https://www.scribd.com/document/632742041/Peter-Obi-Election-Petition

Above is a link to the full text of Peter Obi’s petition challenging Tinubu’s victory in court.

Key takeaways:-

1) In talking about Tinubu’s non-qualification to contest the election, no mention was made about his certificates. The grounds of Obi and Labour Party’s prayers are that as of the time of Shettima’s nomination as Vice Presidential candidate of the APC and Tinubu, he was still the senatorial candidate of the APC in a senatorial district in Borno State. An act that contravenes the Electoral Act 2022.

The second ground is Tinubu’s drug case in the US.(an official of the US Justice Department is listed as witness here and might likely be testifying in court)

2) Labour Party and Peter Obi are claiming to have obtained accreditation data from Amazon Cloud which hosts INEC’s accreditation data and are ready to subpoena the staff or officials of Amazon as witnesses.

3) Obi and Labour Party are contending that there was over voting in Oyo, Ogun, Ondo, Ekiti, etc, as accreditation data did not correspond with the votes recorded from these states.

4) That Labour Party’s votes were wrongly allocated to APC and Tinubu in over 18,000 polling units across the country.

5) That Labour Party won in Rivers and Benue.

6) That Tinubu did score 25% in Abuja.

7) That INEC failed to follow its own guidelines for the conduct of the elections.

In summary, the allegations are weighty and evidences almost incontrovertible that will amount to as the 9th wonder of the world if Tinubu’s victory is validated by the courts.

Nlfpmod
Mynd44
Legendhero
Oyatz
Senatordave1
Kyase
Ihordspy

He made a very stubborn allegations

Obi on a loooong ride by bringing Amazon staff 🕴️whom can be influence with a bottle of champagne🍾.
Bringing on propaganda of Drug case again and again, in which never workout during the campaign.
PO claimed over voting in States where he loses but under voting in States He WON no be ju ju be that🤪🤪.
PO by winning almost 💯 in all the states in your region speak volumes of your cunning.

The C of Appeal knows how to use their pen🖋️
Signed

The lawyers:

The picture below is why Tinubu’s drug case in the US amounts to a ground for disqualification from the presidential race.

This blackmail.

Is that how to retrieve stolen mandate? 😂

Dead on arrival.

Una don start to make noise again. Amazon workers from America lol.

Na so Atiku talk server for 2019. Very weak case.

raskymonojendor:
The lawyers:

There are close to 40 lawyers listed as solicitors in the case with some of them being Yoruba and other tribe.

But of course, you will only screenshot the part that suits the agenda and propaganda you want to push.

But nevertheless, whether Obi’s lawyers are all from Anambra or are all his siblings is of no material consequence to his case.

Just tell Fagbemi and his co ewedu lawyers to prepare their defense.

Ngiyaponga!

2) Labour Party and Peter Obi are claiming to have obtained accreditation data from Amazon Cloud which hosts INEC’s accreditation data and are ready to subpoena the staff or officials of Amazon as witnesses.

Peter Obi is even more clueless than I thought. So his ground of discrediting INEC accreditation figure is that he obtained it from Amazon cloud.

What they will first ask him is that “How did you obtain the record in the first place”. Did he obtain it through INEC themselves coz I am 100% sure that Amazon will not legally reveal their data to third party.

So how do you subpoena someone who did not legally release the data to you in the first place? It’s like he is even more daft than I thought.

With regards to the rest of the jargons, all the case file of Tinubu with regards to Chicago issue is online and it is very evident that he was never convicted of any crime. USA life no hard, if Tinubu was convicted, anyone can easily check the public record and find his name.

So how do you disqualify a presidential candidate that was not convicted?

Penguin2:
https://www.scribd.com/document/632742041/Peter-Obi-Election-Petition

Above is a link to the full text of Peter Obi’s petition challenging Tinubu’s victory in court.

Key takeaways:-

1) In talking about Tinubu’s non-qualification to contest the election, no mention was made about his certificates. The grounds of Obi and Labour Party’s prayers are that as of the time of Shettima’s nomination as Vice Presidential candidate of the APC and Tinubu, he was still the senatorial candidate of the APC in a senatorial district in Borno State. An act that contravenes the Electoral Act 2022.

The second ground is Tinubu’s drug case in the US.(an official of the US Justice Department is listed as witness here and might likely be testifying in court)

2) Labour Party and Peter Obi are claiming to have obtained accreditation data from Amazon Cloud which hosts INEC’s accreditation data and are ready to subpoena the staff or officials of Amazon as witnesses.

3) Obi and Labour Party are contending that there was over voting in Oyo, Ogun, Ondo, Ekiti, etc, as accreditation data did not correspond with the votes recorded from these states.

4) That Labour Party’s votes were wrongly allocated to APC and Tinubu in over 18,000 polling units across the country.

5) That Labour Party won in Rivers and Benue.

6) That Tinubu did score 25% in Abuja.

7) That INEC failed to follow its own guidelines for the conduct of the elections.

In summary, the allegations are weighty and evidences almost incontrovertible that will amount to as the 9th wonder of the world if Tinubu’s victory is validated by the courts.

Nlfpmod
Mynd44
Legendhero
Oyatz
Senatordave1
Kyase
Ihordspy

1) shettima as at the time of the election was not a senatorial candidate.
2) indictment is different from conviction.even if,it expires after 10 years...
3) accreditation data are inconclusive and incomplete as of now
4) lp winning rivers and benue makes no difference.

Penguin2:
The picture below is why Tinubu’s drug case in the US amounts to a ground for disqualification from the presidential race.

WhatsApp message constitution abi

The stolen mandate must be returned!

The number one rule of thieves is that nothing is too small to steal .

the stolen mandate must be returned back

E get why

Peter Obi isn't stupid

My 6 years old daughter will win this case for Tinubu, cheap blackmail is that how to collect your stolen manhood back.

I trust Tribunal their trash bin still dey , the will trash this childish case with no substance.


A beg who don buy wearing-in Aso ebi should send me sample a beg ....

O ma loud gan an

Now, you people are talking .

You want to subpoena amazon staffs all the way from America from Nigeria?

You now want to drag a member of justice department from the us as witness.

The case is cheap blackmail to make low IQ youths hate the President - elect and troll him on social media. It has no substance.

Let's watch how the argument go... it seems obi's attorneys are experience, this case I think its more about technicality than it look. Tinubu's guys have to sit up.

senatordave1:



1) shettima as at the time of the election was not a senatorial candidate.
2) indictment is different from conviction.even if,it expires after 10 years...
3) accreditation data are inconclusive and incomplete as of now
4) lp winning rivers and benue makes no difference.

What is this one saying?

Shettima was Senatorial candidate up till a day after his nomination as VP candidate.

LegendHero:


Peter Obi is even more clueless than I thought. So his ground of discrediting INEC accreditation figure is that he obtained it from Amazon cloud.

What they will first ask him is that “How did you obtain the record in the first place”. Did he obtain it through INEC themselves coz I am 100% sure that Amazon will not legally reveal their data to third party.

So how do you subpoena someone who did not legally release the data to you in the first place? It’s like he is even more daft than I thought.

With regards to the rest of the jargons, all the case file of Tinubu with regards to Chicago issue is online and it is very evident that he was never convicted of any crime. USA life no hard, if Tinubu was convicted, anyone can easily check the public record and find his name.

So how do you disqualify a presidential candidate that was not convicted?

stop defending rubbish, allow the court to decide, stop jittering, we all are praying for better Nigeria, the foundation this last presidential election laid if not correct may end Nigeria, it's up to u to be just, governance will soon start, you will know why we won't want such.

Lizzysamuel:


What is this one saying?

Shettima was Senatorial candidate up till a day after his nomination as VP candidate.

And he withdrew his senatorial nomination abi?

Lizzysamuel:


What is this one saying?

Shettima was Senatorial candidate up till a day after his nomination as VP candidate.

His nomination as VP took effect the day his name is submitted to INEC not the day he us announced. Until documents are filed, things are taking as word of mouth and ignored

senatordave1:



1) shettima as at the time of the election was not a senatorial candidate.
2) indictment is different from conviction.even if,it expires after 10 years...
3) accreditation data are inconclusive and incomplete as of now
4) lp winning rivers and benue makes no difference.

Actually, the conviction has to be a Nigerian tribunal or court to even hold in the first place.

Mynd44:

His nomination as VP took effect the day his name is submitted to INEC not the day he us announced. Until documents are filed, things are taking as word of mouth and ignored

uncle Mynd44, I didn't see u say anything about what happened in Lagos but ur here defending Tinubu..


Interesting....

Obi is not the one teleguiding the case, i dont think thats his area of competence, he has SANs to do that. So saying he is clueless is you just being mischievous.

What amazon can testify to is if the data is altered because you cannot totally delete something from the cloud. A court order on Amazon to confirm certain information will definitely be honored

LegendHero:


Peter Obi is even more clueless than I thought. So his ground of discrediting INEC accreditation figure is that he obtained it from Amazon cloud.

What they will first ask him is that “How did you obtain the record in the first place”. Did he obtain it through INEC themselves coz I am 100% sure that Amazon will not legally reveal their data to third party.

So how do you subpoena someone who did not legally release the data to you in the first place? It’s like he is even more daft than I thought.

With regards to the rest of the jargons, all the case file of Tinubu with regards to Chicago issue is online and it is very evident that he was never convicted of any crime. USA life no hard, if Tinubu was convicted, anyone can easily check the public record and find his name.

So how do you disqualify a presidential candidate that was not convicted?

The US is supporting Obi and thats why they've not congratulated Tinubu

baralatie:
You now want to drag a member of justice department from the us as witness.

Jamestown123:
WhatsApp message constitution abi

So if you type out a section of the constitution for me on Nairaland, I will dismiss it claiming it is “Nairaland constitution”.

Wouldn’t you think I’m an idiot?

The case na tight case

MightyHand:
Obi on a loooong ride by bringing Amazon staff 🕴️whom can be influence with a bottle of champagne🍾.
Bringing on propaganda of Drug case again and again, in which never workout during the campaign.
PO claimed over voting in States where he loses but under voting in States He WON no be ju ju be that🤪🤪.
PO by winning almost 💯 in all the states in your region speak volumes of your cunning.

The C of Appeal knows how to use their pen🖋️
Signed

You will only be deceiving yourself if you describe Tinubu's drug case as a propaganda

It is on record that Tinubu forfeited over $460,000 of drug proceeds to the US government

senatordave1:



1) shettima as at the time of the election was not a senatorial candidate.
2) indictment is different from conviction.even if,it expires after 10 years...
3) accreditation data are inconclusive and incomplete as of now
4) lp winning rivers and benue makes no difference.

1) There are documents to support that Shettima was still a senatorial candidate for Borno Central as of the time his name was officially filed with INEC on 14th July, 2022. Then he resigned from that contest on 15th July, 2022. The implication is that for close to 24hrs, Shettima was standing election in 2 constituencies. An action that violates the Electoral Act, 2022.

Note: Documents supporting this ground were obtained from INEC and not based on hearsay.

2) There’s a section of the constitution that talks about criminal conviction as grounds for disqualification from an election. The caveat to this provision is that it expires after 10 years.

But as requirements for contesting an election into the office of the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the constitution talked about having been convicted by ANY COURT in a case of corruption which shows the person as dishonest and corrupt. The constitution did not attach an expiry date to this.

3) You think you dealing with aboki, abi? Accreditation is incomplete and inconclusive on INEC dubious IReV but it’s not incomplete and inconclusive on the Amazon Cloud Server that is hosting INEC’s data. Peter Obi claims he has the accreditation data as obtained from Amazon and this accreditation data did not tally with what INEC published in many constituencies. Obi is ready to subpoena Amazon Officials to testify to this. U messed with the wrong guy!

4) Well, if LP is able to prove its case beyond every reasonable doubt that it won Rivers and Benue but INEC declared them for Tinubu, then it would now be left to the Judges to determine if that does not amount to SUBSTANTIAL infringement on the outcome of the election. You called two states for somebody who did not win it and you think it’s not a case? Purge your mind Garfield before it becomes irredeemable.