The College Preparatory Mathematics program is a unique math curriculum that is hugely popular across middle & high schools in the US. The CPM initiative supplements the traditional curriculum followed across numerous educational districts. CPM homework help several doubts and queries of students struggling in maths via their Core Connections courses.

Opinions of the program, however, vary drastically. Teachers across various institutions emphasize the effectiveness of CPM. Numerous parents and even students complain about the inadequate scope of the curriculum. Many criticize the “learning by discovery” technique of the course and backdated in-text activities.

This article looks into the key reasons why the CPM initiative garners such contrasting opinions from such different from teachers and parents alike.

Stark opinions about CPM

Schools across the USA utilize the CPM initiative as a means to improve math skills and knowledge. CPM Homework Help CC1, CC2, and CC3 textbooks target K-12 students and deal with various chapters such as Geometry, Algebra, Calculus, and more replace the traditional math textbooks in many middle and high schools. The CPM initiative was chosen as an exemplary course by the US Department of Education, which recommended the math program to numerous educational institutions.

Schools teachers swear by the course, parents, and students it confusing & insufficient while educational experts recommend against it. The opinions are lopsided with several experts pointing out the cracks in the program.

Why does CPM not work?

1. Experts state that the program will be highly ineffective in classes where the majority are weak or disinterested in maths. Substantial class management is necessary to help such students benefit from the program.

2. Many students are not honesty or diligent enough to solve their CPM homework on their own. They venture online looking for ready-made CPM homework help answers and online homework helpers, failing to learn anything in the process.

3. The CPM initiative follows the “learning by discovery” process. Group activities involve only students with minimum tutor involvement. This technique is not suitable for all students, and many complain about learning difficulties & cement learnt knowledge.

4. Though there are quite a few group activities in the texts, practice problems and homework tasks are far and few. Practice is a critical aspect of any learning process, but the program’s Core Connections textbooks do not offer enough.

5. Another severe limitation is a lack of solved examples that pose a hurdle for many.

The above reasons are significant enough to warrant attention from several avenues. Over the years, math problem solver experts have looked into these limitations, pointing out the disadvantages of opting CPM in comparison to the traditional math curriculum across schools. Source Link