₦airaland Forum

IamV:
Q. Confirm to the court when you concluded your assignment.

A. 19th of March

Q. Back to Exhibit PCB2.
Can you read out to LGA ?

A. Degema

Q. In Ward 7, the Polling Unit you see is?

A. 002

Q. Accredited Voters is 40 correct?

A. Yes

Q. Number of voters 40 correct?

A. Yes

senatordave1:
Oga,read the extracts and see how the witness is double speaking

IamV:
Q. No over voting correct?

A. No over voting

The first respondent cross examiner:
thank you very much Professor, thank you my Lords.

[ The first respondent cross examiner is INEC lead counsel,AB Mahmoud SAN,and he is done with cross examining the witness.
Up next is the second respondent to cross examine the witness. ]

IamV:
[ 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS CROSS-EXAMINATION ]

Q. You'll agree with me that votes are cast at the polling unit?

A. I agree

Q. At end of election, the votes cast will be sorted, counted and recorded in Forms EC8As?

A. Yes

Q. It is the image of Form EC8A that will be transmitted to IREV but the hard copies will be taken by the presiding officer to the ward collation center?

A. Yes

Q. The statutory channel for computation of results of voting begins from the polling unit to ward, to LGA, to state a d to national collation centers?

A. Correct my Lord.

saintbillion:
There's nothing like double speaking there oga. The dude is been logical with his response. That's why the first examiner had to interfere cause he saw the dude is not falling for the other examiner cheap response

Hatrick01:
Peter obi should leave this man.
He is doing a great job already.

saintbillion:
See weti inec dey do. Putting physics expo inside irev. We go again today. Lamidi garfield1 Apapa. Pls stay off

IamV:
Q. It is part of your claim in your report that some forms you downloaded were blurred ?

A. Yes

Q. Will I be correct to say that whether transmission failed or what you downloaded was blurred, it will not change the result recorded at the Polling Unit.

A. It will not change if properly used.

Q. You also will confirm that IREV is not a collation center ?

A. It's not a collation center but meant to serve as a checker.

Q. Your report covers only two states, Benue and Rivers State?

A. We did analysis of all the states.

senatordave1:
Oga,read the extracts and see how the witness is double speaking

Trust22:
THIS EXAMINER DEY WICKED

IamV:
Q. It is part of your claim in your report that some forms you downloaded were blurred ?

A. Yes

Q. Will I be correct to say that whether transmission failed or what you downloaded was blurred, it will not change the result recorded at the Polling Unit.

A. It will not change if properly used.

Q. You also will confirm that IREV is not a collation center ?

A. It's not a collation center but meant to serve as a checker.

Q. Your report covers only two states, Benue and Rivers State?

A. We did analysis of all the states.

senatordave1:
Good hit from olujimi san

senatordave1:
He is not.how will you say irev is a collation system and later say it doesn't collated results?

HIGHESTPOPORI:
Name the good hit?

HIGHESTPOPORI:
You are the only one seeing a different thing as usual

senatordave1:
Did the prof not say irev is a collation system

IamV:
Q. It is part of your claim in your report that some forms you downloaded were blurred ?

A. Yes

Q. Will I be correct to say that whether transmission failed or what you downloaded was blurred, it will not change the result recorded at the Polling Unit.
Upper cut from this lawyer. Those blurred images Obi was handling are rubbish as far as this matter is concerned. End of matter.

A. It will not change if properly used.

Q. You also will confirm that IREV is not a collation center ?

A. It's not a collation center but meant to serve as a checker.

Q. Your report covers only two states, Benue and Rivers State?

A. We did analysis of all the states.

Shantyken:
Which state let me also check

IamV:
Q. Your report is for 2 states?

A. Not only 2 states, Benue and Rivers are part of what I tendered.

Q. Did you tender for Oyo State?

A. Yes

Q. Apart from Rivers and Benue, which other state did you tender?

A. In what I tendered the two states stood out, Rivers and benue.
Q. Prof, which other state did you tender?

A. You're asking the question and smiling, I don't know..

[ The whole court is laughing. ]



The Court:
Chief Olujimi, you better frown while asking
This is between senior Advocate of the law and senior Advocate of mathematics.

[ ]

IamV:
Q. What else can you see ?

A. There were blurred images and some that were not related to the analysis done. For instance, results of Senate replaced for House of Reps.

Q. When you refer to Blurred images of Forms EC8A, you did not mean the physical copies could be blurred?

A. I didn't see physical copies.

Q. In all your review, you did not see anything on the portal that suggests there is an electronic collation system?

A. The IREV portal is an electronic collation system

Q. Are you suggesting to the court that the portal is capable of collating and tabulating results?

senatordave1:
Did the prof not say irev is a collation system

Frank688915:
See dem mumu ipob, so na like this una go dey continue 😂

IamV:
The Court:
did you tender for any other state apart from benue and Rivers?

A. No

[ The second respondent now continues with cross examination of the witness ]

Q. In your report, you made it clear that you worked only on available data.

A. I worked only on available data but it is expected that the data should be completed.

Q. If you had more data, your report will be different ?

A. Yes

Q. in your witness statement at paragraph 2B, page 2, you listed recent data analysis practical experience.

A. Yes

Q. You've not claimed in this witness statement to have done any analysis for a court case in election matter like this ?

A.No

senatordave1:
Like I've been saying,he agreed that irev being blurred doesn't mean other copies are blurred

IamV:
Q. At Paragraph 3, Page 2 of your witness statement, you said you were requested on 20th Feb. 2023 by Labour Party to carry out analysis on the results for election not yet held?

A. Yes

Q. You were also in that engagement required to determine INEC compliance with electoral act and regulations ?

A. Yes.

Q. At same Paragraph 3 Sub B, part of your mandate was to determine whether the results to be announced by INEC match with result uploaded without any anticipation that LP will lose the election?

A. That's part of what was requested of me to do

saintbillion:
Will he come and lie about it?

Trust22:
HE SAID IREV IS NOT A COLLOTION CENTER BUT MEANT TO SERVE AS A CHECKER

HIGHESTPOPORI:
And so? Everything the prof said is correct so far

senatordave1:
Saintbillion

IamV:
Q. I find it strange that after your engagement showing you specifically what you were told to do, you now insisted on subpoena.

A. In that engagement, nobody made mention of coming to court so I didn't anticipate coming to court.

[ The cross examination by the 2nd and 3rd respondent of the witness is over.
The 4th respondent cross examiner is up to continue crossing examining the witness ]

IamV:
Q. I find it strange that after your engagement showing you specifically what you were told to do, you now insisted on subpoena.

A. In that engagement, nobody made mention of coming to court so I didn't anticipate coming to court.

[ The cross examination by the 2nd and 3rd respondent of the witness is over.
The 4th respondent cross examiner is up to continue crossing examining the witness ]