Donald Trump’s legal team suffered yet another defeat in court Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected the campaign’s latest effort to challenge the state’s election results.

Trump’s lawyers vowed to appeal to the supreme court despite the Philadelphia judges’ assessment that the “campaign’s claims have no merit”.

“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote for the three-judge panel.

The case had been argued last week in a lower court by Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani, who insisted during five hours of oral arguments that the 2020 presidential election had been marred by widespread fraud in Pennsylvania. However, Giuliani failed to offer any tangible proof of that in court.

The US district judge Matthew Brann had said the campaign’s error-filled complaint, “like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together” and denied Giuliani the right to amend it for a second time.

The 3rd US circuit court of appeals called that decision justified. The three judges on the panel were all appointed by Republican presidents. including Bibas, a former University of Pennsylvania law professor appointed by Trump. Trump’s sister, Judge Maryanne Trump Barry, sat on the court for 20 years, retiring in 2019.


“Voters, not lawyers, choose the president. Ballots, not briefs, decide elections,” Bibas said in the opinion, which also denied the campaign’s request to stop the state from certifying its results, a demand he called “breathtaking”.

In fact, Pennsylvania officials had certified their vote count Monday for President-elect Joe Biden, who defeated Trump by more than 80,000 votes in the state. Nationally, Biden and his running mate, Kamala Harris, garnered nearly 80 million votes, a record in US presidential elections.

Trump has said he hopes the supreme court will intervene in the race as it did in 2000, when its decision to stop the recount in Florida gave the election to Republican George W Bush. On November 5, as the vote count continued, Trump posted a tweet saying the “US Supreme Court should decide!”

Ever since, Trump and his surrogates have attacked the election as flawed and filed a flurry of lawsuits to try to block the results in six battleground states. But they’ve found little sympathy from judges, nearly all of whom dismissed their complaints about the security of mail-in ballots, which millions of people used to vote from home during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Trump perhaps hopes a supreme court he helped steer toward a conservative 6-3 majority would be more open to his pleas, especially since the high court upheld Pennsylvania’s decision to accept mail-in ballots through 6 November by only a 4-4 vote last month. Since then, the Trump nominee Amy Coney Barrett has joined the court.

“The activist judicial machinery in Pennsylvania continues to cover up the allegations of massive fraud,” Trump’s lawyer Jenna Ellis tweeted after Friday’s ruling. “On to SCOTUS!”

In the case before Brann, the Trump campaign asked to disenfranchise the state’s 6.8 million voters, or at least the 700,000 who voted by mail in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh and other Democratic-leaning areas.

.“One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” Brann wrote in his scathing ruling on 21 November. “That has not happened.”

A separate Republican challenge that reached the Pennsylvania supreme court this week seeks to stop the state from further certifying any races on the ballot. The Democratic governor Tom Wolf’s administration is fighting that effort, saying it would prevent the state’s legislature and congressional delegation from being seated in the coming weeks.

On Thursday, Trump said the 3 November election was still far from over. Yet he offered the clearest signal to date that he would leave the White House peaceably on January 20 if the electoral college formalized Biden’s win.

“Certainly I will. But you know that,” Trump said at the White House, taking questions from reporters for the first time since election day.

On Friday, however, he continued to baselessly attack Detroit, Atlanta and other Democratic cities with large Black populations as the source of “massive voter fraud”. And he claimed, without evidence, that a Pennsylvania poll watcher had uncovered computer memory drives that “gave Biden 50,000 votes” apiece.

All 50 states must certify their results before the electoral college meets on 14 December, and any challenge to the results must be resolved by 8 December. Biden won both the electoral college and popular vote by wide margins.

[b]Joe Biden has won .../[b]
... renewing hope for the US and the world. After four years of turmoil, misinformation, manipulation and division, the result of this historic presidential election offers fresh promise for democracy and progress.

It’s been an agonising wait this week, with false claims and as yet unfounded allegations of electoral irregularities. It’s never been more important for the Guardian to report the facts with responsibility, integrity and independence. We’ve done just that, and will continue to bring you quality news and clear, intelligent analysis.

Now is the time to support a free press, and the Guardian’s independent, truthful journalism. With no shareholders or billionaire owner, our reporting is free from political or commercial influence. We can investigate, challenge and expose those in power. We report without fear or favour.

And because we believe everyone deserves access to trustworthy news, we keep Guardian reporting open for everyone to read, regardless of where they live or what they can afford to pay.

Our work is only possible thanks to the support we receive from our readers.If you can, support the Guardian today, from as little as $1. Thank you..

Calmblaze:
LIKE for BIDEN, SHARE for TRUMP.

Jeromejnr:
Yes..Rudy was very grateful for the speedy decision.
SCOTUS is up next. That was the plan all along.

Trump don win be that.

People are seeing reject, reject not knowing its part of the plan. Why do you think the rejects are speedy?

Look at the people at the Federal Supreme Court waiting for the juicy cases . And they happened to be tied to the states under investigation. If you know them, then you know.

Donald Trump’s legal team suffered yet another defeat in court Friday as a federal appeals court in Philadelphia roundly rejected the campaign’s latest effort to challenge the state’s election results.

Jeromejnr:
Yes..Rudy was very grateful for the speedy decision.
SCOTUS is up next. That was the plan all along.

Trump don win be that.

People are seeing reject, reject not knowing its part of the plan. Why do you think the rejects are speedy?

Look at the people at the Federal Supreme Court waiting for the juicy cases . And they happened to be tied to the states under investigation. If you know them, then you know.

AZeD1:


The Supreme Court would not pick up case because it's a waste of time.

For those who think this is similar to Bush vs Al Gore, they are not.

Bush vs Al Gore were tired on electoral votes and who ever won Florida won the election.
The supreme Court stopped a recount in Florida in which Bush was leading by 500 votes.

Trump needs to over turn Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin to which isn't possible.

Jeromejnr:


Lol...you obviously been following the wrong news to know whats happening.

You don't just sit down at home without any data of facts in your hand and misinform people that something is impossible.

We would rather listen to experts.