CaptainStephen:
Lol

Can't you all see a coded transfer of his property to another person?

Man no want government to collect am.

pyro62:
He gambles for fun. This man is richer than Dangote, so it's not this miserable yatch that would give him sleepless night.

If you have #20000 and lose #200 in a bet, it is not so bad that's how rich men gamble. But the poor man would have #20000 and he will gamble with #19500 lose everything and be expecting pity from people

CaptainStephen:
Lol

Can't you all see a coded transfer of his property to another person?

Man no want government to collect am.

EkelediliBuhari:
One word


Money laundering

CaptainStephen:
Lol

Can't you all see a coded transfer of his property to another person?

Man no want government to collect am.

Aufbauh:
Abramovich is a serial Gambler!


Says who?
Do you know what's $170m? This is a whooping #85B that can make 85 Nigerian's a Billionaires. It can pay annual wages of more than 5 Chelsea players. Not even CR7 or Messi earns this amount from football in a year.

Logically, if the money is not as valuable or 'pinching' as you observed they wouldn't have place bet on it. Simple!

Aufbauh:
Abramovich is a serial Gambler!


Says who?
Do you know what's $170m? This is a whooping #85B that can make 85 Nigerian's a Billionaires. It can pay annual wages of more than 5 Chelsea players. Not even CR7 or Messi earns this amount from football in a year.

Logically, if the money is not as valuable or 'pinching' as you observed they wouldn't have place bet on it. Simple!

CaptainStephen:
Lol

Can't you all see a coded transfer of his property to another person?

Man no want government to collect am.

SmartyPants:


Value is relative.

$170 million might be plenty to you and I, and even perhaps to the writer of the article. But it is a mere fraction of value to a man like Roman Abramhimovich who has sunk billions into Chelsea for fun.

The figure lost is not up to 3% of his net worth.

Even having said that, we must then add some context, which is to say that he probably won't spend more than 3 billion for the rest of his life anyway.

The yatch is relatively nothing to him.

verybadmouth:
Roman can't b playing poker amidst all the sanction wey dey the guy head.

SmartyPants:


Value is relative.

$170 million might be plenty to you and I, and even perhaps to the writer of the article. But it is a mere fraction of value to a man like Roman Abramhimovich who has sunk billions into Chelsea for fun.

The figure lost is not up to 3% of his net worth.

Even having said that, we must then add some context, which is to say that he probably won't spend more than 3 billion for the rest of his life anyway.

The yatch is relatively nothing to him.

olatunjithomas:



When you talk about earning in dollars, stop converting it to naira. That is when it starts looking like a problem to you.

Someone spends 50 dollars on breakfast. You covert it to Naira, that is where the problem starts. You'll now start wondering the kind of food that would cost that much.

Aufbauh:



Mr . keep your presumptuous relativity to yourself cus I'd put that into consideration already. Maybe you think it's one village naive guy who hasn't seen money in print and digits that is making up this.

$170m anywhere in the world or to anyone in the world is huge.
The value of money is proportional to what it can purchase. Comparing it to the percentage of his worth is ridiculously naive to say the least.
Do you know that the loss of 0.2% of a billionaire is more huge a loss than a millionaire that lose 10% of his worth?

What you can do with money universally matters more than what it is to you. Simple Economics.

Aufbauh:



Mr . keep your presumptuous relativity to yourself cus I'd put that into consideration already. Maybe you think it's one village naive guy who hasn't seen money in print and digits that is making up this.

$170m anywhere in the world or to anyone in the world is huge.
The value of money is proportional to what it can purchase. Comparing it to the percentage of his worth is ridiculously naive to say the least.
Do you know that the loss of 0.2% of a billionaire is more huge a loss than a millionaire that lose 10% of his worth?

What you can do with money universally matters more than what it is to you. Simple Economics.

olatunjithomas:



When you talk about earning in dollars, stop converting it to naira. That is when it starts looking like a problem to you.

Someone spends 50 dollars on breakfast. You covert it to Naira, that is where the problem starts. You'll now start wondering the kind of food that would cost that much.

CaptainStephen:
Lol

Can't you all see a coded transfer of his property to another person?

Man no want government to collect am.

dipson4u08:
This guy is tactically hiding or keeping his assets in the custody of his friends to avert more sanctions ... smart guy

emmanuelbrown26:
U are realest and silent Gee I hv seen on nairaland

Vinceobrian:


Tell them to watch Focus by will Smith, they will understand gamblers are crazy with stakes

CaptainStephen:
Lol

Can't you all see a coded transfer of his property to another person?

Man no want government to collect am.

Aufbauh:



Mr . keep your presumptuous relativity to yourself cus I'd put that into consideration already. Maybe you think it's one village naive guy who hasn't seen money in print and digits that is making up this.

$170m anywhere in the world or to anyone in the world is huge.
The value of money is proportional to what it can purchase. Comparing it to the percentage of his worth is ridiculously naive to say the least.
Do you know that the loss of 0.2% of a billionaire is more huge a loss than a millionaire that lose 10% of his worth?

What you can do with money universally matters more than what it is to you. Simple Economics.