Racoon:
This is false assertion by the lying army.All these cascade of events were the aftermath effects of the army involvement in the Lekki shootings.Abeg make una dey lie with sense.A fact is the army have not portends itself as a credible organisation with lying all the way as far as this issue is concern.

Danzakidakura:
Nigeria Muslims say d the killing was not true.

uniqueboi1:
The soldiers were obeying order. Abi you want them to be shot dead?

calberian:


The fact of the matter is this:

The army claims that they were called upon to restore order and, [/i]more importantly manage the curfew[i] (italicised emphasis mine) but I posit that the reverse was the case:

The curfew was introduced to manage the impending advent of a military exercise at lekki which, believe what you may, was admittedly beyond the powers of the governor.

This is so because, if the main instruction was to restore and maintain order, they’d have been deployed to locations where incidents of violence from civil unrest had been recorded. There’s no need to list them.

The Lekki toll gate never recorded any such incidence until the evening of Tuesday, October 20, 2020. The objective at Lekki could not have been to restore order because no such intervention was needed. Protesting at the toll gate or any other public location was fully within the ambits of the rights of the protesters so there were no grounds for such a move. Nothing was scratched, let alone damaged at that toll gate. Infact, there seemed to be a team saddled with the responsibility of managing the integrity of the toll plaza and evidently, their performance was stellar. So, application of such level of force at that place however, was most befuddling.

I’ll just say this to whom it may concern:
You can fool all of the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time however, you can NEVER fool all of the people all of the time.

calberian:


The fact of the matter is this:

The army claims that they were called upon to restore order and, [/i]more importantly manage the curfew[i] (italicised emphasis mine) but I posit that the reverse was the case:

The curfew was introduced to manage the impending advent of a military exercise at lekki which, believe what you may, was admittedly beyond the powers of the governor.

This is so because, if the main instruction was to restore and maintain order, they’d have been deployed to locations where incidents of violence from civil unrest had been recorded. There’s no need to list them.

The Lekki toll gate never recorded any such incidence until the evening of Tuesday, October 20, 2020. The objective at Lekki could not have been to restore order because no such intervention was needed. Protesting at the toll gate or any other public location was fully within the ambits of the rights of the protesters so there were no grounds for such a move. Nothing was scratched, let alone damaged at that toll gate. Infact, there seemed to be a team saddled with the responsibility of managing the integrity of the toll plaza and evidently, their performance was stellar. So, application of such level of force at that place however, was most befuddling.

I’ll just say this to whom it may concern:
You can fool all of the people some of the time; you can even fool some of the people all of the time however, you can NEVER fool all of the people all of the time.

IMASTEX:

If an army killed someone and refuse to bring out the officer, it shows it was an official operation. Therefore, the COAS is the killer or the C in C Period.

Femiwilli:

Look at the Nigerian Army logo, it has inscription written in Arabic.
This proves the Army is a Northern Islamic tool of occupation

www.nairaland.com/attachments/12608409_20201031054929_jpege31fe89750ed99e56ea19115279a6580

GreenAgain:

https://www.thecable.ng/army-why-we-wont-disclose-identity-of-personnel-deployed-in-lekki-tollgate

GreenAgain:

https://www.thecable.ng/army-why-we-wont-disclose-identity-of-personnel-deployed-in-lekki-tollgate The army had initially denied being responsible for the incident.

In separate tweets, the army had labelled the reports on soldiers opening fire at the tollgate as fake news.

But last week, Olaniyi confirmed that soldiers were the ones who carried out the operation.

Stephenomozzy:
There's just too many things wrong with the Nigerian System.

GreenAgain:

https://www.thecable.ng/army-why-we-wont-disclose-identity-of-personnel-deployed-in-lekki-tollgate The army had initially denied being responsible for the incident.

In separate tweets, the army had labelled the reports on soldiers opening fire at the tollgate as fake news.

But last week, Olaniyi confirmed that soldiers were the ones who carried out the operation.

Racoon:
This is false assertion by the lying army.All these cascade of events were the aftermath effects of the army involvement in the Lekki shootings.Abeg make una dey lie with sense.A fact is the army have not portends itself as a credible organisation with lying all the way as far as this issue is concern.