^{Star Trek may appear poorly done in the set and special effects department, but if you look beyond that, you'll see great characters, good stories and music . Star Trek inspired many to make their own Science Fiction movies and shows (example: Star Wars). So, the special effects and sets are not so good, but everything else is great.}

all4naija:

Star Trek. It was all hype! I swear it was as boring as hell(only burning fire and screaming people - that is how boring hell is like).Lol!!! I would give it a 4/10 rating.

semid4lyfe:

The River Why [2010]. . . .5/10

^{Yeah dear friend i am talking about the one of 1979--- the effect is so dull}

obinna5000:

@Ogaga4Luv
Is it the 1979 Star Trek film you're referring to or the 2009 film?
The visual effects in 2009 Star Trek film were very good.

<sup>Please, do not get me wrong. I love action films. I have a soft spot for those 80's violence fests like Delta Force because they're fun. I also liked the new Rambo movie and Grindhouse.

This, however, was just crap. The only reason why this isn't rated 1 is because of the best performance of the movie, by the AA-12 shotgun.</sup>

BCuZiMBlaCk:

Expendables

Vieira:

This is England - Bleak look at UK in the 70's / 80's and skinheads. I lived through some of this and it was weird looking back with adult eyes via this film. Well filmed and acted and rang very true. 8/10

Immortals - storyline is absolutely disgraceful, no attempt to give any depth or logic to the characters. This film has only one saving grace, it is beautiful to watch! The graphics, action sequences and special effects were off the hook. The Gods fighting was awesome.
I give the script 3/10 and the graphics 8/10. Overall though the lack of a decent plot is a killer making it an overall 5/10
Cavill had no range to play with, just eye candy for the girls and Mickey Rourke had no real logical motivation.

eghost247:

anybody who compares this with  300 should be shot.