker's existence to me, I didn't take it in any way to mean that its maker doesn't exist, because its existence and ability alone was already a proof of its maker's existence, so I didn't need another one. Praise the Lord.

God bless Nigeria.

LikeAking:


Take this post down.

Op?

LikeAking:


If this is your own way of proving the existence things.I will advise you to hand over your CV to the nearest suya man/akara woman for packaging of their products.

See reasoning.

jesusjnr2020:
Lol

You must be speaking to yourself, because I was applying your foolish logic on that occasion.

Such a waste of brains.

LikeAking:


Hand over your Certificates to the nearest suya man/akara woman for packaging of their products.