"The truth is that when a man is making money, all his plan is to give his wife the best, but when a woman is making money, she will only think that she don't need a man."

Not true

I disagree completely.



No normal woman, no matter how rich and influencial she is, that doesn't need a man, except she's a lesbian or been possessed by spiritual husband.

But dont expect a woman with money to be that submissive to you..just few of them can have money and submit.

If she is making more money than the man then your statement is correct..

Wasn't well worded.

But let's put it this way, if more women were self-sufficient, many men would have little reasons to exist.

The fact is, take money away from some men and they've got absolutely nothing else to offer.

But it is very important that every woman grows into becoming self-sufficient...having a means...because it makes her priorities in the choice of a partner better fine tuned. As it is right now, many women put a man's financial capability at the forefront of their priority list, and that's a problem.

Develop yourself first before you think of any1

Women and Money are like 5 and 6

Women and Money are like 5ive and 6ix

Ask your female relatives

No matter how much money a woman has, she will always need money from a man who has more money than she does.

They simply can't help that need...

Not true...
She will assume she can also buy a man.
These days some men are purchasable.

I'm a man, I will never need any woman, I came alone, I will die alone. we move

That statement applies to men that have only money to offer. If you separate lots of today's men from their money, many will be unuseful not only to themselves, but to anyone that is unlucky to come around them, and it is in that context that will make a woman not need a man after making lots of money for herself, after all, what is he bringing that she is not giving herself? So money is like a veneer that overshadows other sophistication of his being that should have been otherwise, developed. If a woman will change her name to yours, bear your kids and so forth, isn't it nice to at least, be a good provider? It is inhumane for a woman to contend with her responsibility of womanhood, and still carry that of a man. It is unnatural, and the insult is the price you pay for not being man enough.

An ideal man is conscious of his looks and won't let himself go (seeing men with potbelly and brown teeth is just disgusting). He must hold himself accountable and treat people with respect, he should be mentally tough and stoic, going to war with himself and back (e.g do not procrastinate and do the hard stuff to move forward), self-assured, and exude a sense of purpose. He should be eloquent, mastery in his craft, and honoured by his associates. He should be dangerous but of course, tame that part of him unless necessary (eg to defend himself/family and show that he is not a pushover). She must feel secured with him and trust in his competence to make the right decisions and inputs. The list is more, but I shall stop here.

Deep inside the instinct of the female brain, there is an ancient bio-instrument that detects when an ideal man shows up, it is in every woman (as well as men), and we know when we meet the ideal. Money is just one of the slices, not the whole pie. When the choice becomes unavailable, the available becomes the choice. Because lots of women go for men with money doesn't mean that is the only thing they want, but its a case of what is available. Better to be with a rich unsophisticated man than a broke one. So dear men, I understand that the post makes you feel macho, but there is more work to be done.

MANDIPUTIN:
"The truth is that when a man is making money, all his plan is to give his wife the best, but when a woman is making money, she will only think that she don't need a man."

If the man she is staying with is not making efforts to struggle too, of what use is he