Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,153,526 members, 7,819,894 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 05:45 AM

Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency - Politics (6) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency (20927 Views)

Tinubu Breaks Silence On Amotekun , Says Amotekun Not Threat To National Unity / Soyinka Slams Musa Balarabe Over Comment On Amotekun / FG Takes New Decision On Amotekun (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by gideonvalor98(m): 11:46am On Sep 09, 2020
LaboPolitics:


Same thing applies when we tell ewedugerians like you that yoruba will never smell Aso till Igbos take their turn in the zonal arrangement.

You have lost 87% of every presidential election you've voted in since 1959 till date and you yorubas have never been united at the polls, always splitting your votes and dribbling yourselves with 'we don't put all our eggs in one basket' self-deceit, when we all know that yoruba problem is lack of unity which they deflect and project unto other.
While yoruba muslims are singing soprano, yoru-christians are throwing shekere. grin

Tinubu's greatest adversaries are yorubas who are gathering to share his meat like they did to MKO and Awolowo. grin

But you people that are united, we all know is not for the right cause na...just where food dey lol...money slaves we know una. Even the ijekuje you're chopping up and down had caused you people more harm, no una want form attachment... grin

The fact is, you people stubbornness will take you to nowhere, na shout una go dey shout...no level for una. Apart from unity in voting and money ( una unity is in corruption and the money sef you no reach us - most of your rich men make their money from the north and west), talking of human capital prowess, development and personality enh?! Una father - you no reach us. An average northerner will prefer to go with the west than you guys� fact.

Even sef, how many of una dey vote for southeast sef? I served in the east 2015 and pertook in the election, I saw firsthand! As important as 2015 election was, how many of you came out to vote? Even those small numbers you put out sef, rigging join 'am, so what are we saying. Look we no dey make mouth or dey form stubbornness like you guys, but 'real' CONTENT dey...if we decide to finally do Smth, nobody born of human fit stop us, not even NORTHERN power. Wet in you sabi for politics? Nawa for you o...you be small pikin.

1 Like

Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by tolguy(m): 11:47am On Sep 09, 2020
pharmagba:
Did hisbah cost the North presidency?
did hisbah carry arms
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Nobody: 11:52am On Sep 09, 2020
Skynet45:
The hausas fear yorubas they know we have the power to dismantle this country cool
The bold & greatest warriors are the Northerners. North fear no one, even when white came to Nigeria they fought dirty and died for the North. Go and listen to what Northerners say when you bring up this issues, outrightly they'll tell u who even cares. More than 80% of northerners are farmers so they don't care abt the oil only Politicians care much abt it, common men in the North depend either on farming or local market, then tell me who is afraid of losing previlleges?
Northern Politicians know the important of sovereignty of Nigeria as a united nation and beside they're not small children who'll just wake up overnight for small issues and say we should divide the nation without considering other better alternatives.
Wisdom is power, think again. We don't talk trash. If North decide to divide this nation it'll take Nigeria few months to be history and no war will be fought but of it's others, I bet u it'll lead to genocide because when it comes to politics and leadership it's in the DNA of northerners to conquer.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by pharmagba: 11:53am On Sep 09, 2020
tolguy:
did hisbah carry arms

Go to Kano
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by EMIOMOADEOYE: 12:17pm On Sep 09, 2020
LaboPolitics:


https://dailypost.ng/2020/08/27/2023-south-wests-stand-on-amotekun-could-cost-them-presidency-apc-chieftain-gololo/

Put the Hisbah Corp under IG first.

Elections are won by the peoples mandate....not by political agendas.

Except this is an open admittance to election rigging
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Obamaofusa: 12:30pm On Sep 09, 2020
Gololo is surely going low.
SW will keep amotekun and still get the presidency.
Amotekun is here to stay.

1 Like

Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Lacash: 12:56pm On Sep 09, 2020
LaboPolitics:


https://dailypost.ng/2020/08/27/2023-south-wests-stand-on-amotekun-could-cost-them-presidency-apc-chieftain-gololo/
The fact that the inauguration of Amotekun has been giving the Hausa’s a sleepless night makes them nothing but a bunch of cowards...Awon Olofo to nbinu Ologo grin grin

2 Likes

Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Nooel1: 1:11pm On Sep 09, 2020
dalass:


Thanks Lagos is better for it. KANU on the other hand also dictates what to say and do for you.... Now he has abandoned you and run away like the fearful idiot he is... Not our fault all your leaders have no balls kiss

You're a female liar
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Olisehinnocent: 1:50pm On Sep 09, 2020
As far as am concern, nothing like odua republic! Ur Amotekun must be desolve with immediate effect cheesy we die here
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by 0taPiaPia(m): 1:57pm On Sep 09, 2020
LaboPolitics:


Zik...

Nnwanne, ina gwo ha iba na ezioku.. grin

1 Like

Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Nobody: 2:07pm On Sep 09, 2020
Coronabirus:

The bold & greatest warriors are the Northerners. North fear no one, even when white came to Nigeria they fought dirty and died for the North. Go and listen to what Northerners say when you bring up this issues, outrightly they'll tell u who even cares. More than 80% of northerners are farmers so they don't care abt the oil only Politicians care much abt it, common men in the North depend either on farming or local market, then tell me who is afraid of losing previlleges?
Northern Politicians know the important of sovereignty of Nigeria as a united nation and beside they're not small children who'll just wake up overnight for small issues and say we should divide the nation without considering other better alternatives.
Wisdom is power, think again. We don't talk trash. If North decide to divide this nation it'll take Nigeria few months to be history and no war will be fought but of it's others, I bet u it'll lead to genocide because when it comes to politics and leadership it's in the DNA of northerners to conquer.
Lol abokii warriors grin . The yorubas helped Nigeria win the civil war, without yorubas Nigeria would be history. If yorubas decided to leave Nigeria, the igbos are also ready , the Niger Delta are also ready to leave, even the north knows it can't fight the entire south together. The north would lose . Amotekun is a militia and it's main purpose is to fight a civil war if the need arises, it would soon be unleash on the north .
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by ehinmowo: 2:10pm On Sep 09, 2020
Tomiwa69:
Chop ur presidency
On amotekun we stand
Amotekite to the world

This your statement is an insult to Yoruba nation. The presidency is not owned by anybody. And nobody has capacity to decide it.

One thing above else, Àmòtékùn will not be under the inefficient federal police.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Nobody: 2:26pm On Sep 09, 2020
ThatFairGuy1:

If we tell Ndi Igbo they can't be president, we're just saying the truth.
This is what chigozirim have to say

For quoting Chigozirim, it shows the level of your reasoning. So, you want to tell me that every Igbo is a member of the IPOB? Or do you want to tell me that Nigeria is not a zoo, with the spate of killing, insecurity, etc, plaguing it?

Did Buhari not incite violence, yet he's the president today?

If an Igboman can't be president, then Yorubas don't deserve it again, and Gololo is then right.

You're just a hypocrite!

1 Like

Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Shamzo4u: 2:40pm On Sep 09, 2020
I am a typical Yoruba boy, a Lagocian and Amotekun rooter. Amotekun is what we want
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by masseratti: 2:48pm On Sep 09, 2020
DEROX:
Fulani's know the difference very well they only can't differentiate SS and SE do you think they don't know osinbajo tribe or Femi gbaja but you see Jonathan most of them thought he was Igbo with his ebele azikwe name
i will choose an igbo man, a South south any day anytime, we ve tried them both, we have voted for ijaw man over fulani, he packed us aside, now we voted for a fulani over an ijaw man,the result is not better, my point is Yorubas will vote igbo man if we are not contesting over fulani any day any time, we should be above board and forget the online ne teasing please, we don't hate anyone all we all need is good governance irrespective of where the head if government comes from.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Nobody: 2:49pm On Sep 09, 2020
trutharena:


Lol, you don't know history and that is sad.

Yoruba have been elected thrice through the ballot, a feat the Igbos have NEVER achieved.

Also, check every election since 1979, the Yorubas have ALWAYS given BLOC vote if the Presidential candidate is a Yoruba man.

Check 1979, 1983, 1993, 1999, and 2003 election results to validate my claim.

However the Igbos are confused entity that have consistently given the Fulanis more chance against their own because of blind loyalty to a party. You did that for Zik, Ojukwu, and etc.

The Yorubas only have divided vote when the presidential candidate is from another tribe. Check the election results!


Who elected a Yoruba man as president in 1979? Awolowo was defeated!

Igbos and others made Obasanjo president.

The Yorubas have always been in the opposition right from Awolowo to Tinubu. If Jonathan were as wicked as Buhari, the 2015 election wouldn't have been won by him. So, apart from 2015, you have always been in the opposition.

Abiola won because he had a huge following across every nook and cranny of Nigeria. It wasn't the handiwork of Yorubas. In fact, Yoruba leaders who visited him in prison asked Abacha to hold him there, and when they got back to him, they instructed him not to leave prison until his mandate was restored to him. What a two-faced nature!

The Fulanis you talked about are more trusted than Yorubas. Yorubas are backstabbers. It was the issue Zik had with Awolowo.

The civil war was the reason why Igbos felt that Zik and Ojukwu couldn't win, and they then channeled their votes elsewhere.

But as for trust, Igbos are more trustworthy than Yorubas. We saw it play out recently. Peter Obi stood by Atiku until the court cases were over. However, it's regrettable that Gbenga Daniel started courting the APC immediately after the election.

It was the same trust issue that made the PDP stakeholders decide that Jimi Agbaje wouldn't be the PDP national chairman, because others helped in the court cases against Ali Modu Sheriff, while he stayed aloof.

So, you shouldn't take the glory of the presidency of Obasanjo, because the Yorubas didn't contribute to it.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by bbamusa: 3:00pm On Sep 09, 2020
Wiseandtrue:

You can imagine the audacity undecided

When you started hisbah, and you stood by them, did it cost you anything Did it cost you the presidency

Why must you dictate for others

Abi na which kind 2 faced people be this

I don't blame you, CPC couldn't win the election without the help of the south, South West to be precise and now you have the audacity to dictate

Something dey worry una
get it straight Mr Man, the Hisbah are working with the police. any of their arrest is being handed over to police.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by MrColdsweat: 3:12pm On Sep 09, 2020
If Nigeria isn't restructured by 2023, the people of SS,SE and SW should boycott the 2023 elections. Very simple.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by DEROX: 3:18pm On Sep 09, 2020
masseratti:
i will choose an igbo man, a South south any day anytime, we ve tried them both, we have voted for ijaw man over fulani, he packed us aside, now we voted for a fulani over an ijaw man,the result is not better, my point is Yorubas will vote igbo man if we are not contesting over fulani any day any time, we should be above board and forget the online ne teasing please, we don't hate anyone all we all need is good governance irrespective of where the head if government comes from.
We will never vote any igbo over Fulani but you may. Not after the known hatred calling us slaves and all that
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by DMerciful(m): 4:17pm On Sep 09, 2020
True because the Igbos are willing to dismantle it, just one of the tripod is needed. Either Yorubas or Hausas
Skynet45:
The hausas fear yorubas they know we have the power to dismantle this country cool
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by One4me: 4:20pm On Sep 09, 2020
pharmagba:
Did hisbah cost the North presidency?


Please who is this UNKNOWN Galolo? He better STFU. what an Arrogant, foul-mouthed M0r0n.
Unless the North is trying to Blackmail other Nigerians, l am certain that all Southern Nigerians need to take Power from the North is for SE, SW and SS to come to an agreement to rotate Power within themselves and the North is TOAST.

The North should never think it can still retain Power come 2023 (lovers of PDP should insist on a Southern Candidate, Igbo or Yoruba and lovers of APC should insist on the same) and the North should stop arrogating too much importance to itself.
undecided undecided
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by One4me: 4:24pm On Sep 09, 2020
bbamusa:

get it straight Mr Man, the Hisbah are working with the police. any of their arrest is being handed over to police.




Is there any difference between the Hisbah and the Fulani Police, since Buhari came to Power?
Go and check the names of the IGP's under Buhari
undecided undecided

Hisbah working with Fulani Police is their Choice.
Amotekun is for the South West, South East and South South should also have their own, the fulani Police has failed in protecting Southern Nigerians from the Genocide of Terrorist Fulani Herdsmen.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by ceaser: 4:24pm On Sep 09, 2020
Mandeyy:


The Fulanis you talked about are more trusted than Yorubas. Yorubas are backstabbers. It was the issue Zik had with Awolowo.


I beg to differ. Yorubas have done well to move on away from the hurts and betrayals from their South Eastern brothers in the execution of the coup and even the civil war, to the effect that their properties were cared for and kept intact till their return after the war.

But a fact that has been established over the years is that the Igbos relish keeping malice as if they were the only saints in the war. They keep playing the victim up to this day. As if that was not enough, they looove to re-write history to suit their narratives and paint themselves in such saintly light.

Suffice it to say that this problem is mainly by the newer generation that did not witness the war; this is the generation that Nnamdi Kanu belong to and that is why it is so easy for him to insult and accuse the rest of the country without self-control. He declares renewed war with the Yorubas and twist the narratives of the war to his contemporary new gullibles who swallow all he dishes out unquestionably and without research. The elderly among the South East will tell the true picture of the story and will not be quick to beat the drums of war as you guys are won't to do.

Read this:

[b]My Rejoinder to Persistent Accusation Against the Yoruba by Our Igbo Brothers on a Pan-Nigerian Platform.

The answer to your question was that Igbo in cahoots with the North of the Nigeria country put Awolowo in prison, but Igbo became the greatest beneficiaries. I shall elaborate on that towards the end of this factual account of history.

Proverbially speaking, Igbo people will seldom appreciate you if they enter your house and you welcome them with your food and drinks. Their eyes will be on your wife too, and failing to offer her to them as well, would be seen as your unwillingness to appreciate their handsome selves who had cared to pay you a visit! That describes their attitude towards their best friends on earth: the Yoruba. Yes, Igbo people, sit down and survey your peregrinations across Nigeria and the world and you would find that Yoruba people are your best friends.

The Igbo/Yoruba dichotomy began with the false narrative of Chinua Achebe, which is their favourite account like the Cathecism, that Awolowo orchestrated "a daylight robbery" of Zik's "mandate" to be Premier of the Western Region in 1954.

Achebe said in his book "The Trouble With Nigeria" that he was a student at the University College, Ibadan, when the "daylight robbery" occured.

But what was the fact? It's worth repeating before the Igbo false accusers for the umpteenth time because their hearts seethe in that hatred borne of patent biased reportage of events that Awolowo usurped what was supposed to be an Igbo leadership mandate over Yorubaland and associated ethnic groups of the old Western Region.

Don't forget that the elections of 1954 was conducted by the British and it was six years away from independence. The fact of the matter was that neither Awolowo's Action Group nor Zik's NCNC had enough seats in the Western Region's Parliament in Ibadan to form a Government when the votes were counted and who won which seats became public knowledge. Both parties then had to resort to wooing candidates of the smaller parties like the Ibadan Peoples Party and Mabolaje Grand Alliance to form a coalition with them.

The Action Group, of course, went to work assiduously, promising the candidates cabinet positions. On the day the parliament was opened, the white governor of Western Region asked the parliamentarians to signify their affiliations for the records. That was how most of the smaller parties' candidates openly declared their alliance with the Action Group. That was how Awolowo became the Premier. Go to Federal Archives at the University of Ibadan. The election results and parliamentary hansards of the time are there in original forms.

But backtrack to recall that from 1951 to 1954, Awolowo was already a quasi-premier of the West with the title of "Leader of Government Busines". That's why in his autobiography he has a chapter titled "Eight Years of of Office". That is,1951 -1959. He was already a burgeoning legend among his people as a sterling performer. The Igbo had hoped to truncate our pace-setting advancement in education, rural development, industry etc, with Zik taking over from him. I'm sure most Igbo of this generation don't know Awolowo had led the West for about three years before ZIK sought to upstage him.

The lie that Chinua Achebe swallowed alongside his umunna who had converged around the parliament building in Ibadan wearing their ishiagu for the crowning of an Igbo King over Yoruba people was dished out by Zik. He lamented to the press outside the parliament building at the end of swearing in that he had been betrayed. That all those who teamed up with Awolowo were his political associates whose support he had taken for granted. He claimed they simply defected overnight and blamed it on cultic loyalty. Maybe they were Ogbonis. LOL.

Igbo people had to believe him then hook, line, and sinker. He was their political god just as Awolowo was to most Yoruba people.

But, no sir! Those coalition members won their seats on their own steam just as you, Zik, had won yours with Yoruba votes in Yorubaland. They had the freedom to associate with who they wanted. They opted for Awolowo and his Action Group not so much because they were even playing Yoruba ethnic card but because they had a deal! Politics is a game of interest. Chief Augustus Meredith Akinloye of the Ibadan People's Party, for instance, had been promised a cabinet position. Of course, he couldn't have been deceived because if that had happened he could defect and the Action Group ruling coalition would collapse. He became Minister of Agriculture, Western Region.

Meanwhile, Zik became the Leader of Opposition in the Western Region but he was soon pressed by his Igbo kinsmen to leave a region where he had won an election to represent Yoruba people for the Eastern Region where they went to lay the foundation of hatred and hostility between themselves and their minority compatriots of today's Southsouth zone by removing Prof. Eyo Ita, a NCNC leader in his own right, as Premier. The Igbo had majority seats anyway. Zik then became premier. A surrogate in the Eastern parliament vacated his own seat for him.

I return to my opening line. The real act of provocation, which could have led to attacks on Igbo in Yorubaland, were Yoruba not the hospitable and liberal people they are, and which set the stage for the collapse of the First Republic, was laid by the Igbo in cahoots with the north with which they had a ruling federal coalition in Lagos.

It was the NCNC/NPC coalition that framed up Awolowo in a phantom coup d'etat when they could no longer tolerate him as Leader of the Opposition at the Federal Parliament and, of course, to takeover his sphere of influence.

With Awolowo held in Calabar prison for no just cause, the Igbo quickly pressed for the issue of creation of new regions of which Awolowo was the chief advocate as laid out in his autobiography published in 1960 months to independence in October. But they only wanted the Midwest Region he had proposed. They didn't want the COR (Calabar, Ogoja, Rivers) region, equally in the proposal. That would have split their Eastern empire. And, of course, their senior northern partner wouldn't brook any suggestion of a Middle Belt region, also proposed by Awolowo.

Thus, we had a situation where the smallest region in the country was split, while the bigger ones were kept intact. The Igbo plot worked as planned. In August 1963, a second class Igbo (that's by Igbo standard) from Asaba, in the person of Chief Dennis Osadebey, an old boy of Zik's alma mater, the Hope Waddell Training Institute, Calabar, became Premier of the Midwest Region. Hurray, Igbo now had two premiers!

By that, it was believed Awolowo's sphere of influence had been diminished forever.

Then the Igbo went for the bigger goal. They wanted to upstage their Arewa partners from power. They then formed an alliance with the rump of the traumatised and divided Action Group of Awolowo. Earlier, in 1959, they had rejected the same alliance with Awolowo for Zik to be Prime Minister and Awolowo, Minister of Finance. They belatedly formed an NCNC/Action Group alliance known as the United Progressives Grand Alliance (UPGA) for them to control federal powers in addition to two regions.

D-Day was 30 December 1964 when the general elections were held. Meanwhile, the Arewa senior partners in the NPC had wizened up to the Igbo game and also formed an alliance with another faction of the Action Group led by Chief Akintola. They then had what was called the Nigerian National Alliance (NNA). They won! Chief Akintola, without Awolowo's support, had successfully launched a counter-coup on the Igbo splitting of the Western Region by aligning with the north. The ensuing cabinet produced only three Igbo as Federal Ministers as against seven Yoruba. The Igbos were Raymond Njoku, Jaja Wachukwu, and K.O. Mbadiwe. This development, northerners have quietly argued, was the beginning of the coup of 15 January 1966. It is argued that the Igbo political elites, who had lost out, instigated Igbo boys in the military to strike. And that was why no civilian or military casualties were recorded in the whole East during the coup. But Chief Akintola and his newfound northern partners were all eliminated.

I draw you back. You know Yoruba people fight on principles. They launched massive agitations against Akintola for selling out to the northerners. They were not appeased by seven cabinet positions that didn't have the blessings of Awolowo and his progressive lieutenants languishing unjustly in prison. Operation Wetie began in earnest, shaking Balewa in Lagos and Akintola in Ibadan. Somebody had put on the body form of my highly esteemed friend, Prof. Wole Soyinka, to attempt stoppage of the announcement of the election results at gunpoint at Radio House in Ibadan for which the real Soyinka (LOL) was tried and freed by Justice Kayode Eso. Go and read Justice Eso's memoirs titled THE MYSTERY GUN MAN.

Eventually, Aguiyi Ironsi came to power. Awolowo petitioned him for his release. He rebuffed him till northern troops removed him from power. Then Gowon released Awolowo and invited him to join his government and stabilised the country then careening into chaos.

Igbo declared secession. A civil war ensued. They lost. At the end, they picked their favourite scapegoat, Awolowo, for their defeat The accusations traversed the war operations to post-war settlement.

First, he betrayed them, having promised them that if they declared secession, Yoruba would follow. Ask yourself, on what grounds? An old man just out of prison! A civilian! To declare secession in confrontation with Gen. Gowon who had just pitied him and set him free! Something an Ironsi had refused to do! How does that add up? Well, since it's Awolowo who had prevented Igbo premiership of Yorubaland, it must add up.

Second, he starved them during the war. Of course, General Gowon must have been too naive as a British-trained military officer to understand the implications of giving an unimpeded corridor of food supply to enemy territory in war! Awolowo had to teach him that the food was being hijacked by the Biafran troops.

Third, and back to what prompted this recollections ab initio. The accusation of £20. Honest Igbo know the truth. First and foremost, records of Nigerian banks in the East had been destroyed during the war as banks were prime targets of unruly elements among combatants on both sides during the civil war. Hence, apart from their passbooks, most Igbo claiming they had money in the banks had no proof. Many had even lost their passbooks. It was an era when there were no computers to keep soft copies of records or backups. Everything was done manually and in hard copies.

It was a mark of the magnanimity of the Federal Government that it created a fund from which banks were to pay £20 each to any Igbo with some proof of bank account ownership. It was a blanket thing. Even if you had £1 balance in your account you would get it. But those who had proof, especially those in the West - Lagos, Ibadan, Abeokuta etc - where their banking records were intact, had their accounts reactivated.

If anything, the Igbo had, over the years, rendered evil as reward to the only ethnic group in Nigeria that had received them with open arms, including Zik, from the time this country was established till date. If anyone should be held back by the unkindness of old, it should be the Yoruba against the Igbo and not the other way round. It's the Yoruba, among whom Igbo have found accommodation and toleration more than anywhere else they had ever set their foot upon on earth, who should be talking of Igbo betrayal, Igbo unfriendliness, and Igbo selfishness.

But it's one of those ironies of life that the victim is made the accused by his traducers. The Yoruba cosmopolitan outlook and liberal-mindedness is what have kept Nigeria one till date. It's only the Yoruba who have never unleashed violence against other groups. Not that they are contented with their lot in Nigeria or because they're cowards. It's not just in their DNA to spill blood carelessly! The only times they've engaged in any major public disturbances that cost lives (their own lives) were mainly to protest oppression and injustice visited on them and it was limited only to their space. They never went after non-Yoruba as scapegoats. That was during Operation Wetie and Agbekoya Revolt in the 60s and June 12 demonstrations in the 90s.

Let us hope that one day, some sections of Nigeria won't have to look back and regret that they blew their goodwill with the Yoruba.

If you hear of anybody supporting Igbo presidency outside Igboland today, who is not Yoruba, please, tell me. The same thing applied to Igbo sympathisers during the civil war: the Wole Soyinkas, Tai Solarins, the Col. Victor Banjos, the Prof. Sam Alukos of this world etc. They were all Yoruba, and some of them got imprisoned for it like Wole Soyinka. Col. Banjo wasn't as lucky. He was rewarded with bullets!

And recall that Col. Adekunle Fajuyi had died alongside Gen. Ironsi in July 1967 when northern soldiers came for the latter in Ibadan because Fajuyi didn't want the impression to be created, as the northerners wanted it, that Ironsi's death was a Yoruba set up. He chose to be executed with his Igbo commander in-chief who wasn't gracious enough to release Awolowo, his fatherly kinsman, from prison when he had the power to do so! How common is such vicariousness?

The Yoruba are still open to forging a meaningful partnership with the Igbo to safeguard and promote a glorious future. I hope voices of historically false accusations would allow the detente to reach its denouement[/b]

4 Likes

Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by DiagnoPolitics: 4:36pm On Sep 09, 2020
francisbiz:


[s]You lack intelligence.
Think before you type.
Mind you I am an Igboman, but sometimes you need to be subtle and calculative to get what you want.

The last I checked, Igbis have become the Chameleon of the rainforest, sabotaging Igbo interests. Did you hear Orji Kalu recently? I know you and your like will clap for him tomorrow when he is in one of those political gatherings[/s]

Ewedu jibiti man stop deceiving your skull, you yorubas are not united. Muric have already destroyed any atom of unity you have. Tinubu and other yorubas have sold you to the north. grin grin
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Nobody: 5:04pm On Sep 09, 2020
pharmagba:

No opaque agenda?
If you are talking of no apaque agenda this can only be said of amotekun which it's only objective is to flush out criminals.
Hisbah mission is to intimidate and harass free thinkers going to bars to destroy alcohol and hotel to pick prostitute for no reasonable cause. Hisbah wild dangerous weapon and matchtee to intimidate victims.

Amotekun is not against IGP but the reverse is the case, IGP suddenly felt the overwhelming support amotekun got from the south west and like a jealous wife started spewing intimidation instead of stepping up their game and improving on their ineptitude
Hisbah with weapons u said?
So I rest my case because there is no concrete assertion in ur point.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by Nobody: 5:07pm On Sep 09, 2020
Skynet45:

Lol abokii warriors grin . The yorubas helped Nigeria win the civil war, without yorubas Nigeria would be history. If yorubas decided to leave Nigeria, the igbos are also ready , the Niger Delta are also ready to leave, even the north knows it can't fight the entire south together. The north would lose . Amotekun is a militia and it's main purpose is to fight a civil war if the need arises, it would soon be unleash on the north .
lol...very funny...
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by masseratti: 5:32pm On Sep 09, 2020
[font=Lucida Sans Unicode][/font]
DEROX:
We will never vote any igbo over Fulani but you may. Not after the known hatred calling us slaves and all that
surely we will... Igbos are our neighbors and brothers Fulanis are not our neighbors, but we don't need to hate anyone.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by chiedonedoor(m): 5:53pm On Sep 09, 2020
Who is controlling sharia police in the north.
The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Christ is coming soon.
Re: Garus Gololo: South-West’s Stand On Amotekun Could Cost Them 2023 Presidency by masseratti: 5:58pm On Sep 09, 2020
ceaser:


I beg to differ. Yorubas have done well to move on away from the hurts and betrayals from their South Eastern brothers in the execution of the coup and even the civil war, to the effect that their properties were cared for and kept intact till their return after the war.

But a fact that has been established over the years is that the Igbos relish keeping malice as if they were the only saints in the war. They keep playing the victim up to this day. As if that was not enough, they looove to re-write history to suit their narratives and paint themselves in such saintly light.

Suffice it to say that this problem is mainly by the newer generation that did not witness the war; this is the generation that Nnamdi Kanu belong to and that is why it is so easy for him to insult and accuse the rest of the country without self-control. He declares renewed war with the Yorubas and twist the narratives of the war to his contemporary new gullibles who swallow all he dishes out unquestionably and without research. The elderly among the South East will tell the true picture of the story and will not be quick to beat the drums of war as you guys are won't to do.

Read this:

[b]My Rejoinder to Persistent Accusation Against the Yoruba by Our Igbo Brothers on a Pan-Nigerian Platform.

The answer to your question was that Igbo in cahoots with the North of the Nigeria country put Awolowo in prison, but Igbo became the greatest beneficiaries. I shall elaborate on that towards the end of this factual account of history.

Proverbially speaking, Igbo people will seldom appreciate you if they enter your house and you welcome them with your food and drinks. Their eyes will be on your wife too, and failing to offer her to them as well, would be seen as your unwillingness to appreciate their handsome selves who had cared to pay you a visit! That describes their attitude towards their best friends on earth: the Yoruba. Yes, Igbo people, sit down and survey your peregrinations across Nigeria and the world and you would find that Yoruba people are your best friends.

The Igbo/Yoruba dichotomy began with the false narrative of Chinua Achebe, which is their favourite account like the Cathecism, that Awolowo orchestrated "a daylight robbery" of Zik's "mandate" to be Premier of the Western Region in 1954.

Achebe said in his book "The Trouble With Nigeria" that he was a student at the University College, Ibadan, when the "daylight robbery" occured.

But what was the fact? It's worth repeating before the Igbo false accusers for the umpteenth time because their hearts seethe in that hatred borne of patent biased reportage of events that Awolowo usurped what was supposed to be an Igbo leadership mandate over Yorubaland and associated ethnic groups of the old Western Region.

Don't forget that the elections of 1954 was conducted by the British and it was six years away from independence. The fact of the matter was that neither Awolowo's Action Group nor Zik's NCNC had enough seats in the Western Region's Parliament in Ibadan to form a Government when the votes were counted and who won which seats became public knowledge. Both parties then had to resort to wooing candidates of the smaller parties like the Ibadan Peoples Party and Mabolaje Grand Alliance to form a coalition with them.

The Action Group, of course, went to work assiduously, promising the candidates cabinet positions. On the day the parliament was opened, the white governor of Western Region asked the parliamentarians to signify their affiliations for the records. That was how most of the smaller parties' candidates openly declared their alliance with the Action Group. That was how Awolowo became the Premier. Go to Federal Archives at the University of Ibadan. The election results and parliamentary hansards of the time are there in original forms.

But backtrack to recall that from 1951 to 1954, Awolowo was already a quasi-premier of the West with the title of "Leader of Government Busines". That's why in his autobiography he has a chapter titled "Eight Years of of Office". That is,1951 -1959. He was already a burgeoning legend among his people as a sterling performer. The Igbo had hoped to truncate our pace-setting advancement in education, rural development, industry etc, with Zik taking over from him. I'm sure most Igbo of this generation don't know Awolowo had led the West for about three years before ZIK sought to upstage him.

The lie that Chinua Achebe swallowed alongside his umunna who had converged around the parliament building in Ibadan wearing their ishiagu for the crowning of an Igbo King over Yoruba people was dished out by Zik. He lamented to the press outside the parliament building at the end of swearing in that he had been betrayed. That all those who teamed up with Awolowo were his political associates whose support he had taken for granted. He claimed they simply defected overnight and blamed it on cultic loyalty. Maybe they were Ogbonis. LOL.

Igbo people had to believe him then hook, line, and sinker. He was their political god just as Awolowo was to most Yoruba people.

But, no sir! Those coalition members won their seats on their own steam just as you, Zik, had won yours with Yoruba votes in Yorubaland. They had the freedom to associate with who they wanted. They opted for Awolowo and his Action Group not so much because they were even playing Yoruba ethnic card but because they had a deal! Politics is a game of interest. Chief Augustus Meredith Akinloye of the Ibadan People's Party, for instance, had been promised a cabinet position. Of course, he couldn't have been deceived because if that had happened he could defect and the Action Group ruling coalition would collapse. He became Minister of Agriculture, Western Region.

Meanwhile, Zik became the Leader of Opposition in the Western Region but he was soon pressed by his Igbo kinsmen to leave a region where he had won an election to represent Yoruba people for the Eastern Region where they went to lay the foundation of hatred and hostility between themselves and their minority compatriots of today's Southsouth zone by removing Prof. Eyo Ita, a NCNC leader in his own right, as Premier. The Igbo had majority seats anyway. Zik then became premier. A surrogate in the Eastern parliament vacated his own seat for him.

I return to my opening line. The real act of provocation, which could have led to attacks on Igbo in Yorubaland, were Yoruba not the hospitable and liberal people they are, and which set the stage for the collapse of the First Republic, was laid by the Igbo in cahoots with the north with which they had a ruling federal coalition in Lagos.

It was the NCNC/NPC coalition that framed up Awolowo in a phantom coup d'etat when they could no longer tolerate him as Leader of the Opposition at the Federal Parliament and, of course, to takeover his sphere of influence.

With Awolowo held in Calabar prison for no just cause, the Igbo quickly pressed for the issue of creation of new regions of which Awolowo was the chief advocate as laid out in his autobiography published in 1960 months to independence in October. But they only wanted the Midwest Region he had proposed. They didn't want the COR (Calabar, Ogoja, Rivers) region, equally in the proposal. That would have split their Eastern empire. And, of course, their senior northern partner wouldn't brook any suggestion of a Middle Belt region, also proposed by Awolowo.

Thus, we had a situation where the smallest region in the country was split, while the bigger ones were kept intact. The Igbo plot worked as planned. In August 1963, a second class Igbo (that's by Igbo standard) from Asaba, in the person of Chief Dennis Osadebey, an old boy of Zik's alma mater, the Hope Waddell Training Institute, Calabar, became Premier of the Midwest Region. Hurray, Igbo now had two premiers!

By that, it was believed Awolowo's sphere of influence had been diminished forever.

Then the Igbo went for the bigger goal. They wanted to upstage their Arewa partners from power. They then formed an alliance with the rump of the traumatised and divided Action Group of Awolowo. Earlier, in 1959, they had rejected the same alliance with Awolowo for Zik to be Prime Minister and Awolowo, Minister of Finance. They belatedly formed an NCNC/Action Group alliance known as the United Progressives Grand Alliance (UPGA) for them to control federal powers in addition to two regions.

D-Day was 30 December 1964 when the general elections were held. Meanwhile, the Arewa senior partners in the NPC had wizened up to the Igbo game and also formed an alliance with another faction of the Action Group led by Chief Akintola. They then had what was called the Nigerian National Alliance (NNA). They won! Chief Akintola, without Awolowo's support, had successfully launched a counter-coup on the Igbo splitting of the Western Region by aligning with the north. The ensuing cabinet produced only three Igbo as Federal Ministers as against seven Yoruba. The Igbos were Raymond Njoku, Jaja Wachukwu, and K.O. Mbadiwe. This development, northerners have quietly argued, was the beginning of the coup of 15 January 1966. It is argued that the Igbo political elites, who had lost out, instigated Igbo boys in the military to strike. And that was why no civilian or military casualties were recorded in the whole East during the coup. But Chief Akintola and his newfound northern partners were all eliminated.

I draw you back. You know Yoruba people fight on principles. They launched massive agitations against Akintola for selling out to the northerners. They were not appeased by seven cabinet positions that didn't have the blessings of Awolowo and his progressive lieutenants languishing unjustly in prison. Operation Wetie began in earnest, shaking Balewa in Lagos and Akintola in Ibadan. Somebody had put on the body form of my highly esteemed friend, Prof. Wole Soyinka, to attempt stoppage of the announcement of the election results at gunpoint at Radio House in Ibadan for which the real Soyinka (LOL) was tried and freed by Justice Kayode Eso. Go and read Justice Eso's memoirs titled THE MYSTERY GUN MAN.

Eventually, Aguiyi Ironsi came to power. Awolowo petitioned him for his release. He rebuffed him till northern troops removed him from power. Then Gowon released Awolowo and invited him to join his government and stabilised the country then careening into chaos.

Igbo declared secession. A civil war ensued. They lost. At the end, they picked their favourite scapegoat, Awolowo, for their defeat The accusations traversed the war operations to post-war settlement.

First, he betrayed them, having promised them that if they declared secession, Yoruba would follow. Ask yourself, on what grounds? An old man just out of prison! A civilian! To declare secession in confrontation with Gen. Gowon who had just pitied him and set him free! Something an Ironsi had refused to do! How does that add up? Well, since it's Awolowo who had prevented Igbo premiership of Yorubaland, it must add up.

Second, he starved them during the war. Of course, General Gowon must have been too naive as a British-trained military officer to understand the implications of giving an unimpeded corridor of food supply to enemy territory in war! Awolowo had to teach him that the food was being hijacked by the Biafran troops.

Third, and back to what prompted this recollections ab initio. The accusation of £20. Honest Igbo know the truth. First and foremost, records of Nigerian banks in the East had been destroyed during the war as banks were prime targets of unruly elements among combatants on both sides during the civil war. Hence, apart from their passbooks, most Igbo claiming they had money in the banks had no proof. Many had even lost their passbooks. It was an era when there were no computers to keep soft copies of records or backups. Everything was done manually and in hard copies.

It was a mark of the magnanimity of the Federal Government that it created a fund from which banks were to pay £20 each to any Igbo with some proof of bank account ownership. It was a blanket thing. Even if you had £1 balance in your account you would get it. But those who had proof, especially those in the West - Lagos, Ibadan, Abeokuta etc - where their banking records were intact, had their accounts reactivated.

If anything, the Igbo had, over the years, rendered evil as reward to the only ethnic group in Nigeria that had received them with open arms, including Zik, from the time this country was established till date. If anyone should be held back by the unkindness of old, it should be the Yoruba against the Igbo and not the other way round. It's the Yoruba, among whom Igbo have found accommodation and toleration more than anywhere else they had ever set their foot upon on earth, who should be talking of Igbo betrayal, Igbo unfriendliness, and Igbo selfishness.

But it's one of those ironies of life that the victim is made the accused by his traducers. The Yoruba cosmopolitan outlook and liberal-mindedness is what have kept Nigeria one till date. It's only the Yoruba who have never unleashed violence against other groups. Not that they are contented with their lot in Nigeria or because they're cowards. It's not just in their DNA to spill blood carelessly! The only times they've engaged in any major public disturbances that cost lives (their own lives) were mainly to protest oppression and injustice visited on them and it was limited only to their space. They never went after non-Yoruba as scapegoats. That was during Operation Wetie and Agbekoya Revolt in the 60s and June 12 demonstrations in the 90s.

Let us hope that one day, some sections of Nigeria won't have to look back and regret that they blew their goodwill with the Yoruba.

If you hear of anybody supporting Igbo presidency outside Igboland today, who is not Yoruba, please, tell me. The same thing applied to Igbo sympathisers during the civil war: the Wole Soyinkas, Tai Solarins, the Col. Victor Banjos, the Prof. Sam Alukos of this world etc. They were all Yoruba, and some of them got imprisoned for it like Wole Soyinka. Col. Banjo wasn't as lucky. He was rewarded with bullets!

And recall that Col. Adekunle Fajuyi had died alongside Gen. Ironsi in July 1967 when northern soldiers came for the latter in Ibadan because Fajuyi didn't want the impression to be created, as the northerners wanted it, that Ironsi's death was a Yoruba set up. He chose to be executed with his Igbo commander in-chief who wasn't gracious enough to release Awolowo, his fatherly kinsman, from prison when he had the power to do so! How common is such vicariousness?

The Yoruba are still open to forging a meaningful partnership with the Igbo to safeguard and promote a glorious future. I hope voices of historically false accusations would allow the detente to reach its denouement[/b]
can you post this as a new thread? Nice one.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (Reply)

Rivers Assembly Refuses To Swear In Nyeche / Police Promote Nine CPS To AIG And 20,365 Others / Army Invades Delta Community, Seizes Pregnant Woman, Cripple

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 175
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.