seunny4lif:

Killing him at any point makes no sense
USA or NATO did not kill Gadaffi, I was in Libya then, they hit his convoy but it was Libyans that killed Gadaffi with Gadaffi golden gun.

lol bro, wetin you Dey do in Libya, I actually follow the news then too, he was killed by the insurgents with the help of nato firepower, e be like yesterday, Gaddafi was no saint but USA/nato had no rights to invade his country

So they need 400 days to control the whole of Ukraine.

SenatePresdo:


I'm Pro Russia, but Russia is performing Below what people expects of them.

After 100 days fight with Ukraine, they are only able to control 20 percent?

That's underperformance.

Russia is only conducting a military exercise... If Na full blown war Ukraine for Don surrender since

You saying Pro-Russia are Northern Muslims or Yoruba Muslims cos I know alot of people here who are not muslims.
Am asking you if US are right to threaten Solomon Islands militarily if China put a base there.

SmartyPants:


Where did i call anyone names?

And why are you asking me why the US is threatening the Solomon Islands?

HazardAwka:
The problem is Ukraine is banned from firing to Russia. If Ukraine fires long range missile into Moscow, the war will affect Russian citizens too

If Ukraine fires into Russia, Putin will be justified in levelling Ukraine to the ground. This is a special military operation and not a war.

SenatePresdo:


I'm Pro Russia, but Russia is performing Below what people expects of them.

After 100 days fight with Ukraine, they are only able to control 20 percent?

That's underperformance.

The kremlin has always frowned on media that call it a war instead of a special military operation. Believe you me, if the Kremlin had war in mind, Ukraine would be flat before the help would arrive.

hayzed19:
You saying Pro-Russia are Northern Muslims or Yoruba Muslims cos I know alot of people here who are not muslims.
Am asking you if US are right to threaten Solomon Islands militarily if China put a base there.

I didn't say all. I said 98%.

Of course the US is very wrong for that. What does this have to do with Russia and Ukraine?

Teaser4:
you can verify the interview on YouTube it’s all over the news, even Skynews published it

Sky news is Russia media..?

SenatePresdo:


I'm Pro Russia, but Russia is performing Below what people expects of them.

After 100 days fight with Ukraine, they are only able to control 20 percent?

That's underperformance.

Russia is still concerned about infrastructure damage.. otherwise, those rails in liviv would have been destroyed in day 1.

bigpicture001:


Sky news is Russia media..?

Lol, Almighty Uk media nah the junior brother of BBC … I go mention you later when I get the link, I Dey busy now

This is New York post
Below is Forbes
France24

hayzed19:
That one na just mad dog wey no fit do anything on his own except uncle sam support

na your colonial masters you dey shab abi

Judolisco:
Russia is only conducting a military exercise... If Na full blown war Ukraine for Don surrender since

if na full scale war, there will be nothing left for Ukraine to rebuild

SultanOfPuna:
You call Russia a World Power

Ordinary small Ukraine
Is not like ukraine is far away
ukraine is right there as russia neigbour

And it took Russia 100 days just to control 20% of Ukraine.

Russia say they will invade Finland and Sweden for joining NATO

if it takes Russsia 100 days just to capture 20% of small ukraine.
Then it will take 6 years for Russia to capture 10% of Finland and Sweden

This war has exposed Russia for Life.
Even Biafra military can defeat Russian Military

If Russia fight Nigeria it will take them 200 days to capture lagos alone.
Russia has Weakest Military on Earth

This has never been about war as far as Putin is concerned. It’s always been a Special Military Operation to liberate oppressed Russians in a part of Ukraine. If Russia declares a war on Ukraine, you won’t be saying this. The western media dubs it a war to throw shadows at what the real intent is.
How can they sell weapons to Ukraine in Billions of dollars-which of course is in form of loans, if they can’t convince the world it’s war.

It has a great deal to do with it.
I despise killings and the sharing of blood.
If it serves their interests, both Moscow and Washington will always violate international law.
But if the West can do it, Russia certainly can.
Why is there such a disparity in treatment?

SmartyPants:


I didn't say all. I said 98%.

Of course the US is very wrong for that. What does this have to do with Russia and Ukraine?

Topmaike007:
guess what this same people will come to us and steal massively from us and in return will give us peanut in the name of humanitarian aid and all of them will be jumping at there slave master..do you know how much America is making from Swiss canal daily, just because there's insurgency in Northern Nigeria do you know how much they've made through selling of arms....this guys are evil

America makes money from constant conflicts. When America, France and Britain had supplied enough ammunition to Nigeria and at the height of the biafran war, they all were sipping cool oil from the waters in Eastern Nigeria unchecked.

bluefilm:


That 1% will just be his family.

You too wicked o.

hayzed19:
It has a great deal to do with it.
I despise killings and the sharing of blood.
If it serves their interests, both Moscow and Washington will always violate international law.
But if the West can do it, Russia certainly can.
Why is there such a disparity in treatment?

I dont understand how we got here. I just condemnded the actions of the US against the Solokon Islands so why are you still asking me to justify Russia on the basis of what the US is doing?

Logically, shouldnt it be condemnation for both??

darediamond:

NO, he is foolishly funny..

Haha, take it cool bro.

CaseSensitive:


Chief spectator can you imagine? Just 20%? That's like the size of my village. What on earth! When Putin ought to have wiped out the whole of Ukraine in a single day with the sheer machoism that oozes from his a$$.

Some people sabi sarcasm o

am not referring to you brother.
am talking about the western double standard.

SmartyPants:


I dont understand how we got here. I just condemnded the actions of the US against the Solokon Islands so why are you still asking me to justify Russia on the basis of what the US is doing?

Logically, shouldnt it be condemnation for both??

which 3l3ribu colonial masters?
colonial masters wey dey worthless to us.
make buroda boris do anyone, na one hypersonic missiles i go give am

Topmaike007:
na your colonial masters you dey shab abi

JooEeL:


America makes money from constant conflicts. When America, France and Britain had supplied enough ammunition to Nigeria and at the height of the biafran war, they all were sipping cool oil from the waters in Eastern Nigeria unchecked.

abeg don't mention that war own,that one still dey pain me tbh..my mum lost her mom at that war when Nigeria army attacked Afikpo

No o , they're not the west wọn the 20% for them on the internet ..

SenatePresdo:


I'm Pro Russia, but Russia is performing Below what people expects of them.

After 100 days fight with Ukraine, they are only able to control 20 percent?

That's underperformance.

Lol. Russia is not fighting war with Ukraine, if they were they would not have to even step on Ukraine before blowing off kyiv,because it war. But what they are doing is military operations and to have occupied 20% in 3 months speak volume of their might. How many countries have US occupied? They went to Vietnam and lost,went to Afghanistan and lost,give kudos to Russia.

whitebeard:
it a war, ukraine is not banned from firing into russia, during the early months of the operation (cause this isnt a war), ukraine fired missiles into russian territory.

see everyone in the world knows ukraine can never defeat the russians, zelensky was dumb enough to be played by murican pussies.

So zelenski should fold hands and allow the Russians take over their homeland

SenatePresdo:


I'm Pro Russia, but Russia is performing Below what people expects of them.

After 100 days fight with Ukraine, they are only able to control 20 percent?

That's underperformance.

You said it all. This is a poor result looking at the strength of Russia compare to Ukraine. It the war is to go by this calculation, it will take Russia additional 300 days (10 months) at 80% to completely capture Ukraine.

SenatePresdo:

I'm Pro Russia, but Russia is performing Below what people expects of them.
After 100 days fight with Ukraine, they are only able to control 20 percent?
That's underperformance.

Underperformance? Like ukraine is a village they can just run over.

SenatePresdo:


I'm Pro Russia, but Russia is performing Below what people expects of them.

After 100 days fight with Ukraine, they are only able to control 20 percent?

That's underperformance.

I agree that the Russians are underperforming, but don't rule out the "Western" factor.

Russia is basically fighting the whole world, the US and UK keep pumping new weapons into Ukraine, boosting their morale and making them believe they can win this fight.

The hardest people to beat are those who believe they can win.

Most people keep comparing this to when the US and friends ganged up against Iraq during the golf war.

Topmaike007:
give me link where Putin said he will achieve it before two weeks if you can't provide with better Link where Kremlin spoke then you should drop your assumption

Must I spoon feed? Are these the conditions? Ok then...

Have you been observing this war in the slightest? They tried to take Kiev in 2 days and failed absolutely. That was the original war goal - to steamroll Kiev, topple Zelensky, install a puppet regime and end the war. The 2 weeks claim was me being generous based on Putin's own beliefs.

Putin had a total disregard of the Ukrainian military, the evidence is there. He claimed Kiev could be taken in 2 weeks. His intelligence fed him the wrong information, too scared to tell him anything else. We might not be in this mess if it wasn't for that.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/03/world/europe/ukraine-crisis.html?_r=1

adeprof18:
I am afraid the longer he delayed negotiations the more they occupy.

Zelensky is truly a comedian I must admit because how will he imagine a land fought for with lots of resources and time will just be giving back to you before you can think of negotiations.

That was the condition given to russia before they retreated from kyiv and some deluded fellow shouting the battle of kyiv was won. Instead of honoring there own part of the deal after Russia retreated, bucha massacre came and they said with bucha, they can't continue with the negotiations again.

That was when Russia changed tactics to get what they want by force( to fight ). And with there success in the past weeks, they might have bigger interest than what was requested before.

I must confess Russia miscalculated in the first week of the invasion, they never taught they could meet such resistance cuz no reasonable fellow will risk fighting a war they will loose but zelensky proofs otherwise, sacrifice his people without one of his own blood or relatives. If he had just fled when the west was offering him escort out, no one will die, they will just have their choice of leader ruling in Ukraine.

I see some saying Russia is weak, if not why is it taking them long. If this was to be a war and not special military operation, they won't care about grabbing land by settlement, they will blow the whole country multiple times including kyiv from Russia before sending ground troops to do a clean sweep.

You are correct to a large extent but Russia forays into Kyiv and Kharkiv were operations to pin down a large percentage of Ukrainian army personnel around those cities so they could take the east and south Ukraine. The problem in the early days of the war was the Russians probed too deep in their advance towards Kyiv leaving stretching their supply lines..............the ukrainian harassing units occupied the space behind the advancing Russians and started ambushing supply convoys and escorts with slinger and javelin missiles.

TobiAbuja:


Must I spoon feed? Are these the conditions? Ok then...

Have you been observing this war in the slightest? They tried to take Kiev in 2 days and failed absolutely. That was the original war goal - to steamroll Kiev, topple Zelensky, install a puppet regime and end the war. The 2 weeks claim was me being generous based on Putin's own beliefs.

Putin had a total disregard of the Ukrainian military, the evidence is there. He claimed Kiev could be taken in 2 weeks. His intelligence fed him the wrong information, too scared to tell him anything else. We might not be in this mess if it wasn't for that.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/03/world/europe/ukraine-crisis.html?_r=1

go study the art of war... To learn how to decieve your enemies.

rottennaija:

Do you know how big Ukraine is? Do you know Ukraine had the best NATO trained army?

no mind am...........that war is 8 years old! NATO has been training the Ukrainian army for years!