The aim of this thread is to possibily provide information to help those that would want to seek judicial review of thier immigration decision, whether be it after an unfavourable out of country ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW request OR in-country and out of country AYSLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL DECISIONs.

It is hoped that information to be provided by all will be authentic and current with the state of the art of the UK civil procedure acts, (CPR) which guides the frame work for all judicial reviews including but not limited to Asylum and immigration decisions.

@Omo_Tier1

Good idea, a thread like this is long overdue

For those who maybe wondering what immigration Judicial review entails,the process invovled and how and when to trigger a Judicial review,

I have attached here a recent, concise information from the ministry of justice, United Kingdom.

The document itself does not cover the practicalities in great details but it does give you a brief overview of what you should know about immigration Judicial Reviews.

On the practical aspect of it, i.e cost, duration, grounds upon which JR can be sort, those of us who have triggered and won an immigration Judicial Review in not to distant past would gladly provide information to assist.

@justwise,
I think many of the applicants in nigeria are often scared of taking thier immigration matters beyond the appeal stage. Many I have spoken to, even though it was so evident that they would have succeeded in thier JR applications, failed to do so largely due to either lack of off or wrong information of what JR entails.

I think if we have a thread that can assist people with right information, examples of successful JRs, that may encourage some in deciding whether to approach an immigration solicitor to pursue thier case in high court.

Omo_Tier1:

@justwise,
I think many of the applicants in nigeria are often scared of taking thier immigration matters beyond the appeal stage. Many I have spoken to, even though it was so evident that they would have succeeded in thier JR applications, failed to do so largely due to either lack of off or wrong information of what JR entails.

I think if we have a thread that can assist people with right information, examples of successful JRs, that may encourage some in deciding whether to approach an immigration solicitor to pursue thier case in high court.

Thats just the problem, though with the new rule about not accepting new evidence at the appeal level it will get even tougher for many.

justwise:

Thats just the problem, though with the new rule about not accepting new evidence at the appeal level it will get even tougher for many.

I find that move by the immigration minister as disturbing. What then will happen in cases where home office misplaces documentary evidence submitted by applicant? Apart from the letter of index, the Annexes of documents check list forms, how then will one be able to convince the AIT judges that documents were actually submitted or that requirement of the immigration rules was actually met at the date of submission.
This will also have a wider implication in judicial review applications as the home office can lie as they sometimes do that they were not in possession of the documents at the time they made thier decision.

I used to think labour had something wrong with them upstairs but this cameron led conservation appears to be a nutter!