IamV:


He finally drew the court attention to FAYEMI V. ONI (2019) LPELR-49291 (SC) where the supreme court held that the practice direction and rules of court cannot override the right to Fair Hearing.

M4A1carbine:
You are a Tinubu supporter on an LP thread, giving unsolicited and uselessly flawed advice. Who is actually frustrated...talk true, don't cry...

maestroferddi:
I believe you are not so dumb to reckon that you are being ignored...

The bleatings are disturbing our sense of hearing...

IamV:


Akin Olujimi SAN stands up again and the court asks 'So that's all we will do today?'

He noted that the provisions of Paragraph 41(5&6) noted by Okutekpa is totally irrelevant. He also noted that the FAYEMI case did not decide the point which was noted by him.

Pinhero SAN stands again.
But he has resumed his seat as the point he was about to raise was merely a friendly comment, not a legal battle.

Fashanu SAN [/b]stands again.
He noted that the FAYEMI case is far from the case as it is a preelection matter and states that the act of Okutekpa SAN is a professional misconduct to mislead the court.

[ [b]The court vehemently calls him to order that such statements are wrong for him to mention and he's addresses. ]

Okutekpa SAN stands to object what Fashanu SAN was saying and he [ Fashanu SAN] orders Okutekpa SAN to sit down, in his words are on basis of seniority at the bar and once again.

[ Again,the court calls him to order that his statements are unhealthy. ]

Fearyourcreator:

Datti looks more presidential than Obi... Obi supposed be vice

Broveens42:



This doesn't make any difference. You gave a provision for electronic transmission of results in your act and same act still gave INEC powers for guidelines on transmission and collation of results.
Guidelines are not statutory laws, because they can be adjusted in the event of unforseen circumstances.
Technically, if INEC didn't follow it's guidelines strictly, but at least prove they made effort, they are not culpable. These are the kind of confusion you see in the Royal Niger Company

M4A1carbine:
Even though the Tribunal stated emphatically that Technicalities won't be a benchmark to Judge this case, you are still hoping on that? So you think LP doesn't understand that weak underhand tactics?

Tell Olanikpekun that he lost Osun to this same Legal squad because he was hoping on technicalities. Now the same LP, is exposing INEC thief thief brutally and you want to be an advocate for the Umpire?

Agbado FEAR GOD NA!!!

What do you guys smoke in that office sef?

Fashanu (SAN) is feeling the heat and becoming frustrated.

Lamidi Garfield1 Apapa is trying to say otherwise..

Well done bro!!

IamV:


Akin Olujimi SAN stands up again and the court asks 'So that's all we will do today?'

He noted that the provisions of Paragraph 41(5&6) noted by Okutekpa is totally irrelevant. He also noted that the FAYEMI case did not decide the point which was noted by him.

Pinhero SAN stands again.
But he has resumed his seat as the point he was about to raise was merely a friendly comment, not a legal battle.

Fashanu SAN [/b]stands again.
He noted that the FAYEMI case is far from the case as it is a preelection matter and states that the act of Okutekpa SAN is a professional misconduct to mislead the court.

[ [b]The court vehemently calls him to order that such statements are wrong for him to mention and he's addresses. ]

Okutekpa SAN stands to object what Fashanu SAN was saying and he [ Fashanu SAN] orders Okutekpa SAN to sit down, in his words are on basis of seniority at the bar and once again.

[ Again,the court calls him to order that his statements are unhealthy. ]

IamV:


The court have held that the ruling on the objections will be delivered on the final day.
.

Okutekpa SAN then notes that the FAYEMI case, there was a mistake, that it is 2008 8 NWLR (PT. 1089) and not 2019 as cited before. He apologizes.

garfield1:


Same thing in 2019.the guidelines is not law and cannot be a ground for nullifying results

IamV:


Back to witness:

Q. You came with the witness statement on oath, what do you want to do with them?

A. I like to tender and adopt them as my statement.

Q. Your were asked to provide recording or live interview of Prof. Mahmoud and Festus Okoye. Where are they?

A. They are here.

Okutekpa now applies to tender the flash drive containing the videos as provided by the witness into evidence.

(The whole court is about to watch two people lie to us AGAIN on TV)

garfield1:


If the court allows the witness to testify,by the time he is done,lp time is up today.same delay tactics will continue till obi time lapse

chidiokay:


After taking INEC chairman for is word in chatham one will expect you losers to have learnt a thing But here we are you are still holding PTP judges word to heart .... how dense can people.
So when you people finally lose on technalities you will that shouting the judge promised US.

Is it about what the judges promise or what the constitution says about technicalty .. dey play

IamV:


Pinhero: My Lord, the colour of the flash is red, Okutekpa supports Chelsea, he should have brought blue, I'm an arsenal fan.

Okutekpa: My Lord, I brought red to show them red eyes.

The Court: both of you are losers, you went home with no trophy !

IamV:


The court have held that the ruling on the objections will be delivered on the final day.
.

Okutekpa SAN then notes that the FAYEMI case, there was a mistake, that it is 2008 8 NWLR (PT. 1089) and not 2019 as cited before. He apologizes.

JasonScoolari:
Next time don't bring your parents and disgrace them publicly.

Patriot9:
So far, I have not seen anything or any tangible point that will make the Tribunal dismiss or nullify the February 25th presidential election.
All these court processes are mere legal charades and academic exercise.

JasonScoolari:
The respondents are arguing against video presentation saying they weren't made aware of it.

Cc; @General_Oluchi

garfield1:


But he claimed obi won Lagos,ph

M4A1carbine:
So you agree you have no case, but are trying to frustrate proceedings by delaying and objecting senselessly to pertinent issues raised?

We know this tactic already na...wait as events unfold.

You will understand soonest...keep analysing Lamidi Garfield1 Apapa...online SAN for Agbadorian rodents

chidiokay:


After taking INEC chairman for is word in chatham one will expect you losers to have learnt a thing But here we are you are still holding PTP judges word to heart .... how dense can people.
So when you people finally lose on technalities you will that shouting the judge promised US.

Is it about what the judges promise or what the constitution says about technicalty .. dey play

Loonyy:


Dey Never See Chonchin

Confirmedzombie:
The Tribunal must fine Peter Obi and his lawyers for always trying to come up with issues not stated in their petitions.

This is a big slap on the tribunal. The channels reporter cannot be allowed to tender anything or testify.

It is an abuse of court process under the Evidence and electoral Act.

I have said it before, Peter obi cannot prove this case. He is simply wasting his time.

After the tribunal uphold Tinubu declaration as president, Peter obi is finished politically

IamV:


Pinhero: My Lord, the colour of the flash is red, Okutekpa supports Chelsea, he should have brought blue, I'm an arsenal fan.

Okutekpa: My Lord, I brought red to show them red eyes.

The Court: both of you are losers, you went home with no trophy !

IfnobeGod20:

I don't like arguing with you because you always think you know it all but I will refer you to this link below by premiumtimes.

https://www.premiumtimesng.com/opinion/589746-inec-electronic-transmission-of-results-electoral-act-and-matters-arising-by-wahab-shittu.html

Say what you know and stop saying what you don't know.

Why are you bothered... is that your defence? Is is your time?

Mr Lamidi Garfield1 Apapa?

garfield1:

Obi has wasted two weeks,he has one week left

IamV:


Akin Olujimi SAN (for the 2nd and 3rd Respondents) objects to the flash drive, that he was supposed to be served and shown the content of the drive before now and not to just throw it on him here in court.

He submits that having not been served ahead of today's proceedings ,it will deprive them of the right to Fair heating since they do not know the content and couldn't prepare against it.

(Looking for adjournment to go and look at it?)

The court asks him whether this affects the admissibility of the drive. Since it doesn't, no need.
He concedes that he does not have objections and Fashanu SAN have no objections.

we now wait for the court to rule on the drive.

M4A1carbine:
Why are you bothered...us that your defence?

Mr Lamidi Garfield1 Apapa?