| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by udeh3(m): 10:21am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. Very educating |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Godstiger(m): 10:22am On Feb 02, 2023 |
What a mess of a country |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by 9jahotblog: 10:24am On Feb 02, 2023 |
udeh3:
Very educating yes soo |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by AntonVince: 10:25am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. Incisive! By the way, the BVAS machines are the primary data source. Why didn't the compromised Tribunal Chairman refer to them rather than embrace a server report that derives from the BVAS devices. Keep up the advocacy. I have no doubt that the Appellate court will set aside that procured "Jankara" judgement. God bless you! 2 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by leisuretym: 10:25am On Feb 02, 2023 |
It could also be bypass out of wickedness to enable them prove over voting against the winner 1 Like |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by dat9jaguy(m): 10:27am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. Which Bvas report was relied upon to declare the winner  APC applied for the Bvas report and they were given. Up till the time of judgement, INEC did not deny the Bvas report given to APC. All these syncronise talk are just after thoughts. 15 Likes 2 Shares 
|
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Nobody: 10:27am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. Nobody disputed what you said and in fact by the virtue of my work, I can say somethings about sync issues but on what basis was the winner declared when INEC weren't satisfied that all data deeded was completed? My guy Adeleke ti lule as far as this case is concerned 15 Likes 2 Shares |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by adioolayi(m): 10:29am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. Stop the noise, rather use this energy to sensitize your party NOT TO RIG elections, and if they will do, they should rig with sense! 8 Likes |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by olaks4real(m): 10:29am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
You still believe there is anything called synchronized bvas report?
Dey play.
A voter must have been verified from the backend .
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by duro4chang(m): 10:29am On Feb 02, 2023 |
Kennyfancy:
Why always the west, most we always have issues around the west It happens everywhere but the west always exposes what others are hiding 5 Likes 2 Shares |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by FreeStuffsNG: 10:31am On Feb 02, 2023 |
meglith1:
Source :https://punchng.com/osun-rec-admits-politicians-inec-staff-bypassed-bvas/
This is an honest Nigerian who is brutally frank and patriotic. This is why INEC decided not to appeal the judgement; the judgement was sound and an incredible feedback INEC found very helpful. Mr Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke lule pii! Oyetola won that election but Mr Adeleke tried to cheat as usual. check my signature for free stuffs! 8 Likes |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Neoteny7: 10:31am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
You're just talking out of your ass trying to sound like you're knowledgeable about these matters whereas you know nothing. "Internal working of various diodes, resistors..." Seriously?  10 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Parachoko: 10:31am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. What are you trying to say? So you sabi pass Osun INEC chairman? Adeleke ti lule 6 Likes |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by IgOga(m): 10:32am On Feb 02, 2023 |
This REC is reckless sha  It's not even funny when INEC is admitting to declaring the wrong result  Is it not INEC's job to check the uploaded results on the portal with BVAS data....It's called verification...it happens in all elections across the world. Imagine declaring a presidential candidate winner of Feb 25 election only before swearing in the courts say NO....that person did not win cos bvas data shows different number of votes......INEC can easily end Nigeria as we know it. 3 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Naija4love(m): 10:34am On Feb 02, 2023 |
kufre2010:
Popular blogger Kemi Olunloyo conducted presidential poll on her blog and this was the result. poll by someone who was followed by oneside set of people in Nigeria, dey there dey mumu yourself. Just imagine sowore pas atiku 4 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by PointZerom: 10:34am On Feb 02, 2023 |
lansile:
They are just making it easier for Oyetola's lawyers to finish off Adeleke, this statement by REC alone has stopped any music Adeleke might be willing to dance to. Pure lies. The election should be cancelled and a date fixed for rerun. |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by kcnwaigbo: 10:36am On Feb 02, 2023 |
Wickedtruths:
Johnnyessence, hope you're listening.
Adeleke will eat sand on appeal. The worst case scenario will be a re-run |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by kcnwaigbo: 10:37am On Feb 02, 2023 |
FreeStuffsNG:
This is an honest Nigerian who is brutally frank and patriotic.
This is why INEC decided not to appeal the judgement; the judgement was sound and an incredible feedback INEC found very helpful.
Mr Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke lule pii! Oyetola won that election but Mr Adeleke tried to cheat as usual.
check my signature for free stuffs! A re-run will be ordered in Ede and the results should be easily guessed |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by sangresan(m): 10:37am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. You're a mumu and the money spent on your education was wasted. 1. APC got a truly certified report from INEC. I don't know why you said they "fraudulently" got BVAS report.... It's obvious you didn't follow the Tribunal proceedings. 2. They didn't get the report immediately after the election - it was two weeks after. PDP got there own after the "pendency" of the case at the Tribunal. If you don't know the meaning of pendency, consult a lawyer. 3. Even INEC came to court with a report totally different from what they gave both APC and PDP. It got to a point that PDP lawyer had to disown INEC's BVAS report. 4. The majority judgement held that for INEC to have issued a different report to PDP and come to the Tribunal with another report, it meant they were tampering with official documents since they didn't withdraw the earlier reports. 5. It's like a witness contradicting himself in the witness box. No judge will overlook such a misdemeanor. You can continue to amuse yourself with meaningless jargons. Synchronization is not known to our electoral laws. 16 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Parachoko: 10:38am On Feb 02, 2023 |
cliqtips:
And this is what Nigerians think would put an end to over voting....
Thinking INEC has found a solution to the problem.
Trust APC to add this as their plan B Any polling unit that bypass BVAS, the votes from the polling unit will be deducted from the total votes, the way it was done in Osun State. 3 Likes |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Indispensable85(m): 10:38am On Feb 02, 2023 |
Adeleke wanted to rig the election. He has been caught. 8 Likes 2 Shares |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by emu22(m): 10:40am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. From your above analysis it means Inec will have to wait for total synchronisation of the Bvas data which might take days before declaring a winner? 3 Likes |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Parachoko: 10:40am On Feb 02, 2023 |
AntonVince:
Incisive!
By the way, the BVAS machines are the primary data source. Why didn't the compromised Tribunal Chairman refer to them rather than embrace a server report that derives from the BVAS devices.
Keep up the advocacy.
I have no doubt that the Appellate court will set aside that procured "Jankara" judgement.
God bless you! You have been fooled by johnnyessence 3 Likes |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Ventura1: 10:41am On Feb 02, 2023 |
I disagree with this assertion, that couldn't have happened in all the over 700 PU cancelled. Even at that, if all BVAS used were captured, it would have indicate PU 1 & PU 2. Osun issue is a lesson to all. 9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. 1 Like |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by iwaeda: 10:42am On Feb 02, 2023 |
|
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by FreeStuffsNG: 10:42am On Feb 02, 2023 |
Kennyfancy:
Why always the west, most we always have issues around the west The people of Southwest are very smart, brilliant, educated, enlightened and are the most likely to challenge a system. If this had happened elsewhere, the overvoting will probably go undetected and unchallenged. 9 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by funshint(m): 10:43am On Feb 02, 2023 |
Mumu talk...great strategist forsee a problem even before it happens. |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by BeardGangJnr1(m): 10:43am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. Mumu, u just spilled gibberish...🥴🥴 why did inec used unsynchronized data to announce winner When apc asked for the records.... Why did they give APC unsynchronized data...but when apc discovered the evil schemes...they tendered in court another data daht they went and altered as an after thought...Oga use yo head Nah. . . Since it can take time to collate all data....wait untill u collate all before u announce winner 10 Likes |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by Parachoko: 10:44am On Feb 02, 2023 |
PointZerom:
Pure lies. The election should be cancelled and a date fixed for rerun.
If the result was tie after the deducted votes, there would have been a rerun at the cancelled units But after some polling units were cancelled and the result was declared, Oyetola defeated Adeleke, so why should there be a rerun in an election Oyetola clearly won? 9 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by duro4chang(m): 10:45am On Feb 02, 2023 |
PointZerom:
Pure lies. The election should be cancelled and a date fixed for rerun.
Impossible! 5 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by benardtotti(m): 10:45am On Feb 02, 2023 |
9jahotblog:
THE IGNORANCE OF THE WORKINGS OF BVAS IN OUR ELECTION AS RELATED TO RESULTS TRANSMISSION TO INEC SERVER AND THE REPORTAGE BY THE SERVER.
1. Inec put maximum of 500 to 750 registered voters per polling unit, thus the BVAS were programmed like that.
2. However, there are several polling units with over 1200 registered voters.
3. In such polling units as in (2) above will use minimum of two BVAS on election day for the purpose of election in the affected polling units.
4. At the end of the election, the votes are counted together regardless of the number of BVAS used for the election. The results are then filled into INEC form EC8A and same is then sent to INEC server via the BVAS. This is where the challenge is, remember each BVAS machine does *NOT* contain total number of accredited voters, infact, each BVAS will make the result "seemly" over voting until all the BVAS(s) used in such polling units *SYNCHRONISED*
5. In this context synchronisation means that all data on each of the BVAS machine has been processed together in the server such that all the data added up to form a single data. However, this takes time and depends on many factors such as data size, network of service provider, memory of server and processor, internal working of various diodes, resistors etc.
6. Practical examples of (5) above is when salaries of say police is made through a bank, it is programmed as a single schedule in the bank and paid by the push of a single button "pay" or "approved" but in reality the police officers will get their payment alert at different times across days sometimes weeks. If anyone print the statement of account of the while payment is ongoing the person will have different statements until the payment is completed, that's when system has completed synchronisation.
Another example is that we get many alert balance of account that is incorrect, infact sometimes the gives two different balance in a single text message -
i. Current bal. X
ii. Available bal. Y
7. This was what happened in the case under review, the APC fraudulently got a report from the server while synchronisation is ongoing while the PDP got another report from the same server after more data has synchronised.
8. The above explanation is not known to many people and that may include the judges of the tribunal and future judges at the appeal court and supreme court. *THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE*
9. We need to make this known to the entire public through public advocacy using NGOs NOT LAWYERS. Infact we need to stage INEC ICT Director in an interactive discussion in disguised voter education programme organised by our NGO people.
10. This must be done in national TVs such everybody including would be judges would have understood the whole idea before the appellate courts judgement. So inec declared a winner without the so called synchronisation but suddenly remembered they need to synchronise, over 30 days after election and after signing certified true copy of a bvas result ? All these your bullet points is not necessary, the court works with evidence and not theories. 10 Likes 1 Share |
| Re: Osun REC Admits Politicians, INEC Staff Bypassed BVAS by FreeStuffsNG: 10:46am On Feb 02, 2023 |
kcnwaigbo:
A re-run will be ordered in Ede and the results should be easily guessed The 2022 Electoral law recommends cancellation and the failure of INEC to cancel it violated the electoral law. Outright cancellation was in the law to act as strong deterrrent to rigging by overvoting by politicians in their strong political bases. It was either a fatal flaw by the lawyers of Mr Nurudeen Jackson not to do a cross appeal and investigate the results of areas where APC got its highest votes or his lawyers found out that Oyetola's votes were clean and matched BVAS. 6 Likes |
