JohnBullMySon:
Lol. They're still around.

For those who don't know. Nigeria's offshore fields are larger, more secure, more unregulated. More profitable. That's where shell is moving. Agbami alone dey burst brain

mogbeyiteren:
Dont 4get about sea pirates

JohnBullMySon:
They're going offshore ode.

ProfAmaben:
Please don't near Anambra and it's environs. Don't extend your environmental pollution and vegetation destruction to oil rich Anambra .

Oil production should be stopped in Nigeria for it to grow.

JohnBullMySon:
Lol. They're still around.

For those who don't know. Nigeria's offshore fields are larger, more secure, more unregulated. More profitable. That's where shell is moving. Agbami alone dey burst brain

mogbeyiteren:
Dont 4get about sea pirates

EdiskyHarry:
Rubbish.
They will destroy the whole vegetation of Niger delta through oil activities, use the money to enrich the northern part of Nigeria to fun their Islamic terrorist groups .

ednut1:
They will sell the stakes but retain the pipelines to the terminals. Make una just come clean jare lol

ProfAmaben:
Please don't near Anambra and it's environs. Don't extend your environmental pollution and vegetation destruction to oil rich Anambra .

Oil production should be stopped in Nigeria for it to grow.

Haters of the Israelites (Igbos) have been severely pained and disturbed about Anambra being an oil rich state.


Meanwhile....

samdunzo:


the ND states deserve at least a 25% derivation from those offshore fields and full control of the onshore fields... the damage shell has done there will take decades to repair

Gerrard59:


Why is that so? And what difference does it make?

mogbeyiteren:
They need to fucking leave ...we dont need them in Niger Delta

Edibless07:
The main problem is that the are supprise to still see the Niger Delta region still under developed dispite the oil beeing pump out on daily basis.

BodyChief:
If this talk is eventually sealed then it's a big loss to Shell but bigger loss to Niger Delta in regards to revenue and economic benefits on all sides.

Shell as a business venture cannot be blamed entirely because at some point in business analysis on income- expenditure ratio and associated risk must be seriously considered.

Niger Delta equally who bears the brunt has the right not just to life but good, quality life through the natural resources in their land and water.

Nigeria as parent host should not sit idle at the expense of the loss of lives of the people through environmental degradation while feeding fat with no sustainable, wholistic efforts for all individuals devoid of selective egocentric tendencies for their gains.

Las las we need them, they need us; let's talk more.

Health16:


Speaking at the company's annual general meeting, CEO Ben van Beurden said that Shell can no longer be exposed to the risk of theft and sabotage.

"We cannot solve community problems in the Niger Delta, that's for the Nigerian government perhaps to solve. We can do our best, but at some point in time, we also have to conclude that this is an exposure that doesn't fit with our risk appetite anymore," van Beurden said.

"We've drawn that conclusion, and we're now talking to the Nigerian government on the way forward."

Frontail:
... Meanwhile .... Hypocritically forgotten to attached this to your post

JohnBullMySon:
Offshore fields belong to no state. It is known as Nigerian waters. Nobody lives there, abi them dey born anybody for sea ?

Majority of the oil spills are caused by the Niger Delta idiots breaking piplines. Even the Niger Delta people are wicked to themselves, some of the guys behind militancy and oil theft struck lucrative deals with Shell, How much did they give their people? When a Nigerian is crying corruption, it's because he's not the one commiting it. Shell is going, now who will pump the oil for the thiefs?

Edibless07:
The main problem is that the are supprise to still see the Niger Delta region still under developed dispite the oil beeing pump out on daily basis.

BodyChief:
If this talk is eventually sealed then it's a big loss to Shell but bigger loss to Niger Delta in regards to revenue and economic benefits on all sides.

Shell as a business venture cannot be blamed entirely because at some point in business analysis on income- expenditure ratio and associated risk must be seriously considered.

Niger Delta equally who bears the brunt has the right not just to life but good, quality life through the natural resources in their land and water.

Nigeria as parent host should not sit idle at the expense of the loss of lives of the people through environmental degradation while feeding fat with no sustainable, wholistic efforts for all individuals devoid of selective egocentric tendencies for their gains.

Las las we need them, they need us; let's talk more.

Simplyleo:


Don't get it twisted.

The topic is about crude oil in ND, not the palm oil in the SE.

ViolentMooslim:
God punish Nnamdi Kanu

Mpanyi:
A really Oyibo company will not tell you all the truth. There is more to this. Is it switch to renewable energy? Is it oil reserve drying up? Is it the country's component parts going their separate ways in the nearest future, with resultant anarchy? Even if it's not these, it seems there is something they are not telling us.

codemaniacs:




oil spills in Nigeria can be caused by any one from any part of the country... its up to the indigenes to arrest and prosecute vandals... another problem is the oil company is owned by foreigners and not any of the indigenes..

indigenes will have more passion to improve the infrastructure of the communities.

ProfAmaben:


America is 900 times richer than the Netherlands and Nigeria combined. Their president can use spacecrafts if he so wishes.