Kelechi009:


Bro, first of all, you denied that [b]legal prenups could be thrown out of court[/b]WHEN?. Then I asked you Google, then you went & came back. Now to say It has only 10% of occurence, nobody is arguing about the occurrence. Knowledge is not about location, the information is online for everyone to see. The fact is that anything that can be invalidated by a Judge for any flimsy reason cannot be taken lightly & the woman can have someone testify against you in court that this happened years ago & you have no evidence to prove it otherwise except your prenup. That is the end of the road for you.

Go back and read my comments, I said there's no way a judge can deny a prenup prepared by a competent lawyer, keyword is competent. In your rush to critique you missed that keyword, part of being competent is operating from a position that your client is the one with the burden of proof. A competent lawyer not only insists that the female also has a lawyer but there must be witnesses and a notary. A competent lawyer advises his client not to get a prenup so close to the wedding but to do so with at least 2-3 months before to remove the presumption of duress.

Your initial comment specifically stated duress:

A prenup will be 100% thrown out in the state of California if the woman claims that she signed it on duress. A prenup is a waste of time in many ways because it is almost impossible to convince your GF to sign the prenup.

When talking about duress(coercion), I am well confident when I say less than 10% of all prenup related divorce cases in the USA are thrown out by a judge for duress, in fact those cases also involved outright illegal activities such as bullying, fraud etc, if this is your evidence that all prenups are a waste of time then you're a joker! Finally, my argument was never about the dismissal of a prenup but one created by a competent lawyer, there's a big big difference, yes we have exceptions but stop acting like those exceptions invalidates the remaining cases, that's a bullshit argument and you know it!

Helpout12345:


I don't have the data but he is right that prenuptial agreement can be contested and thrown out completely or partially if entered into by duress, no legal representation for both parties before signed, have terms contradicting laws etc.

You are also right that duress must be proven by the party who claims it.

The key message here is that people should be aware that prenuptial agreement can be contested in court.

Everybody knows that it can be contested that was never my argument, he is saying all prenups are useless because the judge will side with the woman for any reason which is a comical way of reasoning. A competent lawyer makes sure all the conditions of the prenups satisfies the legal requirement and beyond.

abbey621:


Everybody knows that it can be contested that was never my argument, he is saying all prenups are useless because the judge will side with the woman for any reason which is a comical way of reasoning. A competent lawyer makes sure all the conditions of the prenups satisfies the legal requirement and beyond.

Okay. Got you now. But where can we find data on prenuptial agreement success in court? Do you have any trusted source?

The school teacher husband will take his share of the billions she was paid by the chief executive of Amazon.com after eating her V. Women sha! She will get her 3ed marriage soon

Probably the Guy was initially thrilled at the thought of marrying former wife of the world richest man and now one of the richest women in the world that basic compatibility of marriage was ignored. Immediately the euphoria died down it became clear to all concerned that they are not really compatible at all

Helpout12345:


Okay. Got you now. But where can we find data on prenuptial agreement success in court? Do you have any trusted source?

The most credible sources I have are confidential or requires subscription(LexisNexis, FBI database, Justia) due to the nature of my work(auditing), if you are willing to spend money on subscription to statista.com, you can also find more stats there but a simple search online shows that only about 5% of divorce cases in the USA actually involves a prenup

https://helloprenup.com/prenuptial-agreements/prenups-are-the-new-life-insurance/

Here's another interesting writeup that shows the history of prenup cases in Georgia where I reside, if you have time go through the cases, you'll be amazed at how important it is to have a competent lawyer.

https://www.hhfamilylaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/CLE-Evolution-of-Prenups-.pdf

Elmojiid:
That means no be Jeff get problem be that ..wetin she wants now so confused set awon future is....

This is not a good assessment of things. Because she left Bezos on account of adultery doesn't mean she has to settle for less or stay in a relationship she is not happy to be in. She can divorce three times and still not her fault. That is why people stay in marriage that is piercing the life out of them because of what people will say when they leave.

SyrusdeHansome:
The woman is a gold digger whose occupation is to marry rich men and later use divorce to cash out

Naija! Well this one is a school teacher. So he is just there. Not rich at all.

omooba969:


Just try and follow the case closely, e go shock you the $$$ that would be awarded to that man in settlement.

Go and read Adele's case

JuanDeDios:

But it doesn't work like that. Without prenup, he'll get his billions.

I no dey argue abeg

HolyMan12:

WTF did you write!?

Go and read Adele's case amd why her husband was entitled to 140M

LMAO!! You can't make this shiii up

Jeff has been vindicated maybe.

Kelechi009:


A prenup will be 100% thrown out in the state of California if the woman claims that she signed it on duress. A prenup is a waste of time in many ways because it is almost impossible to convince your GF to sign the prenup. No woman wants to sign it. The best way to solve the issue is never to get married, just co-habit and then pay for child support if the kids come. That's why Mikel Obi or C. Ronaldo will never get married until his DEATH. So many countries or cities have unique laws against prenups and it will shock you that it doesn't keep people safe that much.

California co-habitation laws

"Living together without being married or being in a civil partnership means you do not have many rights around finances, property and children. Consider making a will and getting a cohabitation agreement to protect your interests."

It's best to cohabit abeg.

linearity:


Not true though!

The court look at the lifestyle they have established together as a couple. It is understandable that, both couple cannot bring equal amount of wealth into the marriage, the courts into that as well.

But, being that the marriage is less than two years old, at most if it goes to court the guy will not at up to one year in alimony.

But, I don’t see this going to court, she will not want their dirty linings washed and set in front of the public, so she is going to write him one big fat check to sign the divorce papers and an NDA to keep his mouth shut forever.

Make we no argue too much....Go and read adele's case....one of the first conditions that makes a spouse entitled to half is when the wealth was made at the time both couples were together...Adele and her husband too spent bearly 3 years together...yet he got half of her money because the judge said all her money was made when they were both married...

I'll give a real life example.....a man was sent to prison for 25 years or so for a crime he ddnt commit.
His wife left him after spening some 10 years in jail.....
22 years into the sentence...he was exonerated of the crime and paid compensation of about 8Million dollars or so......

The wife came to sue for half.....the judge ddnt award shishi to the wife a dime on one grounds: the money came in after she left.
....even though the lawyer tried to argue that the wife was still with him and suffered some of the years the man spent spent in jail which he was being compensated for ...the judge insisted that she was not part of his life when the money was made...so shes not getting half of anything....

oz4real83:
That guy will still receive his share of the proceeds of her divorce from Jeff Bezos, that is how distribution of income goes until it gets to everybody

Prenup

StrikeBack:
Bush meat don finally catch hunter

. No. The woman wants to test new dicks. With all the money she scammed Jeff of, it's tasting dicks spree.
With all those billions, she can't be tied down to and be managing one tiny oyibo dick.
Bet me that her next catch would be a Bbc.

shine12:

Prenup

prenup only ensures that the person doesn't get equal amount of the property with you, he or she will still get a substantial amount in settlements , imagine somebody that never hoped to get $10m in his\her life is given $100m out of $2b because of prenup, is that not a huge profit?

abbey621:


It's the reason why many men misbehave in Nigeria. The divorce settlement is not men settling women but the household assets divided between the two people who contributed to it over the years either physically or emotionally. Furthermore, who told you divorce rate is low in Nigeria? Maybe you believe only those who go to court are actually divorced, in 9ja many women are still married legally but are living separately from their husbands and never going back, in fact them don born for another man

Say Yoruba land, not Nigeria

ednut1:
this guy is a teacher. She is the one losing here

She won't lose much. She got most of her money before marrying him

Kobicove:


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/09/28/business/mackenzie-scott-dan-jewett-divorce/index.html

Muumuuu Woman more men to eat and go
I am among

advanceDNA:


Go and read Adele's case

We're probably drawing the same conclusion.

omooba969:


We're probably drawing the same conclusion.

What conclusion?? Every divorce case isnt the same...even though there are variables and constants that are similar

advanceDNA:


What conclusion?? Every divorce case isnt the same...even though there are variables and constants that are similar

Whom do you think might be awarded settlement in this divorce?

omooba969:


Whom do you think might be awarded settlement in this divorce?

In every divorce...the law states that the wealth made by each party during the time married together is jointly splitted....its not that the person who is richer is the one that will pay......its a joint divismsion of what they both made
Its just that its the person who has gained money when married together loses more... in this case there is no money to be shared cos no money was made in the short-lived marriage..... teacher doesnt have shishi....wife was spending her old money from ex husband

Even adele's case...despite the judge awarded the husband 140M...they still looked fo a way to twist it so that adele wont pay shishi....

https://www.legit.ng/1406734-adele-wont-be-paying-spousal-support-after-divorce-ex-husband.html

Ferdinandu:
Probably the Guy was initially thrilled at the thought of marrying former wife of the world richest man and now one of the richest women in the world that basic compatibility of marriage was ignored. Immediately the euphoria died down it became clear to all concerned that they are not really compatible at all

Yeah!

advanceDNA:



In every divorce...the law states that the wealth made by each party during the time married together is jointly splitted....its not that the person who is richer is the one that will pay......its a joint divismsion of what they both made
Its just that its the person who has gained money when married together loses more... in this case there is no money to be shared cos no money was made in the short-lived marriage..... teacher doesnt have shishi....wife was spending her old money from ex husband

Even adele's case...despite the judge awarded the husband 140M...they still looked fo a way to twist it so that adele wont pay shishi....

Exactly!
That is why I said she found and realized that he would not be able to step up

advanceDNA:



In every divorce...the law states that the wealth made by each party during the time married together is jointly splitted....its not that the person who is richer is the one that will pay......its a joint divismsion of what they both made
Its just that its the person who has gained money when married together loses more... in this case there is no money to be shared cos no money was made in the short-lived marriage..... teacher doesnt have shishi....wife was spending her old money from ex husband

Even adele's case...despite the judge awarded the husband 140M...they still looked fo a way to twist it so that adele wont pay shishi....

https://www.legit.ng/1406734-adele-wont-be-paying-spousal-support-after-divorce-ex-husband.html

Whom do you think might be awarded settlement in this divorce?

Please answer my question or we forget about it.

omooba969:


Whom do you think might be awarded settlement in this divorce?

Please answer my question or we forget about it.

Why are u being demanding and forceful like i owe u something??

Besides ..I answered u already....if u want to be spoon-fed like a child........please dialogue with someone else...i cannot help you

prophetfire:
No. The woman wants to test new dicks. With all the money she scammed Jeff of, it's tasting dicks spree.
With all those billions, she can't be tied down to and be managing one tiny oyibo dick.
Bet me that her next catch would be a Bbc.

Why marry at all then?

chaiiiiii you wikid o!!

advanceDNA:


Shi shi...he will not collect...


but the woman neck long oooo...if bezoz na naija
E go don know say this one na longhroat woman

akwesenana:
Hopefully, he'll share her inheritance.

u will be surprised that she had a pre-nup.